Readers say that the headline is missing some adjective and/or verbs to be fully understood

One should not treat their paitients that way...

OMGSOCIALISIM! Obama wants to deny us access to guns, oxycontin, and mobility scooters!

There's going be a lot of discussion of reasonable doubt in the jury room.

Wait, i can't act irresponsibly resulting in damage to other people's lives???

OMFGSOCIALISMELEVENTYOMBAMAISTEHSUXXORS!!!!

winterwhile is a modmin now?

Norad: That headline is a goddamn trainwreck.

At least he didn't spell 'patients' as 'patience' like I've seen recently. Actually he didn't even really spell 'patients' did he?

The guy who is trolling you right now: Fact: the victim was blown up by a grenade.
Fact: the defendant in this case owns a lot of guns.

That's all the prosecution has. There's no forensic evidence and no eyewitness testimony linking him to the crime; the prosecution's star witness is a jailhouse snitch. And yet, this man, almost certainly innocent, a doctor who's spent his life helping people, will probably spend the rest of his life in jail because a liberal prosecutor and twelve liberal jurymen think that all gun owners are criminals.

Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire". What the fark is this shiat?

To be fair, he also had a bunch of illegal grenades. And he's on record making some incriminating statements.

Now, I don't think there is enough to convict, (there's reasonable doubt), but the case isn't non-existent.

Did some farking Arkansan write that headline?

The guy who is trolling you right now: Fact: the victim was blown up by a grenade.
Fact: the defendant in this case owns a lot of guns.

That's all the prosecution has. There's no forensic evidence and no eyewitness testimony linking him to the crime; the prosecution's star witness is a jailhouse snitch. And yet, this man, almost certainly innocent, a doctor who's spent his life helping people, will probably spend the rest of his life in jail because a liberal prosecutor and twelve liberal jurymen think that all gun owners are criminals.

Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire". What the fark is this shiat?

You didn't read the article, did you.

I'm not saying he's guilty - I don't know - but the case against him includes more than just "he owns guns and a tire".

Don't remember bombs being part of the 2nd Amendment. Luckily I have my bear arms.

/woof

This could be a tough one for Fark Independents. The accused has a lot of guns (a big pro)... but he's rich, educated and an immigrant (all crippling cons).


/I wouldn't convict based on the evidence quoted in the article... but he probably did it

alternative girlfriend: The guy who is trolling you right now: Fact: the victim was blown up by a grenade.
Fact: the defendant in this case owns a lot of guns.

That's all the prosecution has. There's no forensic evidence and no eyewitness testimony linking him to the crime; the prosecution's star witness is a jailhouse snitch. And yet, this man, almost certainly innocent, a doctor who's spent his life helping people, will probably spend the rest of his life in jail because a liberal prosecutor and twelve liberal jurymen think that all gun owners are criminals.

Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire". What the fark is this shiat?

To be fair, he also had a bunch of illegal grenades. And he's on record making some incriminating statements.

Now, I don't think there is enough to convict, (there's reasonable doubt), but the case isn't non-existent.

You missed his username?

To be fair I almost replied.

capnmonkey: One should not treat their paitients that way...

You must be able to spell to complain.

Svingen999: I lack the paitients to decipher the headline.

Sorry Capnmonkey...directed my comment at the wrong patient.

RAAAAAAAAANDEEP!

kapaso: alternative girlfriend: The guy who is trolling you right now: Fact: the victim was blown up by a grenade.
Fact: the defendant in this case owns a lot of guns.

That's all the prosecution has. There's no forensic evidence and no eyewitness testimony linking him to the crime; the prosecution's star witness is a jailhouse snitch. And yet, this man, almost certainly innocent, a doctor who's spent his life helping people, will probably spend the rest of his life in jail because a liberal prosecutor and twelve liberal jurymen think that all gun owners are criminals.

Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire". What the fark is this shiat?

To be fair, he also had a bunch of illegal grenades. And he's on record making some incriminating statements.

Now, I don't think there is enough to convict, (there's reasonable doubt), but the case isn't non-existent.

You missed his username?

To be fair I almost replied.

Totally wasn't paying attention. :-P

Headline gave me a headache.

*rolls up magazine* bad subby, bad admin.

jaimejaim: capnmonkey: One should not treat their paitients that way...

You must be able to spell to complain.

Pun (new window)

You know, he prescribed painkillers to patients, he didn't make them take enough to kill themselves. I suspect that most Doc's work from the assumption the patients will read and actually follow the instructions, if they don't and get themselves killed, that's Darwinism.

About the case, what case? I'm surprised the defense actually has to present their case. This is a farce.

Wow, if what's mentioned in the article is indicative of their case, the prosecution has nothing.

What's a registered gun?

Me thinks subby has been hitting the bottle a little early today.. that or subby is a friggin retard

alternative girlfriend: The guy who is trolling you right now: Fact: the victim was blown up by a grenade.
Fact: the defendant in this case owns a lot of guns.

