Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Photography Is A Right)   Random girl gets discovered in Times Square... Well her butt does anyway   ( carlosmiller.com) divider line
    More: Dumbass, Times Square, expectation of privacy, photo shoots, chief of police, nyc, wankers, girls  
•       •       •

44456 clicks; posted to Main » on 28 Aug 2010 at 8:30 AM (6 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



241 Comments     (+0 »)
 


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2010-08-28 08:24:15 PM  

clyph: Epiphany: clyph: That has nothing to do with it. You get down low to make the subject look taller and to control the relative position of the subject with respect to the background.

Right, then your subject spreads full eagle to show off her crotch, perfectly normal and not attention whorish at all.

The pose she's assuming is called arabesque à la hauteur. If the toe shoes weren't enough of a clue, you might try watching some ballet instead of Faux News, NASCAR, and professional wrestling.

Culture. Try getting some. Besides what's growing between your toes.


Sure, and she was dressed in proper balerina attire, and was in a studio performing it, right?

No wait, she was dressed in skimpy shorts and in the middle of a public street.
 
2010-08-28 08:43:51 PM  
misanthropologist : To me, at the point when someone asks you to stop taking their picture, they've clearly indidcated they do not grant consent, which trumps your right to take pictures in public. From then on, the argument that you don't need their consent and that whatever constitutional amendment covers public videography protects your right to infringe on other people's privacy is just douchebaggery.

So you are saying that you are opposed to a free press?

The girl in that picture slapped the sailor. It seems unlikely that she would have given consent to publish the picture, and it's possible the sailor wouldn't. There are also a lot of people in the background.

Based on your "they have to agree" argument, all of those people would have to consent for you to even take the picture, much less to publish it.

You're talking nonsense about "your right to infringe on other people's privacy". Times Square isn't private. It's silly to intentionally go out in front of thousands of people and then whine about how your privacy was invaded.

How about the video camera at a convenience store? Should they have to turn that off because you don't consent to their taking a video of you?

How about the cops that beat up Rodney King, and numerous other examples. You are saying that filming them is OK only if they agree?

"You can only take a picture with consent" is a really bad idea.

Luckily, the law doesn't agree with you.

steviesgirl777 : Some people have no class, the girl was 17 yrs old so thats considered child porn when youre taping a girl that young without her permission. She was cute but he was a douche.

First off, filming a fully clothed person in public isn't porn.

Second off, 17 is the age of consent in New York. It's 16 in most states, 18 in 12 states.

Arguing "OMG CHILD PORN!" is really, really stupid.

Tom Paulin : He was weaving about all over the place looking for his ideal crotch shot.

And she was intentionally in a very public location spreading her legs so that pictures could be taken of her crotch.

/Goober.
 
2010-08-28 08:46:07 PM  
photos.codlib.com

Meh. Fark farked my picture in the my post above...

/Goober
 
2010-08-28 08:54:25 PM  

clyph: aspAddict: Crotch shots are crotch shots - you know the "approved" photographer is going to make copies when he gets home and spank it to them. It's a pretty sweet gig, actually since he's getting paid for it.

As a photographer who has done similar kinds of photo shoots, I'm going to have to disagree. After you've been doing it for a while your reaction is less "Ooh, hot chick, fapfapfap" and more of "Crap, now I've got to proof and edit all these pics I took". I don't care how hot she is, after staring at the same chick for hours on end, rubbing one out is the last thing on your mind.

You get acclimated to nudity pretty quickly. When I'm doing a nude shoot I honestly don't even notice the model's body. My attention is totally focused on getting the shot -- pose, lighting, composition, etc. It takes a conscious effort to notice her naughty bits, and that's done in the context of making sure that nothing is showing that shouldn't be.


i274.photobucket.com
 
2010-08-28 09:00:06 PM  

TexasPeace: In Texas, that's a felony.

/really
// "inappropriate photography"
/// The Texas law, which took effect in 2001, states an offense is committed if a person is photographed or videotaped without consent and with the "intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person."


