Walker: Tell me, tell me, how to be, a Spillionaire.

According to the article, you get there at the right time, lie about what you know and can do, collect check(s) and go home rich.

If I was a fisherman with a boat who couldn't fish, you bet your ass I'd be out there getting my share.

Well something about this has to be a disaster or we won't have anything to put on the news.

In before the Tin Foil Hat crowd saying Obama caused the accident for economic growth in a area suffering during tough financial times.

jonasborg: Walker: Tell me, tell me, how to be, a Spillionaire.

According to the article, you get there at the right time, lie about what you know and can do, collect check(s) and go home rich.

Are you talking about oil cleanups or IT consultants? The two seem remarkably similar.

In other news, the rent on port-a-potties is more expensive than my apartment

i know of one dude making 60k a day "mopping" up the oil.

Obama caused the accident for economic growth in a area suffering during tough financial times.

Deruke: In other news, the rent on port-a-potties is more expensive than my apartment

Do you have someone come to pump the crap out of your apartment every other day?

Obama caused the accident for economic growth in a area suffering during tough financial times.

Profit = OK
Gouge = Bad

Everyone's got to eat, but you shouldn't get ridiculously rich from one job regardless of the demand.

Ironically we are defending pricing and profit tactics in an oil thread.

45k rent on a 4 BR house now that's retarded.

I wanna be a spillionaire,
so frikin bad

45K a month to rent a house?
/we're all monsters.

rugsucka: Profit = OK
Gouge = Bad

Everyone's got to eat, but you shouldn't get ridiculously rich from one job regardless of the demand.

Ironically we are defending pricing and profit tactics in an oil thread.

45k rent on a 4 BR house now that's retarded.

That really depends. If the normal profit margin is 20% (post payroll, debt management, etc) and that allows you to get rich, why not? Maybe someone else will look at that and decide to get into the business. Maybe this will help these companies create extra capital to make the business itself more efficient.

If they jacked their prices up 100%, well, that's a different story.

rugsucka: Everyone's got to eat, but you shouldn't get ridiculously rich from one job regardless of the demand.

Why not?

Regardless of the demand? Would you also say then that no one should get ridiculously rich regardless of the effect one has had?

rugsucka: Everyone's got to eat, but you shouldn't get ridiculously rich from one job regardless of the demand.

You say the cutest things.

what_now: Why is this a bad thing?

I worked for a Staffing Firm in 2001-2002, and everyone was looking for a "Disaster Preparation Administrator". If you were one of the few people who had studied and implemented a company wide emergency procedure, you could basically write your own salary for major companies in every major city in America.

Now, does anyone REALLY think these people said "YAY! Now I can REALLY rake in the dough" when they watched the towers fall?


Yes, yes I do. Not that they weren't appalled at what happened, but I seriously doubt that they DIDN'T think about the money.

Oh no!!! People that are risking their own money and investors' money are making a profit!!!!
Stop them.

I'm having a hard time getting my panties in a wad over someone seeing an expanding market and then capitalizing on it. Isn't that how you're supposed to make money? Or do the rules change because this a big fat "disaster" and so no one should be allowed to profit from it in any way, shape or form because it's just sooooo traumatic?

rugsucka: Everyone's got to eat, but you shouldn't get ridiculously rich from one job regardless of the demand.

Why not? Who are you to say when someone can make money and how much?

Amdam: Yes, yes I do. Not that they weren't appalled at what happened, but I seriously doubt that they DIDN'T think about the money.

Yep - if I could find a way to make a huge amount of money (legally and ethically), why the hell not? If my company decided to give me enough of the profit after 1-2 major projects that I could retire rich or I could have a job for the rest of my life, why not going with the first rather than the second?

what_now: Why is this a bad thing?

This. It really perplexes me that every time someone, through hard work and/or innovation, comes up with a way to make a lot of money, they get villainized. Isn't that what America is supposed to be all about? Working hard or being innovative, so you can get ahead and make money? But now it's evil?

You have to have high prices to have low prices later. You will see more people entering the area to cleanup the spill, lowering the price. This is not price gouging, it is how things work. If you set the price then you would not have enough people entering the area to work cleaning up the spill. This is how a pro-free-market individual would respond.

If there is some sort of certification, free-marketers would be against that.

Where's the beef Obama WHERE?!?!??!!

You know, some things just aren't worth money (new window)

ShillinTheVillain: If I was a fisherman with a boat who couldn't fish, you bet your ass I'd be out there getting my share.

As far as I remember, they never once declared seafood from the gulf unsafe to eat.

hsg: You know, some things just aren't worth money (new window)



ALL the Exxon Valdez cleanup workers are dead??

They're dead, Dave. All dead. Dead. All dead. Dead Dave all, all dead Dave.

so, they are making money cleaning up a disaster area... what's the problem again?

Who Wants To Be A Spillionaire?

/final answer?
//are you sure?
///really sure?
////really really really sure???

Amdam: what_now: Why is this a bad thing?

I worked for a Staffing Firm in 2001-2002, and everyone was looking for a "Disaster Preparation Administrator". If you were one of the few people who had studied and implemented a company wide emergency procedure, you could basically write your own salary for major companies in every major city in America.

Now, does anyone REALLY think these people said "YAY! Now I can REALLY rake in the dough" when they watched the towers fall?


Yes, yes I do. Not that they weren't appalled at what happened, but I seriously doubt that they DIDN'T think about the money.

And I seriously doubt that you didn't think about all the great comments you would be able to make on Fark.
//see how that works...

Sounds like they're really cleaning up.

The only concern I'd have would be about their disposal methods for all the tar balls, used blotters & other disposable cleanup gear.

KyngNothing: (Shockingly, I bet those "spillionaires" are employing people, and buying goods and services from other companies...)

You assume they're spending it and not putting it somewhere "safe".

what_now: Now, does anyone REALLY think these people said "YAY! Now I can REALLY rake in the dough" when they watched the towers fall?

Um, yes.

Anybody who thinks differently doesn't know much about humans.

/wait, they're staying rich, too

what_now: Now, does anyone REALLY think these people said "YAY! Now I can REALLY rake in the dough" when they watched the towers fall?

We've already criminalized making profits off misery, making profits off sweatshop labor, making profits off illegal immigration, making profits off drugs, making profits off producing any kind of product and selling it, and making profits off any attempt to make the world a better place. Criminalizing the act of making profits by making lemonade when life hands you lemons is the next logical step.

Bend over and take the socialism up the arse, folks. You asked for it, you voted for it, you even demand it every single time the internet gives you a voice.