If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some TL/DNR Guy) Misc "Will professors hold the line? Will they insist that the most distracted generation in history rise to the challenge of reading books, or will future faculty members replace the book with the chapter?"   (chronicle.com) divider line 96
More: Misc, Association of American Universities, shall and will, fashion trends, Moby Dick, expert witnesses, National Education Association, university system, cabinet ministers  
•       •       •

3910 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 Sep 2010 at 11:17 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



96 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-09-01 08:24:06 PM
Book "Twitterature" in TFA actually looks pretty cool: Link
 
2010-09-01 08:40:05 PM
Just might have to change the delivery method. When someone can sit through a farking 80 hour video game in a few sittings, you can bet your arse they can concentrate long enough to read a book.
 
2010-09-01 09:57:10 PM
GaryPDX: Maybe they should just stick to teaching Marxism.

I never took the Marxism class. In the morning? Are you farking kidding me?
 
2010-09-01 10:02:27 PM
Will schools stop watering down the curriculum for the tuition money? Will institutions start being more than just daycare for 20-year-olds?
 
2010-09-01 10:08:55 PM
Paging Guy Montag, Guy Montag, you're wanted at the University.
 
2010-09-01 10:24:55 PM
GaryPDX: Maybe they should just stick to teaching Marxism.

upload.wikimedia.org

I find tinsel distracting.
 
2010-09-01 10:30:29 PM
GaryPDX: Maybe they should just stick to teaching Marxism.

I actually read the Communist Manifesto in college. I thought it was the most boring book I had ever read... until I tried to read Das Capital. Good lord.
 
2010-09-01 11:04:40 PM
Three years ago, Weidenfeld & Nicolson launched its Compact Editions series of classics such as Vanity Fair and Moby-Dick. T

Reader's Digest had condensed books in the early '60's, so that's not indicative of the ADD approach to the written word.

Reading something other than comics needs to begin early - my kids all read by the time they were 3. From the time they were very young, we would sit at breakfast and I would tell a story. Left the with a cliffhanger that would be continued the next day.

Start the kids early.
 
2010-09-01 11:19:02 PM
Everyone listen to me! I'm old and terrified!
 
2010-09-01 11:22:41 PM
TL:DNR
 
2010-09-01 11:23:57 PM
BunkyBrewman: Just might have to change the delivery method. When someone can sit through a farking 80 hour video game in a few sittings, you can bet your arse they can concentrate long enough to read a book.

That's the dumbest farking thing I've heard all day and it's been a day filled with stupid.
 
2010-09-01 11:27:54 PM
More importantly, will paper textbook publishers still be able to charge ridiculous prices for their products, while giving kickbacks to professors who require students to buy them?
 
2010-09-01 11:28:40 PM
Damn that's some bad writing. Get to the point, leave the flowery adjectives behind.
 
2010-09-01 11:28:53 PM
We had that problem when I went back to university to study electrical engineering. It was scary when you asked have you finished the book yet and they give a blank look with the stare "what book?" Somehow they still let some of these people pass, but I guess there is a reason there is a 50% dropout rate at most places.

They hated it when I took history classes, because apparently a Bachelors in Archaeological Sciences wasn't considered good enough to skip Western Civilisations or even basic chemistry. Luckily nowadays the young people coming to the US aren't so hampered and they will accept some British courses.
 
2010-09-01 11:29:28 PM
Here's how it works:

- Professor tells students about required text for class

- Students go to the book store and find out the book is expensive

- Some tech savvy student soon finds the book in pdf format online and distributes the book to their classmates

- Students upload pdf to their mobile device and cheat during tests

So effectively the students are reading the book, they just happen to do it while the examination is being taken.

Gogo multitasking!
 
2010-09-01 11:31:04 PM
Approves of holding the line:
images3.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2010-09-01 11:31:16 PM
Love isn't always on time.
 
2010-09-01 11:31:48 PM
therhinodep: More importantly, will paper textbook publishers still be able to charge ridiculous prices for their products, while giving kickbacks to professors who require students to buy them?

So much THIS.

/bitter & poor
 
2010-09-01 11:32:39 PM
img535.imageshack.us


Now get off of my lawn!

 
2010-09-01 11:33:03 PM
Are books -- at the least the non-technical sort (novels, histories, philosophies) -- as they've been formatted for the past several hundred years really that important to civilization or education?

I'm not really sure that they are.

This guy doesn't give a lot of good evidence. He just seems to think that since books were the last word when he was educated, that things should always stay the same.
 
2010-09-01 11:35:27 PM
therhinodep: More importantly, will paper textbook publishers still be able to charge ridiculous prices for their products, while giving kickbacks to professors who require students to buy them?

I've never gotten a kickback for requiring a book. Which publisher do I need to switch to tell all my fine upstanding colleagues to avoid?
 
2010-09-01 11:36:15 PM
People love to have the same stupid argument every 10 years. No, people are not going to stop reading. Yes, people still read. And Yes, young people read too!

If college professors assign books and expect their students to read them for a decent grade, then students will read the books unless said professor is an absolute pushover doormat who hands out A's like a sex ed teacher hands out condoms.
 
2010-09-01 11:38:34 PM
Shabash: Book "Twitterature" in TFA actually looks pretty cool: Link

The problem with writing a book like this is that it, owing to the speed of online pidgeon/slang/dialects, it will be obsolete in ten years.

We've already gone through several mutants of internet English. From 1337speak to lolcats, ebonics, textspeak and twitterspeak, which is getting so abbreviated it's practically a code now, like newspeak.

Does anyone even talk like JeffK anymore?
 
2010-09-01 11:39:25 PM
Mentat: I actually read the Communist Manifesto in college.

And? Didn't seem to make much sense...might get around to reading Das Kapital, see if Marx improved over time...
You weren't saying it was a long read, were you?
Gods, I hope not!

/First read Lord Of The Rings at 12.
//Can now read 300 page fiction book in a day, 250-300 nonfiction, depending on density.
///Seem ADD-ish otherwise.
 
2010-09-01 11:40:55 PM
Shelter,food and water,guns and ammo,skill or gold and silver,booze,toilet paper,tobacco,seeds,clothing,..did I leave anything out? Sonn we will be dependent on these things! Bye Bye F A R K> i n t e r n e t
 
2010-09-01 11:41:39 PM
soze: Will schools stop watering down the curriculum for the tuition money? Will institutions start being more than just daycare for 20-year-olds?

About one generation from now, after today's college graduates fail to earn enough as baristas and professional bloggers to pay for their kids' education.

Some people seem to think that working three jobs through college dilutes the collegiate experience. Those people are in fact dunderheads: when your kids get up at 6am to do a cafeteria shift, tutor in the evenings and move furniture on weekends, they become very discerning and demanding customers.
 
2010-09-01 11:41:59 PM
7473r4: People love to have the same stupid argument every 10 years. No, people are not going to stop reading. Yes, people still read. And Yes, young people read too!

If college professors assign books and expect their students to read them for a decent grade, then students will read the books unless said professor is an absolute pushover doormat who hands out A's like a sex ed teacher hands out condoms.


To be fair, he's not questioning whether kids will still read. He's asking whether they'll still be held to read entire, unabridged books.

It's a fair question; I just don't know if it's a necessarily bad thing for kids to move away from the traditional forms of ingesting knowledge.
 
2010-09-01 11:43:26 PM
BizarroHulk: TL:DNR

you mean just like how subby listed the source?

you're clever

/not subby
 
2010-09-01 11:44:44 PM
The truth is that books have three strikes against them. The first is that most books are fully of linguistic "fill", grammatical static with little or no content. If you consolidate the important ideas from most textbooks, you are left with a pamphlet.

The second is that reading problems, like dyslexia, are quite common, and happen in degrees. This means that perhaps even the majority of students will be inhibited from reading to some degree, as it is difficult for them beyond content and grammar. They do not want to do it because they do not enjoy the process.

The third problem is that text is inherently a less efficient way of conveying ideas than are other media. A picture truly can be worth a thousand words. And often, text is associated with the context of the time in which it was written. Unless you share a common culture with the author, subtleties and passing references will be missed.

The exception to all of these are poetry and prose, the very purpose of which are contained in all the text. But they are only a fraction of higher studies.
 
2010-09-01 11:44:50 PM
Of course universities will keep using books. They wouldn't want all those poor textbook publishers to lose their multi-million dollar jobs, would they?

/Spent over $500 this semester
//All but one were purchased used
 
2010-09-01 11:48:41 PM
eraser8: To be fair, he's not questioning whether kids will still read. He's asking whether they'll still be held to read entire, unabridged books.

Why force people to get whole books if the whole book isn't worth reading? And technology means there's a third option besides whole books and making copies of the book from the library.

www.xanedu.com
 
2010-09-01 11:48:42 PM
Boo farking hoo, kids are different today and have access to new technology. This is new and scary to me, and must be stopped at all costs.

/Ooo look at me, I scribble crap on dead trees, ain't I farking special
 
2010-09-01 11:51:48 PM
My C++ textbook was peppered with so many sidebars, call-outs, and pro-tips, each with its own color scheme, that it looked like the freaking Marketwatch homepage. I am sure the publisher would have included popups and flash animations if it were possible.

Every time I opened it, I could imagine half my classmates going, "Oooh, shiny!" It was designed for the nano-attention-span student. It contained everything they would ever know about the basics of object-oriented programming, laid out in tiny, separate, colorful, non-challenging tidbits.

Someday, of course, you will be on an airliner in which a subroutine in the engine-out rudder-adjustment algorithm in the fly-by-wire controller was coded by one of them. As the rudder hits the stop and the vertical stabilizer snaps off, you can think to yourself, "Oooh, shiny!"
 
2010-09-01 11:54:36 PM
GaryPDX: Maybe they should just stick to teaching Marxism.

Groucho or Chico?
 
2010-09-01 11:55:22 PM
I encounter this problem fairly often - "B-b-but there's too much reeeeading" - in my mid-level university course. One way around it is to get the students to complete and present projects based on the course material, for example, get into groups to lead the discussion around a film. But I get to teach a cool subject (horror) that gets them interested and then it's great to see what they come up with in terms of research.

Now, if only I had a rapid-fire cartoonist handy... like this RSA animation illustrating David Harvey's lecture about the crises in capitalism. Brilliant and engaging.


/yes, lots of lazy and entitled students with no attention spans
//but man, can they make bloodcorn. Mmm!
 
2010-09-01 11:57:01 PM
This isn't new, and the article isn't about reading. It's about depth of mind, and the mind pool gets shallower every day.
 
2010-09-01 11:57:46 PM
I wonder if Carlin Romano would be able to tell me what Avogadro's number is, or if he would be able to explain both stages of meiosis, or if he could tell me what -16t^2 represents in a position polynomial
 
2010-09-01 11:58:11 PM
You read your programming textbook? I don't even get those anymore, all that info is online in a more specific and helpful fashion. Most of my texts unfortunately don't have such good online resources (though my informatics courses have been brilliant enough to have all digital content, no books to buy). Wikipedia and other wikis are getting close to having enough info on psychology and related fields to replace books, but some of the more esoteric terms still don't pop up much.

Code books are so painfully, ball bustingly boring and irrelevant I can't imagine anyone reads more than 5% of the material.
 
2010-09-01 11:58:29 PM
dumpstertize: And? Didn't seem to make much sense...might get around to reading Das Kapital, see if Marx improved over time...
You weren't saying it was a long read, were you?
Gods, I hope not!


No, CM was short and easy, just boring. Das Capital is what happens when Moby Dick has sex with The Wealth of Nations.
 
2010-09-01 11:58:44 PM
Actually, the biggest problem is not lack of reading, but lack of writing.

Teach a class these days and you'll find kids with laptops taking notes (maybe,) by typing this or that into one of their windows. Far easier than writing it in a notebook with a pen, and by the same token far worse for retention. Then you have kids who just sit there with nothing, not even bothering to bring anything to take notes---as if going to class is like watching a boring movie.

Give them a test and you just get blank answers, or random stabs at drawing numbers from the question and plugging them in to one of the three formulas they remember from somewhere.
 
2010-09-02 12:02:06 AM
brainiac-dumdum: I wonder if Carlin Romano would be able to tell me what Avogadro's number is, or if he would be able to explain both stages of meiosis, or if he could tell me what -16t^2 represents in a position polynomial

Why should I memorize something I can so easily get from a book?

I forget who said that.
/No really, it was Einstein
 
2010-09-02 12:02:49 AM
therhinodep: More importantly, will paper textbook publishers still be able to charge ridiculous prices for their products, while giving kickbacks to professors who require students to buy them?

I had a professor who was pissed off at the combo of a) not having a book he really liked for the class and b) that the textbooks cost so damn much, so he decided to write his own.

Got a local place to print it and made damn sure the price was under $40. Might have been $30 if memory serves correctly. The university wanted a kickback, but he and my student adviser (who also handled that sorta thing) talked them down.

Had him again senior year. No book, and all of our notes were just LaTeX pdfs that he wrote or chapters he got permission to copy.

Awesome professor, and department. Another professor was working on the same thing, but she just had a huge collection of pdf chapters of 'class notes' (really, some editing and text away from being a book) she probably wasn't going to publish. Another professor had a hodgepodge of notes (some apparently written in the days of mimeograph, but hell, the science still worked)... we got a 20+ page stack for the next class at the end of each one.

... Come to think of it, out of all the classes I took in my major (9) I only had to buy 5 books. Two were definitive reference texts for my field, one was optional, and two were no-frills-or-accompanying-CD/Website regular textbooks that ran about $50 a pop.

/my professors rocked
 
2010-09-02 12:02:56 AM
Satanic_Hamster: Approves of holding the line:

i139.photobucket.com

Seconds this!
 