The video taking man is GAY so the intent to arouse clause doesn't apply. What I wonder is why didn't friends of the woman just get in the way of the video...rinse...repeat
 
2010-08-28 09:49:47 PM  

booksmart: Personally, I'd've told the videodouche "I'm paying her x an hour to be here. Pay me x/2 or fark off, pal."


And I'd have told yu that you don't own public space. Screw.
 
2010-08-28 09:50:29 PM  
nrrg.

yu=you
 
2010-08-28 10:34:42 PM  
It seems we can all agree that, legally, the camera-guy did nothing wrong, everybody involved was a doucher, and she does indeed have a nice ass.

Now, let's say I'm 17. White male. For the sake of the argument, good looking to boot. Now, I'm working on becoming an underwear model for Sears or something. Since I live in Michigan, I decide that Detroit would be a good place for a photoshoot. I find the busiest place in town(arguments sake, a couple blocks away from Comerica Park shortly before a Tigers game), bring a bunch of people with cameras and whatnot, strip down to my speedo and wife beater and start posing. Doing the chair-ass thing, spreading eagle etc.

Now, honestly, no matter how that made up story ends, NOTHING good can come of it. It's a stupid idea from the get go. And when that story inevitably ends up on Fark, I'd be ridiculed, mostly, for being an idiot. You can't go into public and do stuff like that and expect nobody to notice, no matter if you're a fine ass 17 year old girl or an old, dodderly man in his 80's.

We can make fun of NYC or Detroit all day, but the fact of the matter is people are the same no matter where you go. If this girl had tried to do this in my hometown(pop 23k tops), the result would of been much the same, if not worse.

I guess my point is, if you don't want your ass to be in the limelight, don't intentionally throw yourself in there. You might not like the results.
 
2010-08-28 10:55:34 PM  
ALL YOU biatchES WITH YOUR SHORT SHORTS, BLONDE HAIR AND VAGINAS ARE ASKING FOR IT.

Look, if you're not hot enough to attract a 6 1/2 ft gorilla to protect you or not smart enough to avoid the situation or not strong enough to pry me off once I get going, you deserve it!

How dare the filthy "laws" of society prevent me from fulfilling my fundamental right to procreate. Concrete or forest canopy, the world is a jungle and the only real "right" you have is to look out for yourself.

Whether it's shanking someone in the neck for a snickers or videotaping a RIPE adolescent for personal gratification, the only rights that apply are my own needs or desires, and screw the rest of you.

/Getting a little tired of raping wimmins, gonna start raping some high-school boys soon and work my way up to middle-aged gym rats.
 
2010-08-29 12:45:16 AM  

holdeestrufs: ALL YOU biatchES WITH YOUR SHORT SHORTS, BLONDE HAIR AND VAGINAS ARE ASKING FOR IT.


You forgot THAT ARE BEING OBVIOUS ATTENTION WHORES IN THE MIDDLE OF A PUBLIC STREET AND ALREADY GETTING YOUR PICTURE TAKEN WHILE DOING IT THEN GETTING MAD SOMEONE ELSE IS DOING THE SAME THING!
 
2010-08-29 12:54:00 AM  
So we should be surprised that an attractive girl in short shorts who is spreading her crotch in the middle of Times Square is attracting unwanted attention?

Maybe the camera guy was trying to catch the juxtaposition of a young lady's taint against a traffic light. He is just a misunderstood artist.
 
2010-08-29 12:55:40 AM  
Ok, so at 2:50 into it, they finally catch on that some dickshine with a camera was taping her. Took 'em long enough. The cyclist that tries to be a tough guy looks like that wasn't his first run in with someone. He looks like he's gotten a beating or two in his lifetime. He should probably stop that, as it looks like he got flattened by some gay guy who can't throw an original insult. That probably wouldn't matter to most people, but it might make a New Yorker commit seppuku.
 
2010-08-29 01:26:59 AM  
That was one very - fit - young woman.
 
