If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NPR) Hero So much for state censorship: NPR contributor uses all 119 Tribune Media's banned words in one sentence   (npr.org) divider line 76
More: Hero, WGN-TV, censorship, NPR, Tribune Company, diva, illegal immigration, Randy Michaels  
•       •       •

11399 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 12 Mar 2010 at 11:06 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



76 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-03-12 07:27:05 AM
My brain hurts.
 
2010-03-12 07:29:54 AM
News flash: Style guides are not censorship.
 
2010-03-12 08:21:21 AM
IgG4: News flash: Style guides are not censorship.

Don't say "news flash."
 
2010-03-12 08:25:23 AM
jehovahs witness protection: My brain hurts.

The Screeching Weasels song was the first thing that came to my mind after reading that sentence as well.
 
2010-03-12 08:43:44 AM
Can we get an Inigo Montoya on the "state" in "state censorship"
 
2010-03-12 09:47:54 AM
119 is backwards for ... 911

/wake up sheeple!
 
2010-03-12 09:53:30 AM
"5 a.m. in the morning" isn't allowed. What about "6 a.m. in the morning"? hmmm?
 
2010-03-12 09:54:20 AM
"Over in" also disallowed.

90% of Fark threads are now invalid.
 
2010-03-12 10:03:33 AM
i didn't see shiat, piss, fark, coont, cocksucker, motherfarker or tits in that article
 
2010-03-12 10:21:59 AM
Dead for Tax Reasons: i didn't see shiat, piss, fark, coont, cocksucker, motherfarker or tits in that article

Those are words you can't say on television. This is print. Carry on.
 
2010-03-12 10:36:22 AM
RminusQ: Can we get an Inigo Montoya on the "state" in "state censorship"

Yeah, and the "censorship" part, too.
 
2010-03-12 10:38:19 AM
Some of these are good suggestions.

■Utilize (you mean use)
■Senseless murder
■Giving 110%
■Fatal death
■Definitely possible
■Completely destroyed, completely abolished, completely finished or any other completely redundant use
■Close proximity
■Area residents


Most of the rest range are either trying to avoid overdone phrases (understandable), or bizarre, arbitrary examples of this doofus throwing his weight around.
 
2010-03-12 10:38:35 AM
"State censorship"?

I hope this is only green so we can ridicule the submitter.
 
2010-03-12 10:38:52 AM
The-Brain: "Over in" also disallowed.

90% of Fark threads are now invalid.


May I suggest we add:

FTW
This
So much this
Thread over
LOL (and all derivatives unless really new and funny)
 
2010-03-12 10:46:17 AM
First of all it's not censorship but more importantly, as someone who has worked in both the corporate and show business worlds, any kind of "speak" is farking obnoxious and should be banned.

/corporate speak narrowly beats out showbiz speak in obnoxiousness
 
2010-03-12 10:48:34 AM
Did he say "Ute"?
 
2010-03-12 10:59:37 AM
Mugato: First of all it's not censorship but more importantly, as someone who has worked in both the corporate and show business worlds, any kind of "speak" is farking obnoxious and should be banned.

/corporate speak narrowly beats out showbiz speak in obnoxiousness


I was on a conference call one time when someone started a sentence with "Just optically from the 30,000 foot level ..." I realized that my further attention would not be required.
 
2010-03-12 11:11:39 AM
The-Brain: "Over in" also disallowed.

90% of Fark threads are now invalid.



over in 7
 
2010-03-12 11:12:23 AM
Give that man an A.
 
2010-03-12 11:12:35 AM
That list is crazy. For instance, you can's say retard, you have to say submitter instead.
 
2010-03-12 11:13:00 AM
"Newsspeak"?

this is doubleplusgood.
 
2010-03-12 11:14:07 AM
Lumox: jehovahs witness protection: My brain hurts.

The Screeching Weasels song was the first thing that came to my mind after reading that sentence as well.


img.photobucket.com
Does not approve.
 
2010-03-12 11:16:30 AM
There are a few words I don't like hearing, some of which have already been listed (like 110% or LOL if you don't really LOL).

What really gets me is 'redouble'. So what, you're now giving 4x or 8x the effort? That adds up quickly.
 
2010-03-12 11:19:37 AM
Well, at least racial slurs are still allowed.
 
2010-03-12 11:23:04 AM
■In the wake of (unless it's a boating story)

lol i dont know why im laughing at this but lol
 
2010-03-12 11:24:02 AM
chimp_ninja: Senseless murder

What's wrong with that one? Murder can be rational and meaningful.
 
2010-03-12 11:26:19 AM
What about gratuitious use of the word 'Belgium'?
 
2010-03-12 11:30:53 AM
Super, but can they call it "torture" yet?
 
2010-03-12 11:31:22 AM
Personally, I love this list, and I applaud the CEO for issuing it. He's obviously trying to restore objective, news-based reporting to his organization, and to get away from 'news' stories about celebrity, rehab, political theatrics and posturing, and inflammatory rhetoric in general.

