If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN) Obvious "Hate speech infiltrates social networking sites," reports Jesse Soloman, who was recently revived from a 25 year cryogenic freeze   (edition.cnn.com) divider line 112
More: Obvious, personal blogs, associate dean, Negroes, hate speech, proliferation, terror groups, social networks, e-commerce  
•       •       •

4721 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Mar 2010 at 7:39 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



112 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-03-15 06:30:47 PM
...so what was the point of that article?
 
2010-03-15 06:35:55 PM
Jesse Soloman, who was recently revived from a 25 year cryogenic freeze

I bet he doesn't even know how to use the three shells!
 
2010-03-15 06:36:21 PM
The report, Digital Terrorism and Hate 2010, notes that there are about 11,500 hate-affiliated Web pages, a 20 percent jump from last year's study.

You know, with more and more people going online every year, I thought for sure the absolute number would go down. My world has been turned upside down.
 
2010-03-15 06:39:45 PM
y'know, i'd rather have the wacko nutballs posting to their blogs than sitting quietly in their basements making bombs.

let 'em talk. at least we know where they are.
 
2010-03-15 06:47:56 PM
Yeah ... Technological advances without societal advances ...
 
2010-03-15 06:49:15 PM
chemical_angel: Yeah ... Technological advances without societal advances ...

actually, the fact that we allow the nutballs to post whatever they want on their blogs is a sign that we ARE an advanced society. If we shut down dissenting opinions, we'd be the opressive jackholes.
 
2010-03-15 06:52:26 PM
You could even say 30 years.
 
2010-03-15 07:42:41 PM
How could I have missed this great revelation in my last issue of "No Shiat Digest" ....
 
2010-03-15 07:44:24 PM
"Simon Wiesenthal Center for Tolerance"

hahahahahaha
 
2010-03-15 07:45:12 PM
JerseyTim: Jesse Soloman, who was recently revived from a 25 year cryogenic freeze

I bet he doesn't even know how to use the three shells!


He does, that's why he was frozen.
 
2010-03-15 07:45:42 PM
Why one day I saw a new social website advertised, called MySpaceExcludesJews.
 
2010-03-15 07:46:51 PM
JerseyTim: Jesse Soloman, who was recently revived from a 25 year cryogenic freeze

I bet he doesn't even know how to use the three shells!


I suddenly feel like Taco Bell.

/not really.
 
2010-03-15 07:48:10 PM
Weaver95: ...so what was the point of that article?

An editor saw the Jihad Jane story, said "reporter, give me a story about how these people are using the internet to coordinate", the reporter talked to someone who said that terror/hate group web sites ain't where it's at any more, and voila, one crappy, meandering story with no point.

It's not news, it's a paycheck.
 
2010-03-15 07:48:17 PM
I hate people who state the obvious.
 
2010-03-15 07:48:51 PM
DavidVincent: "Simon Wiesenthal Center for Tolerance"

hahahahahaha


I know. I laughed, too.
 
2010-03-15 07:49:28 PM
WWRRD?
 
2010-03-15 07:49:36 PM
DavidVincent: "Simon Wiesenthal Center for Tolerance"

"Tolerance" really means "putting up with shiat we don't like with a smile on our face because we HAVE to."
 
2010-03-15 07:50:35 PM
sseye: Weaver95: ...so what was the point of that article?

An editor saw the Jihad Jane story, said "reporter, give me a story about how these people are using the internet to coordinate", the reporter talked to someone who said that terror/hate group web sites ain't where it's at any more, and voila, one crappy, meandering story with no point.

It's not news, it's a paycheck.


What would be really cool is if someone wrote a book about that. I'd probably buy a copy.

/oblig
 
2010-03-15 07:50:56 PM
Doctor Funkenstein: That's simply inexcusable. Hate speech is a crime. And crime is for spics.

/wish I could take credit but not mine
//runs away


skinink: Why one day I saw a new social website advertised, called MySpaceExcludesJews.

How much of "hate speech" are lame (sorry, guys) jokes like these ?
 
2010-03-15 07:51:38 PM
DIAF
 
2010-03-15 07:52:46 PM
In junior high school we took a trip to the museum of tolerance. I learned more racial slurs and prejudicial ideas there than in 9 years of playground shiat talking.
 
2010-03-15 07:52:57 PM
Weaver95: ...so what was the point of that article?

Slow news day...
 
2010-03-15 07:52:57 PM
10,000 hate sites and a brazilian porn sites, so what's the internet more about, hating or farking? I vote farking. In unrelated news, happy 25th anniversary to the dot com domain.
 
2010-03-15 07:53:51 PM

One Bad Apple


How much of "hate speech" are lame (sorry, guys) jokes like these ?


So the jokes are crippled?? I bet you only complain about BLACK humour.


