If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CW11)   XOXO places female living mannequins wearing lingerie in their windows geared toward and you clicked without even hearing what city this is in   (wpix.com) divider line 148
    More: Spiffy, XOXO, lingerie, NY Post, WPIX, Fifth Avenue, Carol Powley  
•       •       •

36693 clicks; posted to Main » on 28 Nov 2009 at 11:16 PM (4 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



148 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-11-28 10:43:35 PM

"The couple walked by the window and the guy looked too much. The woman wacked him with her purse, then she called the police," Powley told PIX News. "The police were great. They came by and they laughed because nothing lewd is going on here. It's just playful."


... so, she hit him, then called the police on him, because he gawked at another woman?

Yeah, I would say, "Dump that. Now. Burn her shiat in front of her..." but if he did, she might kill him.

The police should have tased her.
 
2009-11-28 10:48:56 PM
I read that headline a couple of times.
 
2009-11-28 10:53:40 PM
TehNacho: ... so, she hit him, then called the police on him, because he gawked at another woman?

I think she probably called the police on the store trying to claim that they had lewd mannequins up there. The joke would have been on her if the guy had told the cops she assaulted him.
 
2009-11-28 10:55:17 PM
exick: TehNacho: ... so, she hit him, then called the police on him, because he gawked at another woman?

I think she probably called the police on the store trying to claim that they had lewd mannequins up there. The joke would have been on her if the guy had told the cops she assaulted him.


Hm, not a bad point.

But still, biatch needed a dumping, and a tasering.
 
2009-11-28 11:06:56 PM
Well, I know where I'll be tomorrow!

and thanks for the kudos on L&T. It may be recycled, it may be the last time L&T does Christmas windows in this vein, but dammit, it's my design work and I'll take the compliment.
 
2009-11-28 11:21:37 PM
You know what this window display needs? A webcam.
 
2009-11-28 11:22:11 PM
I guess maybe I will be wandering into the city tomorrow...
 
2009-11-28 11:23:01 PM
I support this.

/as long as it's not at Lane Bryant
 
2009-11-28 11:23:49 PM
TehNacho: "The couple walked by the window and the guy looked too much. The woman wacked him with her purse, then she called the police," Powley told PIX News. "The police were great. They came by and they laughed because nothing lewd is going on here. It's just playful."

ditch the biatch
 
2009-11-28 11:26:39 PM
FARK needs a method for banning people who post idiotic, cliched headlines.
 
2009-11-28 11:26:43 PM
TTIUWV
 
2009-11-28 11:29:54 PM
I think it's a nice concept to see something live instead of seeing fake things in the windows

How can she tell?
www.wpix.com

Good Behavior Day: You know what this window display needs? A webcam.

A shower stall couldn't hurt, either, preferably with both of them in white tanktops.

/Ohhh yeah...
 
2009-11-28 11:30:53 PM
Fake.
 
2009-11-28 11:31:12 PM
drinki bird: I guess maybe I will be wandering into the city tomorrow...

My thoughts exactly....
 
2009-11-28 11:33:16 PM
I want to see a window display of crash test dummies.
 
paj
2009-11-28 11:33:34 PM
I'm guessing these ladies are a little beefy.
 
2009-11-28 11:34:29 PM
same site, more relevant to my interests

Link (new window)
 
2009-11-28 11:35:00 PM
Do they have a cup?
 
2009-11-28 11:36:59 PM
The f*ck did that headline say?
 
2009-11-28 11:39:16 PM
www.thebansheesandothercreatures.co.uk

Peeeek-a-boo!
 
2009-11-28 11:39:51 PM
Can I text them with requests?
 
2009-11-28 11:46:18 PM
Walker: The f*ck did that headline say?

Yeah....the f*ck?
 
2009-11-28 11:47:16 PM
boy that headline is a mess.

/fails at such an easy meme
 
2009-11-28 11:47:35 PM
Meh. I don't personally have a problem with this, but I'm sure many people will come out of their holes to complain about it.
 
2009-11-28 11:49:33 PM
www.grannygear.com
 
2009-11-28 11:53:20 PM
TehNacho: "The couple walked by the window and the guy looked too much. The woman wacked him with her purse, then she called the police," Powley told PIX News. "The police were great. They came by and they laughed because nothing lewd is going on here. It's just playful."

