If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Hill)   In an effort to help the Obama administration with it's pledge to keep illegals from abusing the new and improved US healthcare system, an amendment is offered requiring immigrants to prove their identity   (thehill.com) divider line 489
    More: Hero, First Lady Michelle Obama, Obama administration, healthcare system, Chuck Grassley, pledge, Senate Finance Committee, amendments, ranking members  
•       •       •

2448 clicks; posted to Politics » on 01 Oct 2009 at 1:20 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



489 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-10-01 02:51:43 PM
skullkrusher: Requiring all Americans to buy health insurance is far more authoritarian than asking someone to prove their legal residency to get federal benefits. However, for all your hand-wringing over alleged authoritarianism I don't think you're opposed to the insurance mandate. a gift to the Health Care industry.

FTFY
 
2009-10-01 02:51:56 PM
Epoch_Zero: pandabear: A similar system is used by Japan, I believe.

No, Japan has a public option for natural born citizens, and a lesser version for ex-pat immigrant citizens. The similarities begin at that point. In Japan, a non-citizen resident can buy insurance, but since they are sort of a nationalist society that gives almost holy regard to only Japanese people, they make it extremely expensive, in order to entice citizenship or to gtfo. They are also pretty racist against south-east asians of non-Japanese descent, and sometimes bar them from the health system on those grounds.


Really? When I spent many years in Japan as a kid, and again in college as recently as 2000-2001, my government insurance premium was no higher than it was for all my Japanese friends.
 
2009-10-01 02:53:50 PM
jaerik: Really? When I spent many years in Japan as a kid, and again in college as recently as 2000-2001, my government insurance premium was no higher than it was for all my Japanese friends.

Yeah, but they had tentacle intrusion coverage where you didn't.
 
2009-10-01 02:54:09 PM
jaerik: Really? When I spent many years in Japan as a kid, and again in college as recently as 2000-2001, my government insurance premium was no higher than it was for all my Japanese friends.

There might have been some reform - my info is from a book more than a decade old.
 
2009-10-01 02:55:15 PM
PhilMP: Yup, just immigrants. Because people like my parents and millions of other hard-working people who left their homes and families to help build this country are a bunch of fraudsters.

Pfft, you guys are nothing next to the ones who killed all the Natives.
 
2009-10-01 02:57:22 PM
moothemagiccow: you guys are nothing next to the ones who killed all the Natives.


What natives?
 
2009-10-01 02:57:23 PM
GameSprocket: jaerik: Really? When I spent many years in Japan as a kid, and again in college as recently as 2000-2001, my government insurance premium was no higher than it was for all my Japanese friends.

Yeah, but they had tentacle intrusion coverage where you didn't.


Crap! Why did nobody tell me?!

And to think, I sat right next to that creepy Tentacle Kid in middle school...
 
2009-10-01 02:57:40 PM
skullkrusher: Requiring all Americans to buy health insurance is far more authoritarian than asking someone to prove their legal residency to get federal benefits.

Pffft. Sure it is. You should talk to Grover Norquist about how the estate tax is "like the holocaust". Sorry no, I don't make moral judgments about economic policy and taxation.

I do make them when the state needlessly argues the consent of the governed must first be validated by the state.

The only thing this will lead to is more identity theft and increased counterfeiting.

It's a perfect example of bad policy to fix the wrong problem.
 
2009-10-01 03:00:51 PM
DarnoKonrad: Says you. I can't validate that from the article or anywhere.

so it's just a question of implementation? So, lets assume that you present ID one time to prove your eligibility and then the checks start coming. Are you ok with that?

DarnoKonrad: It's everywhere. health care, the dmv, voting, the airport etc.

And, again, says you. I can't validate your charchterziation from what Grassly's talking about in the article.

I can compare to the idiotic ID shenanigans going on in this state also advocated by Republicans.


we're talking about a single instance here. The fact that you are required to show ID in other cases has no bearing on whether it is a good idea in this case.

Also, once we abolish the notion of nation states, we can get rid of those pesky passports. Until then, deal with it.

