If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NASA) Cool Saturn-probe Cassini serves up a 53-mile wide egg over-easy w/photo goodness   (saturn.jpl.nasa.gov) divider line 28
More: Cool, Cassini, Saturn, gas giants, California Institute of Technology, voyager, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Prometheus, Pasadena  
•       •       •

10652 clicks; posted to Geek » on 08 Feb 2010 at 1:39 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



28 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2010-02-08 10:55:42 AM
What a funny yolk
 
2010-02-08 01:48:58 PM
First thing I did when I saw that pic was try to wipe the dust off my screen.
 
2010-02-08 01:56:24 PM
I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?
 
2010-02-08 02:07:00 PM
Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

My guess is that colour shots as we perceive them have little value in astronomy. Calibrating photographic equipment to reproduce colour as we perceive it illuminated by our sun under our atmosphere is a pretty arbitrary exercise. The mission may not even have a 'colour' camera if it wouldn't produce useful science.
 
2010-02-08 02:08:16 PM
Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

Even if they did, you might not notice:

Color image of Phobos:

www.nasa.gov


B+W image of Phobos:

www.nasa.gov

You don't really gain all that much information.
 
2010-02-08 02:14:17 PM
OK, cool and all but I'm gonna threadshiat here for a minute. I have an acquaintance working on the Mercury Messenger project, but from nasa.gov you get jack about it. The project has its own separate site which is not hosted on or linked to nasa.gov.

Do they just need better IT guys or something? Seems a shame to have projects putting out cool info, but that info is not available on the NASA site

NASA page for MESSENGER, with fark-all info (new window)

Completely separate MESSENGER page, not referenced from NASA page
(new window)

/end threadshiat
 
2010-02-08 02:16:44 PM
sojourner: Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

My guess is that colour shots as we perceive them have little value in astronomy. Calibrating photographic equipment to reproduce colour as we perceive it illuminated by our sun under our atmosphere is a pretty arbitrary exercise. The mission may not even have a 'colour' camera if it wouldn't produce useful science.


There are ways to color correct: When they took a look at the first Viking pictures, the Martian sky was a pretty pale blue. The technicians had 'corrected' the color values in the image, because the sky is blue, right? Then they corrected the images against the color target on board the lander, and it turned out the sky was salmon colored, not blue.
 
2010-02-08 02:18:36 PM
Some of those white dots must be errant pixels and not stars, otherwise it would have a completely impossible shape.
 
2010-02-08 03:03:40 PM
In before Mork from Ork references.
 
2010-02-08 03:23:24 PM
dittybopper: Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

Even if they did, you might not notice:

Color image of Phobos:

B+W image of Phobos:



You don't really gain all that much information.


Must have been one big flash on that camera.
 
2010-02-08 03:28:01 PM
Tsar_Bomba1: dittybopper: Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

Even if they did, you might not notice:

Color image of Phobos:

B+W image of Phobos:



You don't really gain all that much information.

Must have been one big flash on that camera.


What the flash may have looked like:
z.about.com
/hot
 
2010-02-08 03:34:16 PM
The-Brain:

What the flash may have looked like:

/hot


latimesblogs.latimes.com

Sprinta please.
 
2010-02-08 03:44:05 PM
[pro-MEE-thee-us]

/good to know.
 
2010-02-08 03:59:45 PM
The Cassie app is farken awesome.
 
2010-02-08 04:03:11 PM
www.startrek-gamers.com
 
2010-02-08 04:26:26 PM
Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

In order to take a "color photo" they have to take multiple shots over different wavelengths, then merge the images together, much the same as your color printer has 3 toner cartridges along with the black toner in order to produce a color image. Hence, more images, more bandwidth to send back, using up resources and other data that might be of more interest to scientists back here on Earth.

Divvying up time on the DSN (Deep Space Network) for many different spacecraft is already spread thin, so taking glamour shots is low on the priority chain.
 
2010-02-08 04:28:26 PM
dittybopper: The-Brain:

What the flash may have looked like:


knology.net
 
2010-02-08 04:43:03 PM
First thing I thought when I saw that picture was that it was an illustration from Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

Or a menu item from the restaurant at the end of the universe.
 
2010-02-08 05:53:46 PM
Prometheus displayed its pockmarked, irregular surface

I guess it rolled the hard six.
 
2010-02-08 06:11:34 PM
Damn, now I want a fried egg sammich.

/GF's vegan
//that's all you get to know
 
2010-02-08 06:14:34 PM
i856.photobucket.com
 
2010-02-08 06:21:49 PM
Count_0 [TotalFark]

My god, it's full of cholesterol.

/at least the yoke
//probably.
 
2010-02-08 06:48:06 PM
Holy shiat! A space article that's not by Bad Astronomy! And I don't have to go digging through 4 different websites to find that actual high res photo!

Thank you submitter!

PS: !
 
2010-02-08 07:37:35 PM
sojourner: Scutter: I realize that you can get more detail from a black-and-white photo, but would it kill them to take a color shot once in awhile?

My guess is that colour shots as we perceive them have little value in astronomy. Calibrating photographic equipment to reproduce colour as we perceive it illuminated by our sun under our atmosphere is a pretty arbitrary exercise. The mission may not even have a 'colour' camera if it wouldn't produce useful science.


Taking an actual picture of what we farking flew out to there to see might be useful to someone.
 
2010-02-08 07:55:29 PM
We're going to need bigger toast.
 
2010-02-08 08:55:52 PM
dittybopper: There are ways to color correct: When they took a look at the first Viking pictures, the Martian sky was a pretty pale blue. The technicians had 'corrected' the color values in the image, because the sky is blue, right? Then they corrected the images against the color target on board the lander, and it turned out the sky was salmon colored, not blue.

Along those lines, I think all the Voyager images had heightened red tones because the CCDs were including some infra-red in the red channel.
 
2010-02-08 10:51:37 PM
somewhere in space, there are strips of bacon several light years long.
 
2010-02-08 11:04:16 PM
Devolving_Spud: somewhere in space, there are strips of bacon several light years long.

The FLDSMDFR is on the fritz again?
 
Displayed 28 of 28 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »