If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Telegraph)   You discover your 17-year-old daughter is having a relationship with a 57-year-old man. Do you: C) Castrate him with a bread knife? "His life was saved but he remains a eunuch for life"   (telegraph.co.uk) divider line 703
    More: Obvious, bleeding to death  
•       •       •

31411 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Dec 2010 at 7:09 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



703 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-12-13 01:46:16 PM
kerpal32: Satanicpuppy: It's not your farking decision.

true, but I do have a right to support the father who made it.

/what part of this aren't you grasping?


in fact what you're saying is that it's your opinion that anyone who has sex with someone 40 years younger than them sould automatically be castrated, regardless of what laws are in place?

you lose at internet whight knighting 101
 
2010-12-13 01:50:36 PM
kerpal32: There are lots of things that there are no laws against that I also do not support and actually oppose.

like what?

I'm curious
 
2010-12-13 01:51:54 PM
So, for all of you pro-castrators out there, if it was the father's 17-year-old son and his 57-year old girlfriend, would you support the father cutting out her ovaries with a butter knife?
 
2010-12-13 01:52:05 PM
uttertosh: in fact what you're saying is that it's your opinion that anyone who has sex with someone 40 years younger than them sould automatically be castrated, regardless of what laws are in place?

nope. just 1 to cull the herd as an example will do.

/works better than telling them Keyser Söze's going to get them
 
2010-12-13 01:52:33 PM
kerpal32: username101: Clearly you've never been 17 before.

At 17 you know damn well what sex is, who you want to fark, and what the consequences are. At that point it's okay for the vast majority of teens to start farking.

yes. once. long ago.

clearly, you've never been a parent with a teenage daughter or been older than 50.

What you can't seem to grasp here.... The issue isn't reproductive or at what age they start farking. I fully support age of consent laws because it prevents criminalization of acts between teens. I do not support age of consent laws because they allow 57 yr old males to prey on teenagers. That does not mean I do not support age of consent laws. It means I do not support age of consent laws because they allow 57 yr old males to prey on teenagers. And I do not support 57 yr olds banging 17 yr olds as socially acceptable because there's no law against it. There are lots of things that there are no laws against that I also do not support and actually oppose.


I get what you're saying. I don't even get what we were arguing to each other about.

You dislike that the two had sex, I say "whatevs" to both the law allowing them to and the societal factor.

(I hate age of consent laws in many states because it'll screw over a 16 year old that has sex with a 15 year old, etc etc).
 
2010-12-13 01:54:40 PM
rebelyell2006: So, for all of you pro-castrators out there, if it was the father's 17-year-old son and his 57-year old girlfriend, would you support the father cutting out her ovaries with a butter knife?


Not exactly.

media.canada.com
 
2010-12-13 01:55:10 PM
boobsrgood: Santa's Knee: Yeah, you run with that...

Oh, you are a higher authority on the age of consent laws in Germany than the German government?

Yeah, you run with that.


Who the hell is talking about AoC laws?

He boinked a man's 17yo daughter.

That ain't right.
 
2010-12-13 01:57:07 PM
kerpal32: uttertosh: in fact what you're saying is that it's your opinion that anyone who has sex with someone 40 years younger than them sould automatically be castrated, regardless of what laws are in place?

nope. just 1 to cull the herd as an example will do.

/works better than telling them Keyser Söze's going to get them


Awesome. So, by your logic, the "one" that needs culled to warn the rest of the heard has just had his cum-uppance, so there wil now never ever be anything like this happen again!

I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

/feels safer already
 
2010-12-13 02:01:15 PM
Santa's Knee:

That ain't right.


neither's cutting the woman's consensual lover's testicles off with a bread knife.

crappy logic is crappy.
 
2010-12-13 02:03:08 PM
username101: lilistonic: haterade69: /seriously, how do you not know the half+7 rule?

It's not a rule for me if it means that 76 year-old men see themselves as eligible to date me. In fact, it's not a rule at all, just something someone made up in an essay somewhere, and it keeps getting repeated.