:-)
 
2010-03-15 07:54:15 PM
I'm not sure there's anything that annoys me more than when the MSM tells people on the Web, what's happening on the web. Yeah we farking know already D-bag!
 
2010-03-15 07:55:34 PM
Let's see... AIPAC continually lobbies the US congress to make war on Israel's enemies. Iraq, Iran, etc. And often the US will go to war and kill thousands of people.
If someone notices and mentions any of this: HATE CRIME.

Some people will look at the economic crisis and see names like Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Ben Bernanke and Bernie Madoff.
If anyone notices and mentions it: HATE CRIME.

How nice to have everything exactly the way you want it.
 
2010-03-15 07:56:34 PM
Is this Rule #35?
 
2010-03-15 07:57:19 PM
Weaver95: y'know, i'd rather have the wacko nutballs posting to their blogs than sitting quietly in their basements making bombs.

let 'em talk. at least we know where they are.


And who they are likely to target at the same time eh?

/Que the Guinness guys
//BRILLIANT!
 
2010-03-15 07:58:12 PM
We're just takin' it back... all of it.
 
2010-03-15 08:03:07 PM
If black people knew how to use computers then I would say the author was right.
 
2010-03-15 08:04:00 PM
bighasbeen: We're just takin' it back... all of it.

i308.photobucket.com

farm3.static.flickr.com
 
2010-03-15 08:04:20 PM
What the fark? How dare this damn pile of shiat say something like that. He needs to be hung and have his guts eaten by a pack of politically outraged crows.
 
2010-03-15 08:05:54 PM
DavidVincent: Let's see... AIPAC continually lobbies the US congress to make war on Israel's enemies. Iraq, Iran, etc. And often the US will go to war and kill thousands of people.
If someone notices and mentions any of this: HATE CRIME.

Some people will look at the economic crisis and see names like Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Ben Bernanke and Bernie Madoff.
If anyone notices and mentions it: HATE CRIME.

How nice to have everything exactly the way you want it.


Let me guess, you graduated magna cum laude from the Ku Klux Klan Institute for the Terminally Retarded? Seriously, do you think everyone that worked for those companies was Jewish?
 
2010-03-15 08:07:01 PM
Frankly, I am appalled that we have let this Internet thing go on as unregulated as it has been for as long as we have been. The era of people posting whatever filthy garbage spews out their dirty finger tips, without regards for the children who may inadvertantly stumble upon it, is comming to an end and not a moment too soon.

Part of being a responsible digital citizen is understanding that we need stringent authority over what we are or are not allowed to put on our nation's vital Facebook pages and YouTube accounts. The web is no longer your digital playground. Anonymity is NOT a right. Once we have ceded control of our digital browsing practices, we can finally put an end to all this cyberbullying (which IS terror, whether you agree with us or not) that is DESTROYING our nation's youth.
 
2010-03-15 08:08:57 PM
Wait till Jesse Soloman sees Left 4 Dead. Louis has probably had more hate speech directed at him than any actual human being, ever.
 
2010-03-15 08:09:11 PM
The guy at the end of the thread: Frankly, I am appalled that we have let this Internet thing go on as unregulated as it has been for as long as we have been. The era of people posting whatever filthy garbage spews out their dirty finger tips, without regards for the children who may inadvertantly stumble upon it, is comming to an end and not a moment too soon.

Part of being a responsible digital citizen is understanding that we need stringent authority over what we are or are not allowed to put on our nation's vital Facebook pages and YouTube accounts. The web is no longer your digital playground. Anonymity is NOT a right. Once we have ceded control of our digital browsing practices, we can finally put an end to all this cyberbullying (which IS terror, whether you agree with us or not) that is DESTROYING our nation's youth.


0/10

Too damn earnest.
 
2010-03-15 08:09:11 PM
Weaver95: ...so what was the point of that article?

To remind us that pin-headed cretins use the internet. As long as we've been on Fark, I don't think we need a reminder of that.

The real question is "Why was this greenlit"? The answer to that is so the mods/admins could watch teary-eyed pin-headed cretins scream about how hate speech shouldn't be protected speech.
 
2010-03-15 08:09:40 PM
The guy at the end of the thread: Frankly, I am appalled that we have let this Internet thing go on as unregulated as it has been for as long as we have been. The era of people posting whatever filthy garbage spews out their dirty finger tips, without regards for the children who may inadvertantly stumble upon it, is comming to an end and not a moment too soon.

Part of being a responsible digital citizen is understanding that we need stringent authority over what we are or are not allowed to put on our nation's vital Facebook pages and YouTube accounts. The web is no longer your digital playground. Anonymity is NOT a right. Once we have ceded control of our digital browsing practices, we can finally put an end to all this cyberbullying (which IS terror, whether you agree with us or not) that is DESTROYING our nation's youth.


3/10. needs more Jesus.
 
