How about the total lack of hair on his body.

I see just enough hair for me.

Why so grumpy, Thornhill?

I've procrastinated writing 2 papers all weekend.

Meh...cute, but he looks like his IQ is sorely lacking from his facial expressions.

Not that you ever hear anyone on a street corner howling, "Hey, check out the IQ on that one!"

But really...who howls in street corners anymore.

Method - yeah, good thing!

OH...MY...GOD...

How come I've never seen this guy before now? I must not look at enough mags that have CK ads.

And speaking of turtles

Were we speaking of turtles? I thought we were talking about men and their hair.

The turtle is always there.
The turtle is everywhere.

Help me! I can't get away from the turtle!

I was asked to post this up to the next weeners thread.

Ah, fer feck's sake.

Round two:

Just cut and copy if you wanna see; you probably know what to do about the Geocities thing.

http://www.geocities.com/desertfoxg2000/desertfox.jpg

There ya go Resident_Weevil

Wow.

I didn't think you'd actually do it. The ctrl-c/v was definitely worth my time. ; )

Am I pretty?

Very nice. Is that finger yours?

Yep, all mine.

The Busey page rules. I wonder if there's equal online reverence for, say, John Tesh...

GO TESH!

TESH SECRETS from Late Night w/Conan O'Brien

"My real name isn't John Tesh. It's Juanita Teshowitz. That's right- I'm a female Puerto Rican Jew."

Resident_weevil: Thanks, and yes, something similar probably exists for John Tesh.

That is one creepy looking dude

In response to the very Boobies on here by Mannequin...I am a woman you dope!



I'm tired of these so-called 'Weener' tagged articles that don't live up to the 'Weener' part...Us Farkettes need our fun too!

psychologist say this is because women subconsciously think that a feminine looking man will be as emotionally sensitive as a woman since they look feminine.

Oh, bullshiat. I'm not looking to have a relationship with Travis or anyone else for that matter. I don't give a crap what he is like. I just find him attractive to look at. I find smooth skin, soft lips and such much more aesthetic than roughness.

I also see no reason for guys to complain about the models being hairless, which I've seen X number of times now. The female models are hairless too and at least it's not a farking social stigma for men to have body hair.

I always wonder why so many weener threads turn into the women trying to stroke the male farkers egos. I think they can take their insecurities elsewhere and allow females to look at someone for such shallow reasons as that the person is hot, without having to make excuse or give explanations.

It's positive to me that increasingly more women understand that we are as visual as men, we just don't have an entire media focused on stimulating us so that part is often underdeveloped. I only see good things coming from women learning to actively desire instead of passively wasting energy on making sure that they are desired by others.

<img src="url of graphic" width="whatever" height="whatever">

Cola:

Did you get a look at desertfoxg? Kinda rough-ish, but a smidgen pretty. Sort of in the middle-ground as far as males are concerned. (I cajoled him to put it up, so I might as well follow through on the endorsement).

Yeah, and I agree that the psychology of the "nice guy" coming through a more refined facial aesthetic is not entirely relevant. Moreso perhaps that these sorts of men are non-threatening (inviting?) to look at?

THE PUBE SHOT! OH MY GOD THE PUBE SHOT!

*grabs box of Kleenex*

Heh....wow, a lot of Farkettes had a really good time in this thread, they are getting more and more like us Farkers everyday!

Wo0t!!

Urgh. Prettyboy. If there are any more Weener featuring the word Travis ever again it'd better be about the band Travis.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, Dougie....................

Girlwithablueguitar - best I could do on short notice...

crap! sorry, it won't seem to work.
Dougie Payne