If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   Christians called "intolerant" by some stupid atheist who is going to burn in hell when he gets there   (theherald.co.uk) divider line 678
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

14370 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Mar 2009 at 2:20 AM (5 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



678 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-03-25 03:51:58 AM  
this thread is full of crazy now
 
2009-03-25 03:52:38 AM  
You can has my username: Um, guys? The author of this article was actually female, therefore rendering this entire thread null and void.

/yep, you just spent this long arguing about an article written by a chick
//and it wasn't an article comparing her tits to her ass
///if a man had written that article, it would have been intelligent


also, fark you
 
2009-03-25 03:52:49 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: answered more than one time

No, you didn't. I asked you what evidence you have as the basis of your assertion that "something is in control" and you went off on a tirade not having said what that something is.

I wasn't asking what it is. I'm asking what leads you to assert that "something" even exists at all.
 
2009-03-25 03:52:53 AM  
Markoff_Cheney: LOL PROVE GOD EXISTS! CHECK AND MATE!
OMG PROVE GOD DOESNT EXIST! CHECK AND MATE!
stale.


No, I and other atheists don't have to disprove ANYTHING. Other people have injected this god fellow into our society and our culture with out any proof of it's existence. Do you know what the null hypothesis means?

Prove god exists in the physical universe. If believers have this proof, by all means, divulge it. But they don't. So why is it my job to DISPROVE god existence? They're the ones saying he exists.

This video clarifies my point.
 
2009-03-25 03:54:03 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: Markoff_Cheney: Britney Spear's Speculum: What_Would_Jimi_Do: i don't know, neither do any of you. something does.

The burden of proof is on you to prove that this 'something' exists.

Otherwise, I'm gonna have to go with the null hypothesis on this one

LOL PROVE GOD EXISTS! CHECK AND MATE!
OMG PROVE GOD DOESNT EXIST! CHECK AND MATE!
stale.

i never said god exists? did i ever say god?
you are a moran.


Did I ever take this thread seriously? Or take a side? Just pointed out the frivolity of this argument which you were about to get into, with a joke. I can name call too! You are a farkbait. Or a shiatfist. Cockbrander? Anal dinner plate?
 
2009-03-25 03:54:16 AM  
all i have said is something is in control and i am not the (thing, person, whatever) in control and i have no idea what to call this(thing, person, whatever).

all i said is i am not in control. so fark all you that are trying to prove otherwise.
 
2009-03-25 03:54:59 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: all i have said is something is in control and i am not the (thing, person, whatever) in control and i have no idea what to call this(thing, person, whatever).

all i said is i am not in control. so fark all you that are trying to prove otherwise.


are you on mushrooms?
 
2009-03-25 03:55:15 AM  
Britney Spear's Speculum: Did you know that your username is poorly punctuated? No offence, but it bugs me every time I see it in a thread. It should be "Spears's".

Yeah, I've said my bit. I'm out now.

/PS... A GIRL wrote the article
//yes, a GIRL
///you're all arguing over something written by a dumb coont instead of a human being
 
2009-03-25 03:55:35 AM  
For giggles.

As for new pictures, this one doesn't see much action:

i75.photobucket.com

and fo course, drunk and embittered jesus TOLD YOU HE WAS HARDCORE!
 
2009-03-25 03:56:00 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: all i have said is something is in control and i am not the (thing, person, whatever) in control and i have no idea what to call this(thing, person, whatever).

all i said is i am not in control. so fark all you that are trying to prove otherwise.


I am not trying to prove you otherwise. I am asking you very specifically what your basis is for this assertion. It's a simple question. What is your basis for this assertion?
 
2009-03-25 03:56:38 AM  
brainiac-dumdum: this thread is full of crazy now

Indeed.
 
2009-03-25 03:58:01 AM  
mamoru: What_Would_Jimi_Do: answered more than one time

No, you didn't. I asked you what evidence you have as the basis of your assertion that "something is in control" and you went off on a tirade not having said what that something is.

I wasn't asking what it is. I'm asking what leads you to assert that "something" even exists at all.


go outside and look at the sun and the stars, who controls that? physics? something does. i am not it.
 
2009-03-25 03:58:33 AM  
You can has my username: Britney Spear's Speculum: Did you know that your username is poorly punctuated? No offence, but it bugs me every time I see it in a thread. It should be "Spears's".

Actually, I think it should be Spears'

Failing at point out failure...
0/10
 
2009-03-25 03:58:56 AM  
mamoru: brainiac-dumdum: this thread is full of crazy now

Indeed.


The best farking brand of crazy.
 
2009-03-25 04:00:24 AM  
You can has my username: Britney Spear's Speculum: Did you know that your username is poorly punctuated? No offence, but it bugs me every time I see it in a thread. It should be "Spears's".

Yeah, I've said my bit. I'm out now.

/PS... A GIRL wrote the article
//yes, a GIRL
///you're all arguing over something written by a dumb coont instead of a human being



I was drunk when I made the login, so HA HA!

Yes I know it's a typo
 
2009-03-25 04:01:06 AM  
mamoru: brainiac-dumdum: this thread is full of crazy now

Indeed.


thirded
 
2009-03-25 04:01:34 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: mamoru: What_Would_Jimi_Do: answered more than one time

No, you didn't. I asked you what evidence you have as the basis of your assertion that "something is in control" and you went off on a tirade not having said what that something is.

I wasn't asking what it is. I'm asking what leads you to assert that "something" even exists at all.

go outside and look at the sun and the stars, who controls that? physics? something does. i am not it.
What_Would_Jimi_Do: mamoru: What_Would_Jimi_Do: answered more than one time

No, you didn't. I asked you what evidence you have as the basis of your assertion that "something is in control" and you went off on a tirade not having said what that something is.

I wasn't asking what it is. I'm asking what leads you to assert that "something" even exists at all.

go outside and look at the sun and the stars, who controls that? physics? something does. i am not it.


like i said something is in control, i am not that thing
 
2009-03-25 04:01:37 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: go outside and look at the sun and the stars, who controls that? physics? something does. i am not it.

Why do you say "who controls that?"?

Why don't you say "what?"?

Based on your question question of "who?", I must revise my question: what is the basis of your assertion that some entity is in control?

Just to reiterate, I am asking about "some entity" specifically because you asked the question "Who?" which leads me to think that you believe that it is "some entity".
 
2009-03-25 04:03:06 AM  
Jedi_Templar: almafuerte: I am sick of Tolerance. Tolerance is AGAINST humanity. The Fundamental (Strong, Weak, Electromagnetic, Gravity) Forces are not Tolerant, That's why the universe exists and evolves. Inorganic molecules are not tolerant, that's why life started. No life form has ever been tolerant, that's why we evolved. That's why we exist. INTOLERANCE. Each system doing it's best for itself. That brought us here. It's what we are. If Animals had been tolerant and weak, they wouldn't have eaten the lowest specimens, and there would be no life in this planet. It's hard to accept, for the modern human being, that being cruel is necessary. Even the most cruels man of today lie and justify their actions. There's no need to do that. Anything STRONG is GOOD. Anything that destroys weakness and elevates the human being is GOOD. Religion is Weakness of the mind. But Don't believe me. Let evolution decide. Stop being considerate to each other. That kills evolution. Let the Religious people try to destroy Atheism, and let the Atheists try to destroy Religion. Evolution will take care of choosing the best of each, and man will better at the end of the day.
Religions that preach tolerance, weakness, humility, poverty (Like Christianism) are PERVERSE religions. They foment the worst of the human being, and attack the instincts that made us what we are. They must be destroyed. Atheists that preach peace and tolerance and freedom of beliefs are weak too, and must be destroyed too.

It's time for the human being to embrace its true roots, and let evolution continue, take the evolution of the human race in its hands and lead it to the future. without mercy, without shame, without doubt. Any action that goes against the natural laws is SUICIDAL.



Even he thinks you went too far.



Well, Thank you! That's a big compliment.
Anyway, if you actually read Frederich throughly, you'll see he's not far away from what I'm saying ...

From Nietzsche's masterpiece, The Antichrist:

Schopenhauer washostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue....Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous stateof mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regardedtragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seeksome means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerousaccumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer's case (and also,alack, in that of our whole literary _decadence_, from St. Petersburg toParis, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged....Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, thanChristian pity. To be the doctors _here_, to be unmerciful _here_, towield the knife _here_--all this is _our_ business, all this is _our_sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!--
 
2009-03-25 04:03:39 AM  
if physics is in control, that is the entity, that would be whom. stop now loser.
 
2009-03-25 04:04:37 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: if physics is in control, that is the entity, that would be whom. stop now loser.

but, physics is not an entity. Physics is a field of study.
 
2009-03-25 04:05:23 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: Leviticus 18:22

And you remember Matthew 21-17
 
2009-03-25 04:06:42 AM  
wildsnowllama: What_Would_Jimi_Do: Leviticus 18:22

And you remember Matthew 21-17


you are the biggest moran of all, that was a family guy quote, meant as a joke.
 
2009-03-25 04:08:37 AM  
mamoru: I get the feeling that you think evolution is "survival of the fittest" and therefore "the strong survive

Also, contrary to what the rugged individualist types love to spout, evolution doesn't much care about any individual. It only concerns itself with populations and the fitness of the group.

Jedi_Templar: Even he thinks you went too far.

Given the post was almost nihilistic, he would have been very against it. Given that he despised nihilism.
 
2009-03-25 04:11:46 AM  
mamoru: What_Would_Jimi_Do: if physics is in control, that is the entity, that would be whom. stop now loser.

but, physics is not an entity. Physics is a field of study.


named by human, so by your field of study so would christianism. no different? of muslim or hindu or islam? those are fields of study?
 
2009-03-25 04:12:45 AM  
I need more popcorn. Should I pray some appears in my bowl or get off my ass and make it myself?
 
2009-03-25 04:14:28 AM  
Ctrl+F
bevets
Next
Next
Next
Next
*exit thread*
 
2009-03-25 04:16:15 AM  
hostJP: No, it's definitely "Spears's". The "s'" form is only for possessive plurals. See here for more info.
 
2009-03-25 04:16:21 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: named by human, so by your field of study so would christianism. no different? of muslim or hindu or islam? those are fields of study?

Hmmm... It is at this point in our conversation that I must ask, is English your first language?

In response to your question, yes, they are different. Those by themselves are not fields of study. However, theology is a field of study which may include analysis of all of those belief systems.

/not sure if I'm being trolled of if I've made someone's brain blow a fuse, shorting out the neural pathways for communication in coherent English
//what say you, rest of Fark?
///meh, either way, it's still fun :D
 
2009-03-25 04:17:28 AM  
how many civilizations belive they were built from nothing, that they were built from nothing? the mayans, you believe in them?
 
2009-03-25 04:18:21 AM  
Begoggle: Ctrl+F
bevets
Next
Next
Next
Next
*exit thread*


why are people still so crazy for the Bevets? He never sticks around anymore and he always posts the same crap with, of course, a link to his site.
 
2009-03-25 04:19:19 AM  
You can has my username: hostJP: No, it's definitely "Spears's". The "s'" form is only for possessive plurals. See here for more info.

Ok, ok, I farked up.

It should read Britney Spears' Speculum

Let this be a lesson to you: Don't drink and create logins.
 
2009-03-25 04:19:25 AM  
You can has my username: hostJP: No, it's definitely "Spears's". The "s'" form is only for possessive plurals. See here for more info.

no, it's Spear's, just look at his name- Britney Spear's Speculum
 
2009-03-25 04:19:26 AM  
mamoru: What_Would_Jimi_Do: named by human, so by your field of study so would christianism. no different? of muslim or hindu or islam? those are fields of study?

Hmmm... It is at this point in our conversation that I must ask, is English your first language?

In response to your question, yes, they are different. Those by themselves are not fields of study. However, theology is a field of study which may include analysis of all of those belief systems.

/not sure if I'm being trolled of if I've made someone's brain blow a fuse, shorting out the neural pathways for communication in coherent English
//what say you, rest of Fark?
///meh, either way, it's still fun :D


either way you are the embecile.
 
2009-03-25 04:20:16 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: how many civilizations belive they were built from nothing, that they were built from nothing? the mayans, you believe in them?

oh yeah, you ate mushrooms.
 