There's a rule for that, right? Something that's repeated endlessly so people think it's solid or useful, even though it's actually full of crap?

glwtta: Seriously it's a rule in the sense of a "useful guideline", and it's pretty spot on.

I am fully immature enough to be grossed about by men over 5 or 6 years older than me. I suppose I don't count because I'm middle-aged, but I'm certain I'm not the only person who thinks this. Or do men get to apply the rule and women just get to accept it as real?

When I was a young adult, I could imagine being with a man 10-12 years older than me. Now, at 45, sex with a 57 year-old man sounds slightly icky, please no offense to those here. At age 17, I would have found the notion utterly appalling.

Still, that German girl was plenty old enough to decide for herself who she wants to fark, as there is no indication of coercion at all.


Girls think they're old enough. Maybe a few are. It doesn't justify the outcome, but as a parent of three young adult women, I know something about 17 year-old girls. Also was one. Maybe he was even dumber than her, thinking this is okay. But it almost never is, and he should not have gotten involved with her. Young women are often more mature than young men, so men their own age seem like children at times. But they're still at a period of development in which they are still changing monthly. Parents still have a job to do, though perhaps a less horrifying one than castration, and a man that old must be aware of this or there's something wrong with him.

Two of my girls have boyfriends much older than themselves. (Not *that* much older!) With the 24 year-old, I get it, I get them together, it makes complete sense. With the 19 year-old, yeah, they're okay for now. I'm not really cool with it, wish he was about 5 years younger, but you have to always remain supportive of your kids as people, and that's a tough age to be, not quite grown-up, but nearly. Young women are often more mature than young men, so men their own age seem like children at times.
 
2010-12-13 02:06:43 PM
lilistonic: Young women are often more mature than young men, so men their own age seem like children at times.

Darn it. That sentence wants to copy itself infinitely.

Still won't let a 76 year-old near me, no matter who thinks that's a "rule."
 
2010-12-13 02:07:53 PM
uttertosh: I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

Is that really what you think I'm attempting to do? solve all pedo problems in the world your over simplification of the problem and irrational adherence to the absolute limits of the law where age of consent is concerned by my
a) pointing out how the 57 yr old was wrong,
b) pointing out that age of consent does not mean someone who is 17 makes rational or sound judgments
c) that does not excuse the 57 yr old
d) empathizing with the father instead of the victim
e) supporting the perpetuation of the psychotic over protective father in society because it does serve a purpose
f) a few other things you apparently can't grasp


whatever,
www.motifake.com

/go grow up and have some kids.
 
2010-12-13 02:09:03 PM
uttertosh: crappy logic is crappy.

logic doesn't solve all the issues in the world.
 
2010-12-13 02:09:18 PM
uttertosh: kerpal32: uttertosh: in fact what you're saying is that it's your opinion that anyone who has sex with someone 40 years younger than them sould automatically be castrated, regardless of what laws are in place?

nope. just 1 to cull the herd as an example will do.

/works better than telling them Keyser Söze's going to get them

Awesome. So, by your logic, the "one" that needs culled to warn the rest of the heard has just had his cum-uppance, so there wil now never ever be anything like this happen again!

I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

/feels safer already


Absolutely - it is SO much better to do nothing.

Then no one has to think on it further.
 
2010-12-13 02:12:23 PM
uttertosh: Santa's Knee:

That ain't right.

neither's cutting the woman's consensual lover's testicles off with a bread knife.

crappy logic is crappy.


Actually, that was pretty spot-on.
 
2010-12-13 02:13:42 PM
Fair enough.
 
2010-12-13 02:14:27 PM
If I can land a 17 year old when I'm 57 I expect high-fives from ALL of you.
 
2010-12-13 02:16:23 PM
PDX Ghost Hunter: If I can land a 17 year old when I'm 57 I expect high-fives from ALL of you.

Or a hand from her pimp.
 
2010-12-13 02:19:39 PM
lilplatinum: Most farkers can add those two numbers together and still have no idea what pussy smells like.

Mostly like a pig's ass pickled in vinegar.
 
2010-12-13 02:20:08 PM
This depends. What was she wearing?
 
2010-12-13 02:26:43 PM
drivingsouth: This depends. What was she wearing?

jeffpicard.com
 
2010-12-13 02:27:47 PM
drivingsouth: This depends. What was she wearing?

He was probably wearing the Depends.
 
2010-12-13 02:30:50 PM
Mykeru: lilplatinum: Most farkers can add those two numbers together and still have no idea what pussy smells like.

Mostly like a pig's ass pickled in vinegar.


Either you're gay (NTTAWWT) or you've dated alot of skanks. Maybe both.
 
2010-12-13 02:32:21 PM
This story kind of reminds me of some women that I've known. I dated one briefly and worked with the other one. Both were in their early 20s and professionals (one a mechanical engineer, the other a geneticist). Both had been dating men in their 40s because they said that men their age were not mature. (The one I dated said I was mature for my age. Go figure.) Both were slightly nerdy and somewhat socially awkward. The engineer still lived with her parents and apparently was expecting to marry this guy and move from her parents' house directly into being married so she wouldn't have to live on her own in between.

What's the point? I don't know. Maybe there is something to the age difference. Maybe these girls were too nerdy for their own age but men twice their age were geeked about having someone so young that they didn't care. Maybe I just know weird women. YMMV.
 
2010-12-13 02:33:26 PM
eraser8: doglover: SpaceyCat: Would you feel the same way if the genders were reversed?

Yes. A 57 year old woman who had any attraction beyond sexual to a 17 year old is kinda weird. It's too big an age gulf, that's why 99% of the time we don't see it. Go watch Harold and Maude. That will explain everything.

Strom Thurmond's last wife was 44 years his junior. That's a bigger age gap than in this case. Should people have been calling for Strom's castration?


So his wife was a teenager when he married her?
 
2010-12-13 02:34:33 PM
JB4Pres: Mykeru:
Oh, and JB4Pres, as ITGs never go for the simple rugged elegance of a .45 Mil-Spec or G.I., I'm betting serious money your .45 is some pimped out Kimber, probably with one of those all-pink-and-flouncy recoil spring laser sites that allow you to look fabulous while making a target group the size of a garbage can lid.

Actually its a G30. It is pimped out though ... 3.5 lb trigger and yes it has a (non-pink) 'flouncy' recoil spring laser SIGHT which I hate. My grouping however is a little tighter than a garbage can lid. I live in the country and regularly shoot in my backyard.


Glock? Dude, never trust a man who trusts a handgun with no hammer. And laser sights? Laser sights? Dude, really? Really?


I feel guilty for having a Springfield Armory Mil-Spec with three-dot sights.

www.gunsamerica.com

And my shovel? German surplus entrenching tool:

www.trueswords.com

/Line to admire my sheer manliness to the right. Please move along, no bunching up.
 
2010-12-13 02:48:11 PM
TenJed_77: lilplatinum: ftfa: He went to police in the town of Bielefeld where he lives but officers said they were powerless to intervene.

I call bullshiat, Bielefeld does not exist...

For a city that doesn't exist it seems to be pretty good size
http://maps.google.fr/maps?hl=fr&q=Bielefeld&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=Bielefeld, + Allemagne&gl=fr&ei=ACsGTdTjNs_xsgaplKz4CQ&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=image&resnum =1&ved=0CBwQ8gEwAA


I'm guessing he didn't actually read the wiki entry he linked to since it does say the city exists. What's a myth is the claim that the city doesn't exist, again mentioned in the entry he linked to.
 
2010-12-13 02:49:18 PM
kerpal32: uttertosh: I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

Is that really what you think I'm attempting to do? solve all pedo problems in the world your over simplification of the problem and irrational adherence to the absolute limits of the law where age of consent is concerned by my
a) pointing out how the 57 yr old was wrong,
b) pointing out that age of consent does not mean someone who is 17 makes rational or sound judgments
c) that does not excuse the 57 yr old
d) empathizing with the father instead of the victim
e) supporting the perpetuation of the psychotic over protective father in society because it does serve a purpose
f) a few other things you apparently can't grasp


whatever,


/go grow up and have some kids.


so, regardless of the ability of this particular 17 year old to have a healthy relationship with a 57 year old man (the ability or non ability has never been revealed)

It's "that's jus wrong" and "that guy deserves to have his filthy pedo balls cut off" regardless of what type of person he is, or what kind of relationship he had with her, Because all you can see is OMFGPEDOFILEZNEEDZCASTRATEDIZJUSNOTRITE!!!!

I genuinely wish there were far, far fewer of you in this world.

It's exactly that "I are the correct defendor of all that is inicint, bow to my higher morality, i haz a dottir you know, so grow up." mentality that drove my brother into drugs.

I farking hate you with every ounce of darkness in my soul. YOU are what pushed that 17 year old into making shiat life decisions. YOU are the one that cut her lovers balls off. YOU are all the tabloid accusations of that journalist that was legitimately taking photos at a school sports event. YOU!!!!

YOU!!!
 
2010-12-13 02:51:29 PM
boobsrgood: Latinwolf: You sound like an old dude trying to justify his fantasy.

You sound like a sexually repressed adolescent. I have a bisexual wife who is 13 years younger than me. Your lack of sexual life experience may lead you to believe that middle-aged men are all icky and creepy, but reality is not a Twilight movie or an episode of Dancing with the Stars.

Middle-aged men have experience, money, and a steady hand. Young girls go nuts for that, even if they don't have daddy issues, as so many of them do. This girl was getting exactly what she wanted, as was he, and all the whining in the world isn't going to make it wrong. As for my fantasies, honestly, it sounds like you should be paying more attention to your own.


Boobs is 100% correct.

All this outrage at the victim just shows how puritanical and repressed Americans really are. "Oh I'm so open minded and liberal unlike those cavemen in Iran OH MY GOD HE HAD 100% LEGAL SEX WITH A YOUNG LADY TEAR HIS BALLS OFF!!!"

Get a grip, Fark.

I bet you are the same people who daily cheer on prison rape.
 
2010-12-13 02:56:08 PM
uttertosh: kerpal32: uttertosh: I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

Is that really what you think I'm attempting to do? solve all pedo problems in the world your over simplification of the problem and irrational adherence to the absolute limits of the law where age of consent is concerned by my
a) pointing out how the 57 yr old was wrong,
b) pointing out that age of consent does not mean someone who is 17 makes rational or sound judgments
c) that does not excuse the 57 yr old
d) empathizing with the father instead of the victim
e) supporting the perpetuation of the psychotic over protective father in society because it does serve a purpose
f) a few other things you apparently can't grasp


whatever,


/go grow up and have some kids.

so, regardless of the ability of this particular 17 year old to have a healthy relationship with a 57 year old man (the ability or non ability has never been revealed)

It's "that's jus wrong" and "that guy deserves to have his filthy pedo balls cut off" regardless of what type of person he is, or what kind of relationship he had with her, Because all you can see is OMFGPEDOFILEZNEEDZCASTRATEDIZJUSNOTRITE!!!!

I genuinely wish there were far, far fewer of you in this world.

It's exactly that "I are the correct defendor of all that is inicint, bow to my higher morality, i haz a dottir you know, so grow up." mentality that drove my brother into drugs.

I farking hate you with every ounce of darkness in my soul. YOU are what pushed that 17 year old into making shiat life decisions. YOU are the one that cut her lovers balls off. YOU are all the tabloid accusations of that journalist that was legitimately taking photos at a school sports event. YOU!!!!

YOU!!!


www.bandticker.com

Now you're just being silly...
 