2010-08-29 02:07:32 AM  

Epiphany: You forgot THAT ARE BEING OBVIOUS ATTENTION WHORES IN THE MIDDLE OF A PUBLIC STREET AND ALREADY GETTING YOUR PICTURE TAKEN WHILE DOING IT THEN GETTING MAD SOMEONE ELSE IS DOING THE SAME THING!


That's right! They farking deserve it. Glad to see you're on board with the program, says alot about your character.

Worthless saggy vagina bearing whores. I mean biatches wear bras in an obvious attempt enhance their figure and make me rape them, and toe shoes as a leg extending, calf-tightening invitation to violate them. What business does society have telling us we are responsible for civil behavior, and self-control???

Why are we relegated to raping women in the shadows, and alleys and all sorts of unsanitary places. If women can't protect or prevent us from raping or taping them, they should just take it!

Filthy farking attention whore slut biatches.
 
2010-08-29 02:08:43 AM  

holdeestrufs: That's right! They farking deserve it. Glad to see you're on board with the program, says alot about your character.


An attention whore that was being an attention whore in skimpy clothes already having pictures taken of her on the street is upset that someone was giving her the attention she wanted?

Sure, that means I think she should've been raped! You're a genius!
 
2010-08-29 02:13:59 AM  

Epiphany: Sure are a lot of white knights in this thread.

Let's go through this step by step.

Step 1: Attention whore dresses in a skimpy outift
Step 2: Decides to do full crotch spreading photo shoot in the middle of a busy street
Step 3: Acts all pissed off because someone else is taking the same pictures as her photographers are, IN PUBLIC
Step 4: White Knight looks like a total goober for trying to get involved "now I'm in your face" *vindiesel.jpg
Step 5: Girl and photographers leave saying "I'm 17 you jerk!" which they should have thought of before they had a 17 year old girl spreading full eagle in the middle of a street for AW pictures.
Step 6: Welcome to the internet for being a attention whore and a white knight, here's your ass for everyone to see, that enough attention for you?
Step 7: Fark White Knights to the rescue!


I haven't said recently how cool you are.

Anyhow, to the White Knights of the FARK Table:

Anyone with shorts that short, and feet that far apart in public, should know they're going to garner lots of pervy attention. OK, so she's young, the rest of her crew are not and certainly should know better. Maybe JFP is her agent, and that's why they didn't bother cordoning off an area. They certainly seemed 3rd rate..

And for the record, no one is really defending the perv. We're pointing out that it(or something similar) was bound to happen and that these people are idiots for taking offense when it was their own lack of planning that allowed such unwanted yet extremely predictable behavior to happen.

You talk about common courtesy, but leave common sense out of the picture entirely. That's not so common any more either, as those people and you white knights prove.

Thanks for playing though, atleast you did meet my challenge half way and proved something.
 
2010-08-29 03:00:27 AM  
i267.photobucket.com

i267.photobucket.com

i267.photobucket.com

He's clearly videoing the man's feet.
 
2010-08-29 03:06:28 AM  

zefal: He's clearly videoing the man's feet.


That girl is clearly not trying to expose herself to a sidewalk full of people.
 
2010-08-29 04:24:15 AM  
She looked like a young Alison Angel. Don't tell me they weren't exploiting her for her assets. (Way to go, mom.) Dressed in almost-there sweatshorts and a t-shirt and spreading for everyone in Times Square to see... and you expect people not to stare, take photos and film?

If you're in a public place you have every right to film whatever you like. If you're taking photos in a public place you need to take that into account - or go someplace else. You can't take away someone else's rights just because it interferes with whatever it is you're doing.
 
2010-08-29 06:46:13 AM  
holycrapthatsfunny.com
 
2010-08-29 09:05:18 AM  
i.imgur.com
221 posts?
 
2010-08-29 09:12:44 AM  
cute
 
2010-08-29 09:52:06 AM  
1. Possibly the greatest clip evar.

2. Is that the videographer's real voice?

2. She's a little chunky for a "ballerina". And doesn't appear to know what type of outfit a ballerina would wear. Nor apparently does the "professional" who was running the shoot. If they did, they would probably also have gotten one of the hangers-on to assist the "model" with her "prop" placement.

3. When the model had her leg straight up at 1:54 is that the old hag saying "more more more more"? Couldn't be sure so I threw up a little in my mouth just in case. Pan shot at 2:06 - videographer cleansing his palate?

4. Just guessing, but Woman Holding Light Reflector = Model's Mother, Old Hag = Model's Grandmother, and demonstrates what Model will look like in 20 and 40 years, respectively.

5. Evidently Sheriff Lance Armstrong and/or his bike went down forcefully at 4:05. If there is a god, footage of that will surface.

Cam Cameraman.
 
2010-08-29 01:32:27 PM  

zefal: He's clearly videoing the man's feet.


Judging by the last shot, its evident she had an asparagus omlette and whole grain toast. She also has a vivid camel toe. I mean, with the legs spread that wide open, it's not hard to miss.
 
2010-08-29 02:26:27 PM  

Epiphany: Sure, that means I think she should've been raped! You're a genius!


You're absolutely right!! I'm not arguing with you. Why are you being so defensive? Are you feeling guilty?

THEY DESERVE IT. Going out in public automatically makes them whores, not just their outfits or behavior. Women that can be identified as women in public DESERVE IT. All that matters are our own personal needs and desires. The only real "rights".
 
2010-08-29 03:08:20 PM  
Step 1: Attention whore dresses in a skimpy outift
Step 2: Decides to do full crotch spreading photo shoot in the middle of a busy street
Step 3: Acts all pissed off because someone else is taking the same pictures as her photographers are, IN PUBLIC
Step 4: White Knight looks like a total goober for trying to get involved "now I'm in your face" *vindiesel.jpg
Step 5: Girl and photographers leave saying "I'm 17 you jerk!" which they should have thought of before they had a 17 year old girl spreading full eagle in the middle of a street for AW pictures.
Step 6: Welcome to the internet for being a attention whore and a white knight, here's your ass for everyone to see, that enough attention for you?
Step 7: Fark White Knights to the rescue!

Step 8: ???
Step 9: Profit!
 
2010-08-29 04:56:49 PM  
Well, /b/ just got found her docs. Good work white knight, you and the other chick just brought yourself attention that nobody wants or deserves.
 
2010-08-29 06:23:50 PM  

Mentat: Epiphany: Sure are a lot of white knights in this thread.

So thinking that the guy should have shown a modicum of class makes us white knights? Maybe he should have just whipped his dick out and started masturbating on the street. She was wearing skimpy clothes, so she was asking for it, right? I have some news for you, what's acceptable in a Fark thread is not acceptable in real life. I don't care what she was wearing or what she was doing. Show some class when you're in public.


this was NY, not Salt Lake City.
 
2010-08-29 06:56:38 PM  

holdeestrufs: THEY DESERVE IT. Going out in public automatically makes them whores, not just their outfits or behavior. Women that can be identified as women in public DESERVE IT. All that matters are our own personal needs and desires. The only real "rights".


Deserve what? The point is the guy was only videotaping, not commiting rape. Ask the Naked Cowboy, if you perform in Times Square wearing only underwear people are going to take pictures.
 
2010-08-29 07:06:08 PM  

Mentat: Epiphany: Sure are a lot of white knights in this thread.

So thinking that the guy should have shown a modicum of class makes us white knights? Maybe he should have just whipped his dick out and started masturbating on the street. She was wearing skimpy clothes, so she was asking for it, right? I have some news for you, what's acceptable in a Fark thread is not acceptable in real life. I don't care what she was wearing or what she was doing. Show some class when you're in public.


So wearing skimpy shorts and spreading your cooch open in the middle of a busy street somehow doesn't represent being unclassy but taking pictures of it does?

Got it. Double standards, check.
 
2010-08-29 11:15:48 PM  

Jula: As a photographer who works with female models, I would like to weigh in on this.

Most people would walk by and be "Oh, they're doing a photoshoot." and walk on. Some, men, will be "Oooh hey a purty girl, let's cat-call and be a douche!" but then eventually walk on. Most people aren't gonna care.

