If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo) Cool Study finds that women between 2000 and 2009 had an average of 5.65 different sexual partners by the time they were 24, none of which were you   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 460
More: Cool, sexual partners, sex educations, cervical cancers, ICM, human papillomavirus, sex life, Cancer Research UK, incidences  
•       •       •

6381 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Mar 2010 at 12:03 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



460 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-03-16 10:08:55 AM
I'll have you know that *I* was that .65, submitter.
 
2010-03-16 10:12:53 AM
That seems awfully low.
 
2010-03-16 10:20:29 AM
Of course not, it was their moms.....
:)
/ok grandmoms.
 
2010-03-16 10:21:19 AM
Between 2000 and 2009 what? Pounds? Kilos? Years?
 
2010-03-16 10:31:20 AM
IrateShadow: That seems awfully low.


That's only because you are using your mom as a benchmark.
 
2010-03-16 10:34:04 AM
UberDave: IrateShadow: That seems awfully low.


That's only because you are using your mom as a benchmark.


BA-ZING!
 
2010-03-16 10:50:03 AM
UberDave: That's only because you are using your mom as a benchmark.

Your mom has benchmarks ON HER ASS! HAHAHAHA!

Get it?

Like we went to the park and had sex on a bench.
 
2010-03-16 10:50:22 AM
Yeah, but the chick only admits that after the dude says he's had 11.30 partners.

/two significant digits
//shocker has three
 
2010-03-16 10:55:08 AM
Swinging 60s had nothing on the 90s

Which had nothing in TFA. Headline fail!

And a stupid article in general. What if you're the refined sort (like most farkers, but of course) who prefers women older than 24 who will do something other than lie there like a dead halibut?
 
2010-03-16 11:08:09 AM
Gulper Eel: Swinging 60s had nothing on the 90s

Which had nothing in TFA. Headline fail!

And a stupid article in general. What if you're the refined sort (like most farkers, but of course) who prefers women older than 24 who will do something other than lie there like a dead halibut?


Gulper Eel complaining about dead halibut? Sounds fishy.
 
2010-03-16 11:12:22 AM
IrateShadow: That seems awfully low.

Well, I'd be willing to put down money that its a bimodal or maybe even trimodal distribution with a lot of them having 1 or 2, another group having 4 or 5, and then a smaller group way above that is throwing off the mean. The last group being known as "Jersey-chasers".
 
2010-03-16 11:41:19 AM
img1.fark.net Women lie. Especially about that.
 
2010-03-16 11:50:38 AM
all the good names are gone: Women lie. Especially about that.

This x1000
 
2010-03-16 12:05:04 PM
Thoguh: IrateShadow: That seems awfully low.

Well, I'd be willing to put down money that its a bimodal or maybe even trimodal distribution with a lot of them having 1 or 2, another group having 4 or 5, and then a smaller group way above that is throwing off the mean. The last group being known as "Jersey-chasers".


this.
 
2010-03-16 12:05:40 PM
So, how many of those partners were Tiger Woods?
 
2010-03-16 12:06:06 PM
Hollywood Cole: all the good names are gone: Women lie. Especially about that.

This x1000


Actually they've studied that as well. Woman tend to recall each partner and men tend to guess.

Both leading to inaccurate numbers, one because woman remember selectively and men guesstimate high.
 
2010-03-16 12:06:13 PM
CheekyMunky: UberDave: That's only because you are using your mom as a benchmark.

Your mom has benchmarks ON HER ASS! HAHAHAHA!

Get it?

Like we went to the park and had sex on a bench.


Ok I laughed
 
2010-03-16 12:06:34 PM
I filled out the 2010 Census last night and don't remember that question being on there.
 
2010-03-16 12:06:39 PM
The .65 had a small member.
 
2010-03-16 12:06:43 PM
5.65?

.... so now I don't feel so weird about that threesome with the midget
 
2010-03-16 12:06:46 PM
Flab: Between 2000 and 2009 what? Pounds? Kilos? Years?

"Women between 2000-2009 pounds had 5.65 different sexual partners by the time they were 24 pounds" is how I read it.
 
2010-03-16 12:07:42 PM
I don't know whether I should be upset or happy that I missed out on hooking up with all these skanky hoes.
 
2010-03-16 12:07:43 PM
supraspinatus: Flab: Between 2000 and 2009 what? Pounds? Kilos? Years?

"Women between 2000-2009 pounds had 5.65 different sexual partners by the time they were 24 pounds" is how I read it.


Yes, because that's exactly how it was intended to be read
 
2010-03-16 12:08:48 PM
You're welcome, ladies.
 
2010-03-16 12:08:52 PM
Wow, those are some really old women.
 
