If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Entertainment Weekly)   What "Lost" is really all about   (popwatch.ew.com) divider line 108
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

11332 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 01 Aug 2009 at 11:12 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



108 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-08-01 02:32:31 PM
paulseta: This is why when I got to the end of season one of Lost (I started late and did the DVD thing) I stopped - cause I realised they did not actually have a plan or proper solution planned out.

Oh, you did did you? Fascinating - thanks for weighing in with your opinion on the show that's almost finished that you've seen less than 20% of.
 
2009-08-01 02:34:02 PM
Have we settled whether this show sucks or not yet?
 
2009-08-01 02:38:43 PM
pnjunction: More seasons just makes it more ridiculous.

Couldn't they have built an ocean liner and launched GPS satellites by now? What is it like Gilligan's island?


Why are you still talking? Didn't you admit you made up your mind about this show five years ago?

Look, some of you are unsure of the concept of "storytelling."

Yes, sometimes the storyteller makes stuff up while he goes along, but if it's a cool story, you don't mind.

Regular people don't whine and sulk because the storyteller hasn't figured it all out ahead of time, and regular people aren't scared to get interested in a story because somewhere down the line, years later, maybe the end isn't the end you wanted, so you figure why bother with a story, right? They are all lies!

Remember when lil' Wheaton looked around disgusted at the campfire at Corey Feldman after telling his gross vomit story, when all Corey offered was "So what happened next?"

That's you people. You're little Corey Feldman, unable to understand what a story is.
 
2009-08-01 02:41:33 PM
John Dewey: Have we settled whether this show sucks or not yet?

Yes.
 
2009-08-01 02:55:17 PM
pnjunction: Couldn't they have built an ocean liner and launched GPS satellites by now? What is it like Gilligan's island?

Actually, only about 6 months have passed on the show, I think.
 
2009-08-01 03:05:56 PM
In the final scene, Jack wakes up in bed with Suzanne Pleshette.

/the show takes place in 2004, so she's still alive
 
2009-08-01 03:36:54 PM
I lost my faith in Lost when they intro'd all the time malarky. Maybe it was planned from the start, maybe not, but it's sure a cheap and easy way for writers to do anything they want and later claim that it was their original intent.

Once you introduce time travel into a story, all bets are off.
 
2009-08-01 03:44:47 PM
Mugato: pnjunction: Couldn't they have built an ocean liner and launched GPS satellites by now? What is it like Gilligan's island?

Actually, only about 6 months have passed on the show, I think.


as oh the season 5 finale, 3 years and 6 months-ish.

i'll say the best thing about Lost is the experience. episode was lame? don't care, talked a bunch of friends about it beforehand and had fun guessing, whining, w00ting.

didn't turn out to be a Richard flashback episode? that's cool cause we came up with plenty of thigns it could've been about and it was fun to yak about until 9 that Wednesday.

whether Lost ends well, or not, I don't care. the experience was truly something else and it was an incredibly fun ride while it lasted.
 
2009-08-01 04:15:18 PM
SomeoneDumb: I lost my faith in Lost when they intro'd all the time malarky. Maybe it was planned from the start, maybe not, but it's sure a cheap and easy way for writers to do anything they want and later claim that it was their original intent.

Once you introduce time travel into a story, all bets are off.


Wait, you mean the sci-fi show with a magic smoke monster in the first episode threw you for a loop when it went all sci-fi?

wow.
 
2009-08-01 04:18:12 PM
I honestly think the nerds who think they outsmarted "Lost" five years ago are just now realizing the joke is on them.

It's been a much smarter show than you, nerds, I know you cannot accept that reality, but it is true. You lost the nerd battle this time.

"Lost" is one of the best sci-fi TV shows in television history.

But you quit watching halfway through Season One, cause you figured out the writers were making stuff up!

You're so clever!

Hahahahahaha
 
2009-08-01 04:20:46 PM
Star Trek 90210!

