Hmmmmm

Wow. What scum.

BackAssward: Target? Really? He couldn't think of a place with a better selection? I mean, if you are going to take the chance, go do it for gold.

All things considered, I'm betting it was his first day after graduating from Walmart. He just wasn't ready for the big leagues.

THE MISSING LINK!

+1 for making me laugh with the phrase "derp perp"

"Let's see what's new on the Up-Kilt Camera!"

I thought these upskirt charges always get thrown out, since there is no expectation of privacy in public. If they get thrown out, that may force the child porn charges to get thrown out too. This person deserves to be in jail, I'm just not sure he'll end up there for long.

Bottom feeder.

situational awareness leads me to believe that i would swat/pimp slap/donkey punch someone if they were within a foot of me and had their had between my knees.

BackAssward: Target? Really? He couldn't think of a place with a better selection? I mean, if you are going to take the chance, go do it for gold.

But school's out for the summer.

Well the problem is you can't seize someone's computer for suspicion of breaking a law that doesn't exist.

Amateur!

I "shutter" to think what is going on in this deviant's head but I am sure the "picture" will become clear as the story "develops."

You're doing it wrong.

Reed said it's likely that Navaie has other victims who may not know they are victims. Anyone with information is asked to call local law enforcement.

Then what? Self-identification of one's own nether regions?

Could prove somewhat embarrassing, unless you are in the habit of regularly checking out your privates while standing on a mirror.

The perp looks like the love child of Steven Tyler and Billy Bob Thornton.

If he did this at Wal-Mart, instead of the the police you'd be calling the suicide prevention hotline for the poor kid.

I've been to that Target. I think he could have found better looking girls at the Washington Square Mall.

Was the lady in a coma or something? He practically had his hand up her crack, she didn't even notice.

at risk of playing the devil's advocate, voyeurism is a sexual fetish, and he was obviously willing to risk getting caught to satisfy his perceived need. He also doesn't look highly intelligent, so his stupidity coupled with his compulsion probably made safer outlets like the internet or a strip joint not a possibility for him.

Day_Old_Dutchie: Reed said it's likely that Navaie has other victims who may not know they are victims. Anyone with information is asked to call local law enforcement.

Then what? Self-identification of one's own nether regions?

Could prove somewhat embarrassing, unless you are in the habit of regularly checking out your privates while standing on a mirror.

Ya mean everyone doesn't do...

Nevermind.

maybe he wasn't informed that target frowns upon that sort of thing.

"... because you got caught!"

could be worse you know? at least it wasn't wal mart. I don't think I want to look at any upskirt shots of the typical saggy flabby log size cottage cheese covered wrinkly and splotchy pale thigh behemoths.

Why the heck did he pick that broad? If you are going to take a chance at getting busted doing something like that then why not at least pick out the hot chicks. That broad looks old and kinda fat.

I feel bad for the girls that had their privacy invaded, but I think it is scary that the cops were able to search his home and confiscate his personal possessions. Maybe he lives in his mom's basement and she gave them permission to look around.


The Oregon law:

§ 163.700¹
Invasion of personal privacy

(1) Except as provided in ORS 163.702 (Exceptions to ORS 163.700), a person commits the crime of invasion of personal privacy if:

(a)(A) The person knowingly makes or records a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording of another person in a state of nudity without the consent of the person being recorded; and

(B) At the time the visual recording is made or recorded the person being recorded is in a place and circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of personal privacy; or

(b)(A) For the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the person, the person is in a location to observe another person in a state of nudity without the consent of the other person; and

(B) The other person is in a place and circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of personal privacy.

(2) As used in this section:

(a) "Makes or records a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording" includes, but is not limited to, making or recording or employing, authorizing, permitting, compelling or inducing another person to make or record a photograph, motion picture, videotape or other visual recording.

(b) "Nudity" means any part of the uncovered, or less than opaquely covered,:

(A) Genitals;

(B) Pubic area; or

(C) Female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.

(c) "Places and circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of personal privacy" includes, but is not limited to, a bathroom, dressing room, locker room that includes an enclosed area for dressing or showering, tanning booth and any area where a person undresses in an enclosed space that is not open to public view.

(d) "Public view" means that an area can be readily seen and that a person within the area can be distinguished by normal unaided vision when viewed from a public place as defined in ORS 161.015 (General definitions).

(3) Invasion of personal privacy is a Class A misdemeanor. [1997 c.697 §1; 2001 c.330 §1; 2009 c.877 §1]

Note: 163.700 (Invasion of personal privacy) and 163.702 (Exceptions to ORS 163.700) were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 163 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

I thought in most states it wasn't illegal as long as the persons face wasn't recorded and there was no sound.

Can I assume "Nixon you dolt" will fade away now?

Video was for the lulz. How did that lady NOT notice?

etymxris: I thought these upskirt charges always get thrown out, since there is no expectation of privacy in public. If they get thrown out, that may force the child porn charges to get thrown out too. This person deserves to be in jail, I'm just not sure he'll end up there for long.

Citation needed. Esp since being in a private business is not being in public. I'm willing to bet a woman has a reasonable expectation to privaacy under her skirt.

So you're telling me he went out with his hair looking like that on purpose?