2010-03-15 08:11:22 PM
Well, what exactly is "hate speech"? Any statement that minorities don't like?
 
2010-03-15 08:12:28 PM
art.penny-arcade.com
 
2010-03-15 08:12:40 PM
The guy at the end of the thread 2010-03-15 08:07:01 PM
Frankly, I am appalled that we have let this Internet thing go on as unregulated as it has been for as long as we have been. The era of people posting whatever filthy garbage spews out their dirty finger tips, without regards for the children who may inadvertantly stumble upon it, is comming to an end and not a moment too soon.

Part of being a responsible digital citizen is understanding that we need stringent authority over what we are or are not allowed to put on our nation's vital Facebook pages and YouTube accounts. The web is no longer your digital playground. Anonymity is NOT a right. Once we have ceded control of our digital browsing practices, we can finally put an end to all this cyberbullying (which IS terror, whether you agree with us or not) that is DESTROYING our nation's youth.


Ironically, i bet you want socialized healthcare too.
 
2010-03-15 08:14:36 PM
towatchoverme:
0/10

Too damn earnest.


Shhh! I wanna see how many he hooks.
 
2010-03-15 08:18:14 PM
The guy at the end of the thread: Frankly, I am appalled that we have let this Internet thing go on as unregulated as it has been for as long as we have been. The era of people posting whatever filthy garbage spews out their dirty finger tips, without regards for the children who may inadvertantly stumble upon it, is comming to an end and not a moment too soon.

Part of being a responsible digital citizen is understanding that we need stringent authority over what we are or are not allowed to put on our nation's vital Facebook pages and YouTube accounts. The web is no longer your digital playground. Anonymity is NOT a right. Once we have ceded control of our digital browsing practices, we can finally put an end to all this cyberbullying (which IS terror, whether you agree with us or not) that is DESTROYING our nation's youth.


I don't know why (new window)
 
2010-03-15 08:22:34 PM
blogs.guardian.co.uk
Mr. Soloman appears to be...
images.ctv.ca
alone in his opinion.
 
2010-03-15 08:25:20 PM
Duke sucks.
 
2010-03-15 08:25:32 PM
The Southern Dandy: Is this Rule #35?

What comes after rule# 32 "enjoy the little things"

scifiwire.com

Noone ever mentoned any rules after #32.
 
2010-03-15 08:25:35 PM
Gdalescrboz: The guy at the end of the thread 2010-03-15 08:07:01 PM
Frankly, I am appalled that we have let this Internet thing go on as unregulated as it has been for as long as we have been. The era of people posting whatever filthy garbage spews out their dirty finger tips, without regards for the children who may inadvertantly stumble upon it, is comming to an end and not a moment too soon.

Part of being a responsible digital citizen is understanding that we need stringent authority over what we are or are not allowed to put on our nation's vital Facebook pages and YouTube accounts. The web is no longer your digital playground. Anonymity is NOT a right. Once we have ceded control of our digital browsing practices, we can finally put an end to all this cyberbullying (which IS terror, whether you agree with us or not) that is DESTROYING our nation's youth.

Ironically, i bet you want socialized healthcare too.



Well SOMEONE has to pay for the arterial bypass I'll require after reading the comments in this thread. The hubris is shocking. Shocking.

To think, assigning numerical values on some arbitrary scale representing G-D knows what! Is this some hacker code you kids get your lulz from nowadays? Well, I just downloaded my FREE copy of Windows Protector XP from a Digisolutions popup ad that appeared in my Spam folder. So for all you internet tough guys, for SHAME.

To think, in a perfect internet, I would be able to report you all for reprimandation. And not just to Drew. You'll probably get your goodtime kicks on someother PUBLIC forum. This is why we need a Social Networking Czar, to keep the ne'er-do-wells doing well.
 
2010-03-15 08:25:50 PM
towatchoverme: DavidVincent: "Simon Wiesenthal Center for Tolerance"

"Tolerance" really means "putting up with shiat we don't like with a smile on our face because we HAVE to."


"Tolerance" really means putting up with shiat we don't like with a smile on our face because we want others to put up with our shiat with a smile
 
2010-03-15 08:30:38 PM
farkstorm: "Tolerance" really means putting up with shiat we don't like with a smile on our face because we want others to put up with our shiat with a smile

Yeah. I guess its like being married.
 
2010-03-15 08:34:57 PM
farkstorm: "Tolerance" really means putting up with shiat we don't like with a smile on our face because we want others to put up with our shiat with a smile

That too. It's a weak word. Implies an unshakable opposition. And yet people use it like it's a GOOD thing.

Imagine if i turned to my girlfriend, nuzzled her sweetly and said, ever so gently: "My darling, i TOLERATE you."

I mean, it'd be TRUE ... but it's not very NICE.
 
Displayed 50 of 112 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »