Theres a sh*tload of incest in the bible, why don't they ban that too?

Dammit, elchip!

spudvol: let me know when they ban the bible for mentioning rape, incest, adultery, murder(mass), murder(single), violence towards anyone and everyone, etc......

that stuff too, yea

So why doesn't a school system ever just reply

"No. That's farking stupid. If you don't want your stupid kid to read books and continue being stupid, that's entirely up to you. We're trying to run a god damn place of learning here. In short, fark you."

Good Behavior Day: Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina

Penis Penis

themeatcleaver: Best analogy evar.

/libraries around the country suddenly run out of The Diary of Anne Frank thanks to elchip

It's Virginia...what do you expect...

Knows about Anne Frank and vaginas.
/Hot

Original article from Culpeper Star-Exponent

Link (new window)

I read an expanded version of The Diary of Anne Franke. It mentioned her first kiss and her second period. No other vaginal discussion. Unless there is a more unabridged version, the parent is a total idiot.

JNowe: Good Behavior Day: Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina Vagina

Penis Penis

Thanks for the tip.

jimpoz: Thanks for the tip.

HotWingConspiracy: So why doesn't a school system ever just reply

"No. That's farking stupid. If you don't want your stupid kid to read books and continue being stupid, that's entirely up to you. We're trying to run a god damn place of learning here. In short, fark you."

Private schools do, all the time. Or, depending on their administration's philosophy, sometimes they pull the offending book and replace it with some other book. (For example, they might pull the sexy version of DOAYG and replace it with... the classic version of DOAYG.) Parents are then free to send their kids and tuition dollars to whatever private school they think will be best for them. The system works well, generally.

It only turns into a clusterfark when government schools get involved.

mrexcess: /libraries around the country suddenly run out of The Diary of Anne Frank thanks to elchip

...and when they get 'em all back, several pages will be stuck together...

eraser8: KajakPro: Knows about Anne Frank and vaginas.
Mrs. Potato Head?

Back doors are not secrets!

/ahem

Sounds like the school just isn't ready for such Frank discussion of female genitalia...

OW-Stop!
But...I ****** from there.
Not Anymore You Don't!

elchip: I'd like to ask Peter whether he knows what girls look like down there. I don't think boys are as complicated as girls. You can easily see what boys look like in photographs or pictures of male nudes, but with women it's different. In women, the genitals, or whatever they're called, are hidden between their legs. Peter has probably never seen a girl up close. To tell you the truth, neither have I. Boys are a lot easier. How on earth would I go about describing a girl's parts? I can tell from what he said that he doesn't know exactly how it all fits together. He was talking about the "Muttermund," but that's on the inside, where you can't see it. Everything's pretty well arranged in us women. Until I was eleven or twelve, I didn't realize there was a second set of labia on the inside, since you couldn't see them. What's even funnier is that I thought urine came out of the clitoris. I asked Mother one time what that little bump was, and she said she didn't know. She can really play dumb when she wants to!

But to get back to the subject. How on earth can you explain what it all looks like without any models? Shall I try anyway? Okay, here goes!

When you're standing up, all you see from the front is hair. Between your legs there are two soft, cushiony things,also covered with hair, which press together when you're standing, so you can't see what's inside. They separate when you sit down, and they're very red and quite fleshy on the inside. In the upper part, between the outer labia, there's a fold of skin that, on second thought, looks like a kind of blister. That's the clitoris. Then come the inner labia, which are also pressed together in a kind of crease. When they open up, you can see a fleshy little mound, no bigger than the top of my thumb. The upper part has a couple of small holes in it, which is where the urine comes out. The lower part looks as if it were just skin, and yet that's where the vagina is. You can barely find it, because the folds of skin hide the opening. The hole's so small I can hardly imagine how a man could get in there, much less how a baby could come out. It's hard enough trying to get your index finger inside. That's all there is, and yet it plays such an important role!

Yours, Anne M. Frank

Is this the actual passage? It's just an observation of her own anatomy. A fairly astute one at that, considering her environment and age.

wait, isn't there a passage that talks about her getting horny watching other women? is that not in this book, or did they overlook that and complained only about the vagina part?

Vagina> Describing the horror of living under the Nazis.

/What a bunch of pussys.

Maybe they should ban the Yellow Pages; they have listings for gynecologists and abortion clinics after all

ladyway905: elchip [TotalFark] Quote 2010-01-28 10:45:18 PM
[...text discussing lady parts...] That's all there is, and yet it plays such an important role!

Yours, Anne M. Frank

Is that the real quote? Cause if it is, that's nothing more than what you learn in 5th grade sex ed. Dumbasses.



Honestly, people are ridiculous. And, retrosteve, it already happened. It even made it to fark. Linkity-pop (new window)

elchip: Hahaha, yup.

I would not be the person I was today if my mother didn't encourage me to read controversial and thought-provoking texts. I wanted to travel, which we could rarely ever afford to do (and that just inside the US), so she pointed to the book shelf and told me to learn about the world in a more affordable way.

I didn't even know the extended version was released. I'll have to re-read it, because I was always intensely curious about what her father withheld. As much as I abhor censorship, it was his little girl. I understand a father's instinct to protect that.

I love how all these cool atheists are automatically assuming that the parent is some bible thumping religious nut, when the article gives no information with regards to religion. Some people just love to jump at every possible chance to yell "I hate religion, pay attention to me!" Has anyone even wondered if the parent could be a white supremacist looking for an excuse to get the book pulled off the shelf? No, of course this is FARK, where there are only two types of people: cool liberals, and right wing religious nuts.

WTF is up with this week? Seriously, we're surrounded by stupid. 'Tardo book bannings, Salinger dies, and tax dollars are spent worrying about some fruitcake Christian's concern that a mountain is named Devil Mountain. Fark those people, yes, THOSE people who are too stupid to be ignored. I love this country, but I hate about 49% of its inhabitants.

I didn't say crap about religious nutjobs, FYI. I just thought some people are dumbasses because they can't accept basic anatomical descriptions in a book, if it even comes that detailed.

/Still haven't gotten a confirm or deny on whether or not the above quote is actual.

KajakPro: Knows about Anne Frank and vaginas.

THAT is a wonderful album. One of the very best of the 90's.
One of the most interesting singers / songwriter's I've heard in a while.

/been listening to it for a few years, have it on both vinyl and cd.
// "on avery island" isn't as good, tho. some songs are good, the rest are 'meh'.

What's a German's favorite kind of sausage?

Anne Franks, but they're so hard to find.

starchild: I love how all these cool atheists are automatically assuming that the parent is some bible thumping religious nut, when the article gives no information with regards to religion. Some people just love to jump at every possible chance to yell "I hate religion, pay attention to me!" Has anyone even wondered if the parent could be a white supremacist looking for an excuse to get the book pulled off the shelf? No, of course this is FARK, where there are only two types of people: cool liberals, and right wing religious nuts.

What a "cool liberal" might look like:

joeflood: Let's go over this one more time. Sex is no more interesting than any other bodily function. It's on the same level as farting.

And boy, do I enjoy farting.

*fart*

starchild: I love how all these cool atheists are automatically assuming that the parent is some bible thumping religious nut, when the article gives no information with regards to religion. Some people just love to jump at every possible chance to yell "I hate religion, pay attention to me!" Has anyone even wondered if the parent could be a white supremacist looking for an excuse to get the book pulled off the shelf? No, of course this is FARK, where there are only two types of people: cool liberals, and right wing religious nuts.

___________
Two things,

1. White supremacists generally aren't that clever (and are in fact inclined to be proud of the brutality of the Nazi regime in following their creed.)

&

2. The Bible thumpers are known to do this from time to time.

So, it follows that it is a safe assumption that this is an overzealous Bible thumper afraid of her own sexuality and the thought that her precious little snow flake might learn about *Gasp!* sex, and genitals and be damned for all eternity because he "spanked the monkey."

It should be legal to commit first degree murder or assassinations against people this stupid.

In fact, you should get a tax credit for doing so.

Egalitarian: starchild: I love how all these cool atheists are automatically assuming that the parent is some bible thumping religious nut, when the article gives no information with regards to religion. Some people just love to jump at every possible chance to yell "I hate religion, pay attention to me!" Has anyone even wondered if the parent could be a white supremacist looking for an excuse to get the book pulled off the shelf? No, of course this is FARK, where there are only two types of people: cool liberals, and right wing religious nuts.

LOL. The truth hurts, don't it.

Well I should say, the supposition that it usually is a bible thumping parent or group behind censorship in public schools and libraries. That's probably true.

A lot of Fark atheists are neither cool nor liberal, though.

I... I...fark.

Let`s see, "ORAL SEX," and "VAGINA`S" in the same headline and not even one pick of a HOT CHICK??? WTF has happened to FARK,, YA`LL really suck anymore!

duskglow2000: tuffsnake:

"First off "that's what she said" and second off everyone in the district is putting their money in (including the single people who may or may not intend on having kids but that's a separate argument) and if the majority of them are okay with it and they are putting in the majority of the money what's the problem?"

That argument really has nothing to do with my point.



That's what SHE said!

She's your typical attention-whoring author, who injects something "controversial" into her work just to milk the controversy for its invaluable free publicity.

Shame on you, Anne Frank.

RIP Anne Frank

Ryker's Peninsula: This parent would go ballistic over "Flowers in the Attic" like they did THIRTY YEARS AGO.

No because, thats how half of the births in Virginia happen.
Including her family.

joeflood: Let's go over this one more time. Sex is no more interesting than any other bodily function. It's on the same level as farting.



Disagrees

joeflood: Let's go over this one more time. Sex is no more interesting than any other bodily function. It's on the same level as farting.

Funny, never heard of someone launching the hand shuttle to the sound of Le Pétomane... but then again, people paid to see him, too.

The Icelander: That's right kids: You don't have anything between your legs until it's put there by Jesus on your wedding night.

\And even then you're not supposed to enjoy it

The article didn't say anything about the family's religious preference.

But that's okay, just keep making shiat up to suit your purposes.