If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(YouTube)   WTF is Watchmen?   (youtube.com) divider line 68
    More: Amusing  
•       •       •

8711 clicks; posted to Video » on 26 Feb 2009 at 1:14 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



68 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-02-26 11:25:45 AM
Ha.

/I'm still excited
//Haven't read it either
 
2009-02-26 11:41:29 AM
I heard it's about men who make watches or something.
 
2009-02-26 11:43:24 AM
I have read it, like it a lot, and am looking forward to the eye candy sets if nothing else, mainly the 1980s NYC. Some of the stills I've seen, it's pretty cool how the tone and color are JUST like the comic.

At first I didn't catch this clip was a parody, and was wondering, WTF? No shame in just saying you've not read the book yet and that's why you are just now coming out of the comic book store with it, Mr. Fatty Fan...
 
2009-02-26 12:18:11 PM
They probably could have gotten the real David Hayter.

In a Solid Snake outfit.
 
2009-02-26 01:07:16 PM
A movie I'm paying a babysitter way too much money to watch my kids for the midnight opening.
 
2009-02-26 01:20:21 PM
That's like a Walkman but it only tells you the time?
 
2009-02-26 01:24:01 PM
its like the utter lack of surprise you get when you find a video that has been submitted to fark isn't funny at all.
 
2009-02-26 01:26:41 PM
So what are they parodying here? I guess they want to make the claim that there's a ton of hype around the movie and that not everyone has necessarily read it? That's not shocking. It's not even news. It's..... d'oh you got me again.
 
2009-02-26 01:38:40 PM
GoodyearPimp: So what are they parodying here? I guess they want to make the claim that there's a ton of hype around the movie and that not everyone has necessarily read it? That's not shocking. It's not even news. It's..... d'oh you got me again.

I think he's saying that a lot of people who are all excited because "it's the greatest graphic novel of all time" haven't read it. I didn't read it until after I heard the movie was coming out.

Looking forward to it, but not as much as a lot of people on Fark are.
 
2009-02-26 01:55:42 PM
I've read it and got bored 1/4 into it. Flipped the rest of the pages, went "meh", never thought twice about it.

I will see it in theaters, and will probably love it, because I have truly ZERO expectations.
 
2009-02-26 01:56:25 PM
Ashtrey: I think he's saying that a lot of people who are all excited because "it's the greatest graphic novel of all time" haven't read it.

Seems pretty flimsy. Perhaps it's supposed to be ironic because it took them almost 2 minutes to make that "point". Maybe it's a play on the interviews they did for LOTR -- where almost the entire cast confessed to not having read the book? Maybe that's a longshot, but at least I could give them props for digging something like that up. As it stands -- maybe I'm just not scanning the right parts of youtube -- where are the real life 'guilty pleas' from 'fans'?
 
2009-02-26 02:03:10 PM
I've read it. I'm excited.

/favorite is Rorschach
 
2009-02-26 02:09:42 PM
"Probably Amazing" made me laugh.
 
2009-02-26 02:18:20 PM
Killroy69: I've read it and got bored 1/4 into it. Flipped the rest of the pages, went "meh", never thought twice about it.

LET'S RIDE BIKES!
 
2009-02-26 02:21:10 PM
Killroy69: I've read it and got bored 1/4 into it. Flipped the rest of the pages...

*insert YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG pic here*
 
2009-02-26 02:35:30 PM
Wow... I've never read the Watchman, so I haven't really been keeping up.

Had no idea Hayter wrote the screenplay. Pretty sweet. I dug X-Men 2.

And I'll always love him as Solid Snake. Oh how I'd go gay for him if he'd constantly talk in Snake's voice. Hmmm
 
2009-02-26 02:38:08 PM
I work at a movie theater. One of my managers has been babbling about this movie incessantly ever since it was first announced, and has subsequently been updating virtually every employee at the theater about every twist and turn the Watchmen legal battles have been taking. On top of that, whenever I work upstairs concessions, I'm in direct earshot of about a half-dozen animated preview screens that cycle a 45-minute collection of roughly a dozen movie previews and commercials, including the Watchmen preview with Billy Corgan's trademark scratchy whinge wailing in the background.

I'm almost sick of this movie, and it hasn't even come out yet. Still, I'll probably go see it, despite knowing almost nothing about it.
 
2009-02-26 02:39:58 PM
Never heard of it before but definitely going to see it.

