If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Online.ie)   Pilot announces "Welcome to Palestine" over the PA system when flying into Tel Aviv. Hilarity ensues   (online.ie) divider line 381
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

20918 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 May 2003 at 11:28 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



381 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2003-05-08 10:19:18 AM
"...killed in Israel's wars since 1860? What war were they fighting then?
 
2003-05-08 11:04:03 AM
Awesome!
 
2003-05-08 11:27:24 AM
OMG!!! He said the word "Palestine" to a bunch of Israelites!! He shall be stoned to death for uttering such a word!!!

Seriously, they all need to STFU and learn how to calm down.
 
2003-05-08 11:31:33 AM
this happened last weekend...
 
2003-05-08 11:32:02 AM
This pilot has an interesting sense of humor. I bet he likes Jackass videos.
 
2003-05-08 11:32:53 AM
Freudian slip?
 
2003-05-08 11:34:17 AM
That is hilarious.
 
2003-05-08 11:34:26 AM
they've only lost 21K people?

well shiat, that's nothing!
 
2003-05-08 11:34:39 AM
WHEEEE!
 
2003-05-08 11:35:54 AM
 
2003-05-08 11:35:54 AM
Hah! I love people who do that. I know this one kid who asks people to guess where he's from and when they say "Israel" he goes "Nah, Palestine"
 
2003-05-08 11:36:38 AM
I think it is funny.

/sarcasm starts

Palestenians don't count though, so its ok to get mad when someone references what used to be their homeland.
 
2003-05-08 11:36:40 AM
Don't be hatin'. Can't we all just get along? Probably not. So, sit down, shut up, hang on, enjoy the show.
 
2003-05-08 11:36:58 AM
Excuse me? I'm surprised that this person didn't get his ass whipped.

This seems to come up from time to time. Maps that label isreal "Palistine".

One problem. There has never been a nation named Palistine.
 
2003-05-08 11:37:55 AM
At least he didn't say 'Welcome to Detroit.'
 
2003-05-08 11:38:07 AM
Touche.
 
2003-05-08 11:38:42 AM
Actually, that's pretty farking offensive. This article failed to mention that he also said "Happy Independence Day to Palestine", when it happened to be Israel's Independence Day, which is much like our Memorial Day...where they honor all the people killed over the years in all the wars. The pilot did it to inflame the passengers on a really sensitive day, and should be canned.
 
2003-05-08 11:39:18 AM
They should have run over the pilot with a bulldozer. That'll learn 'em.
 
2003-05-08 11:41:06 AM
Must be flame day here in farkistan. First muslims angry over X-Men part deux, now tarded pilots babbling about landing in the wrong country. Nice one!
What's next.

French really think Americans are chicken

or

China says the worlds to blame for SARS. Not them
 
2003-05-08 11:41:29 AM
Pakistan is about as much a nation as Kurdistan. If every ethnic group in the world had its own nation, America would be split into several hundred territories.
 
2003-05-08 11:41:31 AM
I wonder if "X-2" was the in-flight movie?
 
2003-05-08 11:44:07 AM
OY VEY!
 
2003-05-08 11:44:07 AM
That pilot is a with a twisted humour.
 
2003-05-08 11:44:36 AM
This story was sure interesting when I read about it days ago.
 
2003-05-08 11:44:38 AM
Dr.Jones -

where did you get "Pakistan"?
 
2003-05-08 11:45:35 AM
He won't be flying into Palestine anymore that's for sure!

Whoops! I just did it too...
 
2003-05-08 11:46:08 AM
The pilot was accurate. There was no misunderstanding.

All others who disagree with me are wrong.
 
2003-05-08 11:48:26 AM
Dr. Jones trolling attempt thereby thwarted by him accidentally typing Pakistan instead of Palistine. Who knew trolling was so tough?
 
2003-05-08 11:49:49 AM
Well he may have meant palestine Texas.

I guess its better than him running the length of the plane wearing a parachute and shouting "were all gonna die women and pilots first".
 
2003-05-08 11:49:56 AM
Nice to know that Italy has become so tolerant of the Jewish culture. Too bad they didn't feel that way during WWII, eh?

And since when has Israel been a country since 1860? Are the Israelis pissed off at the neo-Nazi revisionists, so now they're rewriting their own history? As far as my limited knowledge goes, Israel has been a recognized country since the late 1940s (48 or 49, right?). Can anyone educate me?
 
2003-05-08 11:51:14 AM
Am I the only one who thinks that fvcking with anybody, regardless of ethnicity, race, sex, etc. is really funny? This is funny!
 
2003-05-08 11:51:41 AM
1948
 
2003-05-08 11:52:52 AM
Fark.

Palestine is a name of a region, much like Sahara is used to describe a region.

The Jews who lived inside or outside of Eretz Yisrael (Israel) have called it such for 3,000 years.
The first people in fact to start referring to themselves as "Palestinians" were in fact Zionist Jews who like to anchor themselves psychologically to land rather than the bible. There were newspapers, hotels, restaraunts, businesses with the name "Palestine" in them, and they all belonged to Jewish proprietors.

The pilot is an insensitive prick though.
 
2003-05-08 11:54:29 AM
Pointing out the futility of putting people into artificial groups that they subsequently get upset and fight wars over is always funny.
 
2003-05-08 11:54:45 AM
Normally, I'd say people need to STFU and calm down, but I can understand where Israelis would get offended. Seeing as very few of it's neighbors refuse to recognize the country has the right to exist, I can see where they'd be defensive when a farking airline pilot from neo-fascist Italy decides not to recognize the country's proper name either. I mean, anyone here would be a little jumpy they were part of a population of 6 million surrounded by 100 million people who not only want your country erased from the face of the earth, but you too.
 
2003-05-08 11:56:01 AM
neo-fascist Italy

If there's one thing the Italians aren't it's fascist. Izzard got it right when he said that they were too busy riding on mopeds going Ciao.

This is a country where income tax is more or less optional.
 
2003-05-08 11:56:10 AM
In other news, pilots of Air Iraq have been heard saying, "Welcome to the newly-created territory, Texas Jr."
 
2003-05-08 11:56:23 AM
05-08-03 11:36:58 AM Draksig
Excuse me? I'm surprised that this person didn't get his ass whipped.
This seems to come up from time to time. Maps that label isreal "Palistine".
One problem. There has never been a nation named Palistine.


Yes....,keep denying them their home.

/Sarcasm
//Flame-war inciting post
 
2003-05-08 11:56:35 AM
The only problem with this is that the Israelis will probably use this as a reason to slaughter a bunch a Palestinian children. fark zionism.
 
2003-05-08 11:56:51 AM
Let the Israelis have Israel.

Just let the Palestinians have Judah.
 
2003-05-08 11:59:05 AM
Give the guy a break, at least he didn't say "Occupied Palestine".
 
2003-05-08 12:01:46 PM
Wow, it doesn't take much to bring the Jew-haters out.

Seething with hate, aren't you LawyersRock, Macabre and Casaguapo?
 
2003-05-08 12:01:52 PM
Welcome to Palistine ? Oy vey !
 
2003-05-08 12:02:05 PM
Fry1138
I guess its better than him running the length of the plane wearing a parachute and shouting "were all gonna die women and pilots first".


I tried that once on a flight to Vegas! Everybody just ignored me. :D
 
2003-05-08 12:02:57 PM
DeanMoriarty: By Pakistan I of course meant Palestine.
/head*
/hit*
/keyboard*
 
2003-05-08 12:03:30 PM
They should fill up his plane with jet fuel and force him to crash it into the UN terrorist... er "refugee" camps. Then the towel-heads that are left can scurry off to Jordan where they belong.
 
2003-05-08 12:04:28 PM
Pakistan is about as much a nation as Kurdistan.

Come again? Pakistan is a nation with recognized boundaries. Kurdistan is not, although it should be.

The Kurds are an awesome bunch. They've always been pretty pro-American.
 
2003-05-08 12:05:06 PM
Yes, LawyersRock...you nailed it on the head there, boy!

Zionism is all about slaughtering Palestinian children! It's the main tenet of the movement! Kill as many Palestinian children as possible. You, sir, are so well-informed!
 
2003-05-08 12:06:27 PM
Hey Ariel Sharon
What is the significance of the FarkerLewisCantLose handle that you use on Fark. Were you a big fan of the early Fox sitcoms while you were encouraging the massacres at Shabra and Shatilla?
 
2003-05-08 12:07:27 PM
05-08-03 10:19:18 AM Kevinatilusa
"...killed in Israel's wars since 1860? What war were they fighting then?

Good question.
 
2003-05-08 12:08:05 PM
They should fill up his plane with jet fuel and force him to crash it into the UN terrorist... er "refugee" camps. Then the towel-heads that are left can scurry off to Jordan where they belong.

Nor, apparently, does it take much to bring out the arab haters.
 
2003-05-08 12:08:50 PM
My $.02

Take all US forces out of Isreal and Palestine. Take all US made weapons out of them as well. Let them fight it out in hand to hand combat or with whatever meager weapons they might have made themselves. To the victor go the spoils.

I really don't see why the US or any other country gives a shiat which group "owns" the land. I bet Isreal would be much more willing to find a peaceful solution if they did not have the US backing them up.

Isolationism is the key to our future!
 
2003-05-08 12:09:36 PM
These flame wars remind me of Walken singing "Potato/Potato" on SNL.

"Let's call the whole thing off."
 
2003-05-08 12:09:50 PM
Joshg: It was a mistake. I meant Palestine, not Pakistan. My typin' fingers betrayed me.



11 AM and already I've had a long day...
 
2003-05-08 12:11:25 PM
Palestine is a Farce
 
2003-05-08 12:13:21 PM
LexiLuthor: strangely enough, I think the Jewish lobby in this country is too powerful to allow for that... as far as I can tell, there really isn't much of a Jewish lobby on almost any issue, except Israel/foreign policy issues. But in those realms, they wield quite a lot of power.

Interestingly, a lot of Christians seem to have jumped on the pro-Israel bandwagon as well lately.
 
2003-05-08 12:13:43 PM
Tigger: I loved Dressed to Kill, too, but he did that entire comedy routine before the current PM of Italy came into power. with all his protectionist policies and xenophobia, I'd say the moniker "neo-fascist" is increasingly ringing true . . .
 
2003-05-08 12:13:49 PM
I got it! Let's create a "Freedom Car" that doesn't rely on Middle Eastern Oil! That way, Haliburton and Exxon can now dedicate their business to creating playgrounds and zoo's in the Middle East!
 
2003-05-08 12:14:47 PM
LexiLuthor: although I hope your last sentence was sarcastic...
 
2003-05-08 12:14:56 PM
Critisize Israel in any way shape or form and you're a jew hater. Maybe I should try that. It's so much easier to level "hater" charges at someone than have to debate a valid point of view, isn't it?
 
2003-05-08 12:15:50 PM
Interestingly, a lot of Christians seem to have jumped on the pro-Israel bandwagon as well lately.

I don't know if I'd agree with that. I think many Americans are tired of seeing the results of the I/P conflict on the nightly news and would prefer to see Israel stand down a bit. Seeing rocks vs. tanks and the blood that results tends to make you root for the underdog.

/bait
 
2003-05-08 12:16:22 PM
The next American Airlines pilot landing in Rome should tell the passengers, "Welcome to Guido-land, the home of cowardly spaghetti twirlers."

And the so-called "palestinians" are mostly Jordanians. why doesn't Jordan take them back, instead of making them live in refugee camps for 50 years? I thought charity was one of those 5 Muslim virtues?
 
2003-05-08 12:17:09 PM
I suppose this would be like a pilot saying "Welcome to America Jr." when they land in Canada.

/nuttin
 
2003-05-08 12:18:16 PM
Nelson: Here comes a greaseball!

Luigi: [walking in] Hey! Luigi bring-a you kids-a free pizza! ...
 
2003-05-08 12:18:39 PM
LexiLuthor

..... I bet Isreal would be much more willing to find a peaceful solution if they did not have the US backing them up.

If the US wasn't backing them up the "peaceful solution" would be dead Jews everywhere and an end to Israel. You'd be a militant reactionary jerk if all of your neighbors wanted you dead too.
 
2003-05-08 12:19:53 PM
Yeah, and "Jihad" means 'Witness', but it has apparently been taken to mean "Witness this, sucker!"


Good ideas are usually perverted by bad people.
 
2003-05-08 12:20:01 PM
This guy might just have a twisted sense of humour. We don't know if he made a political statement or not. It might have been a joke. One of those, that although it is funny, you regret saying it about a second it comes out of your mouth. I will admit it was inappropriate. But have we become such tight asses that if some makes a joke about Isreal that they are anti-semetic?

I thought it was funny and I could care less if they call it Isreal, Palestine of Frakisatn. Who cares??? These guys have been blowing theselves up and running over each other bulldozers for so long that whatever either side thinks is nonsense. I think they should kick out the Isrealis and the Palestinians (who are geneticly identical) and give it to the Tibetans or something. Both sides have adequately proved a thousand times over that they don't deserve a country.
 
2003-05-08 12:20:03 PM
why do italians bring a bucket of shiat to a wedding?

to keep the flies off the bride.
 
2003-05-08 12:20:45 PM
Damn_Conservative_Media: And that is exactly the problem. I don't think we should be supporting either side, simply because they are both be beligerant and, heck, it ain't none of our business no-how.

I am aware of the strong Jewish lobby on this point though. I think they should be silenced as much as those stupid Christian lobbyists who are anti-choice, anti-gay and pro-school prayer. Why? Simply put, religious views have no place in our political system. The government is not supposed to uphold one religion over another, yet it does any time it gives money to Israel for weapons, because their beef with the Palestinians is essentially a religious one.

Too much stupidity in the world to handle...will sponteneously combust....
 
2003-05-08 12:21:22 PM
GEAH
Wow, it doesn't take much to bring the Jew-haters out.

Seething with hate, aren't you LawyersRock, Macabre and Casaguapo?

Uh, speaking for myself, no. You need to relax, pal.
 
2003-05-08 12:23:01 PM
Albo
"And the so-called "palestinians" are mostly Jordanians. why doesn't Jordan take them back, instead of making them live in refugee camps for 50 years? I thought charity was one of those 5 Muslim virtues?"

An I thought that "thou shall not steal" was one of those 10 Jewish commandments. The Zionists came in after WWII and stole the land of the alleged Jordanians whose heirs now live in the refugee camps.
why can't the Israelis just give up the West Bank in exchange for peace?
 
2003-05-08 12:23:47 PM
LexiLuthor: and I bet the Palestinians will clamor for a peaceful solution now that they're not getting any money from Saddam and world scrutiny is fixed much more intently on Saudi money going to the Palestinians. America just balances the odds in that fight. The difference is, no Israeli politician has been in control of the his people for 30 years, and has had the opportinity to embezzle ~1 billion from them (sorry for the PDF)
 
2003-05-08 12:23:50 PM
Wonder who's stronger, the Jewish Lobby or the Arab Lobby?

Oh wait. Isn't Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia a good friend of Dubya, the single most powerful man in the world?

+1 to Arab Lobby
 
2003-05-08 12:24:01 PM
Bass555

why you gotta make-a da fun?
 
2003-05-08 12:24:19 PM
I should have said WWI. Can someone get spell check on this thing?

/walks away sheepishly
 
2003-05-08 12:25:35 PM
Damn_Conservative:

"I hope your last sentence was sarcastic"

No, it wasn't. OUr founding fathers had very strong views on this. They did not want the United States involved with the politics of the world, because it would ultimately draw enemies, which it did. 9/11 would not have happened if we would have kept our noses out of what was going on in the Middle East. Vietnam would have never happened if we were not so worried about what other countries were up to. It sounds shiatty, but the US has plenty of it's own problems without having to deal with other country's issues as well. And we can definately deal without the enmity of everyone who doesn't like our stance on issues that have no relevance to our own country.
 
2003-05-08 12:25:55 PM
why can't the Israelis just give up the West Bank in exchange for peace?

Why can't the "palestinians" just give up the suicide bombings for peace? Why can't the arabs give homes to the "palestinians" for peace?

Maybe the Jews should just turn left and march themselves into the Mediterrean Sea for peace, huh?
 
2003-05-08 12:26:33 PM
Seeing rocks vs. tanks and the blood that results tends to make you root for the underdog.

Unless the underdog is prone to killing innocent civilians through terrorist acts. I be we would be pretty pissed if terrorists attacked our country. Wait...they did and we are. Hmm...why not let the Israeli's defend themselves as we would?
 
2003-05-08 12:27:14 PM
BritneysSpeculum: except there's a long history of Jews in that region buying land from the Arabs - prior to 1948 Jews and Arabs lived in relative peace in that region, until the Arab states decided the Jews shouldn't have that land anymore. That the palestinian Jordanians rose up against the Israelis on ther land was a good enoug hreason to remove them. In America, we'd put them in prison, but not every country likes to have the kind of prison population America does.
 
2003-05-08 12:27:48 PM
Suicide bombings are wrong, but since the latest Intafada started the body count is about 6 Palestinian to 1 Israeli. For every terrorist that the Israeli missle attack kills, about 10 innocent person dies.
 
2003-05-08 12:29:58 PM
err...bet we would be

that shoulda been bet...d'oh
 
2003-05-08 12:30:28 PM
BritneysSpeculum: you body count proves only one thing: the Israelis are better shots than the palestinians.

(and i like your handle!)
 
2003-05-08 12:30:53 PM
BritneysSpeculum: only the Israelis at least try to make their actions justifiable. Palestinian suicide bombers don't even try to restrict their actions to military targets - Hamas is very clear that _ALL_ Israeli citizens are considered fair game. Israel at least tries to do less damage - and with the kind of weapons they have, that the ratio of casualities is only 6 to 1, that shows some pretty impressive restraint.
 
2003-05-08 12:31:56 PM
Criticism of Israel is fine, Dave_te85.

Calling Israelis "baby killers" is hatred.
 
2003-05-08 12:31:56 PM
Albo, we have your IP address. Please report to Human Resources for sensitivity training.
 
2003-05-08 12:32:16 PM
So, if they TRY not to kill children, it's OKAY if they kill children?
 
2003-05-08 12:32:21 PM
Bass555: Well, I've definitely seen a lot of conservative Christians come out in support of Israel. I offer two documents:

1
2

But, a lot of Christian websites voice support for Israel and solidarity with Israel in general now.

http://www.pastornet.net.au/jmm/pray/pray0115.htm
http://www.cc.org/
 
2003-05-08 12:32:26 PM
Kill'em all. Let Allah and Yaweh sort'em out.

Or

Give the land to the Catholics in Northern Ireland!or the Tibetans. Or Farkers so we can really have a Farkistan!

Or

Let's move on. These people will NEVER sort this issue out. Why do we still try?


All three work for me.
 
2003-05-08 12:33:16 PM
Bass555: I think many Americans are tired of seeing the results of the I/P conflict on the nightly news and would prefer to see Israel stand down a bit. Seeing rocks vs. tanks and the blood that results tends to make you root for the underdog.

No sensible person roots for suicide bombers who target civilians.
 
Ant
2003-05-08 12:34:46 PM
9/11 would not have happened if we would have kept our noses out of what was going on in the Middle East.

That is complete and utter bullshiat! The Islamo-fascists are just as pissed off about our music, movies, books, magazines, etc. getting over there and corrupting the minds of their followers as they are about us being in Saudi Arabia. What should we do, stop exporting cultural items and ideas?
 
