If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Smithsonian Magazine) Silly The most needlessly poetic article about not finding treasure you'll read today   (smithsonianmag.com) divider line 24
More: Silly  
•       •       •

4308 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Mar 2010 at 6:15 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



24 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2010-03-15 06:18:53 PM
i.ytimg.com
Approves!

/hot
//obscure if you're over the age of 3
 
2010-03-15 06:19:52 PM
girljen: /hot if you're over the age of 3


Dude?
 
2010-03-15 06:20:25 PM
This reminds me of the gifts I give on mother's day.
 
2010-03-15 06:21:35 PM
Links to the second page of TFA make the baby Jeebus cry Subby

Oh and tl;dr
 
2010-03-15 06:21:48 PM
www.swapmeetdave.com
 
2010-03-15 06:34:02 PM
The cargo never arrived, at least in one batch. Somewhere in the Arthur Kill tidal strait the Harold tipped, sending most of the silver bars to the bottom.

So these people are nothing more than farking salvagers. Wonderful.
 
2010-03-15 06:40:48 PM
I didn't see the words "gruntbuggly" or "lurgid" anywhere in the article, Subby.
 
2010-03-15 06:42:35 PM
In case anybody else was confused by starting in the middle of the article

The first half (new window)
 
2010-03-15 06:42:49 PM
I predict he will discover the silver, and it will promptly be confiscated by the State of New York.
 
2010-03-15 06:53:03 PM
But Hayes and company were hardly relinquishing the quest. Over the winter they developed a sampling device that can plunge deep in the mayonnaise to collect a small flake of metal from suspected silver bars, "much the same way a surgeon would biopsy a tumor," Hayes said.

Wow they have Mayo? Someone go make me a sammich!
 
2010-03-15 07:03:49 PM
hardly poetic, in fact, a rather interestingly written article considering the lack of concrete results in the search...

subby, you have failed miserably as both a submitter and a human being.

I give it a -23,854 on a scale of 1-10
 
2010-03-15 07:16:29 PM
Man thats 3 articles in the past day which linked to page 2 of an article.
Either people are forgetting to go back and get the correct link, or they are sending in pg 2 because the link has already been sent in.
 
2010-03-15 07:46:13 PM
Talk about entitlement. Woe is me, I didn't find $20 million.
 
2010-03-15 07:58:03 PM
WTF ?
 
2010-03-15 08:17:37 PM
wtf ?
 
2010-03-15 08:28:00 PM
Tfw!
 
2010-03-15 08:41:02 PM
Page 2 of 2 Dumbmitter? Really?


/Ugh
//bad linking makes me stabby
 
2010-03-15 09:05:27 PM
"The cargo never arrived, at least in one batch. Somewhere in the Arthur Kill tidal strait the Harold tipped, sending most of the silver bars to the bottom. The barge's deckhands-"dumbest skunks I ever had to do with," the salvage company's owner later told the New York Times-didn't notice until docking at dawn. A secret salvage effort recovered about 85 percent of the bars, but that still left up to 1,400 "pigs" unfound. Today they could be worth $20 million."

My money is on there being no bars at the bottom, but some "dumb" deckhands retiring early back in the day.
 
2010-03-15 09:21:09 PM
unclecrazy99: wtf ?

BFD
 
2010-03-15 09:43:09 PM
Has anyone mentioned they linked to the second page of the article?
 
2010-03-15 10:03:54 PM
FTFA: "Well, I guess we get Pete's tool out and try to bring it up,"

snert
 
2010-03-15 10:19:48 PM
The Smithsonian Magazine is such a disappointment. I like National Geographic, but I'll read an issue of NG and then I'll read an issue of Smithsonian from the same month or a month nearby, and Smithsonian will repeat the article, but in a less interesting fashion.

For example, February 2010 Smithsonian had an article about Venus Fly Traps, which was somewhat of a boring article. March 2010 NG had an article about Venus Fly Traps and other carnivorous plants, and the article was far more in-depth, and was absolutely fascinating. During Spring Break, I went home and read the magazines that were piling up. I read NG first, so the Smithsonian article seemed redundant, even though it came out one month before.

And that is just one of many examples.
 
2010-03-16 03:03:57 AM
Sounds like they needed a little music to get things going:

Link (new window)
 
2010-03-16 07:03:49 AM
gunther_bumpass: Tfw!

FTW!
 
Displayed 24 of 24 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »