If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Hot Air)   Wikileaks: Cuban doctors walked out of a screening of Michael Moore's Sicko and the film was banned in Cuba due to the "blatant misrepresentation of healthcare in Cuba"   (hotair.com) divider line 492
    More: Obvious, Cuban, Wikileaks, Havana, stossel  
•       •       •

4378 clicks; posted to Politics » on 18 Dec 2010 at 5:54 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



492 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-12-18 12:20:40 PM
TappingTheVein: Yes, i did. Read up.
Or just head over to Youtube and watch.


Adults don't cite "Youtube." Unless it's a movie thread. Hmm... okay, this is kind of a movie thread but since you haven't come up with a single foundation to your argument I'm going to go with "you don't have any."

bigdavediode: I can. In fact, I can come up with a bunch of problems. Do you need me to take over your argument for you? You seem unable to put up a fight.

Selective reading ? mild retardation ? some kind of eyesight impairment ? what is it ?


Well for starters they utterly lack sufficient chemo drugs. They have, however, managed to improve their surgical skills to such an extent that they're able to overcome that somewhat.

Now they blame the embargo, and there is probably some truth in that -- but the reality also is probably due to the cost.

See? This is how to present an argument. Now, if I'm asked to back this up I can cite various articles regarding chemo in Cuba. How do I know about this? I met a guy whose father was dying due to the US embargo.
 
2010-12-18 12:22:03 PM
Fail in Human Form: I think I've found the disconnect. Those conditions are still better than healthcare for some here AND those conditions are the result of our embargo NOT the health care system.

I wasn't talking about the reasons (embargo, dictatorship, i'm repeating myself here).
I wasn't talking about the US (i'm repeating this, 3 times now ?).
I simply stated that fact that Moore based his report in his movie regarding Cuba on incorrect data.
 
2010-12-18 12:22:48 PM
thenooch: Mrtraveler01: That's like saying Burger King is a better gourmet meal than McDonald's. In the large scope, they both suck.

Burger King is better. MMNNnnn "Flamed Broiled" nom nom nom


I got hungry as I was typing that.
 
2010-12-18 12:22:51 PM
Phil Herup: Halli: But a private system is 100% truthful and not looking out for its interests?


Are you really this dumb?

We do not have a private system that colludes to protect itself. That would be impossible on so many levels to accomplish.

The record keeping in US medical care is pretty serious as well.


you haven't been paying attention.
 
2010-12-18 12:22:51 PM
thenooch: Burger King is better. MMNNnnn "Flamed Broiled" nom nom nom

Dairy Queen has more flavor. But just try to find a decent patty in a burger nowadays. Even the angus burgers have too much fat in them. Rabble rabble.

And if anyone is going to say KFC I'll post my picture of my meal with the two deep fried feathers sticking out of it.
 
2010-12-18 12:23:50 PM
bigdavediode: thenooch: Burger King is better. MMNNnnn "Flamed Broiled" nom nom nom

Dairy Queen has more flavor. But just try to find a decent patty in a burger nowadays. Even the angus burgers have too much fat in them. Rabble rabble.

And if anyone is going to say KFC I'll post my picture of my meal with the two deep fried feathers sticking out of it.


That's why you go to Popeye's for chicken.
 
2010-12-18 12:23:57 PM
"The Whopper with Cheese"


blstb.msn.com


/wake and bake today
 
2010-12-18 12:24:00 PM
TappingTheVein: I simply stated that fact that Moore based his report in his movie regarding Cuba on incorrect data.

Yeah yeah yeah, you keep repeating that without telling us what data. You don't have any data, you can't tell us what is incorrect and you're boring the shiat out of us by repeating the same crap over and over and over...
 
2010-12-18 12:26:16 PM
TappingTheVein: Fail in Human Form: I think I've found the disconnect. Those conditions are still better than healthcare for some here AND those conditions are the result of our embargo NOT the health care system.

I wasn't talking about the reasons (embargo, dictatorship, i'm repeating myself here).
I wasn't talking about the US (i'm repeating this, 3 times now ?).
I simply stated that fact that Moore based his report in his movie regarding Cuba on incorrect data.