... so, she hit him, then called the police on him, because he gawked at another woman?

Yeah, I would say, "Dump that. Now. Burn her shiat in front of her..." but if he did, she might kill him.

The police should have tased her.


I guess the world of romantic comedies has finally won.
 
2009-11-28 11:58:51 PM
"This window doesn't look like a clothing advertisement to me. It looks like these girls are waiting for some customers to come along."



...duh
 
2009-11-28 11:59:48 PM
Shut that biatch up!

img.photobucket.com
 
2009-11-29 12:03:20 AM
Walker: The f*ck did that headline say?

Something about your mom.
 
2009-11-29 12:05:25 AM
Antilope: I want to see a window display of crash test dummies.

They do. Check out the Betty Ford exhibit.
 
2009-11-29 12:15:30 AM
LOL That headline was funny the first couple of times but you already stopped reading this because you were too busy beating off to your headline counter.

Sheesh, is there anything Fark won't beat like a dead horse!?
 
2009-11-29 12:18:12 AM
So the NY penal code is OK with this?
 
2009-11-29 12:21:56 AM
que
 
2009-11-29 12:25:03 AM
bugmn99: Peeeek-a-boo!

Blue Velvet reference?
 
2009-11-29 12:27:15 AM
Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.
 
2009-11-29 12:31:09 AM
Mayah: Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.

Welcome to Internet.
 
2009-11-29 12:34:02 AM
TFA: The display -- which plays out more like a peep show -- has drawn hundreds of men.

And a fair number of women, I would wager.

*looks at author's name*

Ahhh... well, that explains the tone.
 
2009-11-29 12:35:01 AM
Relatively Obscure: Mayah: Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.

Welcome to Internet.


i294.photobucket.com
 
2009-11-29 12:42:55 AM
I eat mop: same site, more relevant to my interests

Link (new window)


I don't know who any of those people are.

.
 
2009-11-29 12:43:27 AM
img38.imageshack.us

What a female in lingerie, in Zozo, may look like.

/Oh wait, XOXO?
 
2009-11-29 12:43:36 AM
Relatively Obscure: Mayah: Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.

Welcome to Internet.


More like welcome to Fark. Wasn't too long ago when the main page was full of SbB tit advertisements and dozens of tit threads.

/few dicks, too, but this is the internet. manworld.
 
2009-11-29 12:50:04 AM
I accidentally the whole headline.
 
2009-11-29 12:50:38 AM
bhcompy: More like welcome to Fark. Wasn't too long ago when the main page was full of SbB tit advertisements and dozens of tit threads.

Sigh. I miss the good times on fark.
 
2009-11-29 12:56:53 AM
Mayah: Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.

Nice heteronormative tunnel-vision there, Mayah. Why do you hate lesbians? Aren't they also entitled to enjoy the freely offered spectacle of attractively-dressed women?
 
2009-11-29 01:02:03 AM
Way to post a headline that will end up with users leaving FARK. Half of them will now be on Fifth Avenue gawking instead of providing HITS!@
 
2009-11-29 01:03:33 AM
I can't believe this hasn't happened yet...

Lingerie thread!

www.instablogsimages.com

/hawt
 
2009-11-29 01:04:01 AM
Mayah: Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.

Hey biatch, when you start paying for the headline submissions, we'll follow your guidelines. Until then, since subby is probably a man, I see no reason why his default viewpoint wouldn't be male oriented, just like your default viewpoint is undoubtedly stupid victimized coont oriented.

/aren't you supposed to be working on your wish list and begging for total fark sponsorships?
 
2009-11-29 01:04:58 AM
Witchydiva: I can't believe this hasn't happened yet...

Lingerie thread!



/hawt


Nice default-male viewpoint, Witchy.
 
2009-11-29 01:04:59 AM
EverWatcher: Mayah: Nice default-male viewpoint, subby.

Nice heteronormative tunnel-vision there, Mayah. Why do you hate lesbians? Aren't they also entitled to enjoy the freely offered spectacle of attractively-dressed women?


Burn.
 
2009-11-29 01:05:31 AM
GoSurfing: bugmn99: Peeeek-a-boo!

Blue Velvet reference?


Nope, Siouxsie.

www.nnpromotions.co.uk

Golly jeepers where'd you get those weepers
Peep show creep show where did you get those eyes
 
Displayed 50 of 148 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report