DarnoKonrad: And each time you ask it the qualifiers get narrower and narrower. If you have a point to make -- try to without begging the question. This kind of argumentation should be beneath you. But then I lost quite a bit of respect for your argumentation after you race baited a Latino representative and failed to own up to it.

you mischaracterized that conversation as well by pretending I was saying that a hispanic Rep in the House was not "one of us", to use your words, when in reality I was calling into question the ethics behind representing illegal residents in his district to the detriment of people of all races who are living in his area. When an elected representative in the US government uses the term "us" to mean people here illegally, there is a problem.
 
2009-10-01 03:01:49 PM
Phil Herup: rastjr: That's just a human construct.


True.

So are taxes.

You think those are great.


Liberals love to pick and choose their constructs as they are convenient.


When you go to a party, do you bring just what you are going to drink? Maybe a 6 pack. I always a bottle of something for the host and a case of 24 beer because there are always a few people who didn't have enough money to bring much or any booze. No matter what I drink, I always leave whatever is left over at the party.

Some Conservatives (some mind you) remind me of the people driving the new fully loaded SUV to the party who bring a 6 pack of beer and a bag of chips for the host. They will likely drink all 6 beers and snag a glass of wine from someone else.

Taxes are like that. I like paying my taxes in the same way I like bringing beer to a party. I asked my HR to take additional taxes off each pay. At the end of the year, I get a huge refund. I like the feeling that I am able to contribute more to my countrymen. It makes me feel good. If you make enough money that you have to pay more than other people in taxes, you should count yourself lucky and quit your belly-aching.

You will say the beer analogy is false because it is voluntary. I say when I organize a party, I'm going to make the people with deeper pockets shell out a little more for beer than the people will less cash. In the end, everyone is going to have a better time and more of us will get laid. I've officially taken the analogy too far.
 
2009-10-01 03:01:52 PM
The_Six_Fingered_Man: DNA. If you are determined to be here illegally, you forfeit your right to a warrantless seizure. We get your DNA in order to ensure that you are not willfully raping the system. There comes a point where human decency cannot outweigh the economic consequences.

This is you joking around, right? You couldn't seize the DNA without proof that they're illegal-- and if the proof is the DNA, that makes a Catch-22 that prevents the DNA being seized to determine if you can seize the DNA.

Sorry, I'm busy on tons of stuff today so my sarcasm/jokey filter is a little wonky.

The_Six_Fingered_Man: I will concede that there can be problems definitively determining citizenship at the ER. It should not be THAT difficult though.

Why? Simple assertion isn't really compelling. Consider what an emergency room does-- it provides emergency care. It is not a good place to add in a layer of bureaucracy. It will have costs; those costs will include citizens being denied care because they cannot prove citizenship. Since it is an emergency room, this will mean death on some occasions.


The_Six_Fingered_Man: That article was about how the government is trying to NOT provide free care to illegals, but it still happens. It doesn't say that they bill the patient for the care.

No, you're right. They may simply pay for it themselves-- which would still require hat-munching on your part. The UK definitely pays for the emergency health care of illegals.
 
2009-10-01 03:02:08 PM
DarnoKonrad: skullkrusher: Requiring all Americans to buy health insurance is far more authoritarian than asking someone to prove their legal residency to get federal benefits.

Pffft. Sure it is. You should talk to Grover Norquist about how the estate tax is "like the holocaust". Sorry no, I don't make moral judgments about economic policy and taxation.

I do make them when the state needlessly argues the consent of the governed must first be validated by the state.

The only thing this will lead to is more identity theft and increased counterfeiting.

It's a perfect example of bad policy to fix the wrong problem.


Grover stopped taking my calls.
 
2009-10-01 03:05:12 PM
CheekyMunky

Listen...your superior knowledge is overwhelming my senses. Pardon my ignorance. As a meek individual with no education (other than a BBA in Business Analysis from a top-100 in the world university), I am at your mercy.

But, professor, please tell me how putting American citizens in jobs currently filled by illegal aliens, and securing (as best we can) our healthcare system from "sabotage" by illegal aliens, wouldn't be a huge boost for the US economy in totality. Please explain why I'm wrong.
 
2009-10-01 03:05:23 PM
skullkrusher: you mischaracterized that conversation as well by pretending I was saying that a hispanic Rep in the House was not "one of us", to use your words, when in reality I was calling into question the ethics behind representing illegal residents in his district to the detriment of people of all races who are legally living in his area. When an elected representative in the US government uses the term "us" to mean people here illegally, there is a problem.


/ftfm
 
2009-10-01 03:05:27 PM
www.7ate9.net
 
2009-10-01 03:05:49 PM
Epoch_Zero: Scerpes: I'm talking about people who are in the country illegally. That doesn't include a lot of non-citizens.

I....but, you....


What?


Er...lol Yeah...that probably wasn't the most articulate thing I've ever written.
 
2009-10-01 03:06:12 PM
jaerik: Except, they ARE those missing X votes. So it's like saying "This would pass if I voted for it, but it can't pass if I don't, so I can't vote for it. The Aristocrats!"

if we had some bacon we could have bacon and eggs, if we had some eggs.
 
2009-10-01 03:07:23 PM
I know, this is a radical idea - but why don't they go with some sort of amendment that provides medical care to keep from dying (ie - only life threatening care) and then put them in jail and deport immediately if they are illegal aliens?

It seems simple enough. You show up to the hospital - you don't get discharged until your identity is proven. If it is not proven - you are incarcerated until verification. If you are an alien - you get an immediate ticket out of town. Sure - we'd pay some illegal's medical bills, but they would get deported, and we wouldn't be denying life threatening care. It would also send a message that hospitals are not somewhere you want to be as an illegal - you'll have to go home.
 
2009-10-01 03:08:01 PM
skullkrusher: rastjr: No, they should be welcomed here. This is the great melting pot of immigrants.

yes, they should be. They should also pay the same taxes we do. However, they currently do not so unless we're going to overhaul immigration before healthcare reform, your argument regarding immigration as it pertains to healthcare doesn't make much sense.



They do pay taxes and get nothing in return.
 
2009-10-01 03:08:41 PM
CheekyMunky

Scratch that. I'm pretty sure we're close to the same mindset. My apologies.
 
2009-10-01 03:09:03 PM
Phil Herup: rastjr: Why you hate to pay your taxes is beyond me.

Dentists maka a pretty good living.

Society has been good to you.


I hate to pay excessive taxes.

Society has not done anything for me that it has not done for you or anyone. Society is here for all of us.



Exactly what percentage is excessive and what is not?
 
2009-10-01 03:09:04 PM
Civil_War2_Time: But, professor, please tell me how putting American citizens in jobs currently filled by illegal aliens, and securing (as best we can) our healthcare system from "sabotage" by illegal aliens, wouldn't be a huge boost for the US economy in totality. Please explain why I'm wrong.

the fact that illegals work "outside the system" and are therefore not subject to any labor law protections do keep prices a lot lower than they would be otherwise so that itself is a boost to the economy.
 
2009-10-01 03:10:13 PM
skullkrusher: So, lets assume

My point is let's not assume. This idea doesn't belong in a health care bill. it belongs in immigration reform -- and even at that, not as a national ID check.

skullkrusher: we're talking about a single instance here. The fact that you are required to show ID in other cases has no bearing on whether it is a good idea in this case.

We don't know that. We don't know under what circumstances, or by whom, or to what degree of proof.

skullkrusher: Grover stopped taking my calls.

Mine too.
 
2009-10-01 03:10:15 PM
www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com
 
2009-10-01 03:10:35 PM
The_Six_Fingered_Man: Every little bit helps. And I don't know where you are getting your information, but the last foreign aid appropriation to Mexico was in the neighborhood of $500M.

Oh, actually yeah you're right, I'm sorry. I guess my google-fu failed me earlier. Well, anyway, it seems as if the money we're sending down south is going for some good things anyway, no?

With U.S. government support, international family planning programs have been successful. In fiscal year 2008, USAID programmed $457 million for family planning activities. Since the 1960s, the percentage of women and couples using contraceptives in the developing world has risen from less than 10 percent to more than 50 percent. The average number of children born to women in these countries has fallen from six to three. Repealing the Mexico City Policy will help improve the lives of mothers and children through increased access to family planning services and supplies. Global estimates indicate that by helping women space births and avoid unintended pregnancies, family planning could prevent 25 percent of maternal and child deaths in the developing world.

Link (new window)
 
2009-10-01 03:10:35 PM
Scerpes: rastjr: No, they should be welcomed here. This is the great melting pot of immigrants.

Sure. As long as they get here legally. They should not get preference over those who follow the law and wait their turn.