2009-03-25 04:20:51 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: how many civilizations belive they were built from nothing, that they were built from nothing? the mayans, you believe in them?

In answer to your first question, none?

In answer to your second question, umm, yes, as there is empirical evidence that they existed.

How were your two questions (quoted here) related to the topic of this thread?
 
2009-03-25 04:21:42 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: either way you are the embecile.

Ok, that's the clincher. I'm either being trolled, or...

brainiac-dumdum: oh yeah, you ate mushrooms.

This.

Ah, good times. :D
 
2009-03-25 04:23:30 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: named by human

Physics doesn't need names, or words, it only needs math.
 
2009-03-25 04:24:54 AM  
WhyteRaven74: What_Would_Jimi_Do: named by human

Physics doesn't need names, or words, it only needs math.


yay math! That's the best part of math, it's a universal language.
 
2009-03-25 04:26:18 AM  
brainiac-dumdum: What_Would_Jimi_Do: how many civilizations belive they were built from nothing, that they were built from nothing? the mayans, you believe in them?

oh yeah, you ate mushrooms.


teddziuba.com
Oblig and agreed.
/But where does 'where' come from?
 
2009-03-25 04:26:26 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: how many christians listen to slayer, motorhead, megadeth, iron maiden, steppenwolf, hendrix, celtic frost, death angel, thin lizzy etc.

A lot actually. Why, what does taste in music have to do with religion?
 
2009-03-25 04:26:45 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: wildsnowllama: What_Would_Jimi_Do: Leviticus 18:22

And you remember Matthew 21-17

you are the biggest moran of all, that was a family guy quote, meant as a joke.


Google it...
 
2009-03-25 04:30:56 AM  
brainiac-dumdum: Begoggle: Ctrl+F
bevets
Next
Next
Next
Next
*exit thread*

why are people still so crazy for the Bevets? He never sticks around anymore and he always posts the same crap with, of course, a link to his site.


I am crazy for the Bevets of old.
I keep hoping the return of "Bevets classic".
 
2009-03-25 04:31:58 AM  
brainiac-dumdum: That's the best part of math,

indeed :) Now watch, I'm going to get asked about something to do with 1+1 = 2...

Markoff_Cheney: /But where does 'where' come from?

Just take a walk on a Mobius strip. Everywhere is here, there is there no there there.
 
2009-03-25 04:34:03 AM  
WhyteRaven74: indeed :) Now watch, I'm going to get asked about something to do with 1+1 = 2...

But, I thought 1+1 = 10

:(
 
2009-03-25 04:35:44 AM  
mamoru: WhyteRaven74: indeed :) Now watch, I'm going to get asked about something to do with 1+1 = 2...

But, I thought 1+1 = 10

:(


it does in binary
 
2009-03-25 04:41:00 AM  
Britney Spear's Speculum: it does in binary

shh!Britney Spear's Speculum: mamoru: WhyteRaven74: indeed :) Now watch, I'm going to get asked about something to do with 1+1 = 2...

But, I thought 1+1 = 10

:(

it does in binary


Hehehe. Fine, 1+1 may equal 2 or 10, but 1+1+1 = 10, too. :D

/don't mind me... just bored.
 
2009-03-25 04:42:26 AM  
What_Would_Jimi_Do: wildsnowllama: What_Would_Jimi_Do: Leviticus 18:22

And you remember Matthew 21-17

you are the biggest moran of all, that was a family guy quote, meant as a joke.


I didn't realize using a Simpsons quote to counter a family guy quote would be traumatizing for you...
 
2009-03-25 04:43:18 AM  
Lets take the statement "God has a plan"
Would believing in God change this plan?

If no, then why should I believe in God? (God planned on me going to hell in the 1st place right?)

If yes, then that would mean I have control over God. I can control God's actions. Then why is he called God in that case?
 
2009-03-25 04:46:25 AM  
Wii.Tard: Lets take the statement "God has a plan"
Would believing in God change this plan?

If no, then why should I believe in God? (God planned on me going to hell in the 1st place right?)

If yes, then that would mean I have control over God. I can control God's actions. Then why is he called God in that case?



'god has a plan' has to be the most willfully ignorant statement I've ever heard come out of someone's mouth.
 
Displayed 50 of 678 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report