2010-12-13 02:57:02 PM
Stanfan114: OH MY GOD HE HAD 100% LEGAL SEX WITH A YOUNG LADY TEAR HIS BALLS OFF!!!

Should be more like:

"Honey, you're 17, he's 57. When he's retired, you'll be 25. When your friends are out having fun, you'll be helping him pick out Medicare plans and AARP benefits. When your kids are older, he may have dementia or Alzheimer's. During your sexual peak, he could be in a nursing home and forgetting your name. When you go see him, all the nurses will tell him that his granddaughter is here to visit. Is that what you really want?"
 
2010-12-13 02:57:28 PM
 
2010-12-13 03:02:44 PM
uttertosh: kerpal32: uttertosh: I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

Is that really what you think I'm attempting to do? solve all pedo problems in the world your over simplification of the problem and irrational adherence to the absolute limits of the law where age of consent is concerned by my
a) pointing out how the 57 yr old was wrong,
b) pointing out that age of consent does not mean someone who is 17 makes rational or sound judgments
c) that does not excuse the 57 yr old
d) empathizing with the father instead of the victim
e) supporting the perpetuation of the psychotic over protective father in society because it does serve a purpose
f) a few other things you apparently can't grasp


whatever,


/go grow up and have some kids.

so, regardless of the ability of this particular 17 year old to have a healthy relationship with a 57 year old man (the ability or non ability has never been revealed)

It's "that's jus wrong" and "that guy deserves to have his filthy pedo balls cut off" regardless of what type of person he is, or what kind of relationship he had with her, Because all you can see is OMFGPEDOFILEZNEEDZCASTRATEDIZJUSNOTRITE!!!!

I genuinely wish there were far, far fewer of you in this world.

It's exactly that "I are the correct defendor of all that is inicint, bow to my higher morality, i haz a dottir you know, so grow up." mentality that drove my brother into drugs.

I farking hate you with every ounce of darkness in my soul. YOU are what pushed that 17 year old into making shiat life decisions. YOU are the one that cut her lovers balls off. YOU are all the tabloid accusations of that journalist that was legitimately taking photos at a school sports event. YOU!!!!

YOU!!!


Dude, relax, read the subtext of this thread: It's all about dudes who want to touch other dude's junk, even if they have to cut them off after to provide cover.

Read the ball cutter's posts. Can't you just smell the musky undertone of homoeroticism?
 
2010-12-13 03:04:43 PM
Dad?
 
2010-12-13 03:06:02 PM
kerpal32: username101: Clearly you've never been 17 before.

At 17 you know damn well what sex is, who you want to fark, and what the consequences are. At that point it's okay for the vast majority of teens to start farking.

yes. once. long ago.

clearly, you've never been a parent with a teenage daughter or been older than 50.

What you can't seem to grasp here.... The issue isn't reproductive or at what age they start farking. I fully support age of consent laws because it prevents criminalization of acts between teens. I do not support age of consent laws because they allow 57 yr old males to prey on teenagers. That does not mean I do not support age of consent laws. It means I do not support age of consent laws because they allow 57 yr old males to prey on teenagers. And I do not support 57 yr olds banging 17 yr olds as socially acceptable because there's no law against it. There are lots of things that there are no laws against that I also do not support and actually oppose.


How about realizing the world doesn't kowtow to your whim? At seventeen, this is not a child but a young adult. adult. That you believe they are incompetents that need to be "protected" from the whole of the world just places you as the lamentable self-righteous C.S.Lewis maligned.


Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. Their very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be 'cured' against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.
-C. S. Lewis, God in the Dock
 
2010-12-13 03:08:08 PM
What is really going on here is that voyeuristic onlookers are making judgments about a relationship that doesn't involve them. It's none of your business.

So what if it grosses you out? You're not the one farking the old bag. She's the one who gets to decide what to do with her body.

Maybe you're just jealous because you think "if I can't get a young hottie, nobody should!" Get over it. And don't go off pretending like you're protecting the woman. You're just interfering with a relationship that she chose to have.
 