2010-09-02 12:06:03 AM
Nakito: Someday, of course, you will be on an airliner in which a subroutine in the engine-out rudder-adjustment algorithm in the fly-by-wire controller was coded by one of them. As the rudder hits the stop and the vertical stabilizer snaps off, you can think to yourself, "Oooh, shiny!"

Yes. And if you have the audacity to complain about it, youngsters will call you a butthurt old fuddy-duddy who just doesn't understand that millenials just have a different way of doing things.
 
2010-09-02 12:09:07 AM
I was admonished by an administrator during an evaluation in 2006. She told me, and this is high school, "We don't cover the entire novel any more..." Then she handed me some literature about middle school methods that use chunking on only one section of the novel...and that's all...one section.

NOVELS DON'T WORK THAT WAY!!!!
 
2010-09-02 12:09:12 AM
therhinodep: More importantly, will paper textbook publishers still be able to charge ridiculous prices for their products, while giving kickbacks to professors who require students to buy them?

WTF are you talking about? I have yet to be - or meet - a professor that got any more of a "kickback" than a free copy of the damn book. Heck, virtually every instructor I know is blindly flailing away at any way to reduce costs that they can; the current thing is to include the ISBN on the syllabus so that students can order the books on Amazon at a cheaper price than the bookstore. We've looked into electronic copies of the books, but those are often nearly as expensive as the print version and can't be returned (not that the print versions have that happen all that much with "new editions" coming out every semester). It never ceases to amaze me that everyone acts as if the publishers and the bookstores are some sort of non-profit collective, willing to stare themselves to insure that students get textbooks for less than $.05 each, but the instructors are forcing multi-billion price tags on each book when most instructors receive not a dime from any of the books they assign (yes, I know some instructors assign their own works, but every college I have worked at frowned quite strongly on that - including a prof I had that wrote one of the seminal books in his field but assigned the number 2 book to avoid that sort of conflict)
 
2010-09-02 12:09:36 AM
I find I have trouble concentrating on these textbooks in accounting. Truthfully, a lot of the ideas could be better organized in point form. The writers seem to get lost in how much they love their own words, so you end up with a whole chapter to explain something that can be distilled, without losing any significant information, into a paragraph. It's really lame. The worst was Accounting Theory. Holy hell what a terrible book.
 
2010-09-02 12:11:10 AM
Xcott: Actually, the biggest problem is not lack of reading, but lack of writing.

Teach a class these days and you'll find kids with laptops taking notes (maybe,) by typing this or that into one of their windows. Far easier than writing it in a notebook with a pen, and by the same token far worse for retention. Then you have kids who just sit there with nothing, not even bothering to bring anything to take notes---as if going to class is like watching a boring movie.

Give them a test and you just get blank answers, or random stabs at drawing numbers from the question and plugging them in to one of the three formulas they remember from somewhere.


Um, if you're a prof, there's ways to force it on the kids. Not like you should, but whatever.

Ban computers or typing notes, if you want, and give tests where if you take stabs in the dark at the answers you - shock - don't pass.

Hell, my hardest classes were open-book or open-one-page-of-notes for that very reason. Sure, you have the whole book - because in the real world (engineering-style), you'd be able to reference things - but you damn well better know how to solve the problem because flipping through the book, panic-style, might not get you very far.

One page of handwritten notes for a test is also a great way to actually learn the material. Or at least it was for me. Organizing the important information I needed to solve any problem, then rewriting it in tiny tiny print and making the relevant graphs/charts... that actually took me a decent amount of time to do. I have all of them saved, too. Like works of art almost, except the edges where I threw in anything I forgot or example problems...
 
2010-09-02 12:11:32 AM
Reading arguments with subtle distinctions, hearing about the relevance and accuracy of the sources of evidence from which arguments are made, seeing an argument or concept tested against other competing arguments or conflicting evidence, seeing whether the assumptions used are valid...

sod that, I just want the conclusions.

in point form.

read to me in a 3-min or less video clip.

involving naked women.

and cats acting like people.
 
2010-09-02 12:14:02 AM
LegacyDL: Here's how it works:

- Professor tells students about required text for class

- Students go to the book store and find out the book is expensive

- Some tech savvy student soon finds the book in pdf format online and distributes the book to their classmates

- Students upload pdf to their mobile device and cheat during tests

So effectively the students are reading the book, they just happen to do it while the examination is being taken.

Gogo multitasking!


When I went to school back in the Iron Age, (two years ago, when only the early adopters had smartphones) no one ever did that, and the professors were smart enough to know what was going on if they saw students looking at their phones frequently during tests.
 
Displayed 50 of 96 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »