If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Nearly six out of ten drivers in the U.S. are as dangerous as a drunk driver. And the news gets worse from there   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 177
    More: Scary  
•       •       •

12964 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Aug 2009 at 2:43 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



177 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-08-08 12:22:42 PM
Gee, ya don't say?

Just watch out for the cars with lots of bumper stickers plastered all over the place. Especially if they're religious bumper stickers - they want to go meet Jesus but they don't want to go alone.
 
2009-08-08 12:59:25 PM
So I've got a question:
The bad thing about DUI is that it reduces your reaction time and judgement, right? It's not "that you're drunk", but rather it's what the alcohol does to your driving abilities. Right? Well, people have a range of abilities, and some of them have very slow reflexes and bad judgement even when sober. So why can't we identify them and take away their licenses?

If the whole DUI/MADD bullshiat isn't purely 1)NeoProhibitionism, or 2)fundraising, and is truly based on a desire for safer roads, we should be (relatively easily) able to design a DMV test which will identify people with reaction times/driving judgement in, say, the lowest 20% of the population. And we simply deny them the right to drive a car.

Again, if it's really safety we're interested in, that should make a dent in the non-alcohol related crashes (and should save lives and insurance company profits, which makes everyone happy).

We could, of course, still test for drunks. But this way we are being proactive in getting ALL deadly drivers off the road. Cool, huh?

Or maybe it's pure bullkaka, and the ONLY reason we hear biatching and mewling about drunk driving is that alcohol is the easiest thing to test for, and we can demonize it with dumbass stories of dead friends and relatives.
 
2009-08-08 01:07:57 PM
Mods, please change the (stupid) tag to (obvious).


Thank you.
 
2009-08-08 01:14:23 PM
Careful guys. I brought up these same points in a similar thread awhile ago, and a whole legion of folks started telling me I was being elitist, and one even claimed that you couldn't train a person to drive.
 
2009-08-08 01:38:10 PM
Mods please change the (audioedit) tag to (Wheaton). Thanks
 
2009-08-08 01:44:40 PM
had a fool going the speed limit in the left lane on 395 northbound near the glebe rd ramp. i was trying to merge onto the highway with very little room because i was coming from the shirlington ramp . (had maybe 500 feet if that) because they wouldn't move over to the right, there was a box of cars and 1/3 of them were coming into the right lane to bypass him. if you want to go the speed limit fine, but do not do it in the far left lane if going the speed limit is slow. there is a reason there are words on speed limit signs that say slow traffic keep right.

/stressful experience playing diagonal frogger with cars darting all over the place.
//had to get off chest
 
2009-08-08 01:47:44 PM
All of this could be solved by making the driving test five times more difficult.
 
2009-08-08 01:52:06 PM
(38%) report having shouted or cursed at other drivers in the past year

With good reason from the sound of it.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2009-08-08 01:53:17 PM
I used to sing in the car, thinking it was a safe place where nobody else would hear me. I stopped. Even I don't like the sound of my pathetic attempts to sing.
 
2009-08-08 02:00:58 PM
Nearly six out of ten drivers in the U.S. are as dangerous as a drunk driver. And the news gets worse from there

Three-fifths perhaps? Maths are hard!

Secondly, 60% of all drivers in the U.S. are women?
 
2009-08-08 02:02:32 PM
Tigger: All of this could be solved by making the driving test five times more difficult.

As I wrote in my blog - that woman(?) in front of me had the most evil, hateful, malicious grin on her face as she deliberately cut people off. She did it to me, then she did it to another person when she pulled off onto the main road. She was doing it on purpose, and clearly enjoyed the effect she was having on her fellow drivers.
 
2009-08-08 02:04:20 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: Nearly six out of ten drivers in the U.S. are as dangerous as a drunk driver. And the news gets worse from there

Three-fifths perhaps? Maths are hard!

Secondly, 60% of all drivers in the U.S. are women?


One thing about women drivers that seems consistant - they can't stand merging. Every time I have issues merging into traffic, sure enough it's a woman driver who tried to cut me off.

I dunno. must be something genetic. like they can't stand someone getting in front of them or something.
 
2009-08-08 02:46:37 PM
and 10 out of 10 of these drivers would say they were a good driver, like every 100% of the great drivers that will post in this thread
 
2009-08-08 02:46:42 PM
Sybarite: (38%) report having shouted or cursed at other drivers in the past year

With good reason from the sound of it.


I assume that's "roll down the window, lean out and shout"? Otherwise I'd think it'd be 100%.
 
2009-08-08 02:47:18 PM
Could it be from all of the ones texting people while trying to drive?!?

If you are going to have a 10 minute texting session, JUST CALL THEM!
 
2009-08-08 02:47:41 PM
Picture a drunken teenager, high on coke, with a cup of Stabucks caffeine concoction (I can't really call it coffee) in one hand, and his cellphone in the other.

Now multiply that by three houndred thousand. Now add that same number thirteen times. Now divide those kids on every city in the US.

Be afraid.
 
2009-08-08 02:48:41 PM
Please don't get me started. I am actually moving to a city so I don't have to drive anymore. Just owning a car is a huge liability, and being on the road with so many incompetent drooling fools is just dangerous.
 
2009-08-08 02:48:44 PM
CygnusDarius: Picture a drunken teenager, high on coke, with a cup of Stabucks caffeine concoction (I can't really call it coffee) in one hand, and his cellphone in the other.

Now multiply that by three houndred thousand. Now add that same number thirteen times. Now divide those kids on every city in the US.

Be afraid.


Yeah, and I bet they sing to crappy songs on the radio too. Bastards.
 
2009-08-08 02:49:45 PM
I NEW I WAS SAFER THAN MOST IDIOTS ON THE ROAD AFTER A BEER OR 4!!!

/I focus more on obeying traffic laws when I have a beer in the cupholder. . .
 
2009-08-08 02:50:38 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: Secondly, 60% of all drivers in the U.S. are women?

Probably not, but I'm guessing they make up at least 60% of the miles driven. They're more likely to be doing all the shopping and schlepping kids to activities while the men are more likely to just be going between work, home, and the bar.
 
2009-08-08 02:50:48 PM
Just yesterday a guy in a hummer side-swipped me. He told the cops he didn't see me and the cop response was "How could you not see her? You're driving a Hummer" but he kept saying he never saw me. I didn't see him hit me, all I heard was a "bang" and next thing I know the air bags go off and I see smoke. The door was jammed so I climbed through the window and knew I was bleeding on my head so I grabbed some kleenex and started to stop the bleeding. Ahh what a day!


/2 staples on my head
//thought it was unnecessary for 2-6 cop cars to show up
///whip lash is a biatch
 
2009-08-08 02:52:25 PM
one of the most frightening things i've ever seen from a driver? she was putting her contacts in at a red light. i would still love to know what she was thinking. if you need contact lenses...for the love of god, put them in before you get in a car.
 
2009-08-08 02:53:33 PM
From the Pew research center?
 
2009-08-08 02:53:34 PM
I always like to keep at least three car lengths between me and the driver in front of me. If I'm on an interstate or something I go up to four. Do you know how farking impossible that is?

I do not want to ride the bumper of the person in front of me. I like having enough room to react to anything up ahead. However some asshole always feels this is their space to jump in and then breaks for some reason.

Don't even get me started on the pissing contest everyone makes the merges around here.
 
2009-08-08 02:53:35 PM
proof that common sense flew out the window long ago.

Any idiot these days can get a license, you don't even have to speak english, even though all our street signs are in english. If people gave any sort of damn about safety, they would make the licensing systems 5X harder, and enforcement 10X harder.

I'm 27 and drive a sports car, yet i've never been in any sort of accident? how could this be? well I pay attention to the road, I ignore my phone if it goes off, I don't eat or drink in my car. I actually DRIVE.
 
2009-08-08 02:53:54 PM
Sybarite: (38%) report having shouted or cursed at other drivers in the past year

With good reason from the sound of it.


Well, I like to think that the guy driving the wrong way down a one way street deserved to be yelled at, as did the guy trying to get on the highway using the off ramp.
 
2009-08-08 02:54:45 PM
Drive defensively. Just assume that everyone else on the road is completely farking nuts and you'll do just fine.
 
2009-08-08 02:55:02 PM
paloma: one of the most frightening things i've ever seen from a driver? she was putting her contacts in at a red light. i would still love to know what she was thinking. if you need contact lenses...for the love of god, put them in before you get in a car.

She may have had to take one out to get a piece of dirt or trash out of it. I've pulled one of mine out, cleaned it, and put it back in at a long red light before.

It really isn't much different that a person taking their glasses of to clean them at a red light.
 
2009-08-08 02:55:20 PM
Yeah it's those 6 with cell phones glued to their ear that make that stat believable.
 
2009-08-08 02:55:48 PM
How about jail time for anyone who does anything besides driving when they're behind the wheel of a moving car? Or perhaps a hefty fine of about 5000 dollars?
 
2009-08-08 02:55:52 PM
accelerus: Any idiot these days can get a license, you don't even have to speak english, even though all our street signs are in english.

Road signs are made in standardized colors and shapes and pictograms for a reason.

For example, most anywhere in the world, a red octagon is stop.
 
2009-08-08 02:55:57 PM
Getting a beej strangely missing from the list.
 
2009-08-08 02:56:12 PM
I keep a running list of profiles to look out for, every time somebody almost kills me I take note of them and what they were driving:

1 - Young blondes in any small white car
2 - Asians
3 - Any large Mercedes
4 - The elderly

Sorry, that's how the cookie crumbles.
 
2009-08-08 02:56:29 PM
dahmers love zombie: So I've got a question:
The bad thing about DUI is that it reduces your reaction time and judgement, right? It's not "that you're drunk", but rather it's what the alcohol does to your driving abilities. Right? Well, people have a range of abilities, and some of them have very slow reflexes and bad judgement even when sober. So why can't we identify them and take away their licenses?

If the whole DUI/MADD bullshiat isn't purely 1)NeoProhibitionism, or 2)fundraising, and is truly based on a desire for safer roads, we should be (relatively easily) able to design a DMV test which will identify people with reaction times/driving judgement in, say, the lowest 20% of the population. And we simply deny them the right to drive a car.

Again, if it's really safety we're interested in, that should make a dent in the non-alcohol related crashes (and should save lives and insurance company profits, which makes everyone happy).

We could, of course, still test for drunks. But this way we are being proactive in getting ALL deadly drivers off the road. Cool, huh?

Or maybe it's pure bullkaka, and the ONLY reason we hear biatching and mewling about drunk driving is that alcohol is the easiest thing to test for, and we can demonize it with dumbass stories of dead friends and relatives.


4/10

You were on track for a higher score until the last sentence.
 
2009-08-08 02:58:54 PM
And they all claim cyclists are terrorizing the roads
 
2009-08-08 02:59:07 PM
cowsspinach: Just yesterday a guy in a hummer side-swipped me. He told the cops he didn't see me and the cop response was "How could you not see her? You're driving a Hummer" but he kept saying he never saw me. I didn't see him hit me, all I heard was a "bang" and next thing I know the air bags go off and I see smoke. The door was jammed so I climbed through the window and knew I was bleeding on my head so I grabbed some kleenex and started to stop the bleeding. Ahh what a day!


/2 staples on my head
//thought it was unnecessary for 2-6 cop cars to show up
///whip lash is a biatch


I almost got hit by a 17 year old in a Range Rover like that. I saw her at the last minute and slammed on my breaks and hit the horn. We were at an intersection with another accident and there were 4 cops directing traffic. Stupid biatch was trying to turn left from the far right lane (straight only) and my lane, on her left, was a straight or turn left lane. She rolled down her window and flipped me off. Luckily a cop sitting in her car saw this. Shook her head and pulled her over.

After thinking about it I should have let her hit me. I need a new car and we don't have limited tort in Maryland. A 17 year old driving a Range Rover says "Daddy owns this and has deep pockets."
 
2009-08-08 03:00:47 PM
Farklee: Getting a beej strangely missing from the list.

At least for not married drivers.
 
2009-08-08 03:01:05 PM
Bartleby the Scrivener's Super Whacky Fun Facts: MVA edition.

just about 1% of all reported crashes results in a fatality.

the most probable time for a MVA involving more than 1 vehicle, with the greatest likelihood of injury and/or fatality, is 3-6pm on a weekday.

the greatest likelihood of fatality occurs 12-3 am on saturday/sunday morning.

of all ARCs (alcohol related crashes), the greatest likelehood for fatality occurs with a single occupant vehicle hitting a stationary object on a secondary road.

\NHTSA
 
2009-08-08 03:02:05 PM
I'm with dahmers love zombie up there.

If we're really punishing people for unsafe driving when we arrest them for DUI, then we should handle distracted drivers with the same severity.

In California, I think talking on a cell phone is a $25 fine for the first offense and $50 for each additional. We're punishing a potentially fatal habit in the same way we handle a minor parking offense.

I say raise it to a grand, because it annoys the piss out of me.
 
2009-08-08 03:02:11 PM
Weaver95: Gee, ya don't say?

Just watch out for the cars with lots of bumper stickers plastered all over the place. Especially if they're religious bumper stickers - they want to go meet Jesus but they don't want to go alone.


My ranking of drivers with stickers from worst to best:

1) AAA sticker
2) Jesus Fish
3) Magnetic ribbon
4) Baby on Board
5) Dukakis/Bentsen 1998
 
2009-08-08 03:02:55 PM
Talking on a phone and driving is not that bad, at least for me. In fact, it's less distracting than driving with someone in the car. People tend to occasionally turn and look at the person they are talking to if they are in the car, people point things out to look at, etc.

Now texting and driving is a completely different story. That's far worse than either.
 
2009-08-08 03:03:35 PM
dahmers love zombie: So I've got a question:
The bad thing about DUI is that it reduces your reaction time and judgement, right? It's not "that you're drunk", but rather it's what the alcohol does to your driving abilities. Right? Well, people have a range of abilities, and some of them have very slow reflexes and bad judgement even when sober. So why can't we identify them and take away their licenses?

If the whole DUI/MADD bullshiat isn't purely 1)NeoProhibitionism, or 2)fundraising, and is truly based on a desire for safer roads, we should be (relatively easily) able to design a DMV test which will identify people with reaction times/driving judgement in, say, the lowest 20% of the population. And we simply deny them the right to drive a car.

Again, if it's really safety we're interested in, that should make a dent in the non-alcohol related crashes (and should save lives and insurance company profits, which makes everyone happy).

We could, of course, still test for drunks. But this way we are being proactive in getting ALL deadly drivers off the road. Cool, huh?

Or maybe it's pure bullkaka, and the ONLY reason we hear biatching and mewling about drunk driving is that alcohol is the easiest thing to test for, and we can demonize it with dumbass stories of dead friends and relatives.


This, this this - sorry for using this.
 
2009-08-08 03:04:03 PM
cowsspinach: Just yesterday a guy in a hummer side-swipped me. He told the cops he didn't see me and the cop response was "How could you not see her? You're driving a Hummer"


Its hard to turn your head to the right when your phone is being held on the right. Have your lawyer check his phone records if the insurance company gives you any trouble.
 
2009-08-08 03:04:04 PM
TheyCallThisWork: I'm with dahmers love zombie up there.

If we're really punishing people for unsafe driving when we arrest them for DUI, then we should handle distracted drivers with the same severity.

In California, I think talking on a cell phone is a $25 fine for the first offense and $50 for each additional. We're punishing a potentially fatal habit in the same way we handle a minor parking offense.

I say raise it to a grand, because it annoys the piss out of me.


So are you ready to do the same for people talking to passengers in the car?
 
2009-08-08 03:05:09 PM
Perhaps it's time to make it harder to get a drver license: I'm now 37, and have not had to take a driving test since I first got my license in South Carolina at age 15. And even then I thought the test was too easy. (Actually, I did have a test of sorts when I moved to Wisconsin in 1991: I had to take a vision test before I got my Wisconsin DL).

Those who have lower skills shouldn't be taken off the road completely, but limited to certain ones: the 88-year old woman or the 16 year old kid should probably stay off the Dan Ryan Expressway in Chicago. But County Highway FU outside of Asscrack Falls should be fine.
 
2009-08-08 03:06:46 PM
@ssholes on cell phones. Drugged out old people. Random folks driving around with their mouth hanging wide open (WTF people?). Dumbshiats on Scooters. Old guy on a Hoveround going the wrong way up the street. And the Bus driver for the 30th Ave. bus. That one's crazy.

Every day these people try to kill me. Glad I have good brakes.
 
2009-08-08 03:06:47 PM
Weaver95: Gee, ya don't say?

Just watch out for the cars with lots of bumper stickers plastered all over the place. Especially if they're religious bumper stickers - they want to go meet Jesus but they don't want to go alone.


You know, I really like reading your site. I would add this to your beware of drivers list, watch out for drivers with cowboy hats.
 
2009-08-08 03:06:53 PM
CruJones:

So are you ready to do the same for people talking to passengers in the car?


Let me try it out:

"Honey, could you please stop talking. It's the law."

Yes, I think I would support your measure.
 
2009-08-08 03:07:04 PM
And this is why flying cars are a bad idea. Most drivers are dangerous enough on a two dimensional plane. Putting them in a three dimensional space, behind the controls of a vehicle weighing several tons over my neighborhood with hundreds of others does not inspire confidence. But I suppose I could profit by investing into dome technology, to protect houses from the constant, inevitable rain of burning debris falling from the sky.
 
2009-08-08 03:07:23 PM
So where's the flying cars? I want my flying car!
 
Displayed 50 of 177 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report