If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NewsBusters)   Why doesn't NOW, the New York Times or other "feminist" ogranizations condemn Letterman?   (freerepublic.com) divider line 7
    More: Ironic  
•       •       •

3522 clicks; posted to Politics » on 12 Jun 2009 at 3:56 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2009-06-12 03:44:26 PM
2 votes:
FireBreathingLiberal: Because only NutBuster Blog and Fox News thinks that the ramblings of the 3rd most polular late night talk show host are somehow important.

And they have to twist the facts to make it offensive. That helps, too.
2009-06-12 07:44:31 PM
1 votes:
I just read this awesome joke and had to share it in the first Palin thread I could find:

Q: What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina?

A: Only one retarded thing has come out of her vagina.

zing!
2009-06-12 05:06:33 PM
1 votes:
Everyone who says "oh, you guys are so petty going after an 18 year old girl just because you disagree with her mom" or similar shiat:

When Bristol Palin decided to go on a nationwide tour promoting abstinence after being put into the national spotlight by her mother, she became fair game. Why? Because I think abstinence education is farking stupid, and she's now the biggest face of that movement.

Bristol's an adult and made a very adult decision. I don't mean the one about having multiple rounds of unprotected sex with Levi Johnston and getting pregnant. I mean the one where she decided to go from a political prop in her mother's career to starting a political career of her own.

When Chelsea Clinton was in the White House, that wasn't fair game. When she decided to campaign for her mother, she was.
2009-06-12 04:30:04 PM
1 votes:
EABOD subby. Damn freeper links
2009-06-12 04:27:29 PM
1 votes:
Because those groups are liberal and liberals are hypocritical and very bigoted at the core. They preach acceptance and understanding but would torture and kill all who don't share their beliefs.

I cannot count how many Liberals have "joked" or made reference to water-boarding conservatives... they genuinely have the knee jerk reaction that "then" it would be OK.
2009-06-12 04:01:50 PM
1 votes:
Farking waah
2009-06-12 03:42:13 PM
1 votes:
Because only NutBuster Blog and Fox News thinks that the ramblings of the 3rd most polular late night talk show host are somehow important.
 
Displayed 7 of 7 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report