Incest repeat. Nice.

I guess it wasn't a "one time" thing.

Please tell me this is a repeat of the other day, and not another mom-son pair...

her son, now 33

The son, who is not being named because he is considered a victim of sexual assault

I'm so confused. How on earth is this person a victim?

Lets see. This happened in 2004 and they got round to filing charges in 2010. Statute of limitations?

I would think this would get the sick tag instead >

HotWingConspiracy: her son, now 33

The son, who is not being named because he is considered a victim of sexual assault

I'm so confused. How on earth is this person a victim?

Yeah I'm feeling the same way.

Homosexuality used to be against the law too.

HotWingConspiracy: her son, now 33

The son, who is not being named because he is considered a victim of sexual assault

I'm so confused. How on earth is this person a victim?

NO kiddin'...a 33 year old person isn't a victim unless they're mentally challenged or incapacitated in some way. if you participate otherwise, you should be charged too.

aearra: Lets see. This happened in 2004 and they got round to filing charges in 2010. Statute of limitations?

Also that makes him 27 at the time and still an adult.

Oh and stop F'ing your mom.

uncletogie: Please tell me this is a repeat of the other day, and not another mom-son pair...

I don't know if this is a repeat or not, but this happens a disturbing amount.

moe-foe (new window)

I had a number of snappy lines to post, none of which I feel like doing, because this story is just so full of sad and fail.

What the hell is wrong with these motherfarkers?

aearra: Lets see. This happened in 2004 and they got round to filing charges in 2010. Statute of limitations?

It started in 2004 and continued until 2006, so the clock starts in 2006. It also wouldn't surprise me if the period is exceptionally long.

Taboo!!

I really am sex-offended by this.

ihatedumbpeople:
NO kiddin'...a 33 year old person isn't a victim unless they're mentally challenged or incapacitated in some way. if you participate otherwise, you should be charged too.


This.

/i was gonna use the 'R' word..

Nothing like getting literally and figuratively farked by your own son.

JoeCamelToe: aearra: Lets see. This happened in 2004 and they got round to filing charges in 2010. Statute of limitations?

Also that makes him 27 at the time and still an adult.

Oh and stop F'ing your mom.

It started in 2004 and lasted until 2006. Statute of limitations well in scope. She gets charged with incest and he doesn't? Interesting. Shouldn't both parties be culpable?

What? Most infatuations last about 6 months. Then it's uphill to keep the spark going.

Ew.

That is all.

Freddie got Fingered?

Lampmonster: uncletogie: Please tell me this is a repeat of the other day, and not another mom-son pair...

I don't know if this is a repeat or not, but this happens a disturbing amount.

When you take the entire population into account, that's true. Every single day, mothers kill their children. Right this very second, somewhere in the world, someone is being tortured right out of their sanity, into the realm of stark raving unbelievability, whether it's a third world scenario or a little girl in someone's basement. This very second. People are unaware of it because they're not thinking from the point of view of the entire country wide population, or the world wide population. Otherwise, how could there be a constant supply of human defects for shows like Jerry Springer or Maury Povitch...


/have a nice day

I just want to mention that the incest epic thread was my favorite epic thread.

Yeah there really is no thrill like fraking your mom except for maybe fraking a 7 year old boy.

People are strange.

/and they never notice anything

farm machine: She gets charged with incest and he doesn't? Interesting. Shouldn't both parties be culpable?

Maybe he got off because he tattled on his mommy.

There's a whole lot of mental illness going on in that family.

bump: somewhere in the world, someone is being tortured right out of their sanity, into the realm of stark raving unbelievability, whether it's a third world scenario or a little girl in someone's basement. This very second. People are unaware of it because they're not thinking from the point of view of the entire country wide population, or the world wide population. Otherwise, how could there be a constant supply of human defects for shows like Jerry Springer or Maury Povitch...

I'm currently watching "Philosophy of a Knife" so I'm really getting a kick...

If truly a coincidence I am amused (and horrified they have that on Netflix streaming)

How is a 33 year old man who had a consensual sexual relationship with a 54 year old woman a "victim." I guess he's hoping for attention/a pay-out somewhere here? I agree, it grosses me out (mom and son? yuck!) but I don't think a crime has been committed, and I definitely don't think this guy is a victim.

