So... 3D version, then?

Is this a movie about Palin?

Weaver95: RoxtarRyan: Is this a movie about Palin?

Only if Palin was a furry.

...

And good luck getting THAT image out of your head!

bingethinker: Because only white men fantasize about sex with other races? Moron. F**kin' moron.

You're absolutely right. Strom already covered that for old white guys.

bingethinker: Because only white men fantasize about sex with other races? Moron. F**kin' moron.

duh. you think those black on blond videos are made for black people or white people with penis envy ?


Weaver95: Only if Palin was a furry.

also wtf?

F*CK YOU, whitey!

vossiewulf: Weaver95: RoxtarRyan: Is this a movie about Palin?

Only if Palin was a furry.

...

And good luck getting THAT image out of your head!

What a cosplay Sarah Palin may look like:

Mmmmmm furry porn

Oh come on, The Princess and the Frog wasn't like that at all.

Regardless, Mark Morford is a pretentious hipster asshole douchebag and 99% of his columns are unreadable craprants about how he is better than you.

FTFA
"When we would draw Neytiri and she had fins on her back and gills and all kinds of weird protuberances and so on in odd places, the question was, well, would you want to do her? No? OK, let's back off from that." -- James Cameron"

Somehow I don't think Walt Disney ever had this conversation with himself

I liked Alvin and the Chipmunks. Those chick chipmunks were hawt.

Another AVATAR thread?.... Well, I guess It has been a WHOLE 12 hours!

Lets face it, blue aliens are all about sex with humans.

DamnYankees: fearmongert: Another AVATAR thread?.... Well, I guess It has been a WHOLE 12 hours!

I love it when people complain when lots of threads are greenlit about popular topics. It's never fails. TDK, Obama, Iran, anything. Always someone complaining about Fark covering popular things.

Popular things must be hated, it makes you seem awesome to do so,at least thats what i get from those kinds f posts.

Well, god damn. I just had a fresh install on this laptop, and been gone from fark for a week. Re-installed Stumble, and this was my 5th click. I thought this review was too douchy, even for Fark, so I went on with my life. I have not seen the movie, but I doubt the peron who wrote this even saw the movie. He described everything that you get to see from the trailers.

Epic troll.

/cool story bro

The second time the author made a statement and immediately followed it by saying "I made that up", I quit reading.

FTFA: "...leaping and fighting and taking spectacular risks just before falling into a bed of florid vines with your significant -- and incredibly hot -- alien companion to fondle her tail as the planet smiles in happy bioluminescent munificence all around you."

Alright you mooks.

This movie is a better comparison to Avatar based on the presumption (that I believe is wrong actually) that this movie is some sort of white man fulfillment.

Dances with Wolves is the wrong film to draw the comparison to, even though on the surface level it seems to have a lot in common with Avatar.

In my opinion (take it for what it's worth as some anonymous guy on the internet). The "environmentalist" message is really one of Sustainable Consumption vs. Unsustainable Consumerism. The Na'vi certainly do consume the resources of their planet, yet they do so in a way that minimizes the impact, whereas the Humans in the movie fly from a distant solar system just for the purpose of gutting rocks out of the ground because despite all their technology they don't have the wisdom to manage their resources effectively.

A lot of the movie is set up dehumanizing the humans and "humanizing" the Na'Vi for the purpose that if Cameron doesn't do this, then they may feel bad for the humans that are about to get their faces chomped off at the final battle and send his message home to the audience - which isn't that we should all become tree hugging aliens, but instead that there are moral and ethical limits to how far someone can go to "preserve their way of life". In fact many of the humans that remain behind at the end of the movie seem content to remain human, they just don't want to be the type of humans that would butcher innocent people for some rocks (of which, I think the triteness of was intentional, again to drive home the point of the ludicrousness of the situation)

Of course, just my 2 cents. It's not like I'm a professional writer who gets paid to think about things before I put them before a ton of people...

Oldboy was diarrhea, list automatically blows.

I don't think I'm mad at the fact that it was a fairly well-done troll...

...I'm mad that people will read this, go "Oh wow, he's 100% right," and then start spreading it as though it's true and that Cameron is corrupting us.

Mother's Bloody Sperm: Oldboy was diarrhea, list automatically blows.

fail

I personally thought it took a lot from Speaker for the Dead, besides that the movie was amazing.

wow an article from the SF Gate coming off as oversexed and kink obsessed.. shocker..

What a shiatty article. DamnYankees:
Do we think this will still be in theaters the 2nd week of January?

Is that a serious question?

Are you familiar at all with movies? Even a shiatty bomb of movie will stick around in some movie theater for a month. Avatar is making somewhere between 16 and 20 million every day, and I think it is safe to say it will still be in theaters in the farking 2nd week of January.

Have you ever even been to a movie theater?

AVATAR THREAD

movie = masturbatory presentation. it could be about two asses competing as to who farts first, but you won't care because of the eye candy.

as a movie, crappy generic telegraphed "Chekhov's gun ^{(^)}" throughout.

Worst part for me was how it had the Jar Jar syndrome. Main blue farkers had amazing animation and attention to detail... group shots looked like a 3rd grader's CGI presentation.

See Jar Jar in woods vs. Gungan battle. diff levels of attention and those "blue monkeys around the tree" scenes just made me weep with how fake it looked.

Explain how this is less of an animated movie than Wall-E? Yet Wall-E ends up in the "Kung Fu Panda" category while this will be in the "real movie" category.farking academy.

/drunk
//bitter
///hates mass scenes of Cgi blue farks

snuff3r: Wha. He drew a link to huge, anime-like eyes and their tails and didn't mention tentacle porn?

Funny article though. I chuckled.

Well, now YOU did. It's only a matter of time before gorgor arrives, lightning flashing around his sunken eyes.

ramen_for_all: static.funnyjunk.com

ugh.... the hideousness of that picture will haunt my dreams... forever.

Oh.

Not E.T.

Right.

RoxtarRyan,

you're welcome :D

love, Ramen

Smiths: as a movie, crappy generic telegraphed "Chekhov's gun (^)" throughout.

No. There would have to be a surprise ending for there to be a valid reference to the "Chekhov's gun" technique, or at least an attempt at one. The story was pretty straightforward from point a to point b.