Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(YouTube) Video Israeli army fire tear gas right at media crew. Oh yeah, theres an "oh fark" and a dodging reporter, caught on tape   (youtube.com ) divider line 169
    More: Video  
•       •       •

5815 clicks; posted to Video » on 04 Sep 2009 at 6:14 PM (6 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



169 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-09-04 02:38:19 PM  
They did that because she planned to marry a Jew.
 
2009-09-04 03:14:28 PM  
Haven't we all want to gas the media at some point?
 
2009-09-04 03:20:16 PM  

Blues_X: They did that because she planned to marry a Jew.


You know who else wasn't a fan of race mixing?
 
2009-09-04 03:23:53 PM  
There go the Israelis, using chemical weapons on civilians again.
 
2009-09-04 03:30:35 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: There go the Israelis, using chemical weapons on civilians again.


You know else gassed unarmed people?

/tired meme is getting weary.
 
2009-09-04 03:37:20 PM  
That was farking intentional. Not surprising, I doubt Israeli troops want the world to know how they treat Palestinian civilians. Peacefully protesting ones at that.
 
2009-09-04 03:42:28 PM  
Primitives with modern weapons.
 
2009-09-04 03:43:24 PM  

CitizenTed: You know else gassed unarmed people?


oldfarthenry?
 
2009-09-04 04:05:02 PM  
Wow... Jewish soldiers gassing non-Jewish people.
 
2009-09-04 04:32:53 PM  
I think we should cut off all the aid we've been giving them. If God's got so much to do with why they should be there, he can take care of them.
 
2009-09-04 04:56:13 PM  

GurneyHalleck: I think we should cut off all the aid we've been giving them. If God's got so much to do with why they should be there, he can take care of them.


Seems like 50 years of child support should be enough.
 
2009-09-04 05:18:47 PM  
Fark the god damned Israelis. They're a hell of a lot more trouble than they're worth. They don't even have any oil, for Christ's sake.
 
2009-09-04 05:46:38 PM  
It's striking the difference in the way the US media and the international media cover Israel.
 
2009-09-04 06:20:02 PM  
In before "Al-Jazeerah is associated with terrorists and deserve it."
 
2009-09-04 06:21:49 PM  
But... it's Friday, how will Tats explain that the news crew was threatening the soldiers with their vicious cameras and recording equipment.
 
2009-09-04 06:21:59 PM  
Al-Jazeerah is associated with terrorists and deserve it.
 
2009-09-04 06:22:10 PM  
LOL.. good for them. Imagine every single day having to do out there and have rocks thrown at you by a bunch of people who think little girls strapping bombs to themselves is a good thing, and then on top of that have that stuck up b***h pointing at you while she ignores the murderous terrorists on her side of the fence. If I was an IDF soldier I would have shot the tear gas at her too.
 
2009-09-04 06:22:37 PM  

Hobodeluxe: It's striking the difference in the way the US media and the international media cover Israel.


Well, to be fair, the US media is all owned by teh jooz.

/ducks and runs
 
2009-09-04 06:23:26 PM  
Ooohh!!! Tear GAS!!!

Or as we like to call it, Saturday Night.
 
2009-09-04 06:28:12 PM  
Israel:

American Funded Terrorism
 
2009-09-04 06:33:20 PM  
They came for the bacon and I said nothing because I am a vegetarian.

Then they came for the non-violent protesters in Palestine and I said nothing because I am not from Palestine.

Then they came for the media and I said nothing because I am not in the media.

Then they came for America's money and there was no one left paying attention.

/we're funding this why?
 
2009-09-04 06:34:44 PM  

Calmamity: GurneyHalleck: I think we should cut off all the aid we've been giving them. If God's got so much to do with why they should be there, he can take care of them.

Seems like 50 years of child support should be enough.


To be fair, there's surplus stupid on every side of that entanglement.
 
2009-09-04 06:35:03 PM  

Falcc: /we're funding this why?


Cause of the Holocaust. Oh, and cause if we don't, then we're anti-Semites.

Never mind that Arabs are Semites too...
 
2009-09-04 06:35:19 PM  
But as we all know, they can do no wrong, and if you say differently then you support the Holocaust.
 
2009-09-04 06:37:25 PM  

BiffDangler: LOL.. good for them. Imagine every single day having to do out there and have rocks thrown at you by a bunch of people who think little girls strapping bombs to themselves is a good thing, and then on top of that have that stuck up b***h pointing at you while she ignores the murderous terrorists on her side of the fence. If I was an IDF soldier I would have shot the tear gas at her too.


