If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Chicago Sun-Times)   Revamped Playboy magazine will have less nudity than before   (suntimes.com) divider line 132
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

242 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 Apr 2003 at 1:55 PM (11 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



132 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2003-04-18 12:25:34 PM
Don't we already have a Maxim?
 
2003-04-18 12:43:00 PM
Not like Playboy contains all that much nudity now
 
2003-04-18 12:48:56 PM
Playboy sucks
 
2003-04-18 12:53:17 PM
Well thats ok with me... I just read it for the articles... ;)
 
2003-04-18 12:58:14 PM
Great, now you have to go to Penthouse for your monthly dose of printed porn. I prefer my naked girls when they aren't peeing.
 
2003-04-18 01:18:01 PM
Hmmm. Let me get this straight. Playboy is going to be a Maxim clone? I almost quit reading when they began running fake boobs nearly exclusively. But the literary content won out. I again almost quit buying when it seemed every issue had Pamela (fake boobied skank) Anderson in it. Then followed by Chynna (I still say that's a man baby). The only thing going for Playboy is the literary content. Now that's going too? And less skin? Sad, sad, sad.
 
2003-04-18 01:29:03 PM
All boy and no play makes ... wait.
 
2003-04-18 01:33:43 PM
Thats why I just un-subscribed and get Barely Legal Teen Hos now.
 
2003-04-18 01:38:27 PM
Who buys printed porn anymore?

Isn't that why we have the internet?
 
2003-04-18 01:56:51 PM
It's a trap!
 
2003-04-18 01:57:29 PM
Anti-Boobies on FARK! God no...please...no.
 
2003-04-18 01:57:48 PM
Now we'll finally find out who REALLY gets Playboy "only for the articles"....
 
2003-04-18 01:58:20 PM
I stopped reading Playboy after the age of 12.


Feh.
 
2003-04-18 01:58:23 PM
P'boy lost its appeal when they stopped featuring girl-next-door types and started featuring air-brushed, overly shaved strip club ho's.
 
2003-04-18 01:58:48 PM
Seriously, who buys anything anymore?
Isn't that why we have the internet?
 
2003-04-18 01:59:06 PM
Gawd, life sucks.
 
2003-04-18 01:59:13 PM
And ironically, I was the 12th post.

Weird.
 
rax
2003-04-18 01:59:19 PM
Playboy - Now with 75% more reasons to say you read it for the articles!!
 
2003-04-18 02:00:30 PM
So they're turning Playboy, the rag that started it all, into yet another Maxim/Stuff/FHM clone. Oh farking joy.
 
2003-04-18 02:00:44 PM
Meh... the internet is still the leading contender in the P0rn industry anyway.
 
2003-04-18 02:00:52 PM
Isn't Playboy responsible for Anna Nicole?
 
2003-04-18 02:01:42 PM
/unsubscribe Playboy
 
2003-04-18 02:01:47 PM
There was a time when Playboy was a hip publication. It really did have great articles in it, funny interviews, and overall quality content. In its prime, Playboy was much classier and sophisticated than Maxim.

Recently, however, the interviews suck, articles suck, advertising takes up 1/2 of the mag, and the chicks are so airbrushed they seem more like animation than real women. It was sad day when I realized that Maxim photoshoots are actually sexier than Playboy's nudes. Hef should shut it down before it gets worse.
 
2003-04-18 02:01:48 PM
Playboy is so 80's.
 
2003-04-18 02:02:01 PM
I've now got the tune to The Buggles "Video Killed The Radio Star" with words to the effect of "Internet porn killed Hugh Hefner's rag".
 
2003-04-18 02:02:04 PM
Playboy's ghey.
 
2003-04-18 02:02:12 PM
KITTENS EVERYWERE REJOICE!!!!!!!
 
2003-04-18 02:03:56 PM
OH the humanity...

/i-got-nuthin-and-soon-playboy-will-as-well
 
2003-04-18 02:04:02 PM
With all the porn on the internet, Playboy IS Maxim as far as I'm concerned.
 
2003-04-18 02:04:42 PM
My cousin found a stash of his old man's Playboys from the early 60's, and they are amazing. The pix are okay, about what you'd expect from 1965, but the writing is out of this world. The James Bond serials alone are worth the price of admission (and I hate Bond movies). The lists of authors is like a who's-who of the times. Really cool. And who knew you could order that many different kinds of slacks thru the mail?
 
2003-04-18 02:05:04 PM
There are people over 15 that look at Playboy? Do you still blush and giggle?
 
2003-04-18 02:05:12 PM
Goodbye, Playboy. It was great while it lasted.
 
2003-04-18 02:05:43 PM
Who really cares... my sister worked at HUSTLER

The cartoons are funnier
 
2003-04-18 02:06:44 PM
As if Playboy wasn't already becoming a Maxim immitator? I still read Playboy for the articles (I have a free subscription and can't be bothered with airbrushed porn) and they are getting more & more boring. Maxim & Stuff are worse; just plain stupidity, but you don't buy those rags for the articles.
 
2003-04-18 02:07:36 PM
I would think they would skim back on their editorial content and add more nudity, with the competition coming from the Internet.

I don't read, nor do I own a single playboy, so this will not affect me one bit.
 
2003-04-18 02:08:20 PM
Playwho?
 
2003-04-18 02:08:29 PM
Alas, poor Hef. We knew him well.
 
2003-04-18 02:09:28 PM
Alton:

I think printed porn is for the men in that 24% of the ppl who've never been online.

Still, I agree wholeheartedly. I can see non fake boobs much more quicker by googling for "boobies" or visiting any of my favorite "research" sites.
 
2003-04-18 02:09:28 PM
Can someone please put up a link to the Women's Brazilian Soccer photos?
 
2003-04-18 02:09:34 PM
Seen the new Playboy?

Bo Derek's Tits!
 
2003-04-18 02:10:24 PM
I like Playboy. And I like it for the nekkid chicks as much as for the articles.

The fact that I have never seen a "real" girl look like that makes me feel better about my non-Playboy body. Self-esteem rises for chicks everywhere!
 
2003-04-18 02:11:18 PM
I think Playboy would win if they kept the nudity, but made the articles grab the reader like Maxim does. Right now Playboy seems snobbier than GQ, but even less interesting than the boring GQ. Maxim has the articles right on target, or at least they did a couple years ago. Playboy needs that kind of punch, but along with the nudity. If playboy takes nudity out, then we shall simply see a losing competitor to Maxim.
 
2003-04-18 02:11:51 PM
cause you know, people cant get laid by girls
 
2003-04-18 02:12:04 PM
Yes! Yes! Less nudity....Yes!....wait..no....NO! Crap!
 
2003-04-18 02:13:29 PM
Isn't Bo Derek like 60 now? I haven't seen the new Playboy, obviously.

But I'd like to get the Tori Wilson one...
 
2003-04-18 02:13:50 PM
less nudity, more dog
 
2003-04-18 02:14:09 PM
Did I read this right? Revamped Playboy magazine will have less subscribers than before. What a dumbazz idea.
 
2003-04-18 02:15:39 PM
Playboy is for gay men parading as heteros anyway. I don't like it unless 2 fingers are spreading those sweet lips apart. It's a shame though, because now sooo many air brush artists are gonna be out of work. No zits, stretch marks, or unsightly hairs to edit out of half-beav shots. Playboy blows.
 
2003-04-18 02:15:49 PM
BMX

Beautiful
 
2003-04-18 02:15:54 PM
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
 
Displayed 50 of 132 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report