I'm sure Hollywood is worried about attracting a new audience that isn't familiar with the story. Here's the thing: I like the new Batman movies, not so much the Fantastic Four movies. I only have a passing knowledge of either. Why do I like Batman better? BECAUSE THE SCRIPT AND ACTORS AREN'T HORSECRAP.
 
2009-02-26 02:40:17 PM
I'm a used book dealer and never seen a copy.

I'm getting a kick out of the idea of a post human character actually acting post human. As Bruce Sterling once said "Why would a post human care about us?"
 
2009-02-26 02:44:50 PM
Mystery solved



yanai.blackmage.org
 
2009-02-26 02:53:08 PM
Heamer: Billy Corgan's trademark scratchy whinge
I hope they aren't actually using that crap to score the movie.

wildcardjack: I'm a used book dealer and never seen a copy.
Because it doesn't leave the collections of the people who bought it?
Or because it is a graphic novel from the mid '80s?

Seriously, is the book worth it?
I love Heavy Metal, but never got into the long-running narratives of serialized comics. Is Watchmen more like a serial, or more like a one-off?
I suppose $11 from Amazon might be worth the gamble.

/why is voting enabled?
//Vote for me!
 
2009-02-26 03:07:40 PM
Epiphani: ...Haven't read it either

Doesn't matter. After Snyder gets through with it, the two won't be recognizable to one another.
 
2009-02-26 03:09:18 PM
This made me want to punch something. I know it's a parody, but seriously. How many people saw Iron Man, never having read the comic? Even if you read Watchmen 20 years ago, you'll never forget the characters.

The Water Guy? Please.
 
2009-02-26 03:11:27 PM
xadrian: How many people saw Iron Man, never having read the comic?


I did and really regretted it. (the watching)
 
2009-02-26 03:33:12 PM
Got it, read it, didn't like it.

Sorry, I like actual heroic characters.

On the other hand, I didn't like The Great Gatsby either for much the same reason. Get a character you have expectations of, and then start pulling the supports out from under them. No thanks.
 
2009-02-26 03:53:43 PM
jennyz: I've read it. I'm excited.

/favorite is Rorschach


img104.imageshack.us

Second
 
2009-02-26 04:13:43 PM
Saw the original trailer touting it as the "greatest graphic novel of all time" and wondered immediately "Well then why haven't I ever heard of it?"

Bought the book. Read the first chapter, got bored, and forgot about it. Then the deluge of Fark links led me back to finish the comic. It was excruciating.

It was a story about normal people. I don't really care about normal people - if I did I'd be reading nonfiction books. And that whole sidestory about the dumbshiat pirate or whatever that completely and totally derailed any sense of continuity? WTF was up with that?

The hype caught me and I regret it. I was one click away from buying a midnight screening ticket because hey, it's geeky, right? Then I looked at my desk and saw the comic again and clicked the window closed.

I hope you other guys enjoy it, I truly do - you know who you are. The ones who have read the comic dozens of times and can recite lines at whim. But for the rest of us, wait for the Netflix.
 
2009-02-26 04:32:12 PM
jennyz: I've read it. I'm excited.

/favorite is Rorschach Ozymandias


Hooded Justice ain't half bad either.
 
2009-02-26 04:33:08 PM
I heard they totally borked the ending in the movie.
The people that actually read the book are going to hate the movie if that is the case.
 
2009-02-26 04:46:19 PM
The book probably gets overhyped. I agree it's one of the better graphic novels I've ever read, but I'm not so sure it's as accessible to your average non-comic reader as a lot of people seem to think.

Same with the movie; some fans will love it just because it's finally a live action movie. Others will hate it because of the differences that naturally come with such an adaption. Then there will be the regular movie-going public who made that mall cop movie tops for a few weeks. How THEY react is going to be very, very interesting...I can't decide if it'll be loved for being a superhero movie or hated for being so damn...well, odd.
 
2009-02-26 04:46:46 PM
bberg: It was a story about normal people. I don't really care about normal people - if I did I'd be reading nonfiction books. And that whole sidestory about the dumbshiat pirate or whatever that completely and totally derailed any sense of continuity? WTF was up with that?

That's kind of the point: Superheroes are not perfect, but flawed, some dangerously so. We can't afford to put complete faith in humanity but we must be human toward each other.

The pirate story was a parallel allegory showing that those (superheroes/military) who are ostracized from society when protecting civilians often have trouble reintegrating into society, if they can do so at all. They become the demons they fight.

If you want candy, this is not the movie or story for you.
 
2009-02-26 04:47:25 PM
root88: I heard they totally borked the ending in the movie.
The people that actually read the book are going to hate the movie if that is the case.


It's not the ending of the book, I won't post spoilers here, but it maintains the same sort of tone with a new spin on it. If what one reads on teh interwebs is true, of course...
 
2009-02-26 04:49:27 PM
Won't someone please feed the trolls?
 
2009-02-26 04:57:15 PM
bberg: And that whole sidestory about the dumbshiat pirate or whatever that completely and totally derailed any sense of continuity? WTF was up with that?

It's a parallel metaphor to the main story. They're leaving it out of the movie, though, and releasing it separately. It'd be interesting if the kid reading it makes some comment, I guess, but there's just no way they could leave it in there on film, it WAS sorta hard to follow it in parallel in the book.

bigfatdave: I love Heavy Metal, but never got into the long-running narratives of serialized comics. Is Watchmen more like a serial, or more like a one-off?

It's a one off complete story (i.e. closed, with a clear beginning middle and end known to the writers when they started it) that was released in 12 episodes. The reprinted version is a thickish comic book with 12 chapters.

It takes a while to get into the story, because you're just thrown into it in Chapter 1 with no explanation of who anyone is. Even reading it the first time, it's the sort of book where in Chapter 5 you'll think "aha, so that's who that guy is" and flip back to Chapter 1 to confirm. There are lots of flashbacks, so you get peoples' backstories after you've already seen them in the background, etc.
 
2009-02-26 05:06:26 PM
I read it after 300 came out, when it was announced Synder would be adapting it.

I respect it. I think its a grand, thoughtful entry in the world of comics.

I'm more moved, though, with simplisitc, pulpy stuff, like Frank Millers Sin City series. To me... that is art. Watchmen is more of a statement than art.
 
2009-02-26 05:20:01 PM
wow.

wow.

wow.
 
2009-02-26 05:25:49 PM
wildcardjack:

Seriously, is the book worth it?
...
I suppose $11 from Amazon might be worth the gamble.



On the one hand: It's one of the great literary works of the 20th century.

On the other hand: Have you re-read 'The Grapes of Wrath' since that High School book report?

The gripping hand: It's very much a product of its times, and has to be read in context. And it's a very bad -first- graphic novel. If you're unfamiliar with visual storytelling and not conversant in Silver Age comics tropes, and if you don't remember the Cold War, much of the book will go sailing over your head. What's worse, the post-modernist approach to superheroics has grown somewhat stale in the 20+ years since Alan Moore et al inaugurated it, and the story certainly doesn't play the same way to a modern audience.

Mileage may vary, of course.
 
2009-02-26 05:39:18 PM
itazurakko: It's a one off complete story (i.e. closed, with a clear beginning middle and end known to the writers when they started it) that was released in 12 episodes. The reprinted version is a thickish comic book with 12 chapters.

Thanks, I'll keep an eye out for it at the brick & mortar stores, preview it there and buy online if I dig the preview.

ThePuceGuardian: The gripping hand: It's very much a product of its times, and has to be read in context. And it's a very bad -first- graphic novel. If you're unfamiliar with visual storytelling and not conversant in Silver Age comics tropes, and if you don't remember the Cold War, much of the book will go sailing over your head. What's worse, the post-modernist approach to superheroics has grown somewhat stale in the 20+ years since Alan Moore et al inaugurated it, and the story certainly doesn't play the same way to a modern audience.

On one hand - I enjoy the format on occasion
On the other hand - it sounds a bit long, as my graphic novel attention span is about as long as an issue of Heavy Metal Magazine
On the gripping hand - I remember the end of the Cold War and some of the tropes of classic comics, so I'll try to check out the book before the movie.

/I am voting for the 3-handed Motie logic

//Seriously, is Billy Corgan a major part of the scoring for this movie? That could ruin it on the screen, if that no-talent assclown is responsible for anything but title/credit music.
 
2009-02-26 05:50:18 PM
Killroy69 2009-02-26 01:55:42 PM
I've read it and got bored 1/4 into it. Flipped the rest of the pages, went "meh", never thought twice about it.

I will see it in theaters, and will probably love it, because I have truly ZERO expectations.


I am learning this is the ONLY way to see such over-hyped movies, whether its, Ironman, Hellboy, Gran Torino or Australia.

I didnt expect much out of any of them and they were all worth it.

Went to 'Burn After Reading' expecting lots and man, did it suck, and I like the Coens, Clooney, et al.

(I'm voting 'present' on this one)
 
2009-02-26 06:10:57 PM
bigfatdave: Seriously, is Billy Corgan a major part of the scoring for this movie? That could ruin it on the screen, if that no-talent assclown is responsible for anything but title/credit music.

Actually I think the song from the trailer is ONLY for the trailer, but I could be mistaken. The main theme song is supposedly some "My Chemical Romance" version of the Bob Dylan song "Desolation Row," it's done in punk style (you can YouTube the video, the background in the video there is Watchmen style NYC).
 
2009-02-26 06:28:40 PM
TheSuperFunk: Had no idea Hayter wrote the screenplay. Pretty sweet. I dug X-Men 2.

It's been re-written since his draft. I love Hayter, but his treatment was done in modern times, so I probably wouldn't have liked it. The rewrite changed it back to 1985.
 
2009-02-26 06:36:55 PM
First of all, nice video, but it's one of those 'you get it or you don't' funnys, so I can see the 'huh' reactions here.

Second, I'm not really looking forward to the film, mainly because I enjoy the book so much. There's a lot of reasons why 'Watchmen' is a literary landmark, all of them deserved. However, yes it is a product of the times and yes you do need to be a bit of a comics geek to fully appreciate it. This is not going to be the 'Citizen Kane' of the comic book movies.

Some of the viewing public will go see it and be blown away by the visual effects...and promptly move on to the next eye candy film without really taking anything away from it.

Some of the viewers will go in hearing about how great the source material is and will be underwhelmed because the film had to be 'dumbed down' for the general public.

Comics fans who have read the novel will go in and be disappointed because everything that made Watchmen great seems to have been stripped away, based on the clips I've seen.

In other words, this is going to end up being another mediocre Hollywood spectacle that will have it's 15 minutes of glory before the general public moves onto the next celluloid distraction. Everyone that's expecting anything more is going to be disillusioned; stick with buying and reading the original material.

In fact, that's good advice for anyone interested in anything by Alan Moore. The guy writes way too deep for anything of his to be translated into mass market film well. The problem is that Hollywood keeps trying because Moore is so well-regarded in the comics world as a storyteller, so they think they can cash in on the built-in audience for his work. Yet they loose that audience when they have to strip things down to bring in the rest of the viewing public, who ultimately don't stick around the way the comics fans would.

FWIW, the best adaptation of an Alan Moore work was the Justice League Unlimited episode, 'For The Man Who Has Everything'. It stays the truest to the source material and still maintains the exceptional and deep storytelling of Alan Moore.
Link (new window) Part 1
Link (new window) Part 2

Moviewise, I'd say 'From Hell' is the best adaptation, mainly because it's the closest a Hollywood film has ever come to mainaining Moore's overall story. Even then, it's still not as good as the source material.
 
2009-02-26 06:41:51 PM
I thought it was about galactic policemen written by Cambell in the thirties.
 
2009-02-26 06:46:57 PM
Those dudes are now your average Farkers.
 
2009-02-26 06:47:37 PM
I just got done reading it this last weekend. To tell you the truth, it was the first graphic novel i've ever read, so I can't really say much about the quality, other than it was like reading a movie - which I guess is a good thing.

I think the movie will do it plenty of justice.

That being said, I still don't know about the ending. I didn't really like it, but I suppose it was the only ending it could have had...
 
2009-02-26 07:24:47 PM
Wow, youtube's targeted ads are spot-on!

img19.imageshack.us
 
2009-02-26 07:28:09 PM
This movie sounds perfect for Triumph the Insult Dog to visit...you know, the opening night crowd when adult males will be dressed as the dopey characters from the book...only fatter and balder.

/for me to poop on
 
2009-02-26 07:46:42 PM
The book wasn't bad. It was a quick read, good twists, and an interesting view of humanity. The pirate narrative was retarded and I can't imagine that making it into the movie.

Some of the characters were boring, some didn't get enough love from the author. A screenwriter could fix these things or make them worse. There's no doubt the visuals will be sexy, as will the Silk Spectre.

The Comedian was my favorite. Oh and a vote for me is a vote for not enabling voting.
 
2009-02-26 08:16:04 PM
Early reviews of this movie are saying it is terrible. IGN UK had one up today, but it is gone now.

Link (new window)
 
2009-02-26 08:34:10 PM
hooks4feet: Early reviews of this movie are saying it is terrible. IGN UK had one up today, but it is gone now.

Link (new window)


Pretty misleading statement. Currently has 76% at Rotten Tomatoes. And I personally have read FAR more positive reviews than negative.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/watchmen/
 
Displayed 50 of 68 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report