2010-03-16 12:09:37 PM
Shiat...those are some old women. How many women between 2000 and 2009 do they even have to run the study on...and the real question is...how many guys have they banged in the 2000 or so years after they turned 24...
 
2010-03-16 12:09:40 PM
Well, of course that doesn't count the OTHER 37...

And you have to imagine that the 60's were only this super-hedonistic mass orgy by the standards of the previous decade. People don't change that fast, and the "summer of love" probably featured a lot of monogamy - just with more overt and non-marital sexuality.

Which is good, because in a more repressed culture, people still have all sorts of sex, but in a lot of situations it's unhealthily hidden away, and there's a lot of ignorance about sex.
 
2010-03-16 12:09:43 PM
I beat that record way before 2000.
Wait, what?
 
2010-03-16 12:10:30 PM
"Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infections are very common, especially in younger people," said Clare Kerr, Lloyds Pharmacy's head of sexual health, who warned that HPV is one of the major causes of cervical cancer.


Sluts, the lot of them. I hope their vaginas get happy from all the f*cking!
 
2010-03-16 12:10:38 PM
Yep. sounds right. However, I rounded up.
 
2010-03-16 12:10:45 PM
Snarfangel: I'll have you know that *I* was that .65, submitter.

That's not true. She told me that I was the .65 of her life. She totally lied to us bro!
 
2010-03-16 12:10:47 PM
IrateShadow: That seems awfully low.

How many dicks does 5.65 translate to? I'm guessing 37 in addition to the 5.65 sounds right.
 
2010-03-16 12:11:12 PM
all the good names are gone: Women lie. Especially about that.

truth
 
2010-03-16 12:11:37 PM
Lying sluts!
 
2010-03-16 12:11:40 PM
No Such Agency: And you have to imagine that the 60's were only this super-hedonistic mass orgy by the standards of the previous decade

Ohh trust me, the hedonist never went away and new ones find the fun all the time.

Hell, we got our own damn cruise ships now
 
2010-03-16 12:11:49 PM
Hey baby, I've got something for you that measures 5.65...
 
2010-03-16 12:12:05 PM
It's articles like these that make my husband drink. He swigs and starts muttering something about being born way too early.
 
2010-03-16 12:12:15 PM
Rule of 3

Which basically means that basically it was an actual average of 17.

/this sounds reasonable.
 
2010-03-16 12:12:25 PM
The .65 must mean they all have at least 2 Asian partners on average.
 
2010-03-16 12:13:17 PM
Don't forget to multiply by 3 for girls and divide by 3 for guys.
i44.tinypic.com
 
2010-03-16 12:13:32 PM
Amateurs! only kidding. I admit to being a raging slut in my late teens through about 25. I suffered from a pathologically bad self-esteem. I paid for my own therapy/counseling for two years and it was the best thing I ever did for myself.
 
2010-03-16 12:14:22 PM
are we thinking that is a lot of partners by 24???
 
2010-03-16 12:14:29 PM
cherryl taggart: It's articles like these that make my husband drink. He swigs and starts muttering something about being born way too early.

If it's any consolation to him, there's nothing about it that's proportional. More than likely it was the same 5.65 guys for all of them.
 
2010-03-16 12:14:31 PM
Dialectic: Sluts, the lot of them. I hope their vaginas get happy from all the f*cking!

My vagina is quite happy TYVM.
 
2010-03-16 12:14:34 PM
the money is in the banana stand: The .65 must mean they all have at least 2 Asian partners on average.

With five, they can form Voltron.
 
2010-03-16 12:14:39 PM
Hey Submitter, I've boinked lots of chicks.
 
2010-03-16 12:14:44 PM
unfarkingbelievable: Amateurs! only kidding. I admit to being a raging slut in my late teens through about 25. I suffered from a pathologically bad self-esteem. I paid for my own therapy/counseling for two years and it was the best thing I ever did for myself.


How YOU doin?
 
2010-03-16 12:14:53 PM
Ya, they had 5.65 "partners", but they blew 7 times that number. Isn't that right, Veronica?

ifuctup.com

/hot like Caitlyn
//I'M 37!!?!??!?
 
2010-03-16 12:15:26 PM
Dialectic: "Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infections are very common, especially in younger people," said Clare Kerr, Lloyds Pharmacy's head of sexual health, who warned that HPV is one of the major causes of cervical cancer.


Sluts, the lot of them. I hope their vaginas get happy from all the f*cking!


you sound fat
 
2010-03-16 12:15:30 PM
IdBeCrazyIf: 5.65?

.... so now I don't feel so weird about that threesome with the midget


I bet you've actually done that.

/what was it like, the sex with the midget
 
Displayed 50 of 460 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »