If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reuters)   WHO attempts to clamp down on tobacco ads targeting women, who are apparently less intelligent and able to make their own decisions than men, thus needing protection   (reuters.com) divider line 95
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

2665 clicks; posted to Main » on 29 May 2010 at 5:11 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



95 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-05-29 03:21:52 PM
You've come a long way baby.
 
2010-05-29 04:58:21 PM
I can tell from the headline subby has never gotten laid.

Keep telling them education means they are stupid!
 
2010-05-29 05:14:33 PM
So many pictures of Lily smoking these days. I guess they won't get fooled again.
 
2010-05-29 05:14:57 PM
GIRLZ ARE STOOPID.
 
2010-05-29 05:14:58 PM
Girls who smoke, poke
 
2010-05-29 05:15:00 PM
DNRTFA but who clamped down on tobacco ads targeting women?
 
2010-05-29 05:15:00 PM
I dunno, subby, who?
 
2010-05-29 05:16:03 PM
Odd how people being targeted would need protection. Advertisements work.
 
2010-05-29 05:17:59 PM
men have bigger brains, its science.
 
2010-05-29 05:18:07 PM
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
 
2010-05-29 05:18:14 PM
smokinglog.com
 
2010-05-29 05:18:19 PM
There are already FAR more female smokers then men. That's a fact.


/ex-bartender
 
2010-05-29 05:19:17 PM
Who's on first
 
2010-05-29 05:19:22 PM
www.aaasmokingsex.com

Good thing they are fixing this
 
2010-05-29 05:21:53 PM
But are the kids alright?
 
2010-05-29 05:21:59 PM
Little Billy was the fattest kid in his class
Always the last in line
All the other little kids would laugh at him
Said he'd die before his time

Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha
Little Billy didn't mind

Most of the kids smoke cigarettes
Just to prove that they were cool
The teacher didn't know about the children's games
And Billy always followed the rules

Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha
Little Billy didn't mind

Billy was big on the outside
But there's an even bigger man inside
Ten million cigarettes burning every day
And Billy's still doing fine

Now Billy and his classmates are middle-aged
With children of their own
Their smoking games are reality now
And cancer's seed is sown

Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha
Little Billy's didn't mind

Most of them smoke maybe 40 a day
A habit Billy doesn't share
One by one they're passing away
Leaving orphans to Billy's care

Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha
Little Billy doesn't mind

Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha
Little Billy's doing fine

/The WHO!
 
2010-05-29 05:23:11 PM
www.smokingrachel.com
 
2010-05-29 05:24:29 PM
NSFW (new window)
 
2010-05-29 05:25:31 PM
Townsend and Daltry should just mind their own business.
 
2010-05-29 05:25:55 PM
...
 
2010-05-29 05:26:00 PM
Without having read TFA, I would hazard a guess and say they are more worried about women, because men don't really get pregnant nearly as often.
 
2010-05-29 05:26:53 PM
WHO attempts to clamp down on tobacco ads targeting women, who are apparently less intelligent and able to make their own decisions than men, thus needing protection


Farkin Virginia Slims have been doing this for a while.


farm5.static.flickr.com
 
2010-05-29 05:28:23 PM
Women shouldn't be smoking in the kitchen anymay. They might get ashes in my POT PIE!
 
2010-05-29 05:30:07 PM
I know this is about smoking, but I would be all for them cracking down on Feminine hygiene commercials.

How many ways can you doll up a piece of cotton you shove up your snatch that you have to show the ad's for tampons non stop.
 
2010-05-29 05:38:19 PM
I Won't Get Fooled Again
 
2010-05-29 05:41:09 PM
Can't organizations like this grasp that protecting a single group is discrimination against the rest of us?
 
2010-05-29 05:44:04 PM
Ha ha. Subby was trying to be sarcastic but instead made a statement of truth.
 
2010-05-29 05:45:58 PM
What if we just target the woman's face?

yafh.com
 
2010-05-29 05:47:18 PM
Okay, tobacco is a legal product. Corporations that choose to sell it should be allowed to advertise said product to any demographic that is legally allowed to buy or use said product.

This does remind me a bit of a conversation I had with a friend of mine last weekend over dinner. I don't remember what started the conversation, but it got to the point where I said "Smoking is a legal practice. If I bought the land and building and opened up a restaurant then it should be my right to determine if smoking is allowed in the building and anyone who walks in and complains about smoking should be escorted from the building at once. It should not be within the rights of the government to determine that I can or can not allow smoking. And not just smoking. If I want to open up a restaurant with a sign saying 'No Blacks Allowed', that, as the owner of the land, building, and business, should be my right and not within the power of the government to tell me that I have to allow a demographic that I might not want in my building and won't make feel welcomed if they walked in."

/No, I'm not a racist
//Just hate government pushing in on what should be owner's rights.
 
2010-05-29 05:53:17 PM
sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net
 
2010-05-29 05:55:46 PM
Special Protection like they already get in the courts, on the job, in school, etc?

Subby must not get out much . . .
 
2010-05-29 05:57:34 PM
No "concerned about jackhammers" pic yet?
 
2010-05-29 06:01:45 PM
Oh_Enough_Already: Special Protection like they already get in the courts, on the job, in school, etc?

Subby must not get out much . . .


No, I think subby knows what he's talking about. Even the government and corporations have this "protect the weaker sex" attitude.
 
2010-05-29 06:02:10 PM
Fano: Girls who smoke, poke

They wear strap-ons? Really?
 
2010-05-29 06:05:36 PM
Oh_Enough_Already: Special Protection like they already get in the courts, on the job, in school, etc?

Subby must not get out much . . .


In what way are women specially protected in the courts?
 
2010-05-29 06:08:45 PM
Do what you want but any women that smokes, INSTANT deal-breaker.
 
2010-05-29 06:12:39 PM
Third base!
 
2010-05-29 06:18:04 PM
DslainteC: target the woman's face?

*Gis "target the woman's face"*

google, I am dissappoint.
 
2010-05-29 06:33:43 PM
Obvious tag on break?
 
2010-05-29 06:35:14 PM
Great Janitor: /No, I'm not a racist


... you just sound like one?
 
2010-05-29 06:43:12 PM
frizzantik: Great Janitor: /No, I'm not a racist


... you just sound like one?


because I believe that a bar owner should be allowed to choose his customers for ANY reason and that the government should not have the authority to tell him otherwise.
 
2010-05-29 06:43:56 PM

Well maybe the WHO is just saying....

m0vie.files.wordpress.com

They're smoking the wrong kind of pole.

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!

 
2010-05-29 06:46:17 PM
fark women, they are all evil and untrustworthy. Let them smoke.

/misogynistic rant
 
2010-05-29 06:46:54 PM
Great Janitor: Okay, tobacco is a legal product. Corporations that choose to sell it should be allowed to advertise said product to any demographic that is legally allowed to buy or use said product.

This does remind me a bit of a conversation I had with a friend of mine last weekend over dinner. I don't remember what started the conversation, but it got to the point where I said "Smoking is a legal practice. If I bought the land and building and opened up a restaurant then it should be my right to determine if smoking is allowed in the building and anyone who walks in and complains about smoking should be escorted from the building at once. It should not be within the rights of the government to determine that I can or can not allow smoking. And not just smoking. If I want to open up a restaurant with a sign saying 'No Blacks Allowed', that, as the owner of the land, building, and business, should be my right and not within the power of the government to tell me that I have to allow a demographic that I might not want in my building and won't make feel welcomed if they walked in."

/No, I'm not a racist
//Just hate government pushing in on what should be owner's rights.


Yes, actually, you are racist. The very fact that you can't see why you're racist is one of the reasons you are, in fact, racist.

/but if you really need the help, I'll tell you why
//just wondering if you can figure it out for yourself first
 
2010-05-29 06:49:34 PM
There's like this guy who's really important and stuff, and like he thinks he's like doing all good stuff for all us people. And like he should be an example like to little kids and stuff. But it's like OMG he smokes like cigarettes while he tells other people how they should act and junk. And like it really pisses me off so I won't vote for him next time either and like you should too.

i10.photobucket.com
 
2010-05-29 06:50:03 PM
I've never seem a commercial where a white male looks stupid.

/farkasm
 
2010-05-29 06:50:24 PM
Why do you hate women subby?
 
2010-05-29 06:56:23 PM
Some 5 million people die every year from tobacco-related heart attacks, strokes and cancers, including 1.5 million women, according to WHO. Another 430,000 adults die annually from exposure to second-hand smoke, two in three of them women.

Well, to be fair, those are some pretty High Numbers.
 
2010-05-29 06:56:55 PM
karmachameleon: Great Janitor: Okay, tobacco is a legal product. Corporations that choose to sell it should be allowed to advertise said product to any demographic that is legally allowed to buy or use said product.

This does remind me a bit of a conversation I had with a friend of mine last weekend over dinner. I don't remember what started the conversation, but it got to the point where I said "Smoking is a legal practice. If I bought the land and building and opened up a restaurant then it should be my right to determine if smoking is allowed in the building and anyone who walks in and complains about smoking should be escorted from the building at once. It should not be within the rights of the government to determine that I can or can not allow smoking. And not just smoking. If I want to open up a restaurant with a sign saying 'No Blacks Allowed', that, as the owner of the land, building, and business, should be my right and not within the power of the government to tell me that I have to allow a demographic that I might not want in my building and won't make feel welcomed if they walked in."

/No, I'm not a racist
//Just hate government pushing in on what should be owner's rights.

Yes, actually, you are racist. The very fact that you can't see why you're racist is one of the reasons you are, in fact, racist.

/but if you really need the help, I'll tell you why
//just wondering if you can figure it out for yourself first


Actually, you read one thing I wrote and said "He's a racist." Never actually met me in person. Just read that I should have a right to open up a business and decline serving someone based on skin color and said "racist." Never read where I said I wanted to do that or would do that, just that I think that all business owners should have that right and that the government should not have the authority to dictate who a business owner must serve or if that business owner can decide if they want to allow smoking or not.
 
2010-05-29 06:57:28 PM
I get a huge kick out of the fact that everyone's assuming subby's a male.

/not subby
 
Displayed 50 of 95 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report