This guy was disgusting.

That model is NOT there for his political trolling of 'filming in public' or for anyone person's sexual gratification, or any gratification really.

They were WORKING! It's a job! Photographers and models need to connect and be comfortable to do their job. And if some moron with a bone to pick (or a boner) interrupts your shot to make a point, or is taking photos that are tacky to take, especially when a shoot is non-sensual in nature, then you are interfering with that persons JOB!


photography in public places: serious business.

If they wanted to turn Times Square into a private space, they should've paid for the half-million-dollar permit.

I'm not convinced this entire controversy wasn't some sort of viral marketing. At any rate, anyone who complains about his perviness, should ask who are the people who put the girl out there in that skimpy outfit to do this in a public place.

The guy got his crotch shots; the girl got more attention that she dreamed; everybody wins.
 
2010-08-29 11:36:33 PM  

Epiphany: Well, /b/ just got found her docs. Good work white knight, you and the other chick just brought yourself attention that nobody wants or deserves.


Care to share a link?
 
2010-08-29 11:59:19 PM  

Species8472X: Epiphany: Well, /b/ just got found her docs. Good work white knight, you and the other chick just brought yourself attention that nobody wants or deserves.

Care to share a link?


To her docs? Naw. I didn't save them and won't participate in it, except for watching to see what (if anything) they do.
 
2010-08-30 03:49:08 AM  

holdeestrufs: Epiphany: Sure, that means I think she should've been raped! You're a genius!

You're absolutely right!! I'm not arguing with you. Why are you being so defensive? Are you feeling guilty?

THEY DESERVE IT. Going out in public automatically makes them whores, not just their outfits or behavior. Women that can be identified as women in public DESERVE IT. All that matters are our own personal needs and desires. The only real "rights".


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman (new window)

You suck at arguing.
 
2010-08-30 05:49:23 AM  

browntimmy: You suck at arguing.



How am I arguing? I'm totally agreeing with him. You suck at reading comprehension.

Wall Street: Deserve what? The point is the guy was only videotaping, not commiting rape. Ask the Naked Cowboy, if you perform in Times Square wearing only underwear people are going to take pictures.


Are you paying attention at all? The Naked Cowboy is a dude, with a penis and facial hair, which makes him totally immune to objectification and by extension creepy perviness.

Chicks, with their tits and smelly vaginas deserve the complete lack of consideration demonstrated by fark, farking photogs, and farking gay "videographers". I've been in complete agreement the whole time, and yet you clowns keep arguing with me. Stop projecting your guilt at me!!!

Of course common sense dictates that ballet poses + vagina + shorts mean that anyone with a camera can attempt to zoom into her uterus! It's OUR GOD DAMN RIGHT after all. Praise be to ALLAH, that the days when common sense dictated that you NOT do that because someone would beat your ass are over. I got my SLR camera and 70-400mm lens just to take pictures of any chick that dares to leave her house. I post them on 4-chan while describing all the dirty things I have done to them.

IT'S MY RIGHT YOU COCKSUCKERS!!! RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS ME ME ME ME
 
2010-08-30 06:11:47 AM  

holdeestrufs: browntimmy: You suck at arguing.


How am I arguing? I'm totally agreeing with him. You suck at reading comprehension.

Wall Street: Deserve what? The point is the guy was only videotaping, not commiting rape. Ask the Naked Cowboy, if you perform in Times Square wearing only underwear people are going to take pictures.

Are you paying attention at all? The Naked Cowboy is a dude, with a penis and facial hair, which makes him totally immune to objectification and by extension creepy perviness.

Chicks, with their tits and smelly vaginas deserve the complete lack of consideration demonstrated by fark, farking photogs, and farking gay "videographers". I've been in complete agreement the whole time, and yet you clowns keep arguing with me. Stop projecting your guilt at me!!!

Of course common sense dictates that ballet poses + vagina + shorts mean that anyone with a camera can attempt to zoom into her uterus! It's OUR GOD DAMN RIGHT after all. Praise be to ALLAH, that the days when common sense dictated that you NOT do that because someone would beat your ass are over. I got my SLR camera and 70-400mm lens just to take pictures of any chick that dares to leave her house. I post them on 4-chan while describing all the dirty things I have done to them.

IT'S MY RIGHT YOU COCKSUCKERS!!! RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS ME ME ME ME


1/10. It's only fair I give you a point since I bit.
 
2010-08-30 06:27:55 AM  

browntimmy: holdeestrufs: browntimmy: You suck at arguing.


How am I arguing? I'm totally agreeing with him. You suck at reading comprehension.

Wall Street: Deserve what? The point is the guy was only videotaping, not commiting rape. Ask the Naked Cowboy, if you perform in Times Square wearing only underwear people are going to take pictures.

Are you paying attention at all? The Naked Cowboy is a dude, with a penis and facial hair, which makes him totally immune to objectification and by extension creepy perviness.

Chicks, with their tits and smelly vaginas deserve the complete lack of consideration demonstrated by fark, farking photogs, and farking gay "videographers". I've been in complete agreement the whole time, and yet you clowns keep arguing with me. Stop projecting your guilt at me!!!

Of course common sense dictates that ballet poses + vagina + shorts mean that anyone with a camera can attempt to zoom into her uterus! It's OUR GOD DAMN RIGHT after all. Praise be to ALLAH, that the days when common sense dictated that you NOT do that because someone would beat your ass are over. I got my SLR camera and 70-400mm lens just to take pictures of any chick that dares to leave her house. I post them on 4-chan while describing all the dirty things I have done to them.

IT'S MY RIGHT YOU COCKSUCKERS!!! RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS ME ME ME ME

1/10. It's only fair I give you a point since I bit.


His posts are that of a lunatic, whether he's a troll or not is irrelevant.

He may even be an alt with the account sitting right at a month or two old.
 
2010-08-30 09:48:43 AM  

holdeestrufs: browntimmy: You suck at arguing.


How am I arguing? I'm totally agreeing with him. You suck at reading comprehension.

Wall Street: Deserve what? The point is the guy was only videotaping, not commiting rape. Ask the Naked Cowboy, if you perform in Times Square wearing only underwear people are going to take pictures.

Are you paying attention at all? The Naked Cowboy is a dude, with a penis and facial hair, which makes him totally immune to objectification and by extension creepy perviness.

Chicks, with their tits and smelly vaginas deserve the complete lack of consideration demonstrated by fark, farking photogs, and farking gay "videographers". I've been in complete agreement the whole time, and yet you clowns keep arguing with me. Stop projecting your guilt at me!!!

Of course common sense dictates that ballet poses + vagina + shorts mean that anyone with a camera can attempt to zoom into her uterus! It's OUR GOD DAMN RIGHT after all. Praise be to ALLAH, that the days when common sense dictated that you NOT do that because someone would beat your ass are over. I got my SLR camera and 70-400mm lens just to take pictures of any chick that dares to leave her house. I post them on 4-chan while describing all the dirty things I have done to them.

IT'S MY RIGHT YOU COCKSUCKERS!!! RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS ME ME ME ME


FARKIED as OBVIOUS UNIMAGINATIVE TROLL
 
2010-08-31 03:05:02 AM  
I see.

Complete agreement with the prevailing sentiment makes me a troll.

Got it. Good luck with that critical thinking ability throughout your life.
 
2010-08-31 10:35:20 PM  

holdeestrufs: I see.

Complete agreement with the prevailing sentiment makes me a troll.

Got it. Good luck with that critical thinking ability throughout your life.


Due to the nature of your previous posts, you've been passed off as some asylum escapee. If you can't see why, you're either farking stupid or still trolling.

Either way, your style is sure to get your name plastered into a lot of "my fark" pages. Under the ignored user section. Reason: farking Psychotic

I'm not adding you, Just an FYI.
 
2010-09-01 12:01:20 AM  
3.bp.blogspot.com

The videographer is all, "How dare you talk that way about my son, Mr. Rooney!"
 
Displayed 41 of 241 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report