2010-12-13 03:12:11 PM
Mykeru: Dude, relax, read the subtext of this thread: It's all about dudes who want to touch other dude's junk, even if they have to cut them off after to provide cover.

Read the ball cutter's posts. Can't you just smell the musky undertone of homoeroticism?


You forgot gang-rape-rape.

Get it right.
 
2010-12-13 03:12:37 PM
Mykeru: uttertosh: kerpal32: uttertosh: I'm so happy that you just solved all pedo problems by making this example!!

Is that really what you think I'm attempting to do? solve all pedo problems in the world your over simplification of the problem and irrational adherence to the absolute limits of the law where age of consent is concerned by my
a) pointing out how the 57 yr old was wrong,
b) pointing out that age of consent does not mean someone who is 17 makes rational or sound judgments
c) that does not excuse the 57 yr old
d) empathizing with the father instead of the victim
e) supporting the perpetuation of the psychotic over protective father in society because it does serve a purpose
f) a few other things you apparently can't grasp


whatever,


/go grow up and have some kids.

so, regardless of the ability of this particular 17 year old to have a healthy relationship with a 57 year old man (the ability or non ability has never been revealed)

It's "that's jus wrong" and "that guy deserves to have his filthy pedo balls cut off" regardless of what type of person he is, or what kind of relationship he had with her, Because all you can see is OMFGPEDOFILEZNEEDZCASTRATEDIZJUSNOTRITE!!!!

I genuinely wish there were far, far fewer of you in this world.

It's exactly that "I are the correct defendor of all that is inicint, bow to my higher morality, i haz a dottir you know, so grow up." mentality that drove my brother into drugs.

I farking hate you with every ounce of darkness in my soul. YOU are what pushed that 17 year old into making shiat life decisions. YOU are the one that cut her lovers balls off. YOU are all the tabloid accusations of that journalist that was legitimately taking photos at a school sports event. YOU!!!!

YOU!!!

Dude, relax, read the subtext of this thread: It's all about dudes who want to touch other dude's junk, even if they have to cut them off after to provide cover.

Read the ball cutter's posts. Can't you just smell the musky undertone of homoeroticism?


actually it's more the quasi-Freudian "If I'm not allowed to even imagine what it'd be like to fark my 17 yo daughter, then if anyone old enough to not call me Mister actually does fark her, will be labelled a PERVERTPEDO and be subsequently subjected to a vigilante castration" but, yeah, it's totally been fun baiting the 'superdaddies' of fark.

/ciao
 
2010-12-13 03:14:55 PM
uttertosh: actually it's more the quasi-Freudian "If I'm not allowed to even imagine what it'd be like to fark my 17 yo daughter, then if anyone old enough to not call me Mister actually does fark her, will be labelled a PERVERTPEDO and be subsequently subjected to a vigilante castration" but, yeah, it's totally been fun baiting the 'superdaddies' of fark.

/ciao


His break at Starbucks must be over.
 
2010-12-13 03:19:15 PM
hasty ambush: WilderKWight: freewill: All I said, correctly, was that teenage brains are not fully developed and teenagers are not biologically equipped for adult decision-making. Saying they are is demonstrably wrong.

I could say that about some 40-year-olds. Likewise, I could point out teenagers that are far more adult than the so-called adults they put up with on a daily basis.

For example, it was not a very informed, adult decision to step outside the bounds of the law (and human decency) and castrate a man.

In fact, that was a rather immature, childish, impulsive action.

I would say the inverse is true. The 57 year old who thought he coudl get away with banging this guys 17 year old daughter was not very informed, rather immature and impulsive.

Castrating him reduced the chance of more like him bieng created.

The human gene pool was just improved


At 57 the odds of him producing any more like him were very small to being with.
 
2010-12-13 03:19:29 PM
uttertosh:

uttertosh today
ijustwanttofitin.com


uttertosh in 30 years
boise.pillblogger.com
 
2010-12-13 03:21:03 PM
bulok: I'm sure the question here everyone really wants to know is the daughter hot?