That's all the prosecution has. There's no forensic evidence and no eyewitness testimony linking him to the crime; the prosecution's star witness is a jailhouse snitch. And yet, this man, almost certainly innocent, a doctor who's spent his life helping people, will probably spend the rest of his life in jail because a liberal prosecutor and twelve liberal jurymen think that all gun owners are criminals.

Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire". What the fark is this shiat?

To be fair, he also had a bunch of illegal grenades. And he's on record making some incriminating statements.

Now, I don't think there is enough to convict, (there's reasonable doubt), but the case isn't non-existent.

THIS.

RTFA, like you suggest others do.

They found a bunch of grenades near his home. They found a manual on how to use grenades in his house. He was known to fire practice grenades. A tire, which is what was attached to the grenade that maimed the board official, was found in his freaking shower. And the "jailhouse snitch" was a long-time friend.

But in your world it was only because he had guns.

The guy who is trolling you right now: Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire".

And he might have a motive.

Psumek: Don't remember bombs being part of the 2nd Amendment. Luckily I have my bear arms.

/woof

Um, your wrong. It is perfectly legal for the average citizen to own cannons, machine guns, silencers and so on. All you need is a class III permit.

Road_Kill: You know, he prescribed painkillers to patients, he didn't make them take enough to kill themselves. I suspect that most Doc's work from the assumption the patients will read and actually follow the instructions, if they don't and get themselves killed, that's Darwinism.

About the case, what case? I'm surprised the defense actually has to present their case. This is a farce.

I'd say its pretty unusual to have one person, much less two people, OD on your scripts.

We don't know FTA the whole facts, but that is pretty unusual, you gotta admit.

The guy who is trolling you right now:

No relevant comment, just like the login name.

Road_Kill: Um, your wrong. It is perfectly legal for the average citizen to own cannons, machine guns, silencers and so on. All you need is a class III permit.

He isn't wrong. You are. The second amendment doesn't protect such things. They may be allowed with a permit, but that doesn't mean that its constitutionally protected.

Principal. Caught sayof debate of gulf war illnes. Is It real or not. CNN says yes. St. Pete Times looking for chads -OR- "hello, I am write single to salute and wait for medicine"

The government shouldn't be regulating doctors anyway. Free market solutions always work best.

Queensowntalia: Principal. Caught sayof debate of gulf war illnes. Is It real or not. CNN says yes. St. Pete Times looking for chads -OR- "hello, I am write single to salute and wait for medicine"

I think we just figured out who subby is.

Why did the article only give his gay porn name and not his real name?

Magorn: Little bit more than that, like the Doc threating to kill the guy, the testimony of the guy he tried to hire to Kill the victim, the grenade launcher that fires the same kind of grenades used in the bomb, a case of such grenades being found in the woods on the doctor's property, several comments about what the bomb was "intended" to do made to friends..etc They trying to take our GUNSgarbl!!!

FTFY.

Noticeably F.A.T.: Jakevol2: this just continues to confirm that Second Amendment advocates are far from rational people.

Yep. This one guy speaks for the entire community.

In fact, anyone who supports any amendment is indicative of that group.

For example, the KKK are representatives of the 1st Amendment movement. Right?

bartink: alternative girlfriend: The guy who is trolling you right now: Fact: the victim was blown up by a grenade.
Fact: the defendant in this case owns a lot of guns.

That's all the prosecution has. There's no forensic evidence and no eyewitness testimony linking him to the crime; the prosecution's star witness is a jailhouse snitch. And yet, this man, almost certainly innocent, a doctor who's spent his life helping people, will probably spend the rest of his life in jail because a liberal prosecutor and twelve liberal jurymen think that all gun owners are criminals.

Seriously, read the article. The ENTIRE case against this man is "he owns a lot of guns and a tire". What the fark is this shiat?

To be fair, he also had a bunch of illegal grenades. And he's on record making some incriminating statements.

Now, I don't think there is enough to convict, (there's reasonable doubt), but the case isn't non-existent.

THIS.

RTFA, like you suggest others do.

They found a bunch of grenades near his home. They found a manual on how to use grenades in his house. He was known to fire practice grenades. A tire, which is what was attached to the grenade that maimed the board official, was found in his freaking shower. And the "jailhouse snitch" was a long-time friend.

But in your world it was only because he had guns.

Wow, people who are overly obsessed with guns and weapons might be dangerous, who knew?

Look whackadoodles, it's true that not all gun owners are lunatics. Unfortunately it is also true that those who are absolutely obsessed with weapons generally are mentally unstable at some level, at least from my experience. Your group has A LOT of these latter types in it. You keep pushing the crazy and eventually these people will do things like this.

dryknife: Did some farking Arkansan write that headline?

Arkansas is no longer the bottom of the educational food chain. We discovered erasers and the backspace key a few years ago.