First-degree incest is a Class B felony. If convicted, Thornton would face a 12- to 14-month prison sentence and be required to register as a sex offender.

A year in prison and 10-15 years wearing a scarlet letter that prevents you from ever working or living near children.

That seems like a fair punishment for two years of consensual sex with an adult...

Not even sure why this is illegal.

sick? Very. Immoral? Yes.

But do we really need to lock up a 50-odd year old woman for boffing her 30-odd year old son? Unless there is something else to the story is sounds like a huge waste of time and money.

neonpale: farm machine: She gets charged with incest and he doesn't? Interesting. Shouldn't both parties be culpable?

Maybe he got off because he tattled on his mommy.

I thought he tattled on his mommy because he got off.

farm machine: JoeCamelToe: aearra: Lets see. This happened in 2004 and they got round to filing charges in 2010. Statute of limitations?

Also that makes him 27 at the time and still an adult.

Oh and stop F'ing your mom.

It started in 2004 and lasted until 2006. Statute of limitations well in scope. She gets charged with incest and he doesn't? Interesting. Shouldn't both parties be culpable?

Yeah...you'd think there'd be incest AND rape charges. Because you can't consent isn't an excuse to breaking the law, so it could/should also be rape. Right?

ThoughtSpy: Not even sure why this is illegal.

sick? Very. Immoral? Yes.

But do we really need to lock up a 50-odd year old woman for boffing her 30-odd year old son? Unless there is something else to the story is sounds like a huge waste of time and money.

Oh, but the authorities incest she go to prison.

How the hell is he a victim? He was a grown farking man and he kept sticking it in her for two goddamn years. Unless she was drugging him, or tying him up without a safe word, fark this dude.

was granted a sexual assault protection order against Thornton on Tuesday, barring her from coming within 500 feet of him, his home, school or workplace, court records show.

For some reason, this distinction amuses me. Not just a restraining order [because she can't rape you if she isn't near you] but a magical rape blocker! Now I will amuse myself by picturing Jayne from Firefly telling ladies 'woman this paper says you can't rape me.'

tarheel07: farm machine: JoeCamelToe: aearra: Lets see. This happened in 2004 and they got round to filing charges in 2010. Statute of limitations?

Also that makes him 27 at the time and still an adult.

Oh and stop F'ing your mom.

It started in 2004 and lasted until 2006. Statute of limitations well in scope. She gets charged with incest and he doesn't? Interesting. Shouldn't both parties be culpable?

Yeah...you'd think there'd be incest AND rape charges. Because you can't consent isn't an excuse to breaking the law, so it could/should also be rape. Right?

Dammittohell, omit "you can't"

NEDM: neonpale: farm machine: She gets charged with incest and he doesn't? Interesting. Shouldn't both parties be culpable?

Maybe he got off because he tattled on his mommy.

I thought he tattled on his mommy because he got off.

Or maybe because he couldn't.

"Father?"

"Yes, son?"

"I want to kill you."

"Mother?...I wanna..."


/get arrested in New Haven

ThoughtSpy: sick? Very. Immoral? Yes.

You sound republican. Just like homosexuality used to be considered. If we say that two consenting adults are free to do and choose who to have relations with, we can't start drawing lines. I imagine there will be cousins and siblings in AL/MS/South that will be just as happy when we legalize marrigange for all loving couples without imposing our moral judements on theit love.

From the womb you come out of, and back into the womb you come into.

ThoughtSpy: Not even sure why this is illegal.

sick? Very. Immoral? Yes.

But do we really need to lock up a 50-odd year old woman for boffing her 30-odd year old son? Unless there is something else to the story is sounds like a huge waste of time and money.

What is so sick and/or immoral about it?
What does it affect you what two adults do in the privacy of their own home?

Or does this line of thinking only apply to homosexuality?

/lots of hypocritical mothafockers around here today

maudibjr: I just want to mention that the incest epic thread was my favorite epic thread.

Linky?