2003-05-08 12:35:03 PM
Cosimo: just some old jokes. i already had my mandatory sensitivity seminar. i now know I am complicit in the structures of hegemony imposed by the eurocentric patriarchy and its strategies of domination.
 
2003-05-08 12:35:26 PM
All right, I am going to confess here that I am and have always been largely ignorant of the story behind all the tensoin and bloodshed. Can anybody point me to somewhere I can do a little reading and educate myself? I mostly just want to be able to jump in on these flame wars from time to time. Is there anything online you Farkers would recommend for me to read to get some sort of handle on the situation?
 
2003-05-08 12:35:37 PM
Alexw
Those who don't study history are doomed to look stupid

After the Diaspora, most of the Jews in the area were gone. The local non-Jews who were converted to Islam were under a variety of rulers including most recently the Ottomans and the British who received a mandate from the League of Nations. It was the British who determined that the land they renamed Transjordan would become the home of the state of Israel. This was announced in the Balfour Declaration, which was written in 1922. Then the influx of Jews to the area started in any meaningful matter, but it was still a trickle. It wasn't until after WW2 that the area really saw a meaningful growth.

Beginning in 1946, the Jews decided that they wanted the British out so they began a concerted campaign of terror to chase them out. This included blowing up the King David Hotel, killing British soldiers and other innocents. When the British pulled out, Israel declared itself a state.
 
2003-05-08 12:35:48 PM
Tigger -

Italy invented fascicm
Not that I'm suggesting that they're some sort of totalitarian autocracy today, but strictly speaking, Fascism came out of Italy - so clearly they're capable.
 
2003-05-08 12:35:50 PM
I tried to care, but these darned homeless people in my city kept distracting me from reading the opinions of people who like to tell me what to think...

"Will work for food." Please! Can't you see that people I'll never meet are mad at each other half a world away over fundamental differences in lifestyles and religions? Don't you care that neither will ever attempt to change in order to pursue an end to wanton death and violence???

Stupid hungry neighbor!
 
2003-05-08 12:36:09 PM
BritneysSpeculum: why can't the Israelis just give up the West Bank in exchange for peace?

That's a good question...for the Palestinians.

Their answer: "We don't just want the West Bank. We want to see Israel destroyed. Look, it's not even on our maps!"
 
2003-05-08 12:36:45 PM
LexiLuthor
Actually, the Israelis manufacture most of their own equipment. They are a heavily industrialized nation, and I'm pretty certain they only thing they really buy from us are missile guidance systems which we sell to almost anybody that asks.

As a general aside, the Palestinians are a group of savages that can't handle self rule. We already tried to give them a state, some 40 years ago. As soon as they saw themselves as a recognized power, they tried to take on Jordan, except that King Hussein would have none of that and kicked their asses. Then they tried to take on Israel, who also would have none of that, and kicked their asses and took their land. To the victor go the spoils. It's the rule of life.

The Israelis are THE military power native to the middle east. They have successfully defended themselves against decades of attack from their surrounding neighbors, and have only gotten stronger. I don't think you people realize just how restrained the Israelis are. If they really, really wanted to, they could bulldoze all of the territory the Palestinians currently occupy, but they've held back. They see themselves as teh America of the middle east, they have enough power that they can't use it without being seen as imperialistic.

Some of you keep biatching about the slaughter of Palestinian children without recognizing that Israeli incursions into Palestinian land have always been in response to new or recurring attacks from Palestinian forces, be they PLO or suicide bomber. Imagine your home under constant threat of having some asshat blow up a school bus because you don't follow the same bible. You'd be pretty trigger-happy too.
 
2003-05-08 12:38:07 PM
BritneysSpeculum: Suicide bombings are wrong, but since the latest Intafada started the body count is about 6 Palestinian to 1 Israeli. For every terrorist that the Israeli missle attack kills, about 10 innocent person dies.

You'd think that might encourage the Palestinians to do something about their terrorism problem...other than encourage it, that is.
 
2003-05-08 12:38:12 PM
LexiLuthor

I think Israel doesn't need US aid now as much as they did in the 60's-70's. They have a pretty good economy selling hightech and weapons.

Also, from Israel's POV, it's not a religious conflict. It's about security for their country. They were attacked. They didn't attack Palestine. True, they are milking that for all it's worth and it's about time they be force to comply with the UN resolutions telling them to get out of the west bank and Gaza.
 
2003-05-08 12:38:27 PM
Ant:

If they don't want them (which they obviously don't), we can stop selling it to them. No biggie, really. Most products that they object to are illegal in those countries (or at least censored), so we really shouldn't be trying to export those products to those countries anyhow. We just prove to them that we have no respect for their laws when we do export the forbidden items to their country, which gives them yet another reason to hate us. If they don't want it, we won't give it to them, it's very simple really.
 
2003-05-08 12:39:01 PM
05-08-03 12:25:35 PM LexiLuthor

9/11 would not have happened if we would have kept our noses out of what was going on in the Middle East.

Another nave apologist for murdering fanatics rears their head. Anyone who professes that we (USA) are responsible for the terror attacks of September 11th has an infantile understanding of the ideology and underlying reasons for the Arab/Muslim hatred of our way of life.
 
2003-05-08 12:39:19 PM
05-08-03 12:25:35 PM LexiLuthor
Damn_Conservative:

"I hope your last sentence was sarcastic"

No, it wasn't. OUr founding fathers had very strong views on this. They did not want the United States involved with the politics of the world, because it would ultimately draw enemies...


Uh, you did learn about WWI and WWII right? I think the notion that the US could simply retreat into it's own little world and worry about it's own problems only was stomped on a bit in the early 20th century. Isolationism was very popular at the time, but the world would be a very different place if we had not entered either of those wars. And very different in a bad way. In fact, without dialogue with countries during the Cold War... and treaties like SALT...

I think technology is the final nail in the coffin of isolationism. There is simply no way to remain isolationist, unless you are referring to isolating ourselves from some as yet undiscovered aliens... events thousands of miles away simply have too great an effect now. Combined with the obvious advantages of economic treaties, international trade, arms reduction treaties... etc.
 
2003-05-08 12:40:16 PM
NutznGum: But have we become such tight asses that if some makes a joke about Isreal that they are anti-semetic?

I'm sure that if he had said, "Welcome to Auschwitz," you would have busted a nut laughing.
 
2003-05-08 12:41:04 PM
 
2003-05-08 12:41:27 PM
05-08-03 12:08:50 PM LexiLuthor
Take all US forces out of Isreal and Palestine. Take all US made weapons out of them as well. Let them fight it out in hand to hand combat or with whatever meager weapons they might have made themselves.

Yeah, because no other country sells weapons in that region
*rolls eyes*
Where was that $50 million illegal Palestinian arms shipment from, anyway? (Pssst, I think it was Iran. And you can bet your boots they weren't U.S. made)
 
2003-05-08 12:41:33 PM
Oh goody! Lets try the cold light of rational thought and figure out whos to blame for the Arab-Israeli conflict. that should work.

I mean its only been going on for just over 2 millenia, should be easy to sort out.
 
2003-05-08 12:41:46 PM
05-08-03 12:36:45 PM TheReject
They (Israel) see themselves as teh America of the middle east, they have enough power that they can't use it without being seen as imperialistic.


America is worried about being seen as imperialistic? Coulda fooled me.

America is the America of the middle East.
 
2003-05-08 12:42:00 PM
Yay, so much for my html skills.

Bass555:

1
2
 
2003-05-08 12:42:49 PM
TheReject: All the more reason why we should just pull out and leave them to their own business. Let them prove that they can defend themselves. Make them fight for the country that they didn't actually win for themselves in the first place. Not saying they don't have a right to it, but simply stating they should defend it if it is truly theirs.

Maybe Israel will take over the Middle East, maybe the Palestinians will, I personally don't give a shiat. The US shouldn't be worrying about it all that much either. I've said it before and I'll say it again: IT'S NOT OUR PROBLEM!
 
2003-05-08 12:43:23 PM
 
2003-05-08 12:45:00 PM
Zionist: Abraham founded this place, and it belongs to us, his ancestors!

Muslim: Abraham founded this place, and it belongs to us, his ancestors!

..There's your rational explanation right there.
 
2003-05-08 12:45:47 PM
Hey, did anyone meantion yet, that this whole i/p conflict has been brought to the world by the great peacemakers of Great Britian? Of course after WWII they realized they couldn't fix the problems they caused so passed it on to the great United Nations, who have done a wonderful job at creating some peace these last 50 years.

If there are any English pro-palistine farkers out there, could you answer me a question? How can you disagree with Isreal's policy of building homes in disputed lands when they got the idea from the English and their occupation of Irish lands?
 
2003-05-08 12:45:48 PM
to Palisrael

to Israelistine.

Simopi
 
2003-05-08 12:45:56 PM
LexiLuthor -

Isolationism was never really that ingrained into most american founding fathers. Yes George Washington said "stay out of foreign wars" in his farewell adress, but most people didn't like that much. They saw themselves as the new kids on the block, and most people were anxious to wield some power and fix some of the perceived problems in the world because their own "government by the people and for teh people" was so good so they wanted to spread the idea around

After WWi Isolationism was huge again, but even way before then (Monroe doctrine - 1820s I think)) American policy makers were saying "we're here, we're important too, so get used to it Europe because our opinion is going to matter for quite a while"

Isolationism is tricky because very few countries are totally autonomous. When you have it really good, people will come crawling to you and try to take some of your advantages. And when you have it bad, you've isolated yourself from enemies. No country, even a small one, never mind teh USA, has ever prospered under self-imposed international isolation
 
Ant
2003-05-08 12:46:38 PM
If they don't want it, we won't give it to them, it's very simple really.

No. It's not that simple. They know that as long as their population wants American stuff, they're going to get it and be influenced by it. What they want is for us to stop making it altogether.

Haven't you ever noticed the bass-ackwards way the Islamists do away with moral temptation?

Ex: Can't stop getting horny over your neighbor's wife? It's not your fault for being an unfaithful, leering pig, it's that slut's fault for dressing like such a hussy! How dare she show her form?!
 
2003-05-08 12:47:13 PM
FARK THEM ALL!!!! Let them kill each other!! One group wears one kind of hat on their head, while the other group wears another kind of hat on their head. THEY MUST THEREFORE ALL KILL EACH OTHER!

I'm tired of people arguing about this. If they can't get along, FARK THEM. ALL OF THEM.
 
2003-05-08 12:47:19 PM
NutznGum -

Cut up Israel to create Karkistan? Oh right, because we farkers have demonstarted time and time again our tolerance and ability to discuss our disagreements peacefully

:)
 
2003-05-08 12:49:00 PM
US companies can do business with other countries as much as they want. I'm not saying that we should restrict trade with other countries, as long as the other countries want what we are selling.

BTW, I am NOT saying the US is entirely to blame for September 11, asshats who see violence as the only way to solve their made-up problems are to blame. The reason I am saying that it never would have happened if we had kept our nose out of other countries business is that people who commit these horrible acts tend to only do it if they percieve some injury from the people they are killing. In other words, they would have had no reason to kill us. They are psychotic, and impossible to negotiate with, therefore, why bother trying. Just let them do their thing (so long as it doesn't affect the US specifically), and they'll let us do ours. Simple solution.
 
2003-05-08 12:49:47 PM
Ant: very funny stuff. "My God! Her nose is naked!" *ejaculates*
 
Ant
2003-05-08 12:50:19 PM
By the way...In my last post, I used the word Islamist. Please note that Islamist != Muslim
 
2003-05-08 12:50:24 PM
05-08-03 12:39:01 PM GrymReeper
05-08-03 12:25:35 PM LexiLuthor

...
Another nave apologist for murdering fanatics rears their head. Anyone who professes that we (USA) are responsible for the terror attacks of September 11th has an infantile understanding of the ideology and underlying reasons for the Arab/Muslim hatred of our way of life.


Uh, I'm not so sure about that. It seems that the motivation for terrorism against the US vis-a-vis Al-Qaeda at least has more to do with our troops being in the middle east, particularly Saudi Arabia, than anything else. Our involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict also seems to be a factor.
 
2003-05-08 12:53:48 PM
Well, it's be a blast flaming with y'all, I'm off to lunch. Toodles.

Feel fre to bash me in my absense. My jewish friend (who is highly pro-Israel) and I debate over this stuff for hours. I think we need a Muslim in the mix too.....
 
2003-05-08 12:53:52 PM
Can't remember hwo made it but this was a good point. technology is teh last straw for isolationism. We really are in a global village now, and not only is any attempt to isolate yoruself impossible, but even if you could do it you'd shoot yourslef in teh foot due to interdependence

Also, this whole "fortress north america" thing that GW wants to put missiles in space is ridiculous as well. You can't build a shield anymore. Now you have to stop problems 10 years before they start. And I'm not saying "911 was America's own damn fault" because obviously it's a bunch of factors, but we really do have to fix problems down the line which arent' apparent yet.

Not saying it's easy - far from it - but this is the situation we find ourselvs in today I thiunk
 
2003-05-08 12:53:53 PM
I'm pretty sure the 1860 thing was a typo and they meant 1960 instead.

Also, Lexi, sure we can pull our troops out, and our weapons that we own out, but it will just be 1967 all over again. The Israeli army has been known as one of the better trained and equipped armed forces for years. They kicked multiple countries asses in a multi front war back in the 60's. I'm sure they would do it all over again, especially considering that the majority of their opponents in the area have old, outdated and plain obsolete weapons at their disposal. The Israeli armed forces have been cross training with US forces for a long long time now, and they understand and use our tactics.

One of the reasons we, the US, have been keeping such close ties with the Israeli gov't is the simple fact that Israel has nukes. They have had them since the fight for the Golan Hights, and perhaps even longer than that. We REALLY don't want a rouge nuclear nation in the middle of a boiling, seething, pot of hate that the middle east is becoming do we?
 
2003-05-08 12:54:04 PM
I think Ant has a really good point here:

The reactionary forces in their societies are worried that they might lose power... if we start influencing the region, be it militarily or economically.
 
2003-05-08 12:54:34 PM
Dr.Jones
Zionist: Abraham founded this place, and it belongs to us, his ancestors!
Muslim: Abraham founded this place, and it belongs to us, his ancestors!
..There's your rational explanation right there.

Doc, you have aptly summarized the issue. I bow before you.

/bowing
 
2003-05-08 12:56:45 PM
- Self-explanatory, don't ya think?
.


If for no other reason to to make these jittery asshats worry.
 
2003-05-08 12:57:07 PM
1948, not 1860 or 1960
 
2003-05-08 12:58:07 PM
GEAH:
NutznGum: But have we become such tight asses that if some makes a joke about Isreal that they are anti-semetic?

I'm sure that if he had said, "Welcome to Auschwitz," you would have busted a nut laughing

No I wouldn't. and that analogy isn't comparable. The isreal-palestine conflict has nothing to do with the holocaust. If he had said 'Welcome to Aushwitcz" i would have said he should be tarred and feathered and strung up from the highest tree in Tel-Aviv. But he didn't. He said 'welcome to palestine'. i hardly think that approaches the level of offensiveness as a holocasut remark. but i will concede it was an off-colour remark and it was DEFINTELY not appropriate for public consumption. My point was not so much about not being able to joke about isreal and being labeled anti-semetic, i meant that you really can't joke about anyhting these days. it was a comment on how this PC stuff is getting way out of hand. i just used this case as an example. i should have been clearer.
i sicncerely hope you don't lump me in with the rest of these KKK A**holes. I've got nothin' but love for my jewish brothas and sistas. and nothing against the arabs either. i just wish they could stop killing each other.
 
2003-05-08 12:59:34 PM
This whole Isreal-Palestine bullshiat could have been over years ago. Netanyahu offered to conced to all of Arafat's demand except for the complete destruction of the state of Isreal. Then the homicide bombers decided to start killing kids in pizza shops and discos because they say Isreal would not give the statehood....something to think about...
 
2003-05-08 01:05:25 PM
Peetah:
NutznGum -

Cut up Israel to create Karkistan? Oh right, because we farkers have demonstarted time and time again our tolerance and ability to discuss our disagreements peacefully


Could we do any worse?? : D
 
2003-05-08 01:06:32 PM
What happens between Israel and the region of Palestine should matter to everyone because nuclear fallout can travel along way. FYI Canada is not America Jr. The morons who run the country are stupid in their own right.
 
2003-05-08 01:06:57 PM
If a pilot told me my flight was about to land in a ficticious country, I'd be pretty pissed off, too.
 
2003-05-08 01:07:35 PM
The Super Jews from the US and Canada have to stop emigrating there and settling in areas that belong to the Palestinians. Israel is using the same policies that Hitler used on them. They have packed all the native palestinians into camps. They have taken away their business' and their jobs. I am sick of Israel's hypocracy. Right wing Israelis killed Peres in order to stop the peace process. Arafat is a goon don't get me wrong but Sharon is a bigger monster.
There will be no peace until the whole place is paved over.
Both sides are fundie asshats.
 
2003-05-08 01:11:10 PM
Read any historical account of the British Mandate and the creation of Israel--the Palestinians got fvcked, bigtime, by the Western powers.

I'm not saying Israel shouldn't exist, or that the Palestinians' demands are reasonable--we can't undo a century's worth of history with any action or policy. I'm just saying that there's a chain of events leading to all this, and you can't easily blame Israel or Palestine.
 
2003-05-08 01:12:30 PM
zionist (european jewish) settlement in palestine began around 1860. this wasn't a bloodless process, so surely the zionist settlers did suffer some losses. however to say that israel had soldiers in 1860 is fallacious... there was no israel in 1860. various zionist militias (stern gang, irgun, etc.) existed at the time, and these militias essentially became the israeli military (israeli "defense" forces as they are better known) when the israeli state was declared.
 
2003-05-08 01:13:56 PM
I think the asshat should be canned.
 
2003-05-08 01:14:05 PM
 
2003-05-08 01:14:54 PM

Point of fact a lot of nations don't recognize isreal as a country at all, the vatican city to name one.
 
2003-05-08 01:17:46 PM
The Super Jews from the US and Canada...

Are they the same as "Jews in Space?"

/spaceballs
 
2003-05-08 01:17:46 PM
LexiLuthor,
"Isolationism is the key to our future!"

Amen Sister!!!! Preach on, Preach on!!!!
 
2003-05-08 01:31:30 PM
As any religious-brainwashed foaming-mouthed Zionist-NAZI would proclaim:

"Palestine or Palestinians do not exist."



So what's the big deal?
 
2003-05-08 01:32:05 PM
Funny how so few people even know why we support Israel. Doesn't stop the uninformed from spewing ignorant comments, though.

on a lighter note --

"...Ancient hatreds and modern weapons...now that's entertainment" - George Carlin
 
2003-05-08 01:32:47 PM
"Interestingly, a lot of Christians seem to have jumped on the pro-Israel bandwagon as well lately."

That's true among the hard-core evangelicals. They believe that the 2nd temple has to be rebuilt before Christ can return with the Rapture, etc.


-Never seen a bunch of people so anxious for the end of the world...
 
2003-05-08 01:34:37 PM
Netanyahu offered to conced to all of Arafat's demand except for the complete destruction of the state of Isreal

Uh, no he didn't. In fact, Israel is still violatig UN resolutions by not getting the fark out of dodge and the US is the co-conspirator. I'm not saying that the asshat suicide bombers are justified but neither are the ever-victim-playing Jews.

The answer is pretty simple. These arseholes are never going to make peace with each other and their weapons are getting better and better. So we as the West can either get out of their business, meaning stop funding Israel and leave the Middle East and all this terrorism will go away or continue to be Israel's lap dog/pit bull and let them drag us down with them. Those are the only two scenarios.
 
2003-05-08 01:35:53 PM
Can anyone tell me why we provide 3 billion dollars annually to a country whose intelligence agency has enough revenue pouring in from training and arming opposite sides of a conflict in African/Asian/South American countries, as well as conducting a lucrative drug trade?
 
2003-05-08 01:37:12 PM
Mynamebackwards

Funny how so few people even know why we support Israel. Doesn't stop the uninformed from spewing ignorant comments, though.


Ok I am all ears lay some knowledge on me.


I am not being a arse I would really like to know.
 
2003-05-08 01:37:53 PM
Amigajoe: Those evangelical christians are sure a strange group of clowns. Jesus was executed for exposing/protesting the corruption of the First jewish temple. And now these "christians" want that same temple rebuilt? WTF!?!?!
 
2003-05-08 01:39:53 PM
As much as I hate to bring this back on-topic....

You're landing at LAX. Pilot comes on and announces that you're now landing in occupied Aztlan. You've lived in LA all your life. You pissed off?

You're landing in Montreal. Pilot comes on and announces that you're about to land in "Montreal, Quebec...occupied by Canada since 1867". You're born and raised a Montreal Anglo. You pissed off?

Point is...pilot's job is to fly the plane. If he wants to make political commentary he should join the AP and leave piloting to those who know how to or are willing to follow procedure. ESPECIALLY in a volitile area like the middle east and ESPECIALLY since 9/11, in the words of Vince Vega, "he shoulda farking shoulda known better".
 
2003-05-08 01:41:46 PM
Albo, Jews in Space is from History of the World Part II.
 
2003-05-08 01:42:32 PM
Point of fact to MrNeturon...Jesus was around in the days of the SECOND temple. First temple was destroyed by the Babylonians. Jews to exile. Jews return from exile. Build second temple. Jesus happens. Romans eventually destroy second temple.
 
2003-05-08 01:44:51 PM
I had a kid introduce himself as being from palestine so i says to him "don't u mean israel??" and then he strapped a bomb to his chest and blew up
 
2003-05-08 01:46:49 PM
Bill_Wick's_Friend: Were the TWO previous temples located on the same ground?

"Jesus Happens", sounds like a good idea for a bumber sticker in a Mel Brooks movie.
 
2003-05-08 01:48:48 PM
Hummm wonders what could be funnier?

1: Getting in a plane to Tel-Aviv and once the planes lands say: Wow! This is Palestine? to a shocked neighbor in plane.

2: While in the plane over Tel-Aviv, shout: I am NOT carrying a bomb, but damn this place has too many jews. Ohh wait, if there wasnt jews here, there would be palestinians.

I bet number 2 would get you arrested faster.

The real reason this is still going on is that the Israel neighbors dont want it to really stop.
 
2003-05-08 01:53:50 PM
Well, since they were arriving in Palestine, what's the problem?
 
2003-05-08 01:53:57 PM
You guys saying that evangelic Christians support Israel because they want the end of the world to come, are just spouting off complete bvllshiat made up by non-Christians. Evangelical Christians (me and most of my friends being some of them) tend to support Israel because evangelicals feel a close afinity with Jews. Jesus was a jew, many Christians believe Jews + chritians ( and not muslims ) worship the same God, and also the Bible says that 144,000 Jews will be saved and go to Heaven when the world ends. That being said, is why most evangelicals support the Jews, not because they really want the end of the world to come.

p.s. I am a Christian, and I dont support Israel's actions. They need to offer to withdraw to the 1967 borders in exchange for peace, which they have NEVER not ONCE done. If you think different, you do not know your history. I've studied the conflict in depth and ive come to the conclusion that about every 'fact' you can read, and every 'HISTORY' book is a biased POS written most of the time by Jews, and sometimes by extremely pro-Palestinian people. Its almost impossible to read extremely unbiased material on the conflict.
 
2003-05-08 01:55:43 PM
Does that pilot say "Welcome to Palestine" when he lands in Jordan, I wonder?

Mmmm, double standards.
 
2003-05-08 01:56:18 PM
05-08-03 01:46:49 PM MrNeutron

Bill_Wick's_Friend: Were the TWO previous temples located on the same ground?


If I suspend all rational thought....yes, they supposedly were both on the same spot near or right on where the dome of the rock is now.

Since I'm suspending rational thought, the slab that Jesus' body was lain upon after the crucifixion is right around the corner off Via Delorosa AND the spot from which Muhammed ascended to heaven is also right on the same spot.

1) they're all nutty believers in superstitious bull5hit, or
2) there's some cosmic gravity hole thingy right f8ucking THERE -- bigger than the one Arthur C Clarke lived in in Indonesia.

Discuss amoung yourselves. I actually do have some work to do today (ok...listening to a couple hundred CDs...but I gotta listen critically, eh?)
 
2003-05-08 01:59:10 PM
05-08-03 01:14:54 PM LordOfTheFlies
Point of fact a lot of nations don't recognize isreal as a country at all, the vatican city to name one.


Oh, like they're ones to talk ;-)
 
2003-05-08 01:59:22 PM
There is no reason to give $3 billion a year to Israel when it could go towards public education. Israel has lied to us over and over, they do not do what we ask them to do, they disrespect us and treat us like what we say doesnt matter. yet we continue to give them $3 billion a year, and the Muslim world hates us for it. Fark that. Cut them off. Zero bucks a year. Put the money somewhere else. let God protect them on his own.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 02:00:13 PM
LordOfTheFlies: Point of fact a lot of nations don't recognize isreal as a country at all, the vatican city to name one.

The countries who don't recognize Israel generally fall into one or more of four cateogories: Arab states. Terrorist states. Dictatorships. Theocracies.

Name me a democracy that doesn't recognize Israel.
 
2003-05-08 02:01:21 PM
GEAH:
I think I've discovered your problem. You can solve it by putting both hands under you, firmly grasping the stick, and pulling until it is completely free of your ass.

Repeat after me:
Criticizing the policies of a government does not make you anti-semitic.
Criticizing the murder of innocent civilians does not make you anti-semitic.
 
2003-05-08 02:01:41 PM
SuseJ: Its hard to take christians seriously.

Just trolling... disregaurd
 
2003-05-08 02:03:19 PM
LexiLuthor: They are psychotic, and impossible to negotiate with, therefore, why bother trying. Just let them do their thing (so long as it doesn't affect the US specifically), and they'll let us do ours.

Unfarkingbelievable!
 
2003-05-08 02:03:23 PM
Superoogie: Im absolutely sick of being called anti-sematic if you critisize Israeli's public policies or show the slightest sympathy for any of Israeli's enemies. It really shows what a lack of justification they have for what they do when their only response to critisism is 'shutup anti-semite!'
 
2003-05-08 02:04:58 PM
I do not believe that the Israelies should leave.. indeed, they have been there so long, they cannot simply be uprooted and shipped off.
I *do* believe that they need to get the f*ck off what is currently recognized as the palesinian land. If a neighbor built an extension of his house onto your property, it would piss you off, too. Not that this in *any* way condones the actions of the palestinians. The comment was simply meant to point out why they are angry.

Saying the israelies have an ancient 'right' to the land is like saying a Native American build a settlement on your land and demolish your house... the same argument could now apply to giving the land that is currently recognized as Isreal, though.

In other words: There have been plenty of screw ups on both sides, to the point where it is not solely the fault of any one nation. Also, not every palestinian goes "I'm gonna kill me some jews today!" Nor do all isralies think "Let's shoot some arabs!" It's a small portion of both groups...
 
2003-05-08 02:05:29 PM
NutznGum, thanks for the clarification.
 
2003-05-08 02:08:33 PM
Attention people of Israel: A pilot for an Italian airline announced the wrong destination. He said Palestine when he should have sead Israel. Get the hell over it. This I command.
 
2003-05-08 02:10:16 PM
Superoogie
Repeat after me:
Criticizing the policies of a government does not make you anti-semitic.
Criticizing the murder of innocent civilians does not make you anti-semitic.


Sorry, Superoogie, but it's not that simple. The words, tone and context matter.

There's a huge difference between, "I think Israel should be more careful around civilians" and "Israel is a country of baby killers."

It's no different than American lefties who say, "America is a racist, sexist, homophobic country full of hatred. George Bush is a war criminal who is worse than Hitler," and then claim they're some sort of pro-American patriots.

Bullfark.
 
2003-05-08 02:11:07 PM
Pending, the 'problem' is that he didn't announce the wrong destination, he called it by a different name.
 
2003-05-08 02:12:01 PM
SuseJ: the Bible says that 144,000 Jews will be saved and go to Heaven when the world ends.

Do you have any idea how kooky that sounds to rational people?
 
2003-05-08 02:12:27 PM
Zero bucks a year. Put the money somewhere else. let God protect them on his own.


I don't think you're anti semitic.

I just think you're ignorant of the very recent history of the area. You would abandon allies in favour of those who happilly allied themselves with nazis, communists, dictators, al qaeda, abu nidal, qaddaffi and a whole assortment of the worst bunch of thugs in the world. "Why have these government always taken the side of America's enemies?" is the question you should be asking yourself, and why are you happy to take their side against israel. I'll assume it's not knee-jerk Jew hatred....so what is it? It's not the foreign aid because your post doesnt complain about aid to Egypt, Colombia and Palestine (the three of which combine to more than double what Israel gets in aid...not even considering that half of Israel's "aid" must be spent on US arms), so what is it?
 
2003-05-08 02:14:08 PM
05-08-03 12:50:24 PM Damn_Conservative_Media

Uh, I'm not so sure about that. It seems that the motivation for terrorism against the US vis-a-vis Al-Qaeda at least has more to do with our troops being in the middle east, particularly Saudi Arabia, than anything else. Our involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict also seems to be a factor.

Our support for Israel and our stationing of troops in Saudi Arabia are convenient excuses. To Muslim fundies, there is no greater affront to Allah than a secular lifestyle. For us to be rich and powerful while living a secular existence (while their fundamentalist societies live in illiteracy and poverty) tells them that we must be in league with the devil. Furthermore, their brand of spirituality has little to no relevance in our society. This also infuriates them. Even if we stayed within our own borders and there was no Israel, they would hate us. The fundamentalist Islamic clerics would still call for our death and destruction.

/threadjack
 
2003-05-08 02:16:32 PM
Let's see, a disembodied voice anounces to a group of Jews that they are now arriving into the land of Palestine.

If that had been written in the bible, it would have been interpreted "and God spoke unto thee".
 
2003-05-08 02:17:38 PM
GEAH:

No, it is that simple.

Criticizing the policies of a government does not make you anti-semitic.
Criticizing the murder of innocent civilians does not make you anti-semitic.

Period.

Any assumption otherwise is just a dead end of mudslinging to stifle debate, and, more likely than not, try to cover something up. And the fact remains that the presumption otherwise is being used daily to quell actual debate on Isreal's severely questionable policies the same way the "War on Terror" is being used by Ashcroft to justify historic strictures on liberty.

And those "lefties," as misguided and innaccurate as they may be, are being pro-American whether they want to be or not. The country was founded on dissident opinion. By voicing theirs, they are proving themselves wrong.
 
2003-05-08 02:18:07 PM
SuseJ: Its almost impossible to read extremely unbiased material on the conflict.

I agree with you on this.

So, I look at what's going on and look at it from my points of view:

Suicide bombers blowing up civilians = wrong

Bulldozing the houses of the supporters of suicide bombers = justified

Teaching your children to hate Jews = wrong

Allowing non-Jews to vote = right

Shooting at sniper behind complicit crowds = justifiable

Having a democratically elected leader = right

Having a non-elected leader = wrong

Setting up settlements in occupied lands = not justfiable

Expecting to get back lands you lost in a war you started = not justifiable

I add that all up, and I support Israel. The Palestinians need to do some serious soul searching.
 
2003-05-08 02:19:14 PM
Dickenscyder:

There is a famous quote attributed to Mark Twain, among others: "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

You should really research a topic before forcing us all to wince at your ignorance. For a start, Peres is still alive; I can only assume you meant Rabin.

Secondly, the Israelis don't keep anyone in refugee camps. A little history...large amounts of the Jordanian Arabs who were living in Palestine left at the behest of the surrounding countries in 1948. At the time of Israel's formation, there was much talk of having a Jewish state and an Arab state, but the Arab countries refused, feeling the existence of any state not under Arab/Muslim rule in the area was anathema. Once the U.N. resolution declaring a state of Israel was passed, the surrounding countries all got together to drive out the infidels (who, btw, were not getting any military support from the U.S.). Before going in, they warned the Arab residents to leave in order to avoid the war, and they could return once the Jews were kicked out. That was the origin of the refugee camps, since none of the surrounding nations wanted the "Palestinian" Arabs living in their countries. Many others left to live in these camps after they were driven out in the wars of 1948 and 1967, and others left to live in different countries. However....Israel does nothing to administer these camps and does not force the ones in them to remain there.
The birth of Zionism, with Herzl and others in the latter 19th century, was part of a vision to have Jews live in a country where they weren't subject to persecution by other nations...mostly European pogroms. There was a large Jewish exodus from Russia in the 1880s, with many coming to the U.S., some to other European countries, and few to Palestine (then under Ottoman rule). The atrocities of the Nazis asserted the need for such a state, and allowed for many of the European nations to agree to its formation and charter, mainly due to their own guilt in their complicity with the Holocaust.

The businesses and jobs you mention as "taken away" are because of measures to stop or at least reduce the terrorism. Have a lot of innocents suffered? Yes, and unfortunately more of them will. However, what doesn't get discussed are all of the Israelis who have lost businesses and jobs secondary to terrorist attacks, both directly and due to the marked decrease in tourism to the area with the latest uprising.

Get your facts straight before diminishing your own point through your ignorance. Otherwise you risk being mistaken for a journalist ;)
 
2003-05-08 02:19:56 PM
05-08-03 12:54:34 PM BritneysSpeculum

Dr.Jones
Zionist: Abraham founded this place, and it belongs to us, his ancestors!
Muslim: Abraham founded this place, and it belongs to us, his ancestors!
..There's your rational explanation right there.

Doc, you have aptly summarized the issue. I bow before you.

/bowing


That is, all except for the incorrect use of the word "ancestors".

/grammar nazi
 
2003-05-08 02:20:53 PM
Superoogie: And those "lefties," as misguided and innaccurate as they may be, are being pro-American whether they want to be or not. The country was founded on dissident opinion. By voicing theirs, they are proving themselves wrong.

While they may demonstrate the greatness of America because we allow people who hate our country to be open and vocal about it, it does not make them any more pro-American than a Klansman who says, "America sucks because we let n!ggers vote."
 
2003-05-08 02:21:26 PM
BillWerksFriend: "Egypt, Colombia and Palestine (the three of which combine to more than double what Israel gets in aid..."

Thats a flat out lie. Furthermore, I am educated in history and I know exactly why we support Israel. The excuse that, 'We support Israel because they fight our enemies' is a downright propagandic lie. Israel CREATES our enemies. Perhaps Al-Queda might not have liked America if we didnt support Israel, but 9/11 would never have happened. Our support of Israel causes us to have enemies, sucks billions of dollars of taxpayers money every year and there is no good reason to do it.

Im not saying that Israeli's are bad or shouldnt have their own country. I simply think they we should withdraw ALL foreign aid to them until they withdraw to the 1967 borders and aid Palestine into becoming a recognized state.

GEAH : "Do you have any idea how kooky that sounds to rational people?"

It does not matter how kooky it sounds, it is simply an explanation for why Bible-believing evangelicals feel an afinity for Jews. In fact, many Evangelicals would say they share a more close spiritual bond with Jews than even with Catholics.
 
2003-05-08 02:22:06 PM
Bill Wick's Friend
You've got an interesting definition of an ally. It seems to me that our "alliance" with Israel is pretty much a one way street. We are basically Israel's prison biatch. When has Israel ever done anything to advance the interests of the US? When do allies actively spy on their friend? (Does anyone remember Jonathon Pollard?) Even now, Ariel Sharon is doing everything he can to blow up the roadmap so that he can continue to blow up the hovels in which the Palestinians live.

With allies like that we don't need any enemies.
 
2003-05-08 02:25:01 PM
Dracanulus: The Jews never wanted a 'Jewish/Arab' state during the Zionist movement. They have always pushed for their own state since World War I. That is the root cause of the conflict if you go back far enough, is the _JEWS_ unwilligness to share the land with the Arabs. The Jews were seen as outsiders and wanted a land to call their own. The Jews wanted a land where it was almost all Jews, from the leaders down to the theives and beggars. The Jews did not want to share the land they were moving too, that is the cause of the conflict. Not that Arabs have some instinctual hatred for them.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 02:28:19 PM
Im not saying that Israeli's are bad or shouldnt have their own country. I simply think they we should withdraw ALL foreign aid to them until they withdraw to the 1967 borders and aid Palestine into becoming a recognized state.

A little quiz for you, SuseJ. Why wasn't there a Palestinian state in 1966? What happened in 1967 to change the borders? What assurance can you give Israel that what happened in 1967 won't happen again? If Israel agreed to 1967 borders, would you agree to have the US guarantee those borders, with force, if necessary?
 
2003-05-08 02:30:12 PM
Remember this: Democracy does NOT equal freedom.

The KKK democratically elects its leaders. So do many hate groups/terrorist organizations/cults/corporate boards/religious whacko governments.

Don't EVER confuse democracy with FREEDOM, especially when used in context with a religiously fanatic militaristic country.
 
2003-05-08 02:30:42 PM
That is the root cause of the conflict if you go back far enough, is the _JEWS_ unwilligness to share the land with the Arabs.

This is 100%, pure, unadulterated bullfark, SuseJ.

Arabs in Israel have more rights than Arabs in any Arab county!!!
 
2003-05-08 02:31:48 PM
MrNeutron - "Jesus was executed for exposing/protesting the corruption of the First jewish temple."

Whoa, did you just make that up? That's pretty good. No historical or scriptural basis, but it really sounds convincing. You should be a scriptwriter for Friends or something.
 
2003-05-08 02:32:55 PM
Heres a little history for you GEAH. In 1967 we have the Israel leader on videotape telling America that Israel does not want ANY land. That they will not take up any land for their own because they 'allready have too much than they can handle'. 3 days later, they attack in a pre-emptive strike, and take over TONS of extra land. They then exchange some back with Egypt for peace. And they have had that peace with Egypt ever since. They have never, not once, offered all the land back to the Palestinians in exchange for peace, because they are greedy and want to keep some of the land they took.

to answer your question: Yes. If Israel withdrew to 1967 borders and then they still got attacked, I would support us defending them fully.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 02:34:31 PM
Right on, GrymReeper. One of the problems most westerners really fail to understand is this is only partially a political struggle for the Palestinians. There's equally intense religious pressure from the fundie Arab/Islamic clerics as there is political pressure from the potentates of the region on Arafat and the Palestinians to never come to a settelement. This conflict between Jew and Arab is relatively modern - Jews lived in the Caliphate regions for centuries with little problem.

Yes, both groups have inhabited the region for millenia, but why then did Jew and Arab live in relative peace next to one another until WWI? Find an answer to that and you might be able to find a workable solution to this problem.
 
2003-05-08 02:35:12 PM
GEAH - "SuseJ: the Bible says that 144,000 Jews will be saved and go to Heaven when the world ends.
Do you have any idea how kooky that sounds to rational people?"

99.99% of all people are rational. It means we make excuses/rationalize. It doesn't mean you're right. There are people that say they can kill bums because they won't affect anything. Normal to them. Kooky to me. You calling something kooky means nothing to the rest of us, just like calling yourself rational.
 
2003-05-08 02:35:16 PM
05-08-03 02:21:26 PM SuseJ


Israel CREATES our enemies. Perhaps Al-Queda might not have liked America if we didnt support Israel, but 9/11 would never have happened.

Another naive appologist for murdering fanatics rears their head.
 
2003-05-08 02:35:31 PM
GEAH: "That is the root cause of the conflict if you go back far enough, is the _JEWS_ unwilligness to share the land with the Arabs.

This is 100%, pure, unadulterated bullfark, SuseJ."

You dont know your history. you dont know the reasoning behind the Zionist movement. The whole point of the Zionist movement was to secure a country that was JEWISH. That was almost completely Jewish from head to toe. They never, not once had the inclination to share the land with the Palestinians that were there for hundreds of years. Their motivations from DAY ONE, were make the country a Jewish Israel. Learn your history

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 02:38:20 PM
Ayeroxor: Didn't Jesus storm into the temple and attack the money changers? Didn't Jesus enter the gates of Jerusalem riding an ass, which the Jews believed would be how their REAL mesiah would come?
 
2003-05-08 02:41:25 PM
GrymReeper: you disagree? You think Al-Quedas attack on us had absolutely NOTHING to do with Israel? Oh yeah, thats right, i forgot. your theory must be that they are possed by evil demons and just want to kill the good americans. Right dude.

9/11 - wouldnt have happened without our support for Israel

care to prove me wrong?

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 02:42:32 PM
05-08-03 02:30:42 PM GEAH


Arabs in Israel have more rights than Arabs in any Arab county!!!

This is not only a true statement, but it is something else which drives the Musslim fundies crazy.
 
2003-05-08 02:42:46 PM
Dracunculus,

I always confuse the 2 good leaders of Israel however the fact remains that a Jew destroyed the peace process and the Israeli government policy is responsible for the Palestinians rising up again. Warsaw Ghetto=Ramallah. And by your argument everything Hitler did was justified then. If you keep a people down and not even let them fight they will resort to terrorism. The European/American Jews have no right to settle in the Middle East. Racially they are not semitic and thusly do not belong there. Go back to sleep in your coffin, you undead sumbiatch. Israel is in the wrong and can't admit and are too greedy to give anything back to anyone. If the us pulls its support Israel can't survive bottom line. Zionism is jewish nazism. If the Jews are indeed a chosen race, God chose them to get their asses kicked since the dawn of time until the end of days. Nobody likes whiny duplicious sanctimonious religious nuts!!

As I have steadfastly maintained PAVE THE FARKIN PLACE!!

Both sides are troglodites and I for one, am sick of their shiat. Let them kill each other until no one is left. All I want is a fair fight.
 
2003-05-08 02:43:06 PM
They have never, not once, offered all the land back to the Palestinians in exchange for peace, because they are greedy and want to keep some of the land they took.

SuseJ, please try to follow. There is no land to give "back to the Palestinians" because it wasn't theirs. If Syria and Jordan want the land back, let them negotiate for it.

Handing over Syrian and Jordanian land to a third party after the war--a third party the Syrians and Jordanians oppressed, BTW--is not going to fly.
 
2003-05-08 02:48:26 PM
I can't prove you wrong, Stephen. I don't have a time machine. My contention is that, even without Israel in the equation, Musslim fundies would be calling for our destruction and that there would still be murdering fanatics aplenty to take up the jehad. Go back and read my earlier posts.

Ive got to go catch a plane. Flame on, y'all!
 
2003-05-08 02:51:16 PM
SuseJ--
"In fact, many Evangelicals would say they share a more close spiritual bond with Jews than even with Catholics."

Rofl, I guess that jsut goes to show how flat out stupid and ignorant the Evangelicals are. Catholicism is Christian. Judaism is not. Maybe it's the cash flow that makes Evangelicals feel that way because the Catholics aren't giving them their cash. Most all Christian denominations are deviations from Cahtolicism.
 
2003-05-08 02:52:50 PM
You dont know your history. you dont know the reasoning behind the Zionist movement. The whole point of the Zionist movement was to secure a country that was JEWISH. That was almost completely Jewish from head to toe. They never, not once had the inclination to share the land with the Palestinians that were there for hundreds of years. Their motivations from DAY ONE, were make the country a Jewish Israel. Learn your history.

Arabs farking vote in Israel, SuseJ. Tell me what Arab countries Arabs can vote in. Tell me what Arab countries Arabs can't vote in.

Israel was created as a safe haven for Jews who had been nearly exterminated on the European continent. It's too bad that was necessary, but that doesn't change history. There were 3.3 million Jews in Poland in 1938. Wanna guess how many are there were in 1945 before the concentration camps were liberated? Try a few thousand.
 
2003-05-08 02:55:40 PM
zionism sucks ass.
 
2003-05-08 02:58:54 PM
GEAH: Arabs in the occupied territories cannot vote. Thats why Israel keeps the terroritories occupied and does not annex them. Israel knows that if they annex Palestine, all the Jewish leaders would be voted outed of office by all the new Arab citizens. So Israel continued to militarily occupy thousands of people, not letting them become their own country or even part of Israel. Thats not a democracy.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 03:03:23 PM
Dickenscyder

Phrases like Zionism is Jewish Nazism and Warsaw Ghetto = Ramallah negate any argument you want to make.

Sharon may be a right wing war-loving hawk....but if he were a Nazi (or if he behaved like those benevolent arab neighbours of his) he'd have murdered every "problematic" palestinian first chance he got. He certainly has the power and ability. You toss "nazi" around like it's "doodiehead" and it buries any rational argument you wish to make.
 
2003-05-08 03:05:36 PM
I don't know why everyone is so sympathetic towards Israel. If there is one thing for which they are well known, is witholding intelligence, costing the lives of informants, allies and numerous innocents who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Does anyone recall the truck bomb in Beruit that cost the lives of 200+ marines during the Reagan era? Israeli intelligence knew about it, but didn't inform us; what a fine ally we have. Hell, Denmark thinks that the Mossad is open with them with their intelligence, because they had saved so many Jews during the holocaust, and even provide them with free access to gathered intelligence. But, the Mossad doesn't respond in kind. I use Israel & Mossad interchangably, because it is the one agency that answers only to the Prime minister who grants them carte blanche to "protect Israel". For purposes of plausable deniability, Israeli prime ministers prefer not to be informed of Mossad operations. Israel is it's own worst enemy.
 
2003-05-08 03:05:38 PM
SuseJ--

1. "Arabs in the occupied territories cannot vote."

Because they are not a part of Israel. I don't want Mexicans or Canadians voting in American government either.

2. "Thats why Israel keeps the terroritories occupied and does not annex them."

Incorrect, they keep them occupied because the Palestinians keep sending people over to blow themselves and a tens of Israels up with them.

3. "Israel knows that if they annex Palestine, all the Jewish leaders would be voted outed of office by all the new Arab citizens."

Also incorrect. If they annexed those (it's not Palestine) territories the rest of the middle east would want to wage war on them again and cause a lot more problems. Second, Israel doesn't want the terrirtories because they don't want to continue supporting them.

4. "So Israel continued to militarily occupy thousands of people, not letting them become their own country or even part of Israel. Thats not a democracy."

That's right, it's not. Not because of Israel though. It's because they've stuck to Arafat and didn't want to form a real government of their own. Israel has not interfered with Palestinian internal government. They Palestinians have been free to do as they wished in that department. The fault is their own. Israel cannot force a government upon them.
 
2003-05-08 03:15:25 PM
Stoke: Israel doesnt want the land? RIIGHT. just like they didnt want the land when they attacked Egypt in 1967. lol


"Because they are not a part of Israel. I don't want Mexicans or Canadians voting in American government either."

We havnt been militarily occupying Mexico for almost 40 years have we?

Your statement about the rest of the Arab countries waging war on Israel if they annexed the rest of the Palestinian states is a blatant lie. The rest of the arab states wouldnt mind, and Palestine wouldnt mind. If they annexed all of Palestine, Sharon would be voted out of office and replaced with an Arab. If they were a true democracy they do one of 2 things, 1) get the fark out of the occupied territories or 2) annex them.

Conclusion: Make the occupied territories part of Israel, or get the fark out. By militarily occuping the land they took in the 1967 war they are bringing this shiatstorm upon themselves and are not innocent

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 03:19:33 PM
GEAH "There is no land to give "back to the Palestinians" because it wasn't theirs."

Tell that to the tens of thousands of Palestinian farmers that have been pushed off their land since 1945. If my family lived on a plot of land for generations and suddenly a bunch of radicals told me to leave because they were creating a "jewish state" I'd be more than pissed.

Don't label/associate all palestinians with terrorists either. Like most people, the majority of them just want to have a decent, peaceful life.
 
2003-05-08 03:20:32 PM
Dear lord, is this thread still going on?

Bill_Wick's_Friend

Phrases like Zionism is Jewish Nazism and Warsaw Ghetto = Ramallah negate any argument you want to make.


To a point, sure. Most people are just throwing those words around for affect and have no idea what they're talking about, but saying that they are completely innaccurate is also false.

There are great deal of Zionists who want a racially pure state, and their policy of occupying the land of others sounds familiar. The Isreali government is guilty of promoting ghettos and of using *some* of the same practices as the Nazis: collective guilt and torture, for example.

Sadly because I have to: I do not think the current Isreali government is as bad as the German Nazi regime. Isreal has the most democratic government in the Middle East, but it in no way excuses their excesses.
 
2003-05-08 03:22:23 PM
And before anyone decides to jump on the last paragraph, I am not sad because Isreal isn't as bad as the Nazis. I'm sad because I have to spell that out to avoid the automatic anti-semite label.
 
2003-05-08 03:24:20 PM
Theigor: "Tell that to the tens of thousands of Palestinian farmers that have been pushed off their land since 1945."

Actually its been going on since World War I. The Jews instituted a practice called 'Histadrut' in which they wanted everyone in their society to be Jewish. So they used their money to buy businesses owned and operated by Arabs. They then fired every Arab worker. They bought huge chunks of land from landowners and kicked off every single Arab living on the land.

Sure would make me pissed if some foreign farker moved over to my country and fired me and then kicked me out of my home.

No job + no home + no belongings creates a situation where some very very pissed off people will do some very stupid things. Like I said, theyve brought this shiatstorm upon themselves.
 
2003-05-08 03:25:38 PM
05-08-03 12:42:49 PM LexiLuthor

TheReject: All the more reason why we should just pull out and leave them to their own business. Let them prove that they can defend themselves. Make them fight for the country that they didn't actually win for themselves in the first place. Not saying they don't have a right to it, but simply stating they should defend it if it is truly theirs.

Maybe Israel will take over the Middle East, maybe the Palestinians will, I personally don't give a shiat. The US shouldn't be worrying about it all that much either. I've said it before and I'll say it again: IT'S NOT OUR PROBLEM!


So I guess we should have just let Hitler roll over Europe during WWII then? After all we were attacked by Japan not Germany.
 
2003-05-08 03:25:44 PM
 
2003-05-08 03:29:30 PM
SuseJ - sadly Israel is still promoting policies to push Palestinians off their land. Israel allows settlers to harrass and attack peaceful Palestinian villages. The villagers either abandon their farms or fight back and get their a$$ kicked by the IDF - the results the same.

This New York Times article describes the process.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/21/international/middleeast/21MIDE.html&OQ=exQ3 D1035777600Q26enQ3D4809e906bb947f60Q26eiQ3D5062Q26partnerQ3DGOOGLE
 
2003-05-08 03:33:12 PM
Absolutben: Actually Germany declared war on us, not the other way around. We only declared war on Japan for overtly attacking us, which was justified. Germany declared war on us, they were therefore a specific threat, we showed them who was boss, highly justifiable. Not that I support Hitler or his actions, but they were none of our business until he made it our business.
 
2003-05-08 03:33:27 PM
Yep. Funny thing is, despite us giving them $3 billion a year, the ONE thing we ask them to do, to Stop their settlements, they ignore us completely. I also dont think it should be considered 'innocent civilians' killed when someone on a settlement gets shot by a Palestinian. Your not an innocent civilian if you are invading somebody elses land

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 03:35:18 PM
SuseJ: Arabs in the occupied territories cannot vote. Thats why Israel keeps the terroritories occupied and does not annex them. Israel knows that if they annex Palestine, all the Jewish leaders would be voted outed of office by all the new Arab citizens. So Israel continued to militarily occupy thousands of people, not letting them become their own country or even part of Israel. Thats not a democracy.

With every post, you get farther and farther out there.

1. Who let's people in occupied lands vote in that country's elections? Did we let the Japanese and Germans vote in US elections?

2. Israel didn't take away anyone's right to vote. Not a single Palestinian voted in a Syrian, Jordanian or Egyptian election.

3. Who in the Palestian leadership was voted in by Palestinians? Arafat doesn't let his own people vote for him. Why should Israel let Palestinians vote in their elections.


When people persist with irrational arguments against Israel, I re-evaluate their claims that they aren't anti-Semitic. Especially when they blame Jews for everything and sometimes capitalize JEWS for emphasis.

Oh, did the JEWS kill your Mr. Christ? Is that what you're mad about? You're no different from the other religious kooks.
 
2003-05-08 03:35:24 PM
The key to peace in the middle east? Casinos.

You don't see american indians blowing the crap out of 7/11s. Why? Casinos.

/nuttin
 
2003-05-08 03:36:59 PM
SuseJ--
"Stoke: Israel doesnt want the land? RIIGHT. just like they didnt want the land when they attacked Egypt in 1967. lol"

They attacked everyone around them in 1967. Why? Because they were gearing up for war against Israel. Israel took the land to deprive Egypt of it's use in any future conflicts. If Israel wanted to keep the land, the Palestinians wouldn't be sitting on it right now.

"We havnt been militarily occupying Mexico for almost 40 years have we?"

Actually it's been over 100. Or, do you consider Texas as still belinging to Mexico? Do Mexicans send in people to blow up our civilians? Some big differences. If Mexico was sending in people to suicide bomb us you can most assuredly count on us taking up residence in Mexico where we feel the bombers were coming from. Two planes got dropped on the WTC and we took out an entire country for it because it's government couldn't reign them in. I would pity Mexico for the hell that would be unleashed on them if they did something similar.

"Your statement about the rest of the Arab countries waging war on Israel if they annexed the rest of the Palestinian states is a blatant lie."

Not exactly. Israel could easily annex those territories and evict every single Palestinian on them. Where would they go? To Jordan, Egypt, and Syria... the countries to which all their families originally belonged prior to 1967.
Now, would that piss off the Arab countries or wouldn't it? If Israel annexed that land, they would indeed, have the right to do whatever they wished with it.
 
2003-05-08 03:37:30 PM
Thanks for illuminating my point on Zionism/Nazism. Israel should behave better especially when they are constantly reminding everyone about the Holocaust. Sharon's government wants to exterminate all arabs but knows they can't get away with it. The Mossad will kill anyone who aids the Arab cause. Gerald Bull for instance. Israel has been ignoring UN sanctions since they first printed them. Israel isn ot a democracy it is a theocracy with voting rights. Israel goes through governments like the Italians.

Again, Super Jews stay home. Israel is not your homeland. You are American or European. Stay there. Stop being so obstanate. You are wrong sometimes and just because we disagree doesn't make me any semitic and chance are you are not semitic anyways.

Pave the Middle East.
 
2003-05-08 03:38:37 PM
Since this thread is degenerating into WWII history, may i ask a loaded question:

in the years between 1939 invasion of poland and the 1941 entry of the usa into the war, did the french, english, belgians and dutch call American Cheeze "freedom cheese"? Did they rename the American Beauty rose the "freedom flower"?

Did anyone come up with the phrase "coca cola drinking surrender monkeys?"
 
2003-05-08 03:39:49 PM
SuseJ,

Actually, Congress gave Israel a bonus this year. I'm not sure why. So, total US aid will be over $12 billion now.

Congress approves an extra $9billion for Israel
 
2003-05-08 03:40:56 PM
GEAH

Point of correction. Arafat was elected President of the Palestinian Authority in January 1996.
 
2003-05-08 03:41:41 PM
"Did anyone come up with the phrase "coca cola drinking surrender monkeys?"

In order for this scenario to hold true, you would have to equate saddam with hitler and show that the US was actively fighting to stop those countries from removing him.
 
2003-05-08 03:43:39 PM
Arafat was elected President of the Palestinian Authority in January 1996.


were any jewish israelis allowed to vote in that election?
 
2003-05-08 03:44:28 PM
Bill_Wick's_Friend: Since this thread is degenerating into WWII history, may i ask a loaded question:

in the years between 1939 invasion of poland and the 1941 entry of the usa into the war, did the french, english, belgians and dutch call American Cheeze "freedom cheese"? Did they rename the American Beauty rose the "freedom flower"?

Did anyone come up with the phrase "coca cola drinking surrender monkeys?"


I'm sure you know the differences.

1. We didn't try to tell the English, et al, to not fight the Germans.

2. We supplied the English. These days, the French supply Iraq.

If we had been involved pre-'39, things would have been a fark of a lot different.

We've learned. 9/11 taught us another lesson about waiting to be attacked.
 
2003-05-08 03:44:57 PM
Hey Bill Wick's Friend
HUH?
 
2003-05-08 03:45:00 PM
05-08-03 02:35:31 PM SuseJ

You dont know your history.


Pot=Kettle
you dont know the reasoning behind the Zionist movement.

Judging by your responses, neither do you.

The whole point of the Zionist movement was to secure a country that was JEWISH. That was almost completely Jewish from head to toe. They never, not once had the inclination to share the land with the Palestinians that were there for hundreds of years.


NO PERSON CALLING THEMSELVES PALESTINIAN WAS THERE FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS YOU BLIND IGNORANT TOOL.

Zionism is:

The rightous return of jews to their homeland. Not "kick everybody out whos in the way and create a jewish country.

Arabs who have been living in the land for hundreds of years STILL LIVE IN THE SAME LAND. They are the non-violent arabs, who do not label themselves Palestinian. They are Israeli citizens, hold places in government, and have more rights than any arab or jew would have in countless arab countries around the region.

There are too many ignorant people in this thread for me.
 
2003-05-08 03:45:07 PM
Stoke: Your analogy to Texas and Mexico is downright retarded. Texas isnt militarily occupied. Their arnt hundreds of thousands of Mexicans living in Texas with no citizenship, under curfew, getting shot in the head if they go outside after 9pm. Nice try at an analogy, but its the worst one ive seen in a while.

GEAH: Why would any Christian be mad at the Jews for killing Jesus? Without Jesus's death, salvation wouldn't be possible, the Jews killing him was a good thing. So your argument about Christians 'angry' with Jews because they killed Jesus is pretty stupid, I probably wouldnt repeat it if I were you.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 03:45:48 PM
From Theigorway articel: "The guarantees are to be given in three installments over a three year period, at a rate of interest linked to the U.S. government bonds on the day of issue."

Looks like an additional 3 billion per years for 3 years, and as a loan, with interest, to be paid back.
 
2003-05-08 03:46:50 PM
BritneysSpeculum: Point of correction. Arafat was elected President of the Palestinian Authority in January 1996.

Heh...he got 85% of the vote. Not quite Saddam's 100% or Castro's 99%, but not bad for a newbie dictator holding "elections".
 
2003-05-08 03:47:57 PM
Why would any Christian be mad at the Jews for killing Jesus? Without Jesus's death, salvation wouldn't be possible, the Jews killing him was a good thing. So your argument about Christians 'angry' with Jews because they killed Jesus is pretty stupid, I probably wouldnt repeat it if I were you.

Oh, yeah, SuseJ, thanks for the tip.
 
2003-05-08 03:48:44 PM
BigAl: Too bad you completely ignore the fact that during the Zionist movement they did everything they could to make sure that their 'homeland' was all Jewish. They are the first instigators of the conflict. They came in, and attempted to kick out as many Arabs as possible and create their own state.

Im not saying that the Palestinians are right. I dont support them any more than I support the Isreli's. But blind loyalty to Israeli is retarded because A) they dont deserve it and B) they dont even respect us.

You have to come to a moderate conclusion in the conflict, which is Israel withdrawing to its 1967 borders, and Palestine becomming its own state. That is not too much to ask.
 
2003-05-08 03:49:43 PM
GEAH
I think that Sharon did just a little bit better than that in his last election. And if you are implying that the PA election was rigged, I say if its good enough for W, it should be good enough for Yassar.
 
2003-05-08 03:49:50 PM
There are too many ignorant people in this thread for me.

C'mon, BigAl, this is Fark, after all.
 
2003-05-08 03:50:16 PM
05-08-03 03:37:30 PM Dickenscyder

Sharon's government wants to exterminate all arabs but knows they can't get away with it.


Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

The Mossad will kill anyone who aids the Arab cause.


If, by "arab cause", you mean destroy israel and kill all the jews, then sure, the Mossad stops any arabs from aiding terrorists.

Gerald Bull for instance. Israel has been ignoring UN sanctions since they first printed them.


These are not UN Sanctions, these are UN Resolutions which are non-binding (ie they are suggestions, not demands). Tool.

Israel isn ot a democracy it is a theocracy with voting rights. Israel goes through governments like the Italians.


Whats your point? By your standards, the US is a theocracy as well, because they go through so many governments. Get a clue man, arabs have full rights, as well as jews in Israel. I know it pisses you off to see that arabs are more free in Israel than they would be living in Saudi Arabia for example.


Again, Super Jews stay home. Israel is not your homeland. You are American or European. Stay there. Stop being so obstanate. You are wrong sometimes and just because we disagree doesn't make me any semitic and chance are you are not semitic anyways.


Europeans. Stop coming to America, it isn't your home. I don't care if some of your relatives settled there in the 1700s. Or if you want to make a better life for yourself. DONT GO ANYWHERE UNLESS I, Dickenscyder WANT YOU TO LIVE THERE. /sarcasm

Pave the Middle East.


Good thinking! How about we start by returning the United States to its rightious owners, the native Americans. Will you be willing to move? Yeah, thats what I thought.
 
2003-05-08 03:50:27 PM
Shut........UP,

I don't know if it is true, but I have read that the US has forgiven most or all loans to Israel.

I'd be interested if anyone has more information about Israels history of repayment.
 
2003-05-08 03:52:01 PM
05-08-03 03:45:07 PM SuseJ

GEAH: Why would any Christian be mad at the Jews for killing Jesus?


Why don't you ask the Pope and his followers the reason. I think they just "forgave" the jews a few years ago for killing jesus, and finally accepted the country of Israel.
 
2003-05-08 03:52:46 PM
Britneys: dont try to hijack the thread with a debate over W. =P that isnt even a debate. Who's fault is it that W was elected.. lets see.

1) people who wrote the constitution

2) Supreme Court who ruled in favor of Bush

3) People who votede for Bush

4) and Ralph Nader. Bush won by 400 votes in Florida. Nader got 90,000 in Florida. Undoubtedly Bush would have lost Florida if not for Nader.


Im just sick of people blaming the repubs or bush for rigging the election, if you want to blame someone, blame the supreme court, blame nader, blame the constitution, blame the people who voted for Bush. but dont blame bush, thats just ignorant

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 03:53:07 PM
BritneysSpeculum: I think that Sharon did just a little bit better than that in his last election.

Point of correction. Sharon got about 63% of the vote, not more than 85%.
 
2003-05-08 03:53:36 PM
SuseJ--

Then you shouldn't have asked the question, "We havnt been militarily occupying Mexico for almost 40 years have we?"

You still fail to acknowledge the Palestinians blowing the hell out of Israelis as justification for occupying their lands. My comparison to Mexico lies in that realm. If they were sending in suicide bombers, we would indeed, be occupying Mexico right now.

"Their arnt hundreds of thousands of Mexicans living in Texas with no citizenship..."

Rofl, you haven't been to Houston have you?

"...under curfew, getting shot in the head if they go outside after 9pm."

Well, stop sending suicide bombers aand that might get eased up on. Every time the Israelis back out of an area the Palestinians go blow more Israelis up. It almost seems that they want the Israelis there.

Israelis occupy land... hardly any bombs. Israelis back out... they get bombed daily.

Doesn't take a f'n genius to figure out what keeps the bombs from going off with that pattern.
 
2003-05-08 03:54:16 PM
SuseJ

I dont intend this to be an ad hominum attack on you personally but I find your beliefs to be distasteful, misinformed and generally facetious and ill formed. Stoke had done an excellent job in pointing out the obvious flaws in your reasoning and it is my hope that you listen to what he has to say rather than simply dismissing it out of hand.

Dickenscyder

Your rhetoric is simply ignorant. Im not sure I can put it any other way. Israel is not, and let me repeat that, is not a theocracy. It has a variety of political parties that go from radical to reactionary to orthodox to secular in regards to religious beliefs. As for this misinformed belief that Sharon wants to participate in genocide is probably one of the stupidest things Ive read all day. You and persons holding this same said belief will have to remove the desire to crack down on Palestinian insurgents from mass genocidal ideals. Civilians may get in the way, but terrorism is a nasty dirty business on both ends, from committing acts of terrorism to removing terrorists. Especially when these terrorists have ingrained themselves into a civilian population that identifies with these individuals.

As for this idea of the Super Jew, I find it and entirely disgusting idea to identify some persons of the Jewish faith as somehow being Super. As a matter of fact it reminds me of the particular beliefs of Goering who saw the same said Super Jew as an agent against the fascist regime in Germany. Am I calling you a Nazi though? No. Instead Ill accept the fact that you are prejudiced.
 
2003-05-08 03:54:16 PM
Jeeeebus...I was only kidding.

(must... resist.... urge to ask about ford and bush families supporting the nazis pre-39....)
 
2003-05-08 03:54:44 PM
Big Al, regarding your statement, "Arabs have full rights, as well as jews in Israel." I'm not sure I believe it.

Besides the difficulty of living in a nation with a very active state religion, there is a lot of evidence that Israeli Arabs face frequent discrimination in housing, jobs, and education.
 
2003-05-08 03:54:59 PM
05-08-03 03:48:44 PM SuseJ

BigAl: Too bad you completely ignore the fact that during the Zionist movement they did everything they could to make sure that their 'homeland' was all Jewish. They are the first instigators of the conflict. They came in, and attempted to kick out as many Arabs as possible and create their own state.


Completely wrong. The Arabs were the ones trying to keep the jews from moving back to the territory of Palestine, way before WWII even happened. There was a civil war going on between arabs, jews, and British soldiers until the British moved their troops out. Learn history, stop reading it from arabnews.com

Im not saying that the Palestinians are right. I dont support them any more than I support the Isreli's. But blind loyalty to Israeli is retarded because A) they dont deserve it and B) they dont even respect us.


Respect America? Why would Israel respect America? The US has done nothing privately but sabatoge the peace processes, sell arms to arab terrorists, train and support them, buying oil and selling out to the arabs over their so called Allies, Israel.

You have to come to a moderate conclusion in the conflict, which is Israel withdrawing to its 1967 borders, and Palestine becomming its own state. That is not too much to ask.


Newsflash = Israel gave back land to Jordan and Egypt. Jordan and Egypt refused to allow Palestinians to move back. And you continue to blame just Israel for this... classic.
 
2003-05-08 03:55:49 PM
Stoke: Dude, you need to learn how to think.

"If they were sending in suicide bombers, we would indeed, be occupying Mexico right now."

So, your justifying Israeli's occupation because of the suicide bobmers.

to bad they were occupying decades before the suicide bombers started.

Sorry, try again

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 03:56:08 PM
"We feel this is a subtle but obvious attack on Islam."

well, which one is it, subtle or obvious?
 
2003-05-08 03:56:21 PM
SuseJ
You might also add Jeb Bush to your list given the concerted effort undertaken to purge voters in predominently democratic counties, which resulted in a substantial number of minority voters who were incorrectly denied their right to vote.
 
2003-05-08 03:57:41 PM
05-08-03 03:52:46 PM SuseJ

Im just sick of people blaming the repubs or bush for rigging the election, if you want to blame someone, blame the supreme court, blame nader, blame the constitution, blame the people who voted for Bush. but dont blame bush, thats just ignorant


1. Texas and Florida created a list of "cons and ex-cons" to be excluded from voting. Problem is, the list was deliberately exaggerated to exclude people who never even went to jail from voting.

2. The Supreme Court justices who wanted to retire soon, wanted to retire under a Conservative Administration, so their replacements could be Conservative as well.

There are tons more evidence linking W and his goons and family to rigging the election. You just have to look for it. The BBC did a whole TV show about it a while ago. But of course, the US media refused to air it.
 
2003-05-08 03:57:53 PM
"minority voters who were incorrectly denied their right to vote."

explain please
 
2003-05-08 03:58:54 PM
Big Al: "Respect America? Why would Israel respect America? The US has done nothing privately but sabatoge the peace processes, sell arms to arab terrorists, train and support them, buying oil and selling out to the arabs over their so called Allies, Israel"


Huh? I hope that is sarcasm. Israel has no better friend in the world than the US.
 
2003-05-08 03:58:56 PM
Oh yeah, and

3. Write in military votes were counted even though the dates were far past the deadline to send them in. Of course, most of these votes are for Republicans. (even though Bush is going to cut funding to the Veterans, people still are brainwashed into believing only Republicans care about the military)
 
2003-05-08 04:00:30 PM
05-08-03 03:54:44 PM Theigorway


Big Al, regarding your statement, "Arabs have full rights, as well as jews in Israel." I'm not sure I believe it.

Besides the difficulty of living in a nation with a very active state religion, there is a lot of evidence that Israeli Arabs face frequent discrimination in housing, jobs, and education.


Discrimination is apart of life everywhere in the world. But that has nothing to do with RIGHTS GRANTED BY LAW IN THE COUNTRY OF ISRAEL. I don't care if you believe it or not, its whats going on. Educate yourself or stay the fark out of these arguments (this goes to SuseJ and too many other people to list)
 
2003-05-08 04:01:17 PM
05-08-03 03:58:54 PM Theigorway

Huh? I hope that is sarcasm. Israel has no better friend in the world than the US.


Most citizens and politicians are friends of Israel. Conservatives, the CIA, and the military are definately not friends of Israel and the Mossad.
 
2003-05-08 04:02:03 PM
SuseJ
"minority voters who were incorrectly denied their right to vote."
explain please


Please see Big Als eloquent explanation above.
 
2003-05-08 04:02:15 PM
BritneysSpeculum: You might also add Jeb Bush to your list given the concerted effort undertaken to purge voters in predominently democratic counties, which resulted in a substantial number of minority voters who were incorrectly denied their right to vote.

I take it you're referring to the fact that in predominately black, Democrat-run precincts that the rate of "spoiled" Republican ballots was triple that of the Democrat ballots.

Try as you might, I don't think you can hang that on ol' Jeb.
 
2003-05-08 04:03:51 PM
Notoriousjjp:
By "SuperJew," I believe he is referring to ultra-conservative orthodox Jews who are immigrating to Isreal (especially the occupied territories) and bloating a right-wing voting block.

Using the "SuperJew" name is just another unfortunate case of loaded language clouding a legitimate issue that is lost in the endless vitriol.
 
2003-05-08 04:04:43 PM
There are tons more evidence linking W and his goons and family to rigging the election. You just have to look for it. The BBC did a whole TV show about it a while ago. But of course, the US media refused to air it.

Hey, BigAl, no one aired it because they realize Americans don't give a fark what a few Brits think of how we run our elections.
 
2003-05-08 04:05:34 PM
Big Al,

Why try to tar me as uneducated/uninformed for bringing up the issue of discrimination? "full legal rights" on paper don't mean Palestinians gets a fair hearing.

I'm sure most Israelis would concede that Israeli Arabs aren't treated as full citizens if they were being candid.
 
2003-05-08 04:05:49 PM
GEAH

No I am refering to the voter roll purging that went on in advance of the election. Strangely it was mostly done in the four southern counties that are predominantly black. But that said WTF are you talking about. Once again most of the spoiled ballots were in the southern counties, which had the old punch card balloting system. The republican leaning districts in central and northern Fla had the optical scan system so there were no hanging, pregnant or missing chads to ruin the ballot.
 
2003-05-08 04:06:27 PM
Big Al: "Most citizens and politicians are friends of Israel. Conservatives, the CIA, and the military are definately not friends of Israel and the Mossad."

Expand on this and provide facts/links. I'm interested.
 
2003-05-08 04:06:49 PM
BigAl:
But that has nothing to do with RIGHTS GRANTED BY LAW IN THE COUNTRY OF ISRAEL.

Don't be ignorant. It has *everything* to do with it. Blacks in the Reconstruction South technically had the same rights as whites on paper, but if it is not being enforced, it means nothing. Palestinians are second-class citizens in Isreal. There's no factual way to deny that reality.
 
2003-05-08 04:07:14 PM
05-08-03 04:05:34 PM Theigorway

Big Al,

Why try to tar me as uneducated/uninformed for bringing up the issue of discrimination? "full legal rights" on paper don't mean Palestinians gets a fair hearing.


Because you didn't bring up the issue of discrimination. You brought up the issue that you think arabs don't have the same rights as jews. Which is completely un-true. While discrimination is still alive and well in America, you can't say blacks don't have the same rights as whites. Its just that there are some backwards hatefilled people IN ALL PLACES OF THE EARTH.
 
2003-05-08 04:07:30 PM
BigAl- "Educate yourself or stay the fark out of these arguments (this goes to SuseJ"

Im educated, I know what happened between Israel and Palestine. Your disagreements with mine are unconvincing. I say Israel needs to withdraw to 1967 borders, you respond with they allready gave land back to egypt and Jordan. So? Theyve never offered 100% of the land they took back. They need to give back EVERY square inch they took in the 1967 war. I dont support adding terrority to your country through invasion.

We also seem to differ on our 'definition' of the Zionist movement. You seem to completely ignore the fact that from 1898-1948, long before Israel was a country, Israeli's threw the first blow with their policy of Histadrut. Thats not made up. I didnt get it from www.ihatejews.com. Its a fact. The Israeli's used their money to buy large pieces of land and kick out everyone there that was living in their homes. They bought businesses and fired every arab worker. Fact. This is before the Arabs ever did anything to the Jews. Can you adrress this specifically? Its important, because it is the root of the conflict.
 
2003-05-08 04:08:02 PM
SuseJ--

And you need to keep up with current events.

Israel did pull out per the Oslo accords. It wasn't until recently they began cracking down on the Palestinians again. Israel is wrong with their settlements in these areas but it doesn't justify the bombings.

Palestians weren't under curfew and having their houses run into the ground until they went ape-shiat over an Israeli official visiting a shrine that was of significance to both Jews and muslims. It was that fiasco that spiraled out of control into the current mess. Do you really think Israel enjoys having to spend the cash it does having to occupy those lands? Please. Their tax rates are already insane as it is.
 
2003-05-08 04:08:10 PM
Big Al: 3. Write in military votes were counted even though the dates were far past the deadline to send them in. Of course, most of these votes are for Republicans. (even though Bush is going to cut funding to the Veterans, people still are brainwashed into believing only Republicans care about the military).

Gee, why do you think that is, Big Al? Could it be because the Democrats love to enlarge every single aspect of goverment, except the military, which they love to cut. Could it be because of people like Baghdad Bonier? Or Bill "loathe the military" Clinton?

BTW, Bush is not cutting Veteran's funding. He's slowing the growth rate. Big difference.
 
2003-05-08 04:08:26 PM
05-08-03 04:06:49 PM Superoogie

Don't be ignorant. It has *everything* to do with it. Blacks in the Reconstruction South technically had the same rights as whites on paper, but if it is not being enforced, it means nothing. Palestinians are second-class citizens in Isreal. There's no factual way to deny that reality.


Wrong. Blacks only had rights given to them by the Constitution, states adopted certain laws to counter these rights. Israel has no such laws on the books. Next ignorant statement?
 
2003-05-08 04:09:42 PM
05-08-03 04:08:10 PM GEAH

Gee, why do you think that is, Big Al? Could it be because the Democrats love to enlarge every single aspect of goverment, except the military, which they love to cut. Could it be because of people like Baghdad Bonier? Or Bill "loathe the military" Clinton?

BTW, Bush is not cutting Veteran's funding. He's slowing the growth rate. Big difference.

LOOOOOOOOOOL!!

*breathe*

LOOOOOOOOOL!

I get it. Bush cuts funding to Vets who are struggling to get any money at all, and its "slowing the growth rate." Clinton cuts military spending because of Bush I and Reagans outrageous cold war spending, and hes a commie bastard who hates the military. Dude, youre hiliarous
 
2003-05-08 04:10:04 PM
The Israeli's used their money to buy large pieces of land and kick out everyone there that was living in their homes.

Guess what, SuseJ?

If I buy land and you're living on it, I'm kicking you out!
 
2003-05-08 04:11:04 PM
05-08-03 04:06:27 PM Theigorway


Big Al: "Most citizens and politicians are friends of Israel. Conservatives, the CIA, and the military are definately not friends of Israel and the Mossad."

Expand on this and provide facts/links. I'm interested.


The only thing you need to read is a book called "The Secret War Against the Jews" By John Loftus.
 
2003-05-08 04:11:30 PM
Bush cuts funding to Vets who are struggling to get any money at all,

No, Big Al, you're still not getting it.

Bush is not cutting funding. He is increasing funding.
 
2003-05-08 04:12:22 PM
The only thing you need to read is a book called "The Secret War Against the Jews" By John Loftus.

Well, there you go. Big Al thinks you only need one source to get all the info required to make a judgment on a complex issue.
 
2003-05-08 04:12:58 PM
BigAl:

Wrong. Blacks only had rights given to them by the Constitution, states adopted certain laws to counter these rights. Israel has no such laws on the books. Next ignorant statement?

How many Jewish Isrealis have been kicked out of their homes without due process? How many Jewish Isrealis have been tortured in prison? How many Jewish Isrealis have their movement restricted?

I'm sorry. I didn't realise I was dealing with a close-minded moron. Thus endeth the conversation.
 
2003-05-08 04:12:59 PM
05-08-03 04:07:30 PM SuseJ
You seem to completely ignore the fact that from 1898-1948, long before Israel was a country, Israeli's threw the first blow with their policy of Histadrut. Thats not made up. I didnt get it from www.ihatejews.com. Its a fact. The Israeli's used their money to buy large pieces of land and kick out everyone there that was living in their homes. They bought businesses and fired every arab worker. Fact. This is before the Arabs ever did anything to the Jews. Can you adrress this specifically? Its important, because it is the root of the conflict.


The root of the conflict? Completely wrong. You are taking a small number of radical jews and saying they are the same as everyone else who calls themselves zionists. Thats like saying every religious muslim is a terrorist because bin laden is.
 
2003-05-08 04:13:04 PM
GEAH: They didnt live under the same system we live in today. One Arab would own a large large piece of land, and dozens more would live on it and farm it, and had lived on the same land for generations. The Israeli's came in, bought up the land from the owner, and kicked everyone off that was there for generations. Coupled with Buying businesss and firing all the Arab employees, this rightfully pissed arabs off.
 
2003-05-08 04:13:10 PM
Big Al: - follow this link. Interesting article on the difficulty of living in Israel for non-Jews. It might moderate your vehemence a bit. After all, you don't want to appear as an apologist.

Besides, discrimination in the United States still exists despite laws that forbid unequal treatment. It's naive to believe that laws alone prevent discrimination.

By the way, slapping labels of "ignorant" around doesn't help support your views.

Discrimination in Israel
 
2003-05-08 04:14:27 PM
05-08-03 04:12:22 PM GEAH

Well, there you go. Big Al thinks you only need one source to get all the info required to make a judgment on a complex issue.


The book barely talks on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. John Loftus researches the problems between the US selling out the jews to the arabs and other assorted facts. Including the CIA, MI-5, Vatican, and others, helping nazi war criminals escape persecution.
 
2003-05-08 04:14:59 PM
Big Al: "The only thing you need to read is a book called "The Secret War Against the Jews" By John Loftus."

Should I wear a tinfoil hat while I read it?
 
2003-05-08 04:15:34 PM
05-08-03 04:13:10 PM Theigorway

Besides, discrimination in the United States still exists despite laws that forbid unequal treatment. It's naive to believe that laws alone prevent discrimination.


Inform me of where I said that. Some moronic poster earlier said that arabs don't have the same rights as jews. I said that is not true. Then said poster turned the argument around to say discrimination happens and I never denied that.
 
2003-05-08 04:16:22 PM
Big Al, you might want to adjust that tinfoil hat of yours. It seems to be getting a little too tight.
 
2003-05-08 04:16:54 PM
05-08-03 04:14:59 PM Theigorway


Big Al: "The only thing you need to read is a book called "The Secret War Against the Jews" By John Loftus."

Should I wear a tinfoil hat while I read it?


Go google "John Loftus" and you will notice he isn't a wacko conspiracy theorist. He is a lawyer who worked for the department of justice under Reagan, was involved in hunting Nazis for the US government and brought to the public view how the US was smuggling nazi war criminals away from post war Europe, for starters.
 
2003-05-08 04:18:04 PM
Jews like to pretend that the entire world is secretly against them and everyone else is anti-sematic. "Secret-war against Jews"? stfu

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 04:20:19 PM
05-08-03 04:12:58 PM Superoogie

How many Jewish Isrealis have been kicked out of their homes without due process? How many Jewish Isrealis have been tortured in prison? How many Jewish Isrealis have their movement restricted?


If Israel suspects a person to be aiding a terrorist, they take all measures to protect their country. It is a little different than the US, where even an event like 9-11 didn't come close to bringing down the country. If a 9-11 type attack happened in Israel, it would be disasterous.
Oh yes, and due process is a law on the United States books. Not Israels. nice try.


I'm sorry. I didn't realise I was dealing with a close-minded moron. Thus endeth the conversation.


If by close-minded moron, you mean well educated, well read, and having vast knowledge of the subject, then sure. Go right ahead. Until you deal with the conflict face to face, and not when you turn on your TV or read arabnews.com, you can't really comment on the whole story.
 
2003-05-08 04:20:48 PM
SuseJ
Just wondering, in your spare time are you working on an updated version of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion? And will this edition include the Queen of England as a co-conspirator?
 
2003-05-08 04:21:26 PM
Big Al:

Whether the facts and conclusions in this book are correct, I don't see how the actions that may have been taken by a few Americans 40 or 50 years ago to assist Nazi war criminals has any relevance to the current positions taken by conservatives in 2003. Certainly, the neo-conservatives in Bush's whitehouse are very pro-Israel and pro-Sharon. In fact, with the exception of Pat Buchanan, I can't think of any mainstream conservative that don't support Israel.
 
2003-05-08 04:21:33 PM
05-08-03 04:18:04 PM SuseJ

Jews like to pretend that the entire world is secretly against them and everyone else is anti-sematic. "Secret-war against Jews"? stfu


1. John Loftus, the author, isn't a jew.

2. jews are the most hated group of people in history, bar none. Anyone trying to deny this will definately have a hard time.

3. Please explain what has been worse persecution of jewish people than what the Nazis and Stalin did.

The End.
 
2003-05-08 04:23:47 PM
Oops, I meant "Please explain what has been worse persecution of a group of people, worse than what stalin and hitler did to the jews"


05-08-03 04:21:26 PM Theigorway


Big Al:

Whether the facts and conclusions in this book are correct, I don't see how the actions that may have been taken by a few Americans 40 or 50 years ago to assist Nazi war criminals has any relevance to the current positions taken by conservatives in 2003. Certainly, the neo-conservatives in Bush's whitehouse are very pro-Israel and pro-Sharon. In fact, with the exception of Pat Buchanan, I can't think of any mainstream conservative that don't support Israel.


Publicy, everyone is Pro-Israel in the US. Bush's grandfather made millions dealing with the Nazis for christs sake. Just read the book, I'm not going to go down the list of all the reasons why even conservatives of this day are anti-israel privately and pro-israel publicly.
 
2003-05-08 04:24:32 PM
Theigorway, In fact, with the exception of Pat Buchanan, I can't think of any mainstream conservative that don't support Israel.

Buchanan is no longer a mainstream conservative.
 
2003-05-08 04:25:11 PM
Regarding Palestinians being kicked out of the homes and Israeli policies - here is a recent article that makes me consider Big Al's "security first" policy to be disengenous.

The destruction of Palestinian homes and Israel's double-standard
 
2003-05-08 04:25:39 PM
SuseJ--
"GEAH: They didnt live under the same system we live in today. One Arab would own a large large piece of land, and dozens more would live on it and farm it, and had lived on the same land for generations. The Israeli's came in, bought up the land from the owner, and kicked everyone off that was there for generations. Coupled with Buying businesss and firing all the Arab employees, this rightfully pissed arabs off."

Rightfully?

Excuse me? If I buy land from you, you and everyone else on it is history. If other people living on it have a problem with that they need to take that up with YOU for selling it in the first place. Me? It's shopping mall time, baby. Wait six months and they can get a job at the new McDonald's if they want.
 
2003-05-08 04:26:33 PM
Big Al: 2. jews are the most hated group of people in history, bar none. Anyone trying to deny this will definately have a hard time.

Personally, I'd say black Africans are, but for quite different reasons.
 
2003-05-08 04:26:51 PM
Big Al:

Well even if you are not willing to go into all the details to support your position regarding conservatives and Israel, couldn't you at least post a link to something more current than events that happened almost 50 years ago?
 
2003-05-08 04:29:22 PM
Israel is supported by conservatives because they are a democracy, and an island of relative human rights in start contrast to the sea of dictatorships and brutalitarian regimes in the Middle East.

Furthermore, the Jews have been on that land for about 4000 years...Tel Aviv is *not* Palestine...Jordan is Palestine.

Hell, Palestine is the Latin term for "Phillistine", given to the land by Titus when he ordered the Jews scattered to the edges of the Roman Empire.

Another reason conservatives like them: They are survivors. The Jews have been 'wiped out' so many times, it's almost sickeningly humorous how they've survived. Today, millions argue w/ their bosses and order takeout in Hebrew, while Latin(the language of Titus) has been dead for ages.
 
2003-05-08 04:32:53 PM
Big Al--
"Oops, I meant "Please explain what has been worse persecution of a group of people, worse than what stalin and hitler did to the jews""

Tough call between the Jews and the...

drum roll...

American Indian.
 
2003-05-08 04:36:55 PM
Big Al,

I was the poster that you refered to as "moronic' for suggesting that Israeli Arabs don't have full rights in Israel. Even if Arabs have rights on paper, these can't be enforcing in an environment of discrimination that includes the courts, law enforement, housing, jobs, education, etc. It's perfectly reasonable to argue that the discrimination doesn't exist, but not to deny the possibility.
 
2003-05-08 04:40:19 PM
Stoke

That was a good comeback. American slaughter of natives really is analagous to the actions of the nazis. Wholesale slaughter of men, women and children with a mind to owning their land and their property once they were dead seen as acceptable because "they" were barely human savages (untermenschen).

Extra points for speed.
 
2003-05-08 04:41:56 PM
Tough call between the Jews and the...

drum roll...

American Indian.


Compare and contrast the Jewish experience and American Indian experience from the 5000-year period from 3500BC to 1500AD.
 
2003-05-08 04:43:04 PM
Here's a link to eye-witness accounts of Israel's brutal occupation - mainly by peace activists.

Witnesses to an occupation
 
2003-05-08 04:45:40 PM
05-08-03 04:41:56 PM GEAH

Compare and contrast the Jewish experience and American Indian experience from the 5000-year period from 3500BC to 1500AD.

and we have a winner!!!
 
2003-05-08 04:46:20 PM
Bill_Wick's_Friend: American slaughter of natives really is analagous to the actions of the nazis. Wholesale slaughter of men, women and children with a mind to owning their land and their property once they were dead seen as acceptable because "they" were barely human savages (untermenschen).

Nice try, but not quite.

For the most part, the technologically superior Europeans viewed the mostly nomadic, generally disorganized people who had earlier immigrated to the Americans (there are no native Americans), to be an impediment to their civilization of the continent. Obviously, they made huge errors in judgement, but to compare what happened in the pre-1900s to the Nazis is ridiculous. The Nazis simply didn't like the Jews and the fact that, in many cases, the Jews were farking smarter and more successful than they were. This was all about political scapegoating, which is nothing like Manifest Destiny.
 
2003-05-08 04:46:26 PM
GEAH--
"Compare and contrast the Jewish experience and American Indian experience from the 5000-year period from 3500BC to 1500AD."

No can do. There is little no history of the American Indians prior to the Spanish landing other than cave paintings. Jews are recorded and screwed over fairly often with some good military come-backs and conquering of their own. They weren't persecuted that entire time. The Jews did a good bit of ass-kicking, themselves.

However, Big Al wanted a comparison of Stalin and Hitler's treatment of the Jews only, which he got.
 
2003-05-08 04:46:58 PM
05-08-03 04:36:55 PM Theigorway


Big Al,

I was the poster that you refered to as "moronic' for suggesting that Israeli Arabs don't have full rights in Israel. Even if Arabs have rights on paper, these can't be enforcing in an environment of discrimination that includes the courts, law enforement, housing, jobs, education, etc. It's perfectly reasonable to argue that the discrimination doesn't exist, but not to deny the possibility.


For the hundreth farking time. I never denied the possiblity. I just said that Arabs have every right, by law, that jews have, in Israel. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
2003-05-08 04:47:03 PM
The Jews have been persecuted for 5,000 years. Yes. But that doesnt justify their oppression of someone else. Im all about Jews having their own nation within secure borders in Israel. They just need to do it within the 1967 borders, which is allready more than the UN gave them in 1948. It is far more than enough.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 04:49:19 PM
05-08-03 04:46:26 PM Stoke

However, Big Al wanted a comparison of Stalin and Hitler's treatment of the Jews only, which he got.


Those were just 2 examples of the big "the world hates the jews" picture. I wasn't turning this into a poker game, "I'll give you the holocaust and stalins regime" "Ill see your bet, and raise you the Native Americans slaughter!"
 
2003-05-08 04:49:32 PM
"Furthermore, the Jews have been on that land for about 4000 years...Tel Aviv is *not* Palestine...Jordan is Palestine."

Again, more distortion. When the first Zionists began to survey the land of Palestine, it was already a fairly well inhabited area. Even in the years leading up to Israel's independance, the Jews in the area made up only a very small minority.
 
2003-05-08 04:50:04 PM


I'd like to say that this is really a great discussion. Instead of one side lining up against the other, we have quite a few different discussions going, with allies and advesaries often switching places.

Great job, Farkers!
 
2003-05-08 04:50:54 PM
05-08-03 04:47:03 PM SuseJ

The Jews have been persecuted for 5,000 years. Yes. But that doesnt justify their oppression of someone else. Im all about Jews having their own nation within secure borders in Israel. They just need to do it within the 1967 borders, which is allready more than the UN gave them in 1948. It is far more than enough.


So do you have a problem with the US' war on terror, then? You seem to be up in arms about how badly Israel treats terrorists and civilians in the same cities, are you fighting the same fight against the US when they go into Afghanistan, Iraq, and countless other nations, all in the "War on Terror"? Please keep in mind, as I pointed above, Israels policies have to be more hardlined, because their chances of being destroyed are far greater than that of the US' chances.
 
2003-05-08 04:52:25 PM
Yeah yeah yeah....i know it's close but no cigar.

But it's still a good analogy considering that the events are seperated by a few small thingys like the industrial revolution and other such small milestones in civilization.

Methinks (and, hey, I wasn't there so I don't know fer sure) that hitler's thoughts on the jews were likely similar to custer's thoughts on the siouxs: Kill them or convert them to Christianity and take their land.

(no wait...that's Ann Coulter....)
 
2003-05-08 04:52:46 PM
05-08-03 04:49:32 PM Kilgore40

Again, more distortion. When the first Zionists began to survey the land of Palestine, it was already a fairly well inhabited area. Even in the years leading up to Israel's independance, the Jews in the area made up only a very small minority.

And would you be so kind as to explain exactly why there was a small amount of jews living in the land now called Israel? Could it possibly be, because the arabs were powerful enough to stop jewish immigrants? And could the numbers have turned into millions of jews going to Israel after the independence because of the arabs kicking out of jews after the UN declared Israel a country?
 
2003-05-08 04:53:18 PM
Big Al--
"I wasn't turning this into a poker game, "I'll give you the holocaust and stalins regime" "Ill see your bet, and raise you the Native Americans slaughter!""


Rofl, alright, fair enough. Just remember, while the Jews have been defiantely screwed in history, they aren't the only ones to see it on a catastrophic scale.
 
2003-05-08 04:57:48 PM
And never did I say the jews were the only hated group in history, just the MOST hated group if you add up ever year of civilization. That is all. And yes, the native americans were treated horribly, then the US government had the nerve to turn around and rewrite history to their liking. Great read is "Lies my Teacher Told me" by James Loewan
 
2003-05-08 04:59:39 PM
The UN did not declare Israel a country, Israel did and the United States recognized Israel's soveriegnty. The original UN plan was to partition Transjordan according to the local population's make up and keep it as a UN protectorate. This was unacceptable to both sides and the 1948-49 war followed.
 
2003-05-08 05:02:18 PM
LexiLuthor- Let me see if I have this right. You think that if Germany had not declared war on us and Japan had not attacked us we should have completely stayed out of WWII? Let Hitler roll over Europe, kill all the Jews, Gypsies, gays and every other person who didn't fit in with his perfect man idea. Let Japan take over all of Asia, slaughter the Chinese and anyone else who dared stand up against them. Who do you think the Axis would have come after once they had taken care of all their problems over in Europe and Asia? Do you think they would have left the US alone because we didn't interfere with their plans? I suppose if somone was breaking into your neighbors house and trying to kill and you had the ability to stop them you wouldn't do anything about it because hey, it's not your house so it's not your problem. If i've misunderstood your position let me know, otherwise it makes no sense to me.
 
2003-05-08 05:06:45 PM
05-08-03 04:59:39 PM BritneysSpeculum

The UN did not declare Israel a country, Israel did and the United States recognized Israel's soveriegnty.


Damn, I guess that whole UN represenatives voting to recognize Israel as a country was just misinformation given by the zionist media!

The original UN plan was to partition Transjordan according to the local population's make up and keep it as a UN protectorate. This was unacceptable to both sides and the 1948-49 war followed.


The plan was for an Israel, and a Palestine. The arabs would have none of it, and their armies attacked Israel. They lost, and as the old saying goes, "To the victor goes the spoils"
 
2003-05-08 05:07:23 PM
SuseJ:

If the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza is the root of the whole problem now, then why is it that the PLO was founded in 1963??? Or did your informed history books omit that?

There is nothing illegal about the buying practices of Histadrut, any more than your local government buying the property of a farmer in order to build a shopping mall.

The governments of the other Arab nations are quite happy to keep the conflict in Israel going, since it focuses the attention of their populations on a scapegoat somewhere else, rather than realizing "hey, we live in a shiatehole, while our leaders live like sultans...why can't they spend some of their money on improving our lives???." They care about the "plight of the Palestinians" even less than they care about the plight of people living in their own countries, which is only slightly more than they care about navel lint. As long as they can focus the Mullahs righteous indignation on something other than their own corruption and avarice, then they can survive.

One last question and then I am done with this thread. Jews had been living in relatively large numbers in countries like Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Yemen, etc... what do you think would happen to the descendants of those who were kicked out/killed if they decided to return to their "homelands," since they had been living there for generations (many since before the "Golden Age of Spain")?
 
2003-05-08 05:08:04 PM
05-08-03 05:02:18 PM Absolutben

LexiLuthor- Let me see if I have this right. You think that if Germany had not declared war on us and Japan had not attacked us we should have completely stayed out of WWII?


LexiLuthor already proved he/she/it is a mindless troll. But my problem with the US is that if it wasn't for Pearl Harbor, how much longer would they have waited to join the fight?

How many page 12 small little sentences with "possible jews being killed by nazis" would it have taken to get people to want to stop the horrible acts?
 
2003-05-08 05:09:04 PM
BigAl: "So do you have a problem with the US' war on terror, then? "

No, I have no problem with most of our war on terror. I supported the invasion of Iraq. But I wouldnt support it if we stayed in Iraq for 40 years under military occupation shooting any civilians who looked at you funny.

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 05:09:50 PM
05-08-03 05:07:23 PM Dracunculus

The governments of the other Arab nations are quite happy to keep the conflict in Israel going, since it focuses the attention of their populations on a scapegoat somewhere else, rather than realizing "hey, we live in a shiatehole, while our leaders live like sultans...why can't they spend some of their money on improving our lives???." They care about the "plight of the Palestinians" even less than they care about the plight of people living in their own countries, which is only slightly more than they care about navel lint. As long as they can focus the Mullahs righteous indignation on something other than their own corruption and avarice, then they can survive.


BINGO!

Jews had been living in relatively large numbers in countries like Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Yemen, etc... what do you think would happen to the descendants of those who were kicked out/killed if they decided to return to their "homelands," since they had been living there for generations (many since before the "Golden Age of Spain")?

Millions of jews were kicked out of these countries after 1948. as a response to Israel becoming a country.
 
2003-05-08 05:11:24 PM
05-08-03 05:09:04 PM SuseJ

No, I have no problem with most of our war on terror. I supported the invasion of Iraq. But I wouldnt support it if we stayed in Iraq for 40 years under military occupation shooting any civilians who looked at you funny.


You wouldn't support a military occupation even if said Iraqi citizens kept attacking the US? I get it, the US is free to take over a country, kill anybody they want, use camps like X-Ray to torture and kill and keep people locked up, but when Israel does it, SHAME ON THOSE ZIONIST PIGS!
 
2003-05-08 05:14:30 PM
PS. Occupation did not occur until after the 67 war. So what was their excuse before then?
 
2003-05-08 05:15:07 PM
Big Al

I've always assumed you were an Israeli living in Israel...and yet you just referred to "OUR war on terror".

Just curious....where are u?
 
2003-05-08 05:15:36 PM
"Millions of jews were kicked out of these countries after 1948. as a response to Israel becoming a country."

No reasonable person doubts that Jewish peoples all over the world have been victimized. But, the treatment of Jews in other countries is too often included in arguments that justify or excuse the brutal occupation of the West Bank and Gaza by Israel.
 
2003-05-08 05:18:26 PM
Who do you think would win a war of Isreal vs. the middle east, if one broke out right now. Isreal couldn't use nukes unless it was almost close to being defeated though. The reason I'm wondering this is the US just walked through Iraq with our air/land/sea forces. So, if the US helped Isreal, it wouldn't take too long. But, I am thinking that all of the big countries would stay out of this, who would win. It is Isreal vs. Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Lebannon, Iran, Pakistan(No Nukes), Saudi Arabia, Yemen, U.A.E, Turkey?, Iraq?, Afganistan? Algeria. Does technology improve armies by that much. Will air superiority play a decisive role? Will an overwelming number of muslim fighters dominate?
 
2003-05-08 05:20:13 PM
Normal

Long question. Short answer.

Israel would win.
 
2003-05-08 05:22:22 PM
Shorter answer - no one would win.
 
2003-05-08 05:24:25 PM
Drac "If the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza is the root of the whole problem now, then why is it that the PLO was founded in 1963???"

So what? The fact that the PLO was founded in 1963 in no way invalidates what I said. The conflict is now much much different than it was 40 years ago.
 
2003-05-08 05:25:50 PM
05-08-03 05:15:07 PM Bill_Wick's_Friend

Big Al

I've always assumed you were an Israeli living in Israel...and yet you just referred to "OUR war on terror".

Just curious....where are u?


Sorry, I ment to say "US' war on terror"... my typing got confused between Israels war on terror, and Americans. BTW, where I am located.... that is classified :)
 
2003-05-08 05:26:10 PM


Other than the fact that your "shorter" answer is one word longer than my "short" answer I do concede that u are likely correct.

Or: Strange game, Professor Falken....the only winning move is not to play.
 
2003-05-08 05:27:01 PM
05-08-03 05:24:25 PM SuseJ

So what? The fact that the PLO was founded in 1963 in no way invalidates what I said. The conflict is now much much different than it was 40 years ago.


It is different. Instead of hijacking airplanes and Olympic villages, they send young mindless children and adults to blow themselves up in such military places as Discos and restaurant. Spare me.
 
2003-05-08 05:27:39 PM
Strange game, professor Falken. The only winning move is to CLOSE YOUR GODDAMN TAGS

(mmmmmm....lead paint chips...)
 
2003-05-08 05:28:00 PM
That place has been called palistine for like 2000 years or so.
 
2003-05-08 05:28:19 PM
Please see past wars and then figure out who has the most current technology. Israel would destroy the other countries, but it would take a gigantic toll on their economy.
 
2003-05-08 05:30:07 PM
BigAl: "You wouldn't support a military occupation even if said Iraqi citizens kept attacking the US? I get it, the US is free to take over a country, kill anybody they want, use camps like X-Ray to torture and kill and keep people locked up, but when Israel does it, SHAME ON THOSE ZIONIST PIGS!"

Ummm no. I would not support a lengthy U.S. occupation in Iraq for any reason. I dont support Israeli's occupation, or Americas 'hypothetical' occupation.

"PS. Occupation did not occur until after the 67 war. So what was their excuse before then?"

before 1967 Israeli's had my support. They used shady measures to get their land. They pissed people off. They did bad things, but they still had my support. Up until the 40 year long, cruel, inhumane military occupation, thats when my support ends.
 
2003-05-08 05:39:43 PM
Military Occupation is the only thing keeping terrorists and the people in the Palestinian governments who support them, from having vast resources to plan attacks against Israel.

It has been said for over 20 years, occupation will end when the Palestinians want to police themselves. Until they will fight terrorists on a regular basis, the IDF will do it for them.

Anything different would be suicide by the Israelis, no pun intended.
 
2003-05-08 05:45:06 PM
If Israel withdrew Palestine would have no reason or excuse for the suicide bombings anymore. Its a different world than it was 40 years ago. Before, all the arab countries wanted Israel dead. Not anymore. Egypt has been at peace with Israel for decades. All the other leaders have said that they no longer wish for Israel to be 'driven into the sea'. The idea that all the arab leaders will attack Israel as soon as it gives up the West bank is outdated by a decade or so.

Anyway, if they did withdraw to 67' territory, and then were attacked by every arab country nonetheless (unlikely), Israel wouldnt be alone..
 
2003-05-08 05:52:24 PM
SuseJ--
"If Israel withdrew Palestine would have no reason or excuse for the suicide bombings anymore. Its a different world than it was 40 years ago."

Israel did try to withdraw last year and the Palestinians responded with an increased number of suicide bombings before they could even fully get out. They've tried to withdraw three times and each time they do they get hit with fresh waves of bombings.
 
2003-05-08 05:53:11 PM
05-08-03 05:45:06 PM SuseJ

If Israel withdrew Palestine would have no reason or excuse for the suicide bombings anymore.


Sure, they'd go find another excuse to hate the jews.


Its a different world than it was 40 years ago. Before, all the arab countries wanted Israel dead. Not anymore.


LOL!!! Yes, of course, they all love the jews now, its only the Palestinians who have problems with them! *clueless*

Egypt has been at peace with Israel for decades.


And why? Because the US sends Israel 3 billion, and Egypt 2 billion, to play nice.

All the other leaders have said that they no longer wish for Israel to be 'driven into the sea'. The idea that all the arab leaders will attack Israel as soon as it gives up the West bank is outdated by a decade or so.


In English they tell you that, you'd be surprised at whats in those textbooks and spoken in arabic to the people. Plus, you honestly believe somebody by what they say? Hitler said he wouldn't kill any jews, who would have thought he lied??? I mean, HE SAID IT! IT MUST BE TRUE!

Anyway, if they did withdraw to 67' territory, and then were attacked by every arab country nonetheless (unlikely), Israel wouldnt be alone..


Was Israel alone in any previous war? Besides the US sending a few supplies here and there, exactly which nation went in to help out? Did the UN get involved? Or did everyone sit back on their hands waiting for Israel to lose... only they didn't. They kicked the arabs' a$$, and that pissed them off even more!
 
2003-05-08 05:55:50 PM


Free Palestine!
 
2003-05-08 06:00:14 PM
"Israel did try to withdraw last year and the Palestinians responded with an increased number of suicide bombings before they could even fully get out. They've tried to withdraw three times and each time they do they get hit with fresh waves of bombings."

They have never tried to fully withdraw. If they fully withdrew, they could get a fresh wave of suicide bombings, but it would at least have an end in sight, unlike the current conflict.


"Was Israel alone in any previous war?"

Israel wasnt our ally in 48, and in the previous wars they didnt need our help because they had our weapons. BigAl- do you really believe that if Israel withdrew, and was subsequently attacked by every Arab Nation, that the US wouldnt help at all?

Furthermore, why do you believe that the act of giving up a little bit of land, would suddenly cause 10 nations to attack from every direction? It doesnt make sense
 
2003-05-08 06:09:09 PM
First off, let me say that I am an Israeli-American... I know, to many of you, that means my opinions on this matter really don't count. To those of you who would insist I am just an American, I would disagree. I have citizenship and family in both countries and my parents are both from Tel Aviv.

Now, for those of you who are still reading, thank you for being open to a view from the inside that will most likely come under harsh critisism. I hope that the critisism, however, doesn't target my education, because althought I don't wish to name the college that I'm attending (too personal for me) I assure you it is one of the most rigorous and well-respected colleges in the United States.

The general agreement over the anti-Israel people (for those who don't just want us to grow gills and populate the mediterrainean) is that Israel should pull back to the 1967 borders and give the Palestinian people the so-called "occupied territories" which never belonged to them anyway, but okay, lets just assume it did for the sake of simplicity. There are a number of major problems with this.
1. We have cultivated and developed the land. Our money has turned many of these areas from wasted space, to developed communities.
2. The main reason is a small city, the capital city of the nation of Israel coincidentally, called Jerusalem. Arafat was offered 97% of the occupied territories (this is how the entifada started, read up) leaving out Jerusalem, and instead compensating that with other land so as to not diminish the size of the state Arafat would recieve. Arafat deemed it unacceptable, and in a move of unbelievable stupidity, left the bargaining table and declared the entifada.

First, let me say that 'right of return' is a proposterous notion. These territories were taken in defensive war and it has been over 30 years since then. They are now settled and built. The people who fled from that land did not have a hand in building it, nor did they invest the money. Even if the Israelis are argued to be occupying someone else's land, the most lenient squatter laws in the world wouldn't give the land back to the owners after all that time.

Secondly, Jerusalem is the backbone of the Israeli nation. It is in the national anthem, in the charter, and it houses the most holy site in the Jewish faith. As a territory, Jews were denied the right to visit and pray there, and now, under Israeli rule, everyone, regardless of race, color, or creed can pray in Jerusalem. Note that Israel has never in the history of the country destroyed a completed mosque, ever.

Now, you claim that Israel wants land. That's nonsense. Israel has, and always will want peace. When Israel gained control of the Sinai (another territory gained at war) and then eventually won the war, it subsequently did something that no other nation has ever done. It gave the land back for peace. No other nation on the planet would do that. They beat Egypt in a war. Under any other circumstances, Egypt would have had to sign a peace treaty under Israel's terms, or face being taken over. Tremendous statesmanship has been shown by Israel throughout history, and is continuing to be shown.

As far as the current occupation. If you can suggest an alternative to Sharon's policy, please, by all means, tell me. In Jordan they kill the terrorist and his entire family. I'm pretty sure it's very similar in all the neighboring countries. When IDF troops, who, contrary to your views, are not monsterous criminals, but college-age kids, enter the "territories" to investigate terrorist crimes, anyone who doesn't have a gun to shoot at them throws rocks. In war, when you are fired upon, you return fire. Everyone everywhere, aside from those who truly hate, is sorry for any innocent civilian casualties.

Now, before you call me racist and a number of other nasty names, let me also say that one of my closest friends is Palestinian. I also have very fond memories of my time staying in Tel Aviv and going over to Jericho for lunch with my Uncle and his Palestinian business associates (this is pre-entifada, when there was a large casino in Jericho and the Palestinians were making a mint off of it.) I have nothing against the Palestinian people. Nothing. I just have a first hand view of what many of you like to point at from the other side of the world and shout about.

That said. I have some work to do.
 
2003-05-08 06:10:37 PM
No invisible guy in the sky ever played favorites with anyone. That's just a lot of hockey made up by spinmeisters to justify resource-grabbing.

It is Palestine, as well as a number of other things. . .
 
2003-05-08 06:12:16 PM
They have never tried to fully withdraw. If they fully withdrew, they could get a fresh wave of suicide bombings, but it would at least have an end in sight, unlike the current conflict.

What a stupid statement. I mean, the US could withdraw from countless nations, sure it would hurt their economy, and sure there would be a better opportunity for terrorists to attack the US.........

are you willing to take that chance?

Israel wasnt our ally in 48, and in the previous wars they didnt need our help because they had our weapons.

By "our" weapons, do you mean in the 60s when the US created a import ban against Israel and forced them to buy small amounts of US made products, including airplanes, etc? Or how about in the 48 war, when almost all of Israels military equipment was bought from Czech, France, a few African nations, and others.

You seem to assume that the US will gladly supply countless goods to Israel at no cost, which is ridiuclous. The only reason the US sends 3 billion dollars in aid is to shut Israel up about the policies the Mossad knows that the CIA and the US military is guilty of.

BigAl- do you really believe that if Israel withdrew, and was subsequently attacked by every Arab Nation, that the US wouldnt help at all?


The US "might" help, but just like previously, they would only help enough not to piss off the arabs and their oil exporting. Would the UN help? Definately not.
 
2003-05-08 06:13:21 PM
Big Al--
"Was Israel alone in any previous war? Besides the US sending a few supplies here and there, exactly which nation went in to help out? Did the UN get involved? Or did everyone sit back on their hands waiting for Israel to lose... only they didn't. They kicked the arabs' a$$, and that pissed them off even more!"

The US did assist Israel when they went into Lebanon to try and prevent the overthrow of the government by the Palestinians and Syria. I wouldn't exactly call the amount of military assistance from the US "a few supplies here and there." "Made in the USA" is stamped on quite a lot a large portion of their military equipment. Their Air Force is mostly American made, for example.

American supplies to Israel during the 70's Egyptian attempt to retake the Sinai peninsula was enough to warrant the oil embargo that hurt us pretty badly but we still kept the supply line going.
 
2003-05-08 06:16:24 PM
Well said, StillWaitingForGodot

One of my friends was called back to the IDF after 9-11, and I have lost touch with him. Most people assume that the Palestinians are just throwing rocks. They are also throwing gernades, molotov coctails, and firing AK-47s. The press just loves it when they get pictures of a rock being thrown at a tank, to make it seem like Israel is the big bully against these poor little kids and nothing else.

Sharon is a hawk, but he was voted into power because the vast majority of Israelis believe that there is no other alterantive except fight fire with fire. And it is working.
 
2003-05-08 06:18:23 PM
Yes, the supply line was still going, and thanks to Alexander Haig, who was one of the few pro-Israeli people in the US administration. Remember, most of the airplanes and tanks are bought by Israel from US companies, it isn't just the government saying "here Israel, take some F-15s"

Israel buys many American made products, just like many other countries do, saying that the US government is the reason for that is outrageous.
 
2003-05-08 06:23:05 PM
Big All: "The only reason the US sends 3 billion dollars in aid is to shut Israel up about the policies the Mossad knows that the CIA and the US military is guilty of."

And where are your facts for this?
 
2003-05-08 06:25:17 PM
05-08-03 06:23:05 PM Theigorway

And where are your facts for this?


Dejavu all over again!

The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People by John Loftus
 
2003-05-08 06:28:01 PM
Big Al, would it surprise you that some of us might find it hard to take your more fringe statements seriously without better sources/facts?

I'd even suggest that spurious statements like "The only reason the US sends 3 billion dollars in aid is to shut Israel up about the policies the Mossad knows that the CIA and the US military is guilty of" undermine your credibility.
 
2003-05-08 06:31:46 PM
Big Al,

I like the last review I saw on Amazon's website regarding your bible of US-Israeli relations.

"This book is nothing but fantasy. The authors laboriously cite "authorities" for their various outrageous claims, which authorities are rarely more than citations to anonymous or unnamed confidential "sources." It is hard to tell which is more offensive, the extreme paranoid fantasies presented by the authors as "fact," or their expectation that readers will somehow accept their repeated citations to phantom "authorities.""
 
2003-05-08 06:35:22 PM
WaitingForGodot: Yeah, Sharon offered back 97% of the land they stole. Next time try 100%. Thank you

-Stephen
 
2003-05-08 06:38:15 PM
StillWaitingForGodot, Generally people describe Rabin's offer to Arafat as 95%. And, in my view The 95% number is misleading. To quote another writer "that 5% is crucial stuff, roads and headwaters and East Jerusalem. Imagine if you were offered a house to buy, but told that you could not cross the front walk because it did not belong to you, or that you had no right to the water that was running through the house: it might be there now but would not be later. I bring up this clarification because I think it supports your suggestion that we need to be careful about black and white thinking. If we hear 95% we think that means someone must be a fool to reject it, but the situation is much more complex than that, and rejecting that 95% may be a very smart thing to do. [This is no kind fo justification of Arafat, who is a thug.]"
 
2003-05-08 06:45:55 PM
StillWaitingForGodot - your statement "Now, you claim that Israel wants land. That's nonsense. Israel has, and always will want peace," is overly broad to say the least. A significant percentage of Israels population, particularly the settlers are land-hungry and view the West Bank and Gaza as part of Israel's entitlement granted by God.

I don't know exactly how many Israels feel entitled to what is historically palestinian land, but the government does seem to be responding to their views.
 
2003-05-08 06:53:46 PM
05-08-03 06:31:46 PM Theigorway
Big Al,

I like the last review I saw on Amazon's website regarding your bible of US-Israeli relations.


Why not read the book and come up with your own conclusions? Any book, especially something like this, will get bad reviews from people unwilling to accept what goes on in the world.

05-08-03 06:35:22 PM SuseJ

WaitingForGodot: Yeah, Sharon offered back 97% of the land they stole. Next time try 100%. Thank you


So when are you packing up and moving so the Native Americans can reclaim the land that was stolen by the United States? BTW - most land was not stolen in the first place. It was purchased. Secondly, if the jews stole all the land, how does that explain why there are hundreds of thousands of arabs who live in Israel?
 
2003-05-08 06:55:25 PM
05-08-03 06:45:55 PM Theigorway

I don't know exactly how many Israels feel entitled to what is historically palestinian land, but the government does seem to be responding to their views.


Settlements are viewed by the Israeli government as buffer zones against the terrorists. So they somewhat support citizens moving there. Plus, they are Israeli citizens, the governments job is to protect them.
 
2003-05-08 06:56:38 PM
05-08-03 06:31:46 PM Theigorway
Big Al,

I like the last review I saw on Amazon's website regarding your bible of US-Israeli relations.


And I find it hilarious how you skimmed over the 99.9% good reviews and found the bad one. Especially the one talking only about Chapter 1 and their thoughts. Classic sheep tactics. Refuse to read anything that might alter your opinion on something.
 
2003-05-08 07:00:19 PM
Big Al - I get the impression that you are rather young. It is perhaps a bit naive to base all your conclusions about US-Israeli relations on one book - especially one that relies on shadowy, conspiracy-type theories. There are plenty of mainstream sources of information and public records that seem to contradict the conclusions you've drawn.

I may still pick up this book if I ever see it in a 2nd-hand store though.
 
2003-05-08 07:43:16 PM
Maybe I wasn't clear on the one point in my view that you have chosen to argue against... The other 3% was East Jerusalem. Ask any other country in the world to give up half of it's capital for peace, you'll probably get, well, stones thrown at you...

/irony

Also, it is my personal belief that Arafat didn't take the deal because he is afraid of peace. He has spent so much of his life fighting, going down as a peacemaker would be shame him to his Arab compatriots. He would much rather go down as a revolutionary, no matter how many innocents die of his stubbornness
 
2003-05-08 08:12:53 PM
LexiLuthor

My $.02

Take all US forces out of Isreal and Palestine. Take all US made weapons out of them as well. Let them fight it out in hand to hand combat or with whatever meager weapons they might have made themselves. To the victor go the spoils.

I really don't see why the US or any other country gives a shiat which group "owns" the land. I bet Isreal would be much more willing to find a peaceful solution if they did not have the US backing them up.

Isolationism is the key to our future!


Asshat, Israel EXPORTS weapons. Many US weapons are Israeli technology.
 
2003-05-08 08:22:55 PM
Dickenscyder: "Right wing Israelis killed Peres in order to stop the peace process"

Are you on crack? Peres is alive and well... he just hasnt won any elections lately.

Methinks you meant Rabin, you ignorant asshat
 
2003-05-08 08:23:20 PM
zionism is apartheid... it's off the thread , but then the thread, or the talk about a pilot who mentioned palestine, is shot to shiat... there are too many Farkers who don't now shiat about the region, i suggest they go back to school, oh... wait a minute, school doesn't teach except the 'official line'. Israel created palestinain nationalist aspirations by invading, occupying and settling the lands, israel created the monster of arab terrorism by excluding palestinians in the democratic system... israel, and the unwavering US support of an apartheid stae which has violated more UN resolutions than any in the world (not to mention racist policies and a will to commit genocide), destryed the twin towers... and there will be more to come, as each US conquest (afghanistan, iraq, palestine) occurs, another generation of terrorists(always more extreme than the previous) is spawned. The US feeds Israel, the US arms Israel, and the US turns a blind eye to Israel's sins... don't be too surprised then if it is the US which is held responsible for upholding the illegal status quo... All the weapons in the world will not bring a solution to the Israeli problem.... so get wise, get real, get informed, and get out of Palestine
 
2003-05-08 08:27:27 PM
Big Al--
"Israel buys many American made products, just like many other countries do, saying that the US government is the reason for that is outrageous."

No, it's not outrageous. Where do you think a ton of that money that we give Israel every year goes? Right back to us for military equipment. We may as well be giving them the equipment from the get-go. We give them a ton of cash and they pick and choose what military equipment they want to buy with it.

Theigorway--
"I don't know exactly how many Israels feel entitled to what is historically palestinian land, but the government does seem to be responding to their views."

Historically palestinian land? Ever heard of a place called Judea? That was the land historically belonging to the Jews. I'll give you a clue... Syria, Jordan, and Israel are all sitting on top of it.
 
2003-05-08 08:33:18 PM
People, here's the *real* problem with this Alitalia clown:
he was landing in Tel Aviv, and said "Welcome to Palestine". See,this is a problem 'cause unlike Jerusalem, Tel Aviv isn't part of the West Bank or Gaza, and has *always* been a Jewish city (As opposed to Jerusalem, which *is* located on the West Bank of the Jordan, and *has* been under Christian and Moslem control, and has been alleged to be part of "Palestine" ) . Until this century, actually, there wasn't anything there except a big bloody sand dune. The Dizengoff and the Jewish Agency wandered in and built a nice seaside town. Which they called Tel Aviv.

So here's the problem: the pilot is either ignorant of history or geography, and I wouldn't want a pilot who had geography issues piloting the plane.
 
2003-05-08 08:37:37 PM
SuseJ

Stoke: Dude, you need to learn how to think.

"If they were sending in suicide bombers, we would indeed, be occupying Mexico right now."

So, your justifying Israeli's occupation because of the suicide bobmers.

to bad they were occupying decades before the suicide bombers started.

Sorry, try again

-Stephen


Uhm.. idiot, the PLO was founded in 1966 and the FIRST suicide bombing was before the 1967 war.
learn some history
 
2003-05-08 09:10:43 PM
The only way to fight the deadliness of hurled rocks is to put bullets through their heads, bulldoze their homes, and steal their land.
 
2003-05-08 10:01:12 PM
...the really stupid thing is, everyone's worshipping the same God...

...you know, if you believe in that guy...
 
2003-05-08 10:19:41 PM
Theigorway and SuseJ

In the last offer before Arafat declared the second Intifada the Israelis offer the Palestinians 97 percent of the West Bank. Also the Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem would become the capital of the new Palestinian state, refugees would be allowed to return to Palestine but not Israel, the settlements not on the "Green line" would be dismantled (along with those in Gaza), and a $30 billion fund would be established to compensate refugees. This deal also included ALL of Gaza along with a landlink (a raised road or railway) connecting the two.

This is what Arafat rejected outright. He didn't make a counter-offer. He just flat out rejected it and then delcared the Intifada. What's more is that Palestinian officials latter PUBLICALLY claimed that they had intended to start the Intifada anyway, and that Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount (the complex, which includes the Western Wall, is the holiest site in Judaism) was merely used as an excuse. The Palestinian Authority simply does not want peace (the reason, I believe, is because to have peace would mean a serious reduction in their power, plus being forced to acknowledge the existence of Israel).

SuseJ, you have asked several times why Israel hasn't offered back the land they "took" in 1967. The fact of the matter is, if they gave "back" the land, you would still not have a Palestinian state. You would merely have a slightly larger Egypt and Jordan. In your myriad ramblings, you have never addressed the fact that Jordan and Egypt were in possession of those territories prior to 1967. You should say, in the future, that you want Israel to give the land they took in 1967 to the Palestinians, to form a state. Anyway, they offered to create a state for Palestinians in 1993, and it has consistantly been the Palestinians who refuse to negotiate. Were some of the offers crappy? Yes. However, that is part of negotiation. One said asks for more than they will settle for and the other offers less than they are willing to part with, with both parties meeting somewhere in the middle. However, this is not what has happened. The Palestinians have not budged in their demands. Are they justified in doing so? I don't know, however, you would think they would want what is best for their people, not their egos. Thus logically, they would take a state now and rebuild their people's lives, and worry about the rest later. Yet they don't.

Here's a few more fun little factoids.

Several polls of the Palestinian people show they heavily (around 70%) support the Intifada and suicide bombings directed at Israeli (both military and civilians). The results of one from last year are here:
http://www.jmcc.org/publicpoll/results/2002/no45.htm

Several polls of the Israeli people show they support (64%) the creation of a viable Palestinian state in order to achieve peace, via the "Roadmap", some results of which can be found here:
http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=25963
(Heh, I even post a link from Arabnews.com. I dare you to tell me they are a Zionist controlled source)

Now, do you see the problem. On one hand, you have large public support to continue the violence on the part of the Palestinian leaders and the populace (not to mention the terrorists, backed by other Arab and Muslim nations). On the other hand, you have the bulk of the Israeli people, the targets of that terrorism, who support the establishment of a Palestinian state in return for ending the violence.

What is so fricking hard to figure out here?


You know what, I'll even back up my claims [about the Intifada], a first for Fark (just kidding, or am I?).

PA Communications Minister, Imad Al-Faluji, visited Lebanon and spoke at the Ein Al-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp on March 3, 2001.

"The Al-Aqsa Intifada emphasizes these principles and axioms. Whoever thinks that the Intifada broke out because of the despised Sharons visit to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, is wrong, even if this visit was the straw that broke the back of the Palestinian people. This Intifada was planned in advance, ever since President Arafats return from the Camp David negotiations, where he turned the table upside down on President Clinton. [Arafat] remained steadfast and challenged [Clinton]. He rejected the American terms and he did it in the heart of the US."

Look, it's pretty simple. If the Palestinians stop supporting/condoning/commiting terrorist acts against Israel, they will get what they say they want (a State). The problem is, it is rather obvious it is not what the Palestinian leadership and their Arab/Muslim state backers want. They want a continuation of the bloodshed to continually perpetuate the hostility against Israel. The Palestinian leaders want to keep their power and some probably still hope to destroy Israel (their state aim since the state's inception). The Arab/Muslim states which back want to keep using the conflict to take the mind of their people off their own wretched state. If the people of the Arab and Muslim world stopped having Israel to blame for their woes, they will suddenly realize that their own leadership was to blame all along. Subsequent to that, quite a few heads will end up on pikes.

Until the leadership changes on the Palestinian side (which it hasn't, despite what you might be reading in the media), and until financial backing of terrorism is cut off (which is starting to happen, finally), there will be no end.
 
2003-05-08 11:01:24 PM
05-08-03 10:19:41 PM BeowulfSmith
Several polls of the Palestinian people show they heavily (around 70%) support the Intifada and suicide bombings directed at Israeli (both military and civilians). The results of one from last year are here:
http://www.jmcc.org/publicpoll/results/2002/no45.htm


But that's impossible! EVERYBODY knows that the good name of the Palestinians is being besmirched by the actions of a violent minority.
/I read it on the internet - it must be true
 
2003-05-09 12:48:58 AM
BeowulfSmith... wow... you explained exactly what I wanted to, but couldn't articulate well enough... Also, I didn't have any of those articles at hand... very well done.

/In total awe.
 
2003-05-09 01:10:00 AM
"By "our" weapons, do you mean in the 60s when the US created a import ban against Israel and forced them to buy small amounts of US made products, including airplanes, etc? Or how about in the 48 war, when almost all of Israels military equipment was bought from Czech, France, a few African nations, and others.

You seem to assume that the US will gladly supply countless goods to Israel at no cost, which is ridiuclous. The only reason the US sends 3 billion dollars in aid is to shut Israel up about the policies the Mossad knows that the CIA and the US military is guilty of."

Or the nuclear secrets their spies stole from the United States?;) Saying the only reason we aid Israel is because of the "blackmail" they have on us, is pretty false. Yeah thats some of the reason. It's also so we have some say there, remember when we didn't want Israel to keep selling China technology they were, and well they stopped? Oh and the CIA isn't the only agency guilty of lame things...

"The US "might" help, but just like previously, they would only help enough not to piss off the arabs and their oil exporting. Would the UN help? Definately not. "

UN wouldn't do shiat, I think it's a more of, "Would they need our help?" I don't think any country in the Middle East, short of a nuke, could really do a whole lot against Israel in a military attack. Oh and the fact that they just have a couple of the bombs...Along with a history of seriously beating some ass.

"The Secret War Against the Jews"

Just ordered this book, I'm guessing it's going to be a bit biased, most books in the middle east tend to be. So many as just plain biased, use really horrid sources, and well have really flimsy conspiracy theories. But I still enjoy reading them;)Just finished rereading Gideon's Spies, good book.
 
2003-05-09 03:46:04 AM
BeowulfSmith

In the last offer before Arafat declared the second Intifada the Israelis offer the Palestinians 97 percent of the West Bank.

Which is NOT the same thing as 97% of Palestine proper, it is 97% only of what Israel calls the West Bank these days, which is around 72% of what it was originally set up by the UN to be before the invasion, expansions, and occupations began. 97% of 72% of what was rightfully theirs would be a better description. No wonder they were pissed.

Also the Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem would become the capital of the new Palestinian state, refugees would be allowed to return to Palestine but not Israel, the settlements not on the "Green line" would be dismantled (along with those in Gaza), and a $30 billion fund would be established to compensate refugees.

The Palestinians that fled family homes in Israel after their land was declared part of a country ruled by those that they hated and who more than likely hated them should be able to return. Some of those people had lived on the land for many hundreds of years, and have unbreakable links to the area. They should have the right to live there again if they are prepared to take out Israeli citizenship or special permanent residency and live as law abiding citizens.

Fark hears plenty of theories about how those residents don't deserve to return because they left so they would be safe while Syria et al bombed the crap out of Israel, but think about it without the hate and prejudice for a while.

If you lived in a country (say the USA) you knew was about to become a war zone, and you had little kids and knew you could take them to family in Canada for a while so they would be safe, what would you do? I bet the same proportions would leave there as left Israel. They were never allowed to return.

Also - I believe all the settlements in occupied territory have to go. No point in allowing those with the most animosity towards the Palestinians, the religious freaks that for the most part people the settlements, to stay. They don't deserve the right to be there unless they lived there before Israel was created, ie unless they are historical Palestinians.

This deal also included ALL of Gaza along with a landlink (a raised road or railway) connecting the two.

Gaza was never Israeli land, even historically. Israel has less right to Gaza than it does to the West Bank, imho, and the territory they were prepared to call Gaza is again much less than what was historically Gaza and what was marked as Gaza on the UN partition plan. I just find it strange that you'd say ALL of gaza when that's really no big thing. At least it shouldn't be.

This is what Arafat rejected outright. He didn't make a counter-offer.

I heard he was told take it or leave it, there wasn't negotiation room when the offer was finally made - it was a package deal. Since the right of return is something Palestinians would never have accepted the loss of, Arafat couldn't accept. No point in him 'accepting' for a people that would not have abided by the decision he made for them.

Without right of return I believe the whole thing would have fallen apart very quickly.

What's more is that Palestinian officials latter PUBLICALLY claimed that they had intended to start the Intifada anyway, and that Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount (the complex, which includes the Western Wall, is the holiest site in Judaism) was merely used as an excuse.

Yes, I'd believe that.

The Palestinian Authority simply does not want peace (the reason, I believe, is because to have peace would mean a serious reduction in their power, plus being forced to acknowledge the existence of Israel).

No, I don't believe this. I think they want peace, it would have cemented their power in fact, and provided them with shiatloads of money in aid and the refugee fund for them to administer.

Also - they already formally and legally (accepted by all parties, even Israel) have both recognised Israels right to exist and have stuck the sections of the PLO charter that called for the complete removal of 'the Zionist entity', or Israel, from historical Palestine. So the above paragraph is bullshiat.
 
2003-05-09 04:08:30 AM
"The Palestinians that fled family homes in Israel after their land was declared part of a country ruled by those that they hated and who more than likely hated them should be able to return."

The Palestinians that could prove they owned their home, before they fled were offered the ability to come back. I still have never heard anyone mention the Jews that were expelled from Arab lands, and lost more land then all of Israel, when they are arguing about Palestian state.
 
2003-05-09 04:10:20 AM
"Also - they already formally and legally (accepted by all parties, even Israel) have both recognised Israels right to exist and have stuck the sections of the PLO charter that called for the complete removal of 'the Zionist entity', or Israel, from historical Palestine. So the above paragraph is bullshiat. "
Since threads almost dead here comes the flamebait!

Acknowledging it in a piece of paper is one thing, when your whole population thinks otherwise, and likes to blow up women and children, thats another.
And the whole thing is just a PR stunt, just like how Palestine is just PR for the Arab countries.
 
2003-05-09 04:29:04 AM
StillWaitingForGodot

From what I can see, all your arguments come down to:

1 - they left.
2 - they weren't there for the last 30 years to put money in (even though they were not allowed to return once they left so how could they have contributed?)
3 - we won it in a war.

All fairly despicable reasons imho. Money isn't life, although it is important I'll grant. If some shadowy government offered Jewish Israelis 100 billion to leave Israel, and gave them land in Australia for the sake of arguement, how many would be happy to take the money and run?

Not many, not if I'm any judge of human character. Palestinians are children of Abraham as well, according to the Bible and the Koran if my reading is correct. Both sides have rights to their lands, and the whole encroachment toward Jerusalem and massive shrinking of the recognised borders of the West Bank thing is very definitely a land grab.

Big Al

Jews are the most hated group of people in history, bar none. Anyone trying to deny this will definately have a hard time.

What about Commies? More commies killed in the last few decades than all the Jews in the Holocaust when you tally them up. More persecution in more countries (probably) as well. Since communism has only been around for what - a century and a half? - that's a fairly impressive death rate for what is in the end an idealogy, rather than a race or a religion.

For both Jews and commies - no better way to earn enmity than to be perceived to be a threat to someone elses selfish best interests. Ask kings, churches, modern governments, and business owners down through the ages ;)

All those groups of course had the same grudges and paranoia about Jews that we now see about commies. People are so stupid.
 
2003-05-09 04:37:06 AM
Jalan

I still have never heard anyone mention the Jews that were expelled from Arab lands, and lost more land then all of Israel, when they are arguing about Palestian state.

Why would it be mentioned? Where it happened it was obviously wrong. If those people want to return, they should be able to. If they don't, they should be compensated for whatever assets they lost, or even for cheap sales under duress (because I'm sure that happened too).

Most western supporters of a Palestinian state (like me) don't want to see Israel or any jewish people inconvenienced by the partition. It isn't about punishment of either party, it's about a fair settlement and peace for both sides.
 
2003-05-09 04:39:42 AM
LexiLuthor

My $.02

Take all US forces out of Isreal and Palestine. Take all US made weapons out of them as well. Let them fight it out in hand to hand combat or with whatever meager weapons they might have made themselves. To the victor go the spoils.

Hand to hand combat? As if! Ever hear of the Uzi? Ever hear of the Desert Eagle? Israel has some of the world's premier weapons designers, and they've given them a lot of work.
Heck, even when they buy aircraft from the US, they buy a barebones airframe and stuff it with their own proprietary electronics that are often better than the American hardware. There are Israeli missiles and rockets as well.
'Nother words, if the US got rid of all US weaponry, Israel would still be able to kick major ass. And plenty of people would still be whining about it.
 
2003-05-09 04:53:16 AM
Jalan

Since threads almost dead here comes the flamebait!

... And the whole thing is just a PR stunt, just like how Palestine is just PR for the Arab countries.


I'm thinking, glass houses ...and Palestinian kids ;)
 
2003-05-09 10:44:34 AM
Tadlette... sit down and work out the logistics of 'right of return' sometime and apply it to any country or city or town in the world. It is a completely obsurd notion in and of itself. There is absolutely no legal presidence for it and it makes no sense economically, socially or logically. It is only in the distorted world of policy and sympathies that it makes any sense at all.

With that said, many experts have outright stated (in fact, most experts) that the Palestinians will have to give up this notion before peace can ever be attained. It has never been included in any roadmap or plan for peace, and probably never will be. The ideollogy of, 'it's not fair. I mean sure I left my land 30 years ago but now that a generation of people were born and died on it, I should be able to come back and claim what once was (maybe) mine' is absolutely flawed on so many levels. If that's the case, the former czar of russia should be allowed to take back the whole country, which noone would agree to.

It makes no sense.
 
2003-05-09 11:45:57 AM
I'm trying to get fired up to post something about this, but after ranting on the X-2 thread, I just can't get up enough ambition.

So many people to offend, so little time...
 
2003-05-09 12:05:55 PM
I got kicked out of my apartment because I did not pay rent, I'm going to go to the UN and demand I get a right to return to the place where my ancestors lived! And if they don't listen, I'm going to send my fellow citizens to blow themselves up, preferably in restaurants or discos. Then I will get many people to be on my side.
 
2003-05-09 03:54:39 PM
MrNeutron - "As any religious-brainwashed foaming-mouthed Zionist-NAZI would proclaim: "Palestine or Palestinians do not exist." So what's the big deal?"

Exactly. Next they'll be saying there's no such thing as Oz just because the rest of the world doesn't have an Oz on their map.
 
2003-05-09 04:00:25 PM
Big Al - "You wouldn't support a military occupation even if said Iraqi citizens kept attacking the US? I get it, the US is free to take over a country, kill anybody they want, use camps like X-Ray to torture and kill and keep people locked up, but when Israel does it, SHAME ON THOSE ZIONIST PIGS!"

Don't confuse America with the Bush regime. First strike, indefinite detention without public evidence, denial of lawyers, and denial of family contact are all non-American ideals that would sicken the framers of our constitution. And hey, right-wing bandwagon whiners, STFU and save your breath. If we keep this shiat up, those of us who remember the intent of the constitution will take the country back by vote, by force, or we will leave; leave you to your warmongering and "terrorists are everywhere/marshall law" scare-tactics.
 
2003-05-09 04:08:23 PM
Bill_Wick's_Friend - "because "they" were barely human savages (untermenschen)." Extra points for speed.

Hey, don't menschen it!
 
2003-05-09 04:12:18 PM
FarkingUpTheWrongTree - "[W]hen [Israel buys] aircraft from the US, they buy a barebones airframe and stuff it with their own proprietary electronics that are often better than the American hardware."


Dahhhhh, I heard that!
 
Displayed 381 of 381 comments



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report