It's wrong to make it illegal for people to feed their family.
 
2009-10-01 03:10:41 PM
By immigrant, they mean non-white, right?
 
2009-10-01 03:10:56 PM
rastjr: They do pay taxes and get nothing in return.

Consumption related taxes, that's it. Their children are eligible for medicaid, public schools, they get the benefit of police and fire protection, national security, etc.
 
2009-10-01 03:11:38 PM
rastjr: skullkrusher: rastjr: No, they should be welcomed here. This is the great melting pot of immigrants.

yes, they should be. They should also pay the same taxes we do. However, they currently do not so unless we're going to overhaul immigration before healthcare reform, your argument regarding immigration as it pertains to healthcare doesn't make much sense.


They do pay taxes and get nothing in return.


Well... they usually fix up their W-4s to withhold as little tax as possible, and they do get use of the interstates and some other benefits. Not as many benefits as people who are here legally, but they do get some benefits from the government.
 
2009-10-01 03:12:06 PM
Befuddled: By immigrant, they mean non-white, right?

no, they mean people who left their birth countries and moved to the US. The word does not describe race at all. I can't believe you didn't know that.
 
2009-10-01 03:13:35 PM
skullkrusher: Consumption related taxes, that's it.

Are you sure about that assertion? Illegals only pay consumption-related taxes?

You don't want to reconsider that statement at all?
 
2009-10-01 03:13:46 PM
Brainsick:

she's half right
 
2009-10-01 03:13:50 PM
kukukupo: I know, this is a radical idea - but why don't they go with some sort of amendment that provides medical care to keep from dying (ie - only life threatening care) and then put them in jail and deport immediately if they are illegal aliens?

I can see how might just end up making more illegal immigrants die in their homes or on the streets instead of risking getting deported by going to get care.

Is it just me?
 
2009-10-01 03:15:58 PM
Obdicut: skullkrusher: Consumption related taxes, that's it.

Are you sure about that assertion? Illegals only pay consumption-related taxes?

You don't want to reconsider that statement at all?


yeah probably.
 
2009-10-01 03:16:12 PM
Prest-o change-o fixed!
These government guys are good, really really good. A card you say? Brilliance, sheer brilliance. Someone's pay needs doubling.
 
2009-10-01 03:16:45 PM
It's funny how the rabid righties can be made to love and embrace things they formerly hated (and not have their heads explode from the cognitive dissonance). Now that illegal immigrants are the bogeymen and we just can't have a single one of those people getting public services, the idea of a national identity card, something that was considered a horrible idea when it was brought up not too long ago will now be seen as a wonderful idea.
 
2009-10-01 03:16:50 PM
skullkrusher: yeah probably.

Yeah probably what? Yes, you want to reconsider, or yes, you're probably sure?
 
2009-10-01 03:17:57 PM
skullkrusher: national security

Yeah, we wouldn't have to defend the country so much if it wasn't for all them illegals.
 
2009-10-01 03:18:17 PM
skullkrusher: Brainsick:

she's half right


Best part is that she had her gardener do the lettering on the sign for an extra $10.
 
2009-10-01 03:18:21 PM
Obdicut: The_Six_Fingered_Man: DNA. If you are determined to be here illegally, you forfeit your right to a warrantless seizure. We get your DNA in order to ensure that you are not willfully raping the system. There comes a point where human decency cannot outweigh the economic consequences.

This is you joking around, right? You couldn't seize the DNA without proof that they're illegal-- and if the proof is the DNA, that makes a Catch-22 that prevents the DNA being seized to determine if you can seize the DNA.

Sorry, I'm busy on tons of stuff today so my sarcasm/jokey filter is a little wonky.


Not sarcasm. And the DNA would be extracted once you have been determined to be here illegally. It is not the source of the proof. It is merely the unalterable method to determine your identity. If you go to the ER after being deported and you cannot prove your residency, you get a blood sample drawn. If that DNA matches the DNA previously received, you get no care.

The_Six_Fingered_Man: I will concede that there can be problems definitively determining citizenship at the ER. It should not be THAT difficult though.

Why? Simple assertion isn't really compelling. Consider what an emergency room does-- it provides emergency care. It is not a good place to add in a layer of bureaucracy. It will have costs; those costs will include citizens being denied care because they cannot prove citizenship. Since it is an emergency room, this will mean death on some occasions.


The_Six_Fingered_Man: That article was about how the government is trying to NOT provide free care to illegals, but it still happens. It doesn't say that they bill the patient for the care.

No, you're right. They may simply pay for it themselves-- which would still require hat-munching on your part. The UK definitely pays for the emergency health care of illegals.


True, I conceded the UK argument. It still appears as though they are trying every avenue to NOT provide it though, rather than the US, which is trying every avenue to keep at least the status quo when it comes to immigrants. We can bill them, but we have no reasonable expectation of payment. Even you have to concede that point. We make the attempt to try and get reimbursed, but more often than not, those costs are passed on to those that DO pay.
 
2009-10-01 03:20:22 PM
Befuddled: It's funny how the rabid righties can be made to love and embrace things they formerly hated (and not have their heads explode from the cognitive dissonance). Now that illegal immigrants are the bogeymen and we just can't have a single one of those people getting public services, the idea of a national identity card, something that was considered a horrible idea when it was brought up not too long ago will now be seen as a wonderful idea.

No, you see, here's the thing: only the illegals will be required to have a national identity card. Good white folks like you and me? Well, it's obvious we're citizens.

Oh, and don't worry, we don't need to see your poll stamp, we trust you've paid your poll tax already. See you next Friday at the Klan meeting!
 
2009-10-01 03:20:47 PM
Obdicut: skullkrusher: yeah probably.

Yeah probably what? Yes, you want to reconsider, or yes, you're probably sure?


retracted. Settle down.
 
2009-10-01 03:20:48 PM
The_Six_Fingered_Man: Not sarcasm. And the DNA would be extracted once you have been determined to be here illegally. It is not the source of the proof. It is merely the unalterable method to determine your identity. If you go to the ER after being deported and you cannot prove your residency, you get a blood sample drawn. If that DNA matches the DNA previously received, you get no care.

I don't know, dude. The last time I tried to give a federal agent a sample of my DNA, I got arrested. There is even an iPhone app to track me now.
 
2009-10-01 03:21:22 PM
GameSprocket: skullkrusher: national security

Yeah, we wouldn't have to defend the country so much if it wasn't for all them illegals.


that really wasn't the point at all, was it?
 
2009-10-01 03:22:03 PM
GameSprocket: I don't know, dude. The last time I tried to give a federal agent a sample of my DNA, I got arrested. There is even an iPhone app to track me now.

that's because rape is illegal.
rape
 
2009-10-01 03:22:14 PM
The_Six_Fingered_Man: Not sarcasm. And the DNA would be extracted once you have been determined to be here illegally. It is not the source of the proof. It is merely the unalterable method to determine your identity. If you go to the ER after being deported and you cannot prove your residency, you get a blood sample drawn. If that DNA matches the DNA previously received, you get no care.

whoa big spender, who pays for all these DNA tests?
 
2009-10-01 03:22:14 PM
Barbigazi: This isn't for actual medical care. The proposal was requiring an ID to sign up. For that to work you'd need to sign up in person so somebody can compare you to your ID. It isn't brain science, they actually explain it in the article.

It wouldn't require you to go in anywhere. I had to submit a notarized copy of my driver's license just to open a brokerage account (by mail). Try and keep up.
 
2009-10-01 03:23:35 PM
skullkrusher: GameSprocket: I don't know, dude. The last time I tried to give a federal agent a sample of my DNA, I got arrested. There is even an iPhone app to track me now.

that's because rape is illegal.
rape


You said "rape" twice.

/You're welcome.
 
2009-10-01 03:23:36 PM
rastjr: Phil Herup: rastjr: Why you hate to pay your taxes is beyond me.

Dentists maka a pretty good living.

Society has been good to you.


I hate to pay excessive taxes.

Society has not done anything for me that it has not done for you or anyone. Society is here for all of us.


Exactly what percentage is excessive and what is not?
 
2009-10-01 03:23:41 PM
Theaetetus: skullkrusher: Brainsick:

she's half right

Best part is that she had her gardener do the lettering on the sign for an extra $10.


after he gave her a little sumptin sumptin on the side because her husband is unable to satisfy her because of all the Busch Light he drinks
 
Displayed 50 of 489 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report