Be careful walking in his backyard.

Here's an example of where my mind is right now.

On first glance I thought the last picture in the article was of his penis hanging between his legs.

I don't wanna clean up his poop

I'd have appreciated some pictures that DIDN'T distort the size of the dog, to make it appear larger than it actually is.

But I guess I'd appreciate a real news source, as well.

BackAssward: *dog's size...

Please focus on that instead of the intent of the post.

Relax, Frances.

Take a look at the first photo. Do you see how small the guy's head looks (compare with his knees)?

If he wants steak, HE GETS IT!!!

LordOfThePings: BackAssward: *dog's size...

Please focus on that instead of the intent of the post.

Relax, Frances.

Take a look at the first photo. Do you see how small the guy's head looks (compare with his knees)?



Yup. Yellow journalism photographer. Not that that's a bad thing. The Mail is one of the premier yellow rags, right up there with Fox News. Dude was just doing his job to the best of his abilities.

LordOfThePings: BackAssward: *dog's size...

Please focus on that instead of the intent of the post.

Relax, Frances.

Take a look at the first photo. Do you see how small the guy's head looks (compare with his knees)?

yeah, that's what I was going to point out.

/still, a big farkin' dog

BackAssward : So you have undistorted pics? Or are you just assuming the pics distort the don't size?

Anyone that has experience with using a SLR can tell you that the perspective in the first picture is very distorted.

Hell, don't even look at the dog, look at the man. Look at the apparent size of his lower body compared to his upper body.

I thought it was gonna be some fat dog, but it looks liek this dog is regular proportions

LordOfThePings: Take a look at the first photo. Do you see how small the guy's head looks (compare with his knees)?

That's either a distorted photo or Gheorghe Muresan retired to Tuscon and got himself a big ol' dog.

"Dr. William Wallace..."

That must be the best veterinarian ever.

One of these days I'd like the visit this mythical city of Tuscon, Arizona. It seems all the cool stuff happens there. I guess I'll have to be content with good ol' Tucson.

Oh no! the picture distorts the prespective! My whole night is ruined. I must post about my disgust with this inferior news source

And then my husband is shocked and surprised when I say I DON'T want a great dane.

/this is why you can't have great danes chris

tortilla burger: fat dog



Macro text not mine...

consciousNOT: Be careful walking in his backyard.

That's the beauty of it. It would be incredibly hard not to miss his business.

A buddy of mine has an English Mastiff named Tobias. One time I went to visit and had just come through the gate. Toby came galloping around the corner of the house and clipped me pretty solid. I remember the sensation of flying and seeing my legs silhouetted against the sky, and I'm a pretty big guy.

They have farked with the first photo so much the dog looks like it's in a painting.

Great Danes are awesome dogs, but their life spans are pretty short compared to other dogs, which is one of main the reasons I don't want to get one. That, along with the dinosaur-sized poop.

Solty Dog: If that dog starts to hump your leg, just let it go man, cause it's gone

Excellent post I must say....golf clap and +1 internets for you.

Here's his master's brother in Oklahoma:

I've seen that dog around town.

huh. I thought the Bounty Hunter's wife would be a shoo-in for that title

lordargent: BackAssward : So you have undistorted pics? Or are you just assuming the pics distort the don't size?

Anyone that has experience with using a SLR can tell you that the perspective in the first picture is very distorted.

Hell, don't even look at the dog, look at the man. Look at the apparent size of his lower body compared to his upper body.

OK, seriously, is there anyone on earth stupid enough to not know a wide-angle shot when they see one? This is not an attempt at deception, it just makes for a funny picture to go with a fluff-piece story. The rest of the pics are taken with a regular lens, so what's with all the butthurt over a little creative license taken with one photo, that could arguably be called a photo-illustration? God forbid a journalist ever use a wide-angle lens for a picture that will be published in the media.


OMG! What an irresponsible photographer! Now people will think Obama has a giant noggin!
Yellow journalism! Yellow journalism!

Hick: Cool dog. I would love for him to come over here and teach my cats some manners.

It tends not to work that way. My niece and her husband have the sweetest Great Dane. He is bullied by their cats. He also wants to do all the cat things, like climb up on things, sit on people's laps, and try to fit into things that are way too small for him.

not overly impressed

puffy999: a real news source

IS YOUR LOCAL COUNCIL TURNING TAXPAYERS' MONEY GAY? (new window)

That is awesome.

I could whoop him no problem

UsikFark: puffy999: a real news source

IS YOUR LOCAL COUNCIL TURNING TAXPAYERS' MONEY GAY? (new window)

Lawls.

"WILL IMMIGRANTS INFECT HARD-WORKING FAMILIES WITH AIDS?"

Someone should have the bright idea of posing that giant dog with Shaq.

Sun God: Someone should have the bright idea of posing that giant dog with Shaq.

You mean that isn't Shaq?

LordOfThePings: Take a look at the first photo. Do you see how small the guy's head looks (compare with his knees)?

The guy's head is bothering me in both pictures that might be part of it.

sit ubu sit good dog

Better picture.


Still a big dog, but not the insane over-sized freak the are making it out to be.

/Link is hot

Noticed after posting....................bonus milf cleavage for free