There's no canyons where Kirk grew up! This all sucks!

I'm so much smarter than people who write on the TV!
 
2009-08-01 04:52:14 PM
So this is the tale of the castaways, they're here for a long, long time,
They'll have to make the best of things, it's an uphill climb.
The first mate and the Skipper too, will do their very best,
To make the others comfortable, in the tropic island nest.

No phone! No lights! No motor cars, not a single luxury,
Like Robinson Crusoe, as primitive as can be.
So join us here each week my friends, you're sure to get a smile
From seven stranded castaways, here on Gilligan's Isle!
 
2009-08-01 05:00:21 PM
Confabulat: Star Trek 90210!

There's no canyons where Kirk grew up! This all sucks!

I'm so much smarter than people who write on the TV!




You seem to have a very strong emotional connection to defending some random tv show.
 
2009-08-01 05:04:22 PM
bet it's 66 not 108
 
2009-08-01 05:08:13 PM
weezbo: Confabulat: And above all, they should never, EVER read any Stephen King novel.

I support this notion. Or, at least, I have supported it since I read Gerald's Game, which I'm convinced he wrote on a bet.

Thing is, none of the things you mention are mysteries and Lost is a series built and billed on its mysteries. It's supposed to be a voyage of discovery and if they cheat at the end, it does indeed sour the entire experience.

I watch Lost and I'll likely watch it to the final episode, simply to see where they go, but I'm suspecting I'll get something less satisfying than the end of The Usual Suspects and I'm only hoping I'll get something more enjoyable than the resolution to the Night's Dawn trilogy by Peter F. Hamilton.


You didn't like Joubert?
 
2009-08-01 05:16:29 PM
JestersTear: Even if Abrams never admits it, it's obvious what influenced Lost and where they are.

They're in Neverland. Not the happy Walt Disney version, but the Barrie version, which Disney's is based off of.


The cable and the mention of Joop in the first season had me convinced they were on the "Mysterious Island" of Jules Verne. I expected a Nemo character to pop up.
 
2009-08-01 05:22:53 PM
pnjunction: It's about me not ever watching a single episode because everything I hear about it just makes it sound dumber.

Hey, I'm with you, man. I've never seen it, but the more I hear people talk about it, the less interesting it sounds.
 
2009-08-01 05:34:16 PM
Architecture Of Aggression: Actually, only about 6 months have passed on the show, I think.

as oh the season 5 finale, 3 years and 6 months-ish.


Okay yeah, there are flash forwards. But they made it pretty obvious that this isn't a regular island and there is shiat going on that prevented a jet from a major airline crashing on an island of that size from being discovered the day after the crash. That was clear from the beginning.

But I do agree that time travel is used a lot as a cop out for a lot of coincidences and plot holes.
 
2009-08-01 05:55:06 PM
Why does it have to mean something? Can't it just be entertaining TV? Isn't that good enough? It's a TV show, not a damned work of art.
 
2009-08-01 05:59:27 PM
jj325: No matter how it ends it will never match the awesomeness that was the series finale of Newhart.

This!
 
2009-08-01 06:06:23 PM
"We wanted to see if we could get away with making shiat up as we went along....and people bought it for SIX SEASONS!!"
 
2009-08-01 06:13:21 PM
Confabulat:

Wait, you mean the sci-fi show with a magic smoke monster in the first episode threw you for a loop when it went all sci-fi?

wow.


Not so much threw me for a loop as disappointed me. Like I said, once time travel gets added to the mix, the writers can do anything they want and I think that cheapens the storyline.

I've got nothing against sci-fi or even stories that start with time travel as their premise, but that wasn't the case with Lost. Since their were no "rules" introduced at the beginning of the story, whatever the Lost writers come up with now just strike me as being a cheap and easy way to tie it all together, after the fact.

I loved Lost for quite awhile, but they lost my faith.
 
