A Bush economist disagrees with an Obama economist??!?

OMFG!!1!

UNC_Samurai: Cue the pic

Here's one of them:



I think there's a more broken down and up to date one too.

UNC_Samurai: Cue the pic



gladly

See how republicans control the deficit?

You know how Hot Air was founded by Michelle Malkin? So subby, perhaps you would like to explain why anything they say on the subject of the current administration (or anything else, for that matter) should be taken seriously.

dudemanbro: You know how Hot Air was founded by Michelle Malkin? So subby, perhaps you would like to explain why anything they say on the subject of the current administration (or anything else, for that matter) should be taken seriously.

Poisoning the Well Fallacy. Try again.

The_Six_Fingered_Man: Poisoning the Well Fallacy. Try again.

I'm simply pointing out that they have a strong bias against the administration and are full of wharrgarbl. Therefore nothing they say should be taken seriously. Kind of like yourself.

I hate Chevy: MALKIN FAIL. NO CLICKY!

mrEdude: Thank god the Iraq war was a freebie.
Paid for itself already, didn't it?

Its a good thing gasoline is only $1.50 a gallon, or else it would cost a lot to have to ship home all the flowers the Iraqis gave our welcomed soldiers!

dudemanbro: The_Six_Fingered_Man: Poisoning the Well Fallacy. Try again.

I'm simply pointing out that they have a strong bias against the administration and are full of wharrgarbl. Therefore nothing they say should be taken seriously. Kind of like yourself.

And what you are "simply pointing out" is known as Poisoning the Well. It's a logical fallacy and means that you are intellectually unable to process opposing viewpoints and instead choose to dismiss them out of hand.

I would expect nothing less from a mental midget like yourself.

The defense department budget for 1 year: $651.2 billion

Giving healthcare to all Americans proposed budget over 10 years: $900 billion.

Which one are people protesting as Socialist, un American, and too costly?

smokescreen: it doesn't provide the current President a freebie to go out and spend like a drunken sailor.

No, it doesn't. BUT, where were the tea parties over the last 8 years? Was FOX news organizing them? I missed that.

Teabaggers have ZERO crediblity. Zero.

And what you are "simply pointing out" is known as Poisoning the Well. It's a logical fallacy and means that you are intellectually unable to process opposing viewpoints and instead choose to dismiss them out of hand.

I would expect nothing less from a mental midget like yourself.

I dismiss them out of hand because they have shown themselves to be biased and illogical, as demonstrated in this thread. Why don't you explain to me why their flawed logic should be taken seriously? And my reasons for not being willing to listen to them are not "poisoning the well" because I have not presented any false or disparaging information about Hot Air, the author or Malkin, just pointed out who was presenting the information and that they are full of wharrgarbl.
Calling me a mental midget accomplishes nothing but to make yourself look like even more of a dickhead than you already do on a regular basis.

dudemanbro: And what you are "simply pointing out" is known as Poisoning the Well. It's a logical fallacy and means that you are intellectually unable to process opposing viewpoints and instead choose to dismiss them out of hand.

I would expect nothing less from a mental midget like yourself.

I dismiss them out of hand because they have shown themselves to be biased and illogical, as demonstrated in this thread. Why don't you explain to me why their flawed logic should be taken seriously? And my reasons for not being willing to listen to them are not "poisoning the well" because I have not presented any false or disparaging information about Hot Air, the author or Malkin, just pointed out who was presenting the information and that they are full of wharrgarbl.
Calling me a mental midget accomplishes nothing but to make yourself look like even more of a dickhead than you already do on a regular basis.

Wow. So saying that they are full of "whargarrbl" isn't disparaging? It's just your pet name for them, right?

Your entire argument is that they are so biased (adverse information) and "full of whargarrbl" (adverse information) that nothing they say should be taken seriously. (Intent to discredit)

It's the very definition of Poisoning the Well.

As for the mental midget remark, I'm just fighting fire with fire here. Was it not you that alluded that I also have nothing to say, because you believe that I am also biased against the current administration and "full of whargarrbl?" So you not only engaged in Poisoning the Well, but also a nice little ad hominem.

Congrats. You have shown that you have nothing to add to the conversation.

The_Six_Fingered_Man: Congrats. You have shown that you have nothing to add to the conversation.

It's not my fault that nothing they, or you, say can be taken seriously because of their overwhelming bias against the administration. Now why don't you defend their logic instead of attacking me for pointing out the obvious? Shouldn't be too hard for a conservative mental giant like yourself. Or don't you have anything to add to the conversation?

In other news, I just got invited out for a drink so have fun flaming me for pointing out the obvious while I'm not here. :)