I'm ronery, so ronery...

Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

"no charges were laid"
missed it by THAT much!

A disciplinary hearing was told that Martin John Livingston, 50, allowed the student to perform oral sex on him after telling her that he was lonely.

Allowed? Who prevents oral sex?

/was she hot?

I don't even know what a banana lounge is. Anyone?

lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

I was wondering the same thing. Also, I like how they make "allowing her to perform oral sex on him" sound like harassment. How dare he consent to her advances!

The student said in evidence that Mr Livingston had cupped her breast, tried to kiss her and allowed her to perform oral sex on him.

Shiat, if that's a crime I'm in big trouble. I'd allow pretty much any woman to perform oral sex on me.

CPT Ethanolic: A 50 yr old guy banged an 18 yr old?? And no HERO tag?



Who is this brave Adonis? This Cadillac of men?

Theaetetus: lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

If a boss tells an employee to sleep with him or she'll be fired, they're both over 18, so who farking cares?
Oh, wait... We don't look favorably on using undue influence to coerce others.

We also don't look favorably on those making assumptions and concluding guilt before proving it. It isn't even alleged anywhere in the article that this was a quid pro quo.

Donnchadha: lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

That's why no charges were filed, but crossing the teacher/student line is generally grounds for dismissal.

That's funny, one of the professors where I'm at married one of his graduate students. That makes her both his student and his employee.

ABQGOD: A disciplinary hearing was told that Martin John Livingston, 50, allowed the student to perform oral sex on him after telling her that he was lonely.

Allowed? Who prevents oral sex?

/was she hot?



Just need to find out the name of the school it was he taught at, and then a search of that high school on Facebook should pull her up quickly enough.

I need to get a banana lounge.

I want to take the opportunity to say that my son's principal, who was allowed to hire all the teachers because it is a brand new school, has AMAZING taste.

/I hear some of them can teach too

lennavan: Donnchadha: lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

That's why no charges were filed, but crossing the teacher/student line is generally grounds for dismissal.

That's funny, one of the professors where I'm at married one of his graduate students. That makes her both his student and his employee.

Grad students are more employees than students, different policies govern these interactions

LeroyBourne: I need to get a banana lounge.

Can we please call it a tallywacker?

ultraholland Epic win, my friend.

LeroyBourne: I need to get a banana lounge.

This.

Also, niice.

lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

still, he is in a posiiton of power/influence over the student. Not criminal, but shady and unethical as all hell.

LeroyBourne: I need to get a banana lounge.

Can we please call it a tallywacker?

Tongue bathe the Willy Wonka?

Just checked out the school's code of conduct and they pretty clearly say that having sex with a studen is a big no no. Sucks to be him, sucked to be her. :P

(no hits for his name either sadly to find pics)

movieman_1979: LeroyBourne: I need to get a banana lounge.

Can we please call it a tallywacker?

Tongue bathe the Willy Wonka?

Spit shine the Mustang?

Doctor Funkenstein: They should give the girl an award, too. Any chick who is game for taking a shot in the mouth should have a trophy.

Nah, when you make a big deal about it, it becomes a favor. If I can stay down there till my tongue has cramps and my jaw locks she can have a bad taste in her mouth.

Wolverines: Police investigated the incidents, but it is believed that no charges were laid.

Neither was the teacher

Agh, Wolverines YBMTI, lol.

/+1

If my college history professor had allowed me to perform oral sex on him, I definitely would have. You just can't beat a hot surfer from San Diego with a PhD in history. Helluva passionate teacher, too.

/off to my girlie bunk

"he told her to sunbake on his banana lounge with her bikini on"

euphemism or Aussie colloquialism?

And they say that institutions of higher learning don't produce students with marketable skills.

teeny: If my college history professor had allowed me to perform oral sex on him, I definitely would have. You just can't beat a hot surfer from San Diego with a PhD in history. Helluva passionate teacher, too.

/off to my girlie bunk

Did you ask nicely?

FTA: "Mr Livingston and another teacher from the school were cited for developing a "personal development skills unit" and establishing important local partnerships"

I think the student demonstrated how successful he actually was. These skills will help that young student advance in her academic career and should also net her many free pizzas, based on my research.

BumpInTheNight: Sucks to be him, sucked to be her. :P

No, SHE sucked HIM.
Really, how difficult is this?

CygnusDarius: ABQGOD: A disciplinary hearing was told that Martin John Livingston, 50, allowed the student to perform oral sex on him after telling her that he was lonely.

Allowed? Who prevents oral sex?

/was she hot?

Well, if you know the girl has herpes...

lennavan: Theaetetus: lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

If a boss tells an employee to sleep with him or she'll be fired, they're both over 18, so who farking cares?
Oh, wait... We don't look favorably on using undue influence to coerce others.

We also don't look favorably on those making assumptions and concluding guilt before proving it. It isn't even alleged anywhere in the article that this was a quid pro quo.

Nor is it even alleged anywhere in the article that this was not a quid pro quo.

Theaetetus: You seem to be making an assumption that there wasn't undue influence, and are concluding guilt on the part of the disciplinary hearing members.

You seem to be making an assumption that there was undue influence, and are concluding the disciplinary hearing members only fired him because of the influence and not solely the ethical concerns.

You seem to have ignored the police not charging him with any crimes, say for instance, extortion.

Theaetetus: The fact that we don't know all the details based on this article doesn't mean no one anywhere knows all the details.

Please don't let this stop you from jumping to any conclusions. Fark innocent until proven guilty. Write an article about two adults having sex and I say "who farking cares?" Write an article about a teacher saying "suck my balls or you get an F" and then I'd say "I farking care." There is a difference between these two situations, yes? And we can toss out the "but poor innocent 18 year old didn't know any better my poor baby!"

Theaetetus: I responded by explaining an analogous situation in which we would care, even though they were both over 18. Now, you're assuming that any comparable situation never happened, hence your reply.

You caught me. I assumed innocence until proven guilty. Or at least, I assumed innocence until it was even farking alleged guilt. Wow, you're quick to jump to conclusions aren't you? Further, you did indeed bring up a completely different situation where someone might care. That situation is not this situation.

Theaetetus: As noted previously, we don't look favorably on such unsupported assumptions.

No, we don't.

I think whoever came in second in the "awards" race framed this teacher: egad. Clearly someone has paid off the poor lass to fabricate a story about some fictitious tryst in order to force the forfeiture of this coveted accolade.

/You come in second, just accept it. Don't be a dick.

Lampmonster: Did you ask nicely?

Nope. He was newly married, so I'd imagine he was still gettin' some anytime he wanted. I had to settle for undressing him with my eyes for 4 hours a week.

Mock26: lennavan: Theaetetus: lennavan: Mr Livingston, who taught at a regional college, drove the student to his home about May 8, 2008, according to a decision published by a Victorian Institute of Teaching disciplinary panel.

If it's a college student, presumably 18 years old, who farking cares?

If a boss tells an employee to sleep with him or she'll be fired, they're both over 18, so who farking cares?
Oh, wait... We don't look favorably on using undue influence to coerce others.

We also don't look favorably on those making assumptions and concluding guilt before proving it. It isn't even alleged anywhere in the article that this was a quid pro quo.

Nor is it even alleged anywhere in the article that this was not a quid pro quo.

So we should assume guilt and worry about it later or what?

Just out of curiosity, what country do you live in?

srtpointman: So,according to the article, she refused to kiss him but she blew him? Sounds like she's preparing herself to be a prostitute.

I see you're familiar with Pretty Woman