He argued care in Cuba would be better for people like those presented in the movie. TRUE
He presented it by showing circumstances that are not typical for the Cuban people. ALSO TRUE
This makes his entire argument wrong. FALSE
 
2010-12-18 12:26:27 PM
"big mac"



darleneanitascott.files.wordpress.com
 
2010-12-18 12:27:03 PM
thenooch: /wake and bake today

Burger may not be exactly as shown.


What it actually looks like:

www.thewvsr.com
 
2010-12-18 12:29:09 PM
Mrtraveler01: That's like saying Burger King is a better gourmet meal than McDonald's. In the large scope, they both suck.

But someone came up and said that any of them is, in fact, a gourmet meal ?

bigdavediode: Adults don't cite "Youtube."

Adults can't watch video evidence ?
How old are your adults ? 102 ?

bigdavediode: See? This is how to present an argument.

Which, like i said already, is irrelevant to my point. Like i said 3 or 4 times now.
 
2010-12-18 12:29:18 PM
Fail in Human Form: He argued care in Cuba would be better for people like those presented in the movie. TRUE
He presented it by showing circumstances that are not typical for the Cuban people. ALSO TRUE
This makes his entire argument wrong. FALSE


Um, doesn't he even mention that in the movie? It's been a long time since I saw (half) of it but I'm pretty sure he brings that up.
 
2010-12-18 12:29:43 PM
"IN-N-OUT Double Double"


www.followmefoodie.com



/and we have a winner
 
2010-12-18 12:30:50 PM
TappingTheVein: Adults can't watch video evidence ?
How old are your adults ? 102 ?

bigdavediode: See? This is how to present an argument.

Which, like i said already, is irrelevant to my point. Like i said 3 or 4 times now.


No, adults cite primary sources. OECD, WHO, government sources (US or otherwise.) Not videos, and anecdotes are not data.
 
2010-12-18 12:31:04 PM
Phil Herup: China is homogenous.

China is not homogeneous. It has at least 55 different ethnic population groups.

But what does having a homogeneous population have to do with health care?
 
2010-12-18 12:31:04 PM
bigdavediode: Fail in Human Form: He argued care in Cuba would be better for people like those presented in the movie. TRUE
He presented it by showing circumstances that are not typical for the Cuban people. ALSO TRUE
This makes his entire argument wrong. FALSE

Um, doesn't he even mention that in the movie? It's been a long time since I saw (half) of it but I'm pretty sure he brings that up.


It's been so long since I've seen it I honestly don't remember.
 
2010-12-18 12:32:29 PM
thenooch: /and we have a winner

Up yours, nooch! We don't have an in-n-out around here so you're just teasing me! You bastard! YOU BASTARD!

Mmmmmmmmm.... pretty good burger...
 
2010-12-18 12:32:36 PM
jules_siegel: Phil Herup: China is homogenous.

China is not homogeneous. It has at least 55 different ethnic population groups.

But what does having a homogeneous population have to do with health care?


For some reason a lot of countries don't count for the reason of being too white. I guess the same applies for Asian countries for being too Asian.
 
2010-12-18 12:34:37 PM
bigdavediode: thenooch: /and we have a winner

Up yours, nooch! We don't have an in-n-out around here so you're just teasing me! You bastard! YOU BASTARD!

Mmmmmmmmm.... pretty good burger...


In-n-Out would kill all others if they went national.
 
2010-12-18 12:35:13 PM
Fail in Human Form: It's been so long since I've seen it I honestly don't remember.

So you're saying that because he presents a hospital as representative he's being dishonest even though you can't remember if he said it was or wasn't representative?

Look, I like you, I really do but you're on thin ice here and it's cracking underneath you.

And in another vein, here's a more accurate picture of a Big Mac:

www.thewvsr.com
 
2010-12-18 12:35:33 PM
Life expectancy is a dumb metric. It depends largely on cultural factors rather than any quality of care. One of the highest life expectancy eras was Puritan New England. The average lifespan was well into the 80s and we have the records to prove it. And their concept of quality care was some ginger-root extract and burning witches.
 
2010-12-18 12:36:40 PM
TappingTheVein: Mrtraveler01: That's like saying Burger King is a better gourmet meal than McDonald's. In the large scope, they both suck.