No, because most of the smart people in here have already figured out that if she was hot, she wouldn't have to settle for a guy old enough to be her grandfather.
 
2010-12-13 03:23:18 PM
Latinwolf: bulok: I'm sure the question here everyone really wants to know is the daughter hot?

No, because most of the smart people in here have already figured out that if she was hot, she wouldn't have to settle for a guy old enough to be her grandfather.


+1
 
2010-12-13 03:23:43 PM
crazytrpr: Sticky Hands: altinos: Sticky Hands: Yeah that's Fark.com. No outrage at all for old Afghan Muslims with 13 year old wives. not even a peep....

Well, this story is about the 17 year old wanting the relationship.

Story?
I'm not here to read stories... I'm here to feed trolls.

Although I once had a "17 year old" (so the person claimed...) contact me in a chat room. She wanted to be some kind of S&M slave... obviously I didn't go for that. Should I have, she said that was what she wanted. What says fark?

Run away like a scared little biatch. 70% chance of it being LEO. 30% of being pure psyco, the "slave" could have been 17,14 or 44, male or female who the fark knows. Either way no good for you.


I was thinking the same thing but then figured an actual LEO would have pretended to be in the 16 and under range, but as you say, no good would come of it.
 
2010-12-13 03:27:40 PM
Latinwolf: bulok: I'm sure the question here everyone really wants to know is the daughter hot?

No, because most of the smart people in here have already figured out that if she was hot, she wouldn't have to settle for a guy old enough to be her grandfather.


Never underestimate the power of crazy.

// The other options are golddigging, daddy issues, illicit prostitution, crazy, daddy issues, kinda dumb, bonzai slutty, crazy and one time there was a lady who just liked older men. But what are the odds of that ever happening again?
 
2010-12-13 03:27:41 PM
LOTN: Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.

Yup. Fathers tend to be tyrants in the eyes of children.
 
2010-12-13 03:32:56 PM
socratesthekidd: Oznog: I knew this movie was trouble.

That one was seriously effed up.

/the cook on the last boat I worked brought it out for us
//she was a little odd too


I saw it at a movie theater when it was first release (the first movie I saw Karen Page in) and during the castration scene, I could hear a couple of "ladies" in the back snickering, which bothered me as much as the scene itself.
 
2010-12-13 03:36:43 PM
kerpal32: LOTN: Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.

Yup. Fathers tend to be tyrants in the eyes of children.


You are a sanctimonious ass. To live without the opportunity for mistakes is to live a slave. This young woman isn't going to end her life by shagging an older guy for a couple months. It was her choice to make, it isn't yours. You aren't being shagged by the old guy. You're obviously not getting shagged by young women looking to experience something outside the veil of their oppressive fathers desires. It is her right to experiment with whom she chooses.

Save your wrath for the people in the world who deserve it. Not a couple of transients giving each other a few warm moments of flesh to remember each other by.
 
2010-12-13 03:40:03 PM
boobsrgood: Latinwolf: You sound like an old dude trying to justify his fantasy.

You sound like a sexually repressed adolescent. I have a bisexual wife who is 13 years younger than me. Your lack of sexual life experience may lead you to believe that middle-aged men are all icky and creepy, but reality is not a Twilight movie or an episode of Dancing with the Stars.

Middle-aged men have experience, money, and a steady hand. Young girls go nuts for that, even if they don't have daddy issues, as so many of them do. This girl was getting exactly what she wanted, as was he, and all the whining in the world isn't going to make it wrong. As for my fantasies, honestly, it sounds like you should be paying more attention to your own.


Correction, now you sound like a pedo trying to justify his beliefs.
 
2010-12-13 03:44:01 PM
Santa's Knee: PDX Ghost Hunter: If I can land a 17 year old when I'm 57 I expect high-fives from ALL of you.

Or a hand from her pimp.


More like the pimp sticking his hand out waiting to get paid.
 
Displayed 50 of 703 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report