2009-08-01 06:25:20 PM
Architecture Of Aggression:
whether Lost ends well, or not, I don't care. the experience was truly something else and it was an incredibly fun ride while it lasted.


Great stuff. Good perspective.

My peek experience watching lost was early in Season 1 with "Walkabout". But I've stuck with it because, yeah, it's fun to share the experience! I bet it *will* suck in the end. I'm counting on it. But that's not going to stop me from watching. I look forward to getting together with a bunch of friends and watching that final, disappointing episode together!

And when I say "suck" I really just mean "not as good as the 'Walkabout' episode, but still better than 99% of TV"
 
2009-08-01 06:25:27 PM
SomeoneDumb: I loved Lost for quite awhile, but they lost my faith.

I understand where you're coming from, and not trying to change your mind, just wanted to add my .02.

I think the great thing about introducing time travel is they didn't introduce rules, per se. Yes, Daniel stated rules, but they left the answers to them completely ambigious the whole season and we won't know the answers until maybe the season premiere. Some call that cheap, I personally like it.
 
2009-08-01 06:27:21 PM
ApostropheX: Great stuff. Good perspective.

My peek experience watching lost was early in Season 1 with "Walkabout". But I've stuck with it because, yeah, it's fun to share the experience! I bet it *will* suck in the end. I'm counting on it. But that's not going to stop me from watching. I look forward to getting together with a bunch of friends and watching that final, disappointing episode together!

And when I say "suck" I really just mean "not as good as the 'Walkabout' episode, but still better than 99% of TV"


And a whole heaping of (black screen with white letters) THIS
 
2009-08-01 06:37:56 PM
(Entertainment Weekly) Interesting What "Lost" is really all about T-Shirt

Who farking cares?!?! I can't believe that stupid, lame show is still on the air.
 
2009-08-01 06:40:17 PM
Lost is about creating "mysteries" for the profoundly dumb. That's it, that's all. Doesn't need to be artistically, intellectually or historically referential. It just needs to be unclear.
 
2009-08-01 07:05:16 PM
Hetfield: The mere anticipation of the final season's awesomeness makes me lostgasm with vigor.

THISpnjunction: More seasons just makes it more ridiculous.

Couldn't they have built an ocean liner and launched GPS satellites by now? What is it like Gilligan's island?


Final season. They negotiated an end date to the series before they were even half way done. It is one of the only shows in TV history to have done that. They did this so they could tell the story properly. It will all be over next year and they have promised that all the questions "that matter" will be answered by the end of the show.
 
2009-08-01 07:13:18 PM
Confabulat: Not a bad article. The whole Scooby/Goober debate thing (?) reminds me of how Battlestar Galactica fans reacted to the series finale though.

Rationalists: What a ripoff! What's all this nonsense about angels and gods?

Spiritualists Apologists: Did you ever even WATCH the show?


FTFY hippie.
 
2009-08-01 07:13:47 PM
ApostropheX: Architecture Of Aggression:
whether Lost ends well, or not, I don't care. the experience was truly something else and it was an incredibly fun ride while it lasted.

Great stuff. Good perspective.

My peek experience watching lost was early in Season 1 with "Walkabout". But I've stuck with it because, yeah, it's fun to share the experience! I bet it *will* suck in the end. I'm counting on it. But that's not going to stop me from watching. I look forward to getting together with a bunch of friends and watching that final, disappointing episode together!

And when I say "suck" I really just mean "not as good as the 'Walkabout' episode, but still better than 99% of TV"


What about "The Constant"? I say that's on the level of "Walkabout". I just think that some of the amazing stuff that happens on Lost doesn't seem so amazing anymore because we've gotten used to it over 5 seasons.
 
2009-08-01 07:37:29 PM
John Dewey:
I understand where you're coming from, and not trying to change your mind, just wanted to add my .02.

I think the great thing about introducing time travel is they didn't introduce rules, per se. Yes, Daniel stated rules, but they left the answers to them completely ambigious the whole season and we won't know the answers until maybe the season premiere. Some call that cheap, I personally like it.