But someone came up and said that any of them is, in fact, a gourmet meal ?


You missed the point. Saying that we have a better health care system than Cuba is nothing to be proud of because it's a low standard to go by.

It's like being proud that our health system is better than Zimbabwe.
 
2010-12-18 12:36:49 PM
thenooch: In-n-Out would kill all others if they went national.

Those religious nutcases make a good burger. There's also "O Burger" in California which (I've heard) makes a top-notch 100% organic burger.
 
2010-12-18 12:36:56 PM
I'll just leave this here

Link (new window)

/you people are tards for believing Hot Air
 
2010-12-18 12:37:19 PM
Moore's Sicko movie rails against the health care industry and the only conclusion that's left is that ANY reform will help. So what happens when Health Care Reform passes? He goes on and on about the "pitfalls" and how inherently broken and evil it is because it doesn't have Single Payer. He talks about money and mandates. What does he stop talking about? Health Care! All of a sudden he forgets about the people who benefit from the legislation. Who would stand to benefit the most? Poor minorities. He did nothing more than prove himself a closeted racist hack in the process.

"Oh look at those people who can't take care of themselves and they're suffering. They can wait longer so that way instead of giving them good health care we can give them perfect health care. They'll suffer longer, their conditions will worsen and they will die in far greater numbers but in the end I know I'll feel good about myself!"

You want Michael Moore to shut up long enough to stop shoveling food down his throat, wait for him to show up on Huffington Post and confront him about that or ask what he's doing with the 25 million he got for making Sicko. Does he use any of it to pay medical bills for others or maybe, I dunno, pay someone's mortgage who can't afford it due to hospital costs? No. He hasn't given one thin dime to any of them!

Hey Mike, do your own friggin' laundry.
 
2010-12-18 12:38:03 PM
thenooch: bigdavediode: thenooch: /and we have a winner

Up yours, nooch! We don't have an in-n-out around here so you're just teasing me! You bastard! YOU BASTARD!

Mmmmmmmmm.... pretty good burger...

In-n-Out would kill all others if they went national.


They're expanding into Texas. Although it will screw up the supply chain and mean they have to build a factory there.

I'm just afraid they'll go Krispy Kreme on us and degrade in quality.
 
2010-12-18 12:40:03 PM
Bugs_Bunny_Practiced_Psychological_Warfare: You want Michael Moore to shut up long enough to stop shoveling food down his throat, wait for him to show up on Huffington Post and confront him about that or ask what he's doing with the 25 million he got for making Sicko. Does he use any of it to pay medical bills for others or maybe, I dunno, pay someone's mortgage who can't afford it due to hospital costs? No. He hasn't given one thin dime to any of them!

Hey Mike, do your own friggin' laundry.


So if I follow your counter-argument, you think because Michael Moore doesn't donate all of his money to pay for medical bills the merits of his argument hold no weight?

You're have reached epic levels of retard.
 
2010-12-18 12:41:19 PM
bigdavediode: Yeah yeah yeah, you keep repeating that without telling us what data

How about health-care ? i only repeated it 23 times by now.

img227.imageshack.us

Fail in Human Form: He argued care in Cuba would be better for people like those presented in the movie. TRUE

Not if they are treated in the common hospitals.
 
2010-12-18 12:43:27 PM
chu2dogg: Life expectancy is a dumb metric. It depends largely on cultural factors rather than any quality of care. One of the highest life expectancy eras was Puritan New England. The average lifespan was well into the 80s and we have the records to prove it. And their concept of quality care was some ginger-root extract and burning witches.

I'm pretty certain you have that wrong. Infant mortality alone would drop that number quite drastically, and their infant mortality would be off the scale. You're probably thinking of life expectancy after a certain age.
 
2010-12-18 12:43:37 PM
bigdavediode: No, adults cite primary sources. OECD, WHO, government sources (US or otherwise.) Not videos, and anecdotes are not data.

And i did, both CIA and WHO charts, i explained their context and relevance.

Apparently adults in your area can't scroll up.
 
2010-12-18 12:43:47 PM
TappingTheVein: bigdavediode: Yeah yeah yeah, you keep repeating that without telling us what data

How about health-care ? i only repeated it 23 times by now.



Fail in Human Form: He argued care in Cuba would be better for people like those presented in the movie. TRUE

Not if they are treated in the common hospitals.


His argument could be better made by saying that would be the case for some people but I said he could have made his case better a few pages back.
 
2010-12-18 12:45:14 PM
bigdavediode: anecdotes are not data.

Yeah, common hospitals in Cuba and doctors' evidence are not relevant to common hospitals in Cuba.
 
2010-12-18 12:45:44 PM
bigdavediode: I'm pretty certain you have that wrong. Infant mortality alone would drop that number quite drastically, and their infant mortality would be off the scale. You're probably thinking of life expectancy after a certain age.

Point still stands.
 
2010-12-18 12:46:28 PM
Bugs_Bunny_Practiced_Psychological_Warfare: You want Michael Moore to shut up long enough to stop shoveling food down his throat, wait for him to show up on Huffington Post and confront him about that or ask what he's doing with the 25 million he got for making Sicko. Does he use any of it to pay medical bills for others or maybe, I dunno, pay someone's mortgage who can't afford it due to hospital costs? No. He hasn't given one thin dime to any of them!

Yeah, actually I remember that he did do both of these things -- specifically I remember he paid (anonymously) medical premiums for some people (and was later found out.)
 
2010-12-18 12:47:05 PM
Mrtraveler01: You missed the point. Saying that we have a better health care system than Cuba is nothing to be proud of because it's a low standard to go by.

This was not my point. I won't repeat it for the 435th time.
 
2010-12-18 12:47:44 PM
bigdavediode: No no, no comparisons are valid because they aren't the US. And comparing Hawaii to other states isn't valid either.

What?
 
2010-12-18 12:48:44 PM
chu2dogg: bigdavediode: I'm pretty certain you have that wrong. Infant mortality alone would drop that number quite drastically, and their infant mortality would be off the scale. You're probably thinking of life expectancy after a certain age.

Point still stands.


Um, not really. Your point therefore is left alone without any support that life-expectancy is a poor metric. You could make arguments that this is the case, but there's two problems: 1) life expectancy is just one of the many ways the US system fail in comparison to other systems, and 2) life-expectancy for similar demographics is a reasonable method.
 
2010-12-18 12:50:32 PM
TappingTheVein: Yeah, common hospitals in Cuba and doctors' evidence are not relevant to common hospitals in Cuba.

Testimonials are always worth less than aggregate data.
 
2010-12-18 12:52:38 PM
YouNeedJesus: I'll just leave this here

Link (new window)

/you people are tards for believing Hot Air


Link (new window)

1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2010-12-18 12:52:55 PM
s2s2s2: bigdavediode: No no, no comparisons are valid because they aren't the US. And comparing Hawaii to other states isn't valid either.

What?


What comparisons are acceptable when comparing the US system to others? And what countries/provinces are acceptable to compare against?
 
2010-12-18 12:56:42 PM
bigdavediode: Testimonials are always worth less than aggregate data.

Not when testimonials are presenting the norm.
Not when the hospital Moore showed is not accessible to the average Cuban.
 
2010-12-18 01:03:13 PM
jules_siegel: Phil Herup: China is homogenous.

China is not homogeneous. It has at least 55 different ethnic population groups.

But what does having a homogeneous population have to do with health care?


The Han ethnic group is also 92% of their total population, so it's not very ethnically diverse. The US and Canada are really the only first world countries that have had widespread migration and let people stay. European countries and some others are going through that right now. I'd say Canada is a fairly accurate comparison as far as genetics and life expectancy for your points.
 
2010-12-18 01:03:22 PM
TappingTheVein: Not when testimonials are presenting the norm.
Not when the hospital Moore showed is not accessible to the average Cuban.


Okay, without using statistics tell us how you know the anecdote is the norm.
 
2010-12-18 01:04:38 PM
My question is:

How much of the "information" released in the war logs and cables is utter bullshiat?
 
2010-12-18 01:05:06 PM
bigdavediode: Um, not really. Your point therefore is left alone without any support that life-expectancy is a poor metric. You could make arguments that this is the case, but there's two problems: 1) life expectancy is just one of the many ways the US system fail in comparison to other systems, and 2) life-expectancy for similar demographics is a reasonable method.

You're retarded. I don't know whether you just like to argue for the sake of arguing. Maybe you just like boiling in a rage to people you don't know on the internet? Whatever the case, leave me out of it ok?

If you have a point to make fine. You've added nothing to this conversation. Step away from the keyboard and enjoy your saturday.
 
2010-12-18 01:11:51 PM
bigdavediode: Okay, without using statistics tell us how you know the anecdote is the norm.

Because Cuban doctors claim so. And ex-Cuban doctors.
 
2010-12-18 01:25:31 PM
Liar, liar pants on fire!

December 18th, 2010 4:47 AM
¡Viva WikiLeaks! SiCKO Was Not Banned in Cuba

By Michael Moore

Yesterday WikiLeaks did an amazing thing and released a classified State Department cable that dealt, in part, with me and my film, 'Sicko.'

It is a stunning look at the Orwellian nature of how bureaucrats for the State spin their lies and try to recreate reality (I assume to placate their bosses and tell them what they want to hear).

The date is January 31, 2008. It is just days after 'Sicko' has been nominated for an Oscar as Best Documentary. This must have sent someone reeling in Bush's State Department (his Treasury Department had already notified me they were investigating what laws I might have broken in taking three 9/11 first responders to Cuba to get them the health care they had been denied in the United States).

Former health insurance executive Wendell Potter recently revealed that the insurance industry -- which had decided to spend millions to go after me and, if necessary, "push Michael Moore off a cliff" -- had begun working with anti-Castro Cubans in Miami in order to have them speak out and smear my film.

So, on January 31, 2008, a State Department official stationed in Havana took a made up story and sent it back to his HQ in Washington. Here's what they came up with:

XXXXXXXXXXXX stated that Cuban authorities have banned Michael Moore's documentary, "Sicko," as being subversive. Although the film's intent is to discredit the U.S. healthcare system by highlighting the excellence of the Cuban system, he said the regime knows the film is a myth and does not want to risk a popular backlash by showing to Cubans facilities that are clearly not available to the vast majority of them.

Sounds convincing, eh?! There's only one problem -- the entire nation of Cuba was shown the film on national television on April 25, 2008! The Cubans embraced the film so much so it became one of those rare American movies that received a theatrical distribution in Cuba. I personally ensured that a 35mm print got to the Film Institute in Havana. Screenings of 'Sicko' were set up in towns all across the country. In Havana, 'Sicko' screened at the famed Yara Theater.

But the secret cable said Cubans were banned from seeing my movie. Hmmm.

We also know from another secret U.S. document that "the disenchantment of the masses [in Cuba] has spread through all the provinces," and that "all of Oriente Province is seething with hate" for the Castro regime. There's a huge active underground rebellion, and "workers there readily give all the support they can," with everyone involved in "subtle sabotage" against the government. Morale is terrible throughout all the branches of the armed forces, and in the event of war the army "will not fight." Wow -- this cable is hot!

Of course, this secret U.S. cable is from March 31, 1961, three weeks before Cuba kicked our asses at the Bay of Pigs.

The U.S. government has been passing around these "secret" documents to itself for the past fifty years, explaining in painstaking detail how horrible things are in Cuba and how Cubans are quietly aching for us to come back and take over. I don't know why we write these cables, I guess it just makes us feel better about ourselves. (Anyone curious can find an entire museum of U.S. wish fulfillment cables on the website of the National Security Archive.)

So what do you do with about a false "secret" cable, especially one that involves you and your movie? Well, you wait for a responsible newspaper to investigate and shout what it discovers from the rooftops.

But yesterday WikiLeaks gave the 'Sicko' Cuba cable to the media -- and what did they do with it? They ran it as if it were true! Here's the headline in the Guardian:

WikiLeaks: Cuba banned Sicko for depicting 'mythical' healthcare system

Authorities feared footage of gleaming hospital in Michael Moore's Oscar-nominated film would provoke a popular backlash

And not one scintilla of digging to see if Cuba had actually banned the movie! In fact, just the opposite. The right wing press started to have a field day reporting a lie (Andy Levy of Fox -- twice -- Reason Magazine and Hot Air, plus a slew of blogs). Sadly, even BoingBoing and my friends at the Nation wrote about it without skepticism. So here you have WikiLeaks, who have put themselves on the line to find and release these cables to the press -- and traditional journalists are once again just too lazy to lift a finger, point and click their mouse to log into Nexis or search via Google, and look to see if Cuba really did "ban the film." Had just ONE reporter done that, here's they would have found:

June 16, 2007 Saturday 1:41 AM GMT [that's 7 months before the false cable]

HEADLINE: Cuban health minister says Moore's 'Sicko' shows 'human values' of communist system

BYLINE: By ANDREA RODRIGUEZ, Associated Press Writer

DATELINE: HAVANA

Cuba's health minister Jose Ramon Balaguer said Friday that American filmmaker Michael Moore's documentary 'Sicko' highlights the human values of the island's communist-run government... "There can be no doubt this documentary by a personality like Mr. Michael Moore helps promote the profoundly human principles of Cuban society."

Or, how 'bout this little April 25, 2008 notice from CubaSi.Cu (translation by Google):

Sicko premiere in Cuba

25/04/2008

The documentary Sicko, the U.S. filmmaker Michael Moore, which deals about the deplorable state of American health care system will be released today at 5:50 pm, for the space Cubavision Roundtable and the Education Channel.

Then there's this from Juventudrebelde.cu (translation by Google). Or this Cuban editorial (translation by Google). There's even a long clip of the Cuba section of 'Sicko' on the homepage of Media Roundtable on the CubaSi.cu website!

OK, so we know the media is lazy and sucks most of the time. But the bigger issue here is how our government seemed to be colluding with the health insurance industry to destroy a film that might have a hand in bringing about what the Cubans already have in their poverty-ridden third world country: free, universal health care. And because they have it and we don't, Cuba has a better infant mortality rate than we do, their life expectancy is just 7 months shorter than ours, and, according to the WHO, they rank just two places behind the richest country on earth in terms of the quality of their health care.

That's the story, mainstream media and right-wing haters.

Now that you've been presented with the facts, what are you going to do about it? Are you gonna attack me for having my movie played on Cuban state television? Or are you gonna attack me for not having my movie played on Cuban state television?

You have to choose one, it can't be both.

And since the facts show that the movie played on state TV and in theaters, I think you're better off attacking me for having my films played in Cuba.

¡Viva WikiLeaks!

Source: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/viva-wikileaks
 
2010-12-18 01:29:16 PM
bigdavediode: Well how about WHO's neonatal mortality rates, which aren't supplied by governments and measure any deaths before seven days using surveys of households?

Neonatal Mortality Rates


Wrong.

Neonatal mortality rates are calculated from birth and death data derived from vital registration or from household surveys:


Where do you think they get the bolded info from?

From the very site you linked.

liability of the neonatal mortality estimates depends on accuracy and completeness of reporting and recording of births and deaths. Underreporting and misclassification are common, especially for deaths occurring early on in life.


The rebigdavediode: No, I don't. And if there is such a law they're definitely not enforcing it.

Ok. I am sure you are completely free to criticize the govt in Cuba, all of the political dissidents are full of shiat, and the PDF explaining the problems this policy causes are completely making things up.

bigdavediode: Then what explains WHO's neonatal mortality rates where Cuba also does better than the US, which is done through household surveys?

Wrong.

See above.

bigdavediode: Ha ha... no, my friend. I'm trying to come up with credible explanations for you guys to defend your irrationality. It's not my fault that all the explanations are ridiculous.

Please point out the "irrationality".

If questioning medical statistics from a govt, especially one so controlling of info and lacking in transparency as Cuba is irrational to you after having been given links reporting on it, and the history of similar misinformation from similar regimes, you are the one wiht the problem.

I am going to go ahead and put you in the column of people who believes that kim jong hits holes in one in golf regularly.
 
2010-12-18 01:32:21 PM
Coelacanth [TotalFark]

Holy shiat dude, don't post entire articles, just link to them. Aside from it being annoying as fark, people have linked to that like 15 times in the thread. Next time just post the relevant paragraph or a short summary.
 
Displayed 50 of 492 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report