That's just gay.

It's now 11:20. This posts to the main page at 1:14. That's about 2 hours.

The question, then, is how many different people can post different images of gays kissing in two hours' time?

I say 20. I think 20 would be the absolute ceiling. 20 people.

*drops gauntlet*

jehovahs witness protection: That's just gay.

Think of the Children!

If an image of people kissing offends your sensibilities, it's your sensibilities that are the problem.

Anyone who takes offense at this is an asshole.

Pocket Ninja: The question, then, is how many different people can post different images of gays kissing in two hours' time?

Well, I suppose we should start with the one that started this tirade....

Click here for original article about the uproar and all the comments below it which are mostly supportive. There are a couple of entertaining wackos thou spouting things like:

Most of us are totally disinterested in homosexuality and its manifestations. Many are downright hostile to it. Homosexual activists have their own publications. That's where their affairs belong.

I love how anti-gay people refer to all homosexuals as
"activists". These "activists" are your friends, family, and neighbors. They are just people who want the same rights as you, nothing extra.

Awww. Kyle and Fish.

Sure, NOW they're offended.

abb3w: Well, I suppose we should start with the one that started this tirade....

Jesus, that's what offended people? That barely qualifies as a kiss. I've seen dads kiss their daughters with more sensuality than that. And yes, even in places other than West Virginia.

The ultimate hypocrisy: if it had been two women, the outcry would have been nearly nonexistent.

I think the problem lies in that the picture in question seems to indicate that the couple is happy about getting married. The offense, therefore, is that they're presenting fiction as fact. (Commonly referred to as foxtion or foxion)

why does anyone care about this?

this country is weird.

"Those I've received are running more than 10-to-1 in support of the decision to run the photo"

where is the unlikely tag when you need it?

/hot

Inter-racial gay men kissing!



Lesbians kissing!



Gentile and Jew power brokers kissing!



Richard Gere kissing a hamster!!!

I am completely disgusted by the Washington Post's agenda to show pictures of things that happened. Such decisions show a clear and shameless liberal bias from those reporters and photographers who inflict upon us pictures and stories of newsworthy events that occur in the Washington area.

I want the WaPo to know that I will not be subjected to their filthy and immoral portrayal of things that occur that I don't agree with, and so I will be cancelling my subscription immediately.

Thanks alot, Washington Post. From now on I will get all my news from Conservapedia.

keep up the good work! i am enjoying these pics...