You're right, but I wasn't thinking about the time travel rules as much as the story's rules. All fiction has rules, which is why the "she woke up and it had all been a dream" endings are usually pretty disappointing.

What bothers me with Lost's time travel is it provides a too-convenient way for the writers to invent solutions. I wanted a deep, meaningful story with novel explanations, not just a whitewashing of what I saw before.

I'm not saying that's how they'll conclude it, but I think it's likely.
 
2009-08-01 07:45:50 PM
So why did they kidnap walt? they never really said. now he is just another fatherless kid wandering around NY.
 
2009-08-01 08:16:51 PM
Lost kills me. Girlfriend loves it but it's just nothing but hack writing. You answer a cliffhanger with a cliffhanger to keep viewers coming back - not to mention the erratic schedule. You get 4 episodes, then another 4 in 3 months.

Lost Writing:
Crash on an island. There's a monster on the island.
What's the monster?
Polar bear.
Why's there a polar bear?
Secret corporation lab also on the island.
What is the secret corporation doing on the island?
Experiment to make a guy push a button.
What happens when he doesn't push the button?
Flash of light.
What does the flash of light do?
Skips time.
How does it skip time?
Island exists over a pocket of energy.
How did the corporation find out about the energy?
From a guy from the future who traveled to the past and told them.
What guy?
This guy here, in this brand new episode that you'll see in 6 months.

And every single subplot unfolds the same way. You answer one question with three more. It's not compelling, it's bad writing.
 
2009-08-01 08:38:09 PM
This is what Lost is all about:
theaterofmine.files.wordpress.com
 
2009-08-01 08:48:00 PM
What is Lost about? About 4 seasons too long.
Link (new window)
 
2009-08-01 09:17:12 PM
SomeoneDumb: John Dewey:
I understand where you're coming from, and not trying to change your mind, just wanted to add my .02.

I think the great thing about introducing time travel is they didn't introduce rules, per se. Yes, Daniel stated rules, but they left the answers to them completely ambigious the whole season and we won't know the answers until maybe the season premiere. Some call that cheap, I personally like it.

You're right, but I wasn't thinking about the time travel rules as much as the story's rules. All fiction has rules, which is why the "she woke up and it had all been a dream" endings are usually pretty disappointing.

What bothers me with Lost's time travel is it provides a too-convenient way for the writers to invent solutions. I wanted a deep, meaningful story with novel explanations, not just a whitewashing of what I saw before.

I'm not saying that's how they'll conclude it, but I think it's likely.


The writers of Futurama initially put one rule in place: NO TIME TRAVEL. I think it did force them to figure out good stories without the cheat.

I can't remember their explanation for Roswell that Ends Well, but it was such a good episode you can't fault them.

Benders Big Score on the other hand...
 
2009-08-01 09:18:49 PM
Country_Goodness and Green_Peaness: not to mention the erratic schedule. You get 4 episodes, then another 4 in 3 months.

Well to be fair, it isn't a sitcom that they can shoot on a soundstage in Burbank with three camera. At the least, 1/3 of it it shot in Hawaii with inclement weather. There aren't many movies that shoot under those conditions, much less a weekly TV show.
 
2009-08-01 09:22:58 PM
SomeoneDumb: What bothers me with Lost's time travel is it provides a too-convenient way for the writers to invent solutions

That's the problem I have with it. The temporal Cold war thing in Enterprise was a plot point. As with the Star Trek whale movie. It wasn't a device they used to solve some plot hole, which is what it looks like Lost is doing.

I watch it anyway. There are like 3 other shows that I can stand.
 
2009-08-01 09:25:40 PM
Confabulat: Not a bad article. The whole Scooby/Goober debate thing (?) reminds me of how Battlestar Galactica fans reacted to the series finale though.

Rationalists: What a ripoff! What's all this nonsense about angels and gods?

Spiritualists: Did you ever even WATCH the show?


We're starting this discussion again???
 
2009-08-01 09:32:01 PM
*shrug* it just doesn't feel cheap to me in LOST. If it were in, say, Chuck, it would feel cheap. Hysterical, but cheap.
 
2009-08-01 09:42:21 PM
Mugato: SomeoneDumb: What bothers me with Lost's time travel is it provides a too-convenient way for the writers to invent solutions

That's the problem I have with it. The temporal Cold war thing in Enterprise was a plot point. As with the Star Trek whale movie. It wasn't a device they used to solve some plot hole, which is what it looks like Lost is doing.

I watch it anyway. There are like 3 other shows that I can stand.


Time travel IS the ultimate "ZOMG a wizard did it deus ex machina" in science fiction. Endless do-overs, continuity can be neatly excised... and then paradoxes start gobbling up all sense of reality.

When done well, and as part of the plot, time travel can create some very thoughtful shows.

And obligatory for talking about time travel: Everybody kills Hitler their first time (new window)
 
2009-08-01 09:44:00 PM
Lost seems like a massive waste of time...with producers milking this thing for as long as suckers keep watching.
 
2009-08-01 10:04:21 PM
Confabulat: Not a bad article. The whole Scooby/Goober debate thing (?) reminds me of how Battlestar Galactica fans reacted to the series finale though.

Rationalists: What a ripoff! What's all this nonsense about angels and gods?

Spiritualists: Did you ever even WATCH the show?


I'm sorry, this makes me angry. There was a large contingent of us who were thinking: I see where this is going and now I want to see more than ever how the writers get us out of this dead end. It was clear from early on where it was headed and the underlying suspense throughout much of the show was derived from how the tension between the two tracks would be resolved. It wasn't resolved at all, one side of the whole thing was just completely ignored for the last episode. Which, also, was too long and dragged.

As for Lost, that show stopped being logical at a very early stage and any purist 'Scoobies' have completely disconnected from the actual show. That said, it needs to present some sort of internal consistency if it follows a more spiritual route which is difficult now with all the overlapping themes that have been introduced.
 
2009-08-01 10:17:13 PM
I'll just leave this here...
 
2009-08-01 10:44:19 PM
They are dead...they all died in the plane crash....this is their purgatory

/jacob's ladder
//owl creek bridge
 
2009-08-01 11:06:18 PM
Fano: And obligatory for talking about time travel: Everybody kills Hitler their first time (new window)

That's funny shiat.

onion13: They are dead...they all died in the plane crash....this is their purgatory

/jacob's ladder
//owl creek bridge


They already brought that up. They don't want to blatantly rip off the Twilight Zone.
 
2009-08-01 11:13:40 PM
SomeoneDumb: What bothers me with Lost's time travel is it provides a too-convenient way for the writers to invent solutions. I wanted a deep, meaningful story with novel explanations, not just a whitewashing of what I saw before.

What solutions has their use of time travel provided, outside of "how can we show what was happening on the island 30 years ago for a number of episodes while still having some of the top line actors involved"?

I'm not a fan of time travel plots in general, but I like how they've done it on Lost. So far, nothing they've done has altered the future (that we know of). And the one guy who knew that, who told everyone that, who knew better than to try to change the future, decided to try to change the future. And he was killed. That, I like.
 
2009-08-01 11:43:19 PM
I used to think it was all about Jack and Kate. Lately it's been all Sawyer and Juliette. IMO it's all about Juliette and Gia.
 
2009-08-02 01:50:56 AM
Fano: And obligatory for talking about time travel: Everybody kills Hitler their first time (new window)

Not everybody. (new window)
 
2009-08-02 01:53:44 AM
in the end, i feel like my biggest regret regarding LOST will be that the show's creators missed an opportunity to show eko wearing a tiny hat on the sid of his head, like he wore on "Oz."

i30.tinypic.com
 
Displayed 50 of 108 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report