2/10
 
2009-09-04 06:40:03 PM  
Violence in Israel?! I can't farking believe it!
 
2009-09-04 06:43:43 PM  
They were a bit rude for sure. That said that tear gas looks terribly ineffective.

Also a question for you international law folks out there: Why do the reporters always say "illegal" settlements/wall etc.? Didn't Israel conquer all that territory several times during defensive wars (not that the defensive matters)? I thought right of conquest dictated they could do what ever they liked with the land. Do repeated acts of aggression such as massed rocket attacks/suicide bombers (seemingly acts of war) allow a party to abrogate any peace treaty that may have been made? What does the Geneva convention have in it as far as mechanisms for enforcement if a signatory is at odds with majority of the other signatories? Are the Palestinians and Israelis in a continuous state of war? Is war itself completely extra legal in nature?
Not trolling, serious questions.
 
2009-09-04 06:44:06 PM  

GurneyHalleck: I think we should cut off all the aid we've been giving them.


We would have to break a treaty that stopped all those pesky land wars they were having with each other.
 
2009-09-04 06:44:34 PM  
Wow. What the fark?

Say what you want about Al-Jazeera, but that is quality reporting.
 
2009-09-04 06:45:10 PM  

GurneyHalleck: I think we should cut off all the aid we've been giving them


No no no no, you're missing the point. The string attached on that aid we give them is they are obligated to spend it on American weapons. So not only are doing awesome helping to oppress some economically helpless people, we're also doing double awesome by ensuring good wealth for our buddies in the Defense industry.

Yay America!
 
2009-09-04 06:45:55 PM  
"We're the target and not the protestors!"

Well, gee, maybe they didn't care for your editorializing when you're supposed to be a neutral reporter, you dumb broad.


/so farking sick of "journalists" who can't be impartial
 
2009-09-04 06:46:41 PM  

relcec: They were a bit rude for sure. That said that tear gas looks terribly ineffective.

Also a question for you international law folks out there: Why do the reporters always say "illegal" settlements/wall etc.? Didn't Israel conquer all that territory several times during defensive wars (not that the defensive matters)? I thought right of conquest dictated they could do what ever they liked with the land. Do repeated acts of aggression such as massed rocket attacks/suicide bombers (seemingly acts of war) allow a party to abrogate any peace treaty that may have been made? What does the Geneva convention have in it as far as mechanisms for enforcement if a signatory is at odds with majority of the other signatories? Are the Palestinians and Israelis in a continuous state of war? Is war itself completely extra legal in nature?
Not trolling, serious questions.


Are the occupied territories annexed? If so, what is the citizenship status of people that were there beforehand? If not, what are a nation's responsibility to the occupied? Also serious questions.
 
2009-09-04 06:47:56 PM  

bartink: GurneyHalleck: I think we should cut off all the aid we've been giving them.

We would have to break a treaty that stopped all those pesky land wars they were having with each other.


I am now terrified of being in front of you at a crosswalk.
 
2009-09-04 06:48:30 PM  
OK, now that was just a plainly stupid decision by those Israeli grunts any way you slice it.

Still, saying she's unarmed is only true in the dictionary sense of the word. In this age a camera can be a very dangerous weapon. A lot more dangerous than a pistol in the grand scheme of things... which, of course, is why it was so stupid for those soldiers to have tossed tear gas at the ones controlling it.
 
2009-09-04 06:48:55 PM  
So some Israeli soldiers dislike the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists? Big surprise there.
 
2009-09-04 06:50:49 PM  

OgreMagi: So some Israeli soldiers dislike the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists? Big surprise there.


They dislike a lot of things. Muslims, foreign media, racial impurity. When do we let them host the Olympics?
 
2009-09-04 06:51:29 PM  

OgreMagi: the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists?


Yes! That is why both the host and the reporter are Western women.
 
2009-09-04 06:52:29 PM  
I real don't know. Is it a requirement that defeated people be made citizens? Are there any responsibilities legally speaking?
 
2009-09-04 06:56:34 PM  

vernonFL: OgreMagi: the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists?

Yes! That is why both the host and the reporter are Western women.


Heh, seriously. These threads are a great way to tell who's actually familiar with al-Jazeera, and who's just judging it by the scary muslin-sounding name.
 
2009-09-04 07:00:04 PM  
I summon Tatsuma!

'Cause if it's got to do with Jews, we gotta have his input. It just wouldn't be Fark otherwise.
 
2009-09-04 07:00:58 PM  
i've said it before and i'll say it again:

let them fight it out and stay the hell away.
 
2009-09-04 07:05:12 PM  
so we have entered the Jew-hating portion of the day?

what is there, a modmin checklist?

1)bait moderate Farkers with trollish right wing headline
2)label it "Neutral"
3)repeat
4)repeat
5)throw out token non-right-wing troll headline
6)repeat steps 1-5
7)bait the Jews and philo-semites
8)repeat steps 1-7
9)suck Satan's scaly dragon cock
10)$$$$
 
2009-09-04 07:05:22 PM  

Aracnix: I summon Tatsuma!

'Cause if it's got to do with Jews, we gotta have his input. It just wouldn't be Fark otherwise.


He doesn't troll on shabbat!
 
2009-09-04 07:05:43 PM  
I just came here to say that Israelis are fscking assholes, and they deserve all the shiat they get and then some. Fscking land stealing murdering war criminals.

OgreMagi: So some Israeli soldiers dislike the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists? Big surprise there.


Hey you fscking ignorant racist moron, did you know that Al Jazeera was funded by the Emir of Qatar, who is so pro-terrorism and anti-american that he let the US set up camp to conduct the Iraq invasion of 2003?

Don't believe me? Will you believe the State Department, you vile excuse for a poor imitation of a human being?

Qatari forces played an important role in the first Gulf War, and Qatar has supported U.S. military operations critical to the success of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Qatar hosts CENTCOM Forward Headquarters.
 
2009-09-04 07:06:39 PM  

relcec: They were a bit rude for sure. That said that tear gas looks terribly ineffective.

Also a question for you international law folks out there: Why do the reporters always say "illegal" settlements/wall etc.? Didn't Israel conquer all that territory several times during defensive wars (not that the defensive matters)? I thought right of conquest dictated they could do what ever they liked with the land. Do repeated acts of aggression such as massed rocket attacks/suicide bombers (seemingly acts of war) allow a party to abrogate any peace treaty that may have been made? What does the Geneva convention have in it as far as mechanisms for enforcement if a signatory is at odds with majority of the other signatories? Are the Palestinians and Israelis in a continuous state of war? Is war itself completely extra legal in nature?
Not trolling, serious questions.


If Israel bit the bullet and annexed them, sure. They have right on conquest, and could do that. They did it with East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, in fact, in 1980. Other countries might contest that, but basically, only force of arms can really _do_ anything about it.

But with the West Bank and Gaza, Israel has NEVER claimed them as part of its territory, not in a legal sense. They are occupied territories. THAT is what makes the settlements illegal. If they'd annexed them outright, those settlements wouldn't be. There would be a horde of other problems instead, but the settlements wouldn't be one of them.

The Israeli government tries to have its cake and eat it to, but not offically climing the territory, but instead incrementally encroaching on it, and going for the fait accompli. When the watersheds are secure, Israel will look for peace, not before that.
 
2009-09-04 07:07:05 PM  

nictamer: I just came here to say that Israelis are fscking assholes, and they deserve all the shiat they get and then some. Fscking land stealing murdering war criminals.

OgreMagi: So some Israeli soldiers dislike the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists? Big surprise there.

Hey you fscking ignorant racist moron, did you know that Al Jazeera was funded by the Emir of Qatar, who is so pro-terrorism and anti-american that he let the US set up camp to conduct the Iraq invasion of 2003?

Don't believe me? Will you believe the State Department, you vile excuse for a poor imitation of a human being?

Qatari forces played an important role in the first Gulf War, and Qatar has supported U.S. military operations critical to the success of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Qatar hosts CENTCOM Forward Headquarters.


Location: Paris, FR

yeah...
 
2009-09-04 07:07:58 PM  
They weren't members of the media. They were Palestinian terrorists. You can tell because the Israeli army fired tear gas at them. If they had been legitimate media and not Palestinian terrorists, the Israeli army would not have fired tear gas at them.

/qed
 
2009-09-04 07:10:16 PM  

vernonFL: OgreMagi: the propaganda arm of middle eastern terrorists?

Yes! That is why both the host and the reporter are Western women.


And? I don't see how one precludes the other.
 
2009-09-04 07:11:32 PM  
 
2009-09-04 07:12:57 PM  

Wombatzu: Location: Paris, FR

yeah...


What's your point?
 
Displayed 50 of 169 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report