Not censorship. If you need to use these 119 words and phrases; if you can't find another, more expressive, accurate and creative way to tell your story, you're not cut out for journalism. Try blogging.
 
2010-03-12 11:32:17 AM
glwtta: chimp_ninja: Senseless murder

What's wrong with that one? Murder can be rational and meaningful.


lacer.files.wordpress.com
 
2010-03-12 11:33:08 AM
Wait, what?
 
2010-03-12 11:34:08 AM
Dead for Tax Reasons: i didn't see shiat, piss, fark, coont, cocksucker, motherfarker or tits in that article

Article? Sounds more like a Friday night at my house.
 
2010-03-12 11:34:08 AM
glwtta: What's wrong with that one? Murder can be rational and meaningful.

Well it's not really the job of a reporter to determine the value of a murder.


I think the guy is just trying to make his writers think a bit rather than spit out cliched news-speak.

I like the idea.
 
2010-03-12 11:35:51 AM
Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin van-guarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition.
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.
Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it's my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V.
 
2010-03-12 11:36:33 AM
Those trite and unimaginative tropes are icons of American media's relentless intellectual decline and each and every one of those are staples of the FoxNews lexicon. They should be banned.
 
2010-03-12 11:36:58 AM
glwtta: chimp_ninja: Senseless murder

What's wrong with that one? Murder can be rational and meaningful.


But how can you murder someone without touching, hearing or seeing?

/If you need to smell or taste your victims, I don't want to know.
 
2010-03-12 11:40:27 AM
I was just doing some digging. 'Pig Virus' is in charge of WGN-AM. That explains everything!
 
2010-03-12 11:42:36 AM
did they say "Semprini?"
 
2010-03-12 11:46:05 AM
madgordy: did they say "Semprini?"

Lemon curry?
 
2010-03-12 11:47:45 AM
Not sure if it's in there, but the one I hate the most is "slap in the face", especially in union or government negotiations or discussions. I think just about every single decision that's ever been made has been a slap in the face to some group of people. Yet they all still say it like it means something.
 
2010-03-12 11:50:57 AM
Am I the only one frightened that George Carlin has come back from the dead?
 
2010-03-12 11:52:02 AM
jimpoz: Am I the only one frightened that George Carlin has come back from the dead?

Zombie Carlin wants your farkin' brains.
 
2010-03-12 11:54:36 AM
First of all, subby. Tribune media is not "The State", so no, not so much for "state" censorship.

Also, it's more of a style guide.

I related news, it's getting harder and harder to listen to the news on the radio, (I need traffic reports), with my daughter. We really don't need to know the graphic details about how "he threw his daughter over the bridge" or (on NPR), how women and children "were beheaded". Seriously, to paraphrase Archie Bunker, "would it mean any less if they was pushed out of windows?".

They were murdered, for the full gory, R-rated version, read the print version online, otherwise, a simple "was murdered by" would suffice.
 
2010-03-12 11:59:48 AM
Wow. That writer is SO edgy, I don't even think he has a middle.
/sarcasm
 
2010-03-12 12:00:15 PM
Put me in the camp that agrees with the list. Especially the banning of mispronunciations of Iraq and Iran, we don't need our news media sounding like a bunch of yokels.
 
2010-03-12 12:04:15 PM
Thorndyke Barnhard: Those trite and unimaginative tropes are icons of American media's relentless intellectual decline and each and every one of those are staples of the FoxNews lexicon. They should be banned.

I concur.
 
2010-03-12 12:05:02 PM
# "Two to one margin" . . . "Two to one" is a ratio, not a margin. A margin is measured in points. It's not a ratio.
# 5 a.m. in the morning
# Fatal death


agreed.

# Mute point. (It's moot point, but don't say that either)

agreed to the first part. not the second.

# Utilize (you mean use)

can i explain what synonyms are?

# Dubbaya when you mean double you
# Eye Rack or Eye Ran
# Hunnert when you mean hundred


perhaps you should stop hiring newscasters out of rural alabama.
 
2010-03-12 12:28:38 PM
Super, but can they call it "torture" yet?

Link (new window)

I would give my left kidney for someone to point that discrepancy out to them on-air.
 
2010-03-12 12:30:10 PM
filth: Mugato: First of all it's not censorship but more importantly, as someone who has worked in both the corporate and show business worlds, any kind of "speak" is farking obnoxious and should be banned.

/corporate speak narrowly beats out showbiz speak in obnoxiousness

I was on a conference call one time when someone started a sentence with "Just optically from the 30,000 foot level ..." I realized that my further attention would not be required.


Did you de-prioritize your communication and make kicking his ass your primary action item?

/with an eye towards productivity and connectivity
 
2010-03-12 12:36:22 PM
Somewhere, George Carlin claps slowly for Randy Michaels.
 
Displayed 50 of 76 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »