If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   If you don't like 3D movies, then something is wrong with you. That, or you know, the whole concept is crap   (shadowlocked.com) divider line 98
    More: Unlikely  
•       •       •

2621 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 12 Apr 2010 at 5:07 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



98 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-04-12 01:35:37 PM
3D movies are 1D more awesome than 2D movies.

So there.
 
2010-04-12 01:47:03 PM
Or it's just an excuse to charge more for movies, since most of us are just waiting for the videos anyway....
 
2010-04-12 01:48:52 PM
I dunno what he's going on about. I have one eye that is far stronger than the other, and 3D movies look great.
 
2010-04-12 01:49:29 PM
It's fine in theaters.

It's stupid at home.

And holy sh*t lol at getting the guy without depth perception to write an article on why 3D sucks.
 
2010-04-12 01:52:45 PM
3D is a liberal conspiracy to keep pirates from going to the movie theater.

wholesale.piratemerch.com

These pirates
 
2010-04-12 01:53:14 PM
It's a gimmick, just like it was in the 1950's. Back then it was to get people into theaters because they were afraid of television. Now it's the internet. Although it did make Avatar watchable.
 
2010-04-12 01:57:05 PM
My problem is that they're effectively a still photo, since they lack the fourth dimension of "time."
 
2010-04-12 02:00:48 PM
I have no depth perception because I had amblyopia or "lazy eye" as a child, which had to be corrected with surgery. Once it was corrected, my brain had already learned not to combine the signals from both eyes. As far as I know, this cannot be corrected. At least not in my case. There are quite a few people like me.

As such, I don't see things in three dimensions. 3-D movies look awful to me, and just give me a headache...
 
2010-04-12 02:04:20 PM
I wish they'd just focus on fixing the big-screen blurring effect first. It's as bad as watching early LCD screens (and I'm talking about high-dollar Christie/TI DLP projectors, too).

I don't know if this entails increasing the framerate or what, but every theatre film I've seen appears blurry to me during fast panning.
 
2010-04-12 02:16:08 PM
images.betanews.com
 
2010-04-12 02:21:50 PM
After reading the article in Wired about how Sony is putting all their future on the line with 3D TV, I can say that it will be sad to see Sony go down the tubes. Nobody gives a shiat about 3D TV in the home. Not enough to pay through the butt for a brand new TV all over again after HDTVs just started to become reasonably priced.

Until they can create a system that creates 3D without my having to put on the stupid glasses and hope that my eyes can figure it out, I can live without 3D capability.
 
2010-04-12 02:29:25 PM
GurneyHalleck: it will be sad to see Sony go down the tubes.

Sony has an uncanny ability to bounce back from all of their marketing failures. I'm not worried.
 
2010-04-12 02:34:12 PM
GurneyHalleck: After reading the article in Wired about how Sony is putting all their future on the line with 3D TV, I can say that it will be sad to see Sony go down the tubes. Nobody gives a shiat about 3D TV in the home. Not enough to pay through the butt for a brand new TV all over again after HDTVs just started to become reasonably priced.

You mean people aren't going to want to wear 3D glasses all night while they're watching Two and a Half Men and American Douchebag?

I'm too lazy to research it but why does 3D need a special TV anyway? I remember watching 3D movies as a kid on TV on a regular TV.
 
2010-04-12 02:37:47 PM
I'm developing a new type of 3D TV that doesn't require any glasses at all. It uses a proprietary algorithm to turn everything into Magic Eye pictures.
 
2010-04-12 02:40:39 PM
3-D movies with a lot of movement and action like Avatar and Alice in Wonderland give me a horrible headache.

Until they fix that I'll pass on 3-D.
 
2010-04-12 02:45:47 PM
It's a fad. Just like sound and color and the cheeseball I et last night, it, too, shall pass.
 
2010-04-12 02:47:16 PM
oldebayer: It's a fad. Just like sound and color and the cheeseball I et last night, it, too, shall pass.

Or it could be like that roll of bubble tape I ate in the sixth grade on a dare.
 
2010-04-12 02:51:54 PM
I_Am_Weasel 2010-04-12 02:16:08 PM


Now with video goodness:

Link (new window)

/R.I.P. John Candy.
 
2010-04-12 02:52:37 PM
I remember the first wave of 3D - all those fold-out cardboard 3D glasses that came free in cereal packets. I can envisage wearing the glasses, folding the flaps around my ears and looking through the green and red plastic but somehow can't actually remember watching anything.

I think I see the author's problem.
 
2010-04-12 02:52:58 PM
Thoguh: 3-D movies with a lot of movement and action like Avatar and Alice in Wonderland give me a horrible headache.

Until they fix that I'll pass on 3-D.


I got about 40 minutes into Avatar 3D before I walked out. I was proud to get thru 40 minutes. It was awful. Never again.

/3D=FAIL. Just release the DVD. Theaters suck anyway.
 
2010-04-12 02:56:22 PM
Thoguh: 3-D movies with a lot of movement and action like Avatar and Alice in Wonderland give me a horrible headache.

Until they fix that I'll pass on 3-D.


I watched Avatar at home with an "evaluation" copy. I went to the theatre for Alice and found the 3D distracting and did nothing to add to the story. I would have enjoyed it more without the 3D.

Just because you can make a movie 3D doesn't mean you should.
 
2010-04-12 03:06:05 PM
SpinStopper: I have no depth perception because I had amblyopia or "lazy eye" as a child, which had to be corrected with surgery. Once it was corrected, my brain had already learned not to combine the signals from both eyes. As far as I know, this cannot be corrected. At least not in my case. There are quite a few people like me.

As such, I don't see things in three dimensions. 3-D movies look awful to me, and just give me a headache...


High five! In the same situation. In my case, the diagnosis was alternating strabismis (I can look out of either eye at a time, but not both). I wore glasses briefly as a youth, but since the problem was internal, they did jack and shiat. By the time the problem was discovered, we didn't bother doing surgery because it was unlikely to fix the brain's inability to combine the images, so it was far more likely that it would damage my vision than help it.

Magic Eyes do nothing for me.
 
2010-04-12 03:08:45 PM
yogaFLAME: I'm developing a new type of 3D TV that doesn't require any glasses at all. It uses a proprietary algorithm to turn everything into Magic Eye pictures.

And if this comes to pass, for every Magic Eye TV that is produced, I shall kill you.
 
2010-04-12 03:15:20 PM
ecmoRandomNumbers:
And if this comes to pass, for every Magic Eye TV that is produced, I shall kill you.


You've obviously never stared at TV snow for very long...I remember, not long after Poltergeist, it was pretty terrifying.
 
2010-04-12 03:41:32 PM
The ONLY reason that studios drop hundreds of millions of dollars to make a movie is to get a return on their investment. Period.

They will keep making 3D movies as long as they attract a sufficiently large number of people to warrant their expense.
 
2010-04-12 04:22:55 PM
I'm prone to motion sickness, so I'm really getting a kick out of all these 3-D mo*BLLLLOOORRRRRRRRRRGG*
 
2010-04-12 05:09:01 PM
I am actually working on -- i.e., vaguely thinking about from time to time -- an algorithm that could, in fact, render something similar to 3D on a flat surface without a need for glasses. Trouble is, if I hinted at a single detail, someone else would rip it off and make a million bucks an hour for the next ten years. So unless someone figures it out independently, you're all stuck with teh glasses.


NikolaiFarkoff: You've obviously never stared at TV snow for very long...I remember, not long after Poltergeist, it was pretty terrifying.

It's like watching all the movies ever made, including some that haven't been made yet, all at once.
 
2010-04-12 05:11:15 PM
If they'd refer to it as "Triple D" then I might get excited. Until then, meh
 
2010-04-12 05:11:22 PM
Tell me when they bring back Smell-o-vision
 
2010-04-12 05:17:17 PM
TFA said "green and red" 3D glasses...so I GIS to see if I was completely wrong in thinking they were blue and red and found this:
lh6.ggpht.com

"Let's do coke and watch Avatar. Again."
 
2010-04-12 05:19:04 PM
Ah sh*t...that joke sucks...I should have said some old school 3d movie..

"Let's do coke and watch Friday the 13th: Part 3: 3-D."
 
2010-04-12 05:25:36 PM
busy chillin': Ah sh*t...that joke sucks...I should have said some old school 3d movie..

"Let's do coke and watch Friday the 13th: Part 3: 3-D."


And that's too wordy. You should have used Godzilla.
 
2010-04-12 05:30:44 PM
Not everyone can see the 3-D effect in these movies. Here is a simple test to see if it's waste of money.

1. Hold both your arms in front of you with your hands about a foot apart.
2. Make fists with your hands.
3. Extend the index fingers of both hands towards each other.
4. Bring your index fingers close together and attempt to touch their tips PRECISELY together.

If you can do it, you can enjoy 3D movies. If you cannot, go to a vision therapist. You can also try the above test with one eye closed. You will almost always fail at step 4.
 
2010-04-12 05:37:47 PM
s1ugg0

that floating finger effect made me of this (new window)

/the mind is a funny place
 
2010-04-12 05:39:25 PM
RminusQ: SpinStopper: I have no depth perception because I had amblyopia or "lazy eye" as a child, which had to be corrected with surgery. Once it was corrected, my brain had already learned not to combine the signals from both eyes. As far as I know, this cannot be corrected. At least not in my case. There are quite a few people like me.

As such, I don't see things in three dimensions. 3-D movies look awful to me, and just give me a headache...

High five! In the same situation. In my case, the diagnosis was alternating strabismis (I can look out of either eye at a time, but not both). I wore glasses briefly as a youth, but since the problem was internal, they did jack and shiat. By the time the problem was discovered, we didn't bother doing surgery because it was unlikely to fix the brain's inability to combine the images, so it was far more likely that it would damage my vision than help it.

Magic Eyes do nothing for me.


High five over here, too! Two eye surgeries, eye patch humiliation, etc. I now have scar tissue from the two surgeries and I am unable to drive because it is too terrifying. I can't tell how far away anything is. It's hard to go up narrow stairways without grasping the rail, I suck at pool, bowling, baseball, etc.
 
ecl
2010-04-12 05:41:22 PM
Hating on 3d is for losers trying to impress other, possibly even larger, losers.
 
2010-04-12 05:49:51 PM
ecl: Hating on 3d is for losers trying to impress other, possibly even larger, losers.

I agree, although I'm still waiting for Sony to release smell-o-vision.
 
2010-04-12 05:54:29 PM
oldebayer: I am actually working on -- i.e., vaguely thinking about from time to time -- an algorithm that could, in fact, render something similar to 3D on a flat surface without a need for glasses. Trouble is, if I hinted at a single detail, someone else would rip it off and make a million bucks an hour for the next ten years. So unless someone figures it out independently, you're all stuck with teh glasses.


NikolaiFarkoff: You've obviously never stared at TV snow for very long...I remember, not long after Poltergeist, it was pretty terrifying.

It's like watching all the movies ever made, including some that haven't been made yet, all at once.


Well you better hurry up with that because Nintendo announced they were working on the 3DS last month
 
2010-04-12 05:57:55 PM
starleen Quote 2010-04-12 05:39:25 PM
RminusQ: SpinStopper: I have no depth perception because I had amblyopia or "lazy eye" as a child, which had to be corrected with surgery. Once it was corrected, my brain had already learned not to combine the signals from both eyes. As far as I know, this cannot be corrected. At least not in my case. There are quite a few people like me.

As such, I don't see things in three dimensions. 3-D movies look awful to me, and just give me a headache...

High five! In the same situation. In my case, the diagnosis was alternating strabismis (I can look out of either eye at a time, but not both). I wore glasses briefly as a youth, but since the problem was internal, they did jack and shiat. By the time the problem was discovered, we didn't bother doing surgery because it was unlikely to fix the brain's inability to combine the images, so it was far more likely that it would damage my vision than help it.

Magic Eyes do nothing for me.

High five over here, too! Two eye surgeries, eye patch humiliation, etc. I now have scar tissue from the two surgeries and I am unable to drive because it is too terrifying. I can't tell how far away anything is. It's hard to go up narrow stairways without grasping the rail, I suck at pool, bowling, baseball, etc.


I am in the same boat. I was born with a lesion on my right optic nerve. There is nothing they can do about it right now (hopefully stem cells in the future) so my brain has just compensated. I now see about 95% out of my left eye, and a very faint fuzzy picture out of my right. So yeah, 3D is a waste of money for me as well.
 
kab
2010-04-12 06:00:02 PM
3d haters. Likely the same crowd that also dislikes 5.1 or 7.1 sound.

Does it make a terrible movie good? No. Does it make a decent movie a bit more impactful if used correctly? Yep.
 
2010-04-12 06:00:54 PM
3d porn might be cool.
 
2010-04-12 06:02:04 PM
I like good 3D movies, of which there are very few.
 
2010-04-12 06:02:31 PM
kab: 3d haters. Likely the same crowd that also dislikes 5.1 or 7.1 sound.

Does it make a terrible movie good? No. Does it make a decent movie a bit more impactful if used correctly? Yep.


5.1/7.1 doesn't make me queasy. 3D for me turns what may be an enjoyable movie into a test of how long I can go before I refill the popcorn tub.
 
kab
2010-04-12 06:08:10 PM
BKITU:
5.1/7.1 doesn't make me queasy. 3D for me turns what may be an enjoyable movie into a test of how long I can go before I refill the popcorn tub.


Valid point, but I doubt there will ever be a movie that isn't released in 2-d as an option.

I know where you're coming from though. Playing FPS games doesn't make me sick to my stomach.. but watching videos of other folks playing actually does.

/wow, that sounded geeky.
//I'll shut up now.
 
2010-04-12 06:09:13 PM
BKITU: kab: 3d haters. Likely the same crowd that also dislikes 5.1 or 7.1 sound.

Does it make a terrible movie good? No. Does it make a decent movie a bit more impactful if used correctly? Yep.

5.1/7.1 doesn't make me queasy. 3D for me turns what may be an enjoyable movie into a test of how long I can go before I refill the popcorn tub.


Coraline in 3-D? Excellent pairing of effects. The next Michael Bay twitch-fest? Even more reason not to go.
 
2010-04-12 06:20:30 PM
3D is just a means to increase ticket prices by 30%, or even more, and inflate box office results. Remember, Hollywood is the only industry that measures success in terms of gross revenue, as opposed to units sold. So as movie ticket sales remain flat, the increased box office grosses will make it look like studios are doing better business than they really are.
 
2010-04-12 06:24:47 PM
upload.wikimedia.org
 
ecl
2010-04-12 06:27:11 PM
thornhill: 3D is just a means to increase ticket prices by 30%, or even more, and inflate box office results. Remember, Hollywood is the only industry that measures success in terms of gross revenue, as opposed to units sold. So as movie ticket sales remain flat, the increased box office grosses will make it look like studios are doing better business than they really are.

Thanks Einstein. My dog has more insight than you.
 
j68
2010-04-12 06:32:12 PM
thornhill: the increased box office grosses will make it look like studios are doing better business than they really are.

LOL
 
2010-04-12 06:52:06 PM
I'm going to make sure my next TV is 3D capable. I watched some sequences of the Olympics in 3D and it was mind blowingly cool. I don't care about sports much, but I certainly can see myself playing Fallout on a 50 inch 3D TV.

I already wear the xbox earpiece/mic when playing online and sit right in the middle of the room for surround sound. Just give me a set of 3d glasses w/ mic and earpiece built in, and I'm game.

fakechozostatue.files.wordpress.com
 
Displayed 50 of 98 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report