If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Newsweek)   Eric Holder, the new US attorney general, introduces himself to America most graciously: You're all a bunch of cowardly racists   (newsweek.com) divider line 306
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

4147 clicks; posted to Politics » on 18 Feb 2009 at 5:16 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



306 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2009-02-18 02:58:16 PM
Party Boy: whole student centers divided into race/ethnicity...

Wheres the poor folks student center?


out in the gutter.
 
2009-02-18 03:00:15 PM
Party Boy: An easy way to look at that is to see what classes are offered on U.S. and race, and U.S. and class.

Well, I currently work for a med school, so I'm pretty sure there are no classes like that!

But my Alma Mata? Giant Expensive Private University?

I can almost guarantee there are no classes on class. Let me check..

Well, you can take a poli sci class on: Reckoning with the Past: Reparations and Justice in Comparative Perspective

and

The Politics of Race and Ethnicity


I'm sure there are classes that TOUCH on class- like: Civil Society and the Stateor some of the history classes, but there is NO class specifically on class.

My point isn't that we aren't teaching race issues, it's that we're doing it wrong.
 
2009-02-18 03:00:46 PM
burndtdan: out in the gutter.

Theres a lebowski line that works here, but I'm at a loss.

I gotta go anyway.
 
2009-02-18 03:00:55 PM
Party Boy: whole student centers divided into race/ethnicity...

Wheres the poor folks student center?


My office.

/financial aid
 
2009-02-18 03:02:02 PM
what_now: My point isn't that we aren't teaching race issues, it's that we're doing it wrong.

I see.

There seems to be, then, an even greater vacancy on class in academia.

Why is that?
 
2009-02-18 03:03:07 PM
what_now: /financial aid

thats funny, I'm going there now.

Toodle oo

/see you at the next function at the Hispanic/African/Arab/Asian/Jewish/Indian center?
 
2009-02-18 03:05:13 PM
Man he's got our number.
 
2009-02-18 03:07:34 PM
Party Boy: There seems to be, then, an even greater vacancy on class in academia.

Why is that?


Because class is something you move from, race is not. Look, if you asked most people in this country to list their 5 best friends (not family), most people would mostly list people of the same race.

Now, spare me the "my* friends are a UN..." because I said most. And yeah, I know you* have the one black friend, I'm talking about MOST people. Including ethnic minorities.

However, if you asked that same group of people about the class that their friends were BORN into, I think you'd get a different answer- a lot of people might not even know.

* I don't mean "you" Party Boy, I mean the plural "you", fark. The English language doesn't pluralize "You".
 
2009-02-18 03:08:19 PM
Party Boy: Where I'm from, racial issues are brought up all the time. People look at me funny when I bring up class.

I've been out of school a long time. I have no class.
 
2009-02-18 03:15:18 PM
what_now: most people would mostly list people of the same race.
class

/watch out for proclaiming monocausation on human culture.
 
2009-02-18 03:20:18 PM
i personally don't see why we can't have conversations on both race AND class.
 
2009-02-18 03:22:07 PM
He naiiiiled it. We don't like talking about any tough subjects.
 
2009-02-18 03:27:38 PM
I wish instead of talking about this he were discussing how to go about restoring civil liberties and decreasing executive power instead of maintaining a large amount that was grabbed by GWB.
 
2009-02-18 03:31:53 PM
 
2009-02-18 03:38:46 PM
DslainteC: HAHA! You've become Canada.

That's no shiat.
 
2009-02-18 03:45:00 PM
what_now: And here's a story about a college that has put up White and Black drinking fountains.

I'm sure there will be plenty of butthurt over this.


img16.imageshack.us

This 1950's replica diner is completely accurate in its details...right down to the blacks/whites only tiles on the floor. In the 50's, you could find yourself in some mighty big trouble if you were white and stepped on the black tiles...or vice versa.
 
wee [TotalFark]
2009-02-18 03:51:22 PM
Morgan Freeman has some good thoughts on this topic.

I'm a little sad that us European-Americans don't get our own month, though...
 
2009-02-18 03:54:39 PM
wee: Morgan Freeman has some good thoughts on this topic.

I'm a little sad that us European-Americans don't get our own month, though...


As a black person, I am more than fine with giving up Black History Month. However, it would be nice if black history wasn't relegated to just a couple chapters on slavery and the civil rights movement in school history books.
 
2009-02-18 04:09:26 PM
burndtdan: i don't think we segregate racially so much as we segregate culturally. and that's really to be expected, regardless of race.

Bingo.
 
2009-02-18 04:13:20 PM
He has a point at least in general, just think of how many people reacted to 9/11 or how they still regard Moslems. They act like most Moslems are Arabic looking, which is not the case at all. They represent a minority of the world's Moslems.
 
2009-02-18 04:14:22 PM
what_now: but you didn't have serious discussions about how to bridge the divide

What racial divide is there to bridge in the U.S.??
 
2009-02-18 04:44:14 PM
WhyteRaven74: He has a point at least in general, just think of how many people reacted to 9/11 or how they still regard Moslems. They act like most Moslems are Arabic looking, which is not the case at all. They represent a minority of the world's Moslems.

Not to mention that Muslim is not a race.

I'd agree with most people in the thread about it really being a class issue, but we should be honest about the following:

1. As a percentage, there's more black poverty than for any other race (perhaps American Indian, but that's tricky)

2. Since schools are tied to local taxes, poverty is self-perpetuating

3. All other things being equal, a white-sounding name on an application makes it five times as likely to get a call for an interview than a black-sounding name on the identical application. This is NOT necessarily racist on the part of the interviewer, at al. It is systemic racism, which is not at all necessarily perpetrated by any individual at all.

All of these things can be explained without anyone involved actually being racist. But they still are true.
 
2009-02-18 04:47:28 PM
burndtdan: i don't think we segregate racially so much as we segregate culturally. and that's really to be expected, regardless of race.

i don't care what race someone is, i just want to hang out with people who have the same interests as i do.


And, over in one.
 
2009-02-18 04:55:25 PM
wee: Morgan Freeman has some good thoughts on this topic.

I'm a little sad that us European-Americans don't get our own month, though...


I knew I liked that guy for a reason.
 
2009-02-18 04:59:47 PM
Obdicut: 3. All other things being equal, a white-sounding name on an application makes it five times as likely to get a call for an interview than a black-sounding name on the identical application.

What's a "black-sounding" name? What's a "white-sounding" name?

What's the race of the interviewer?
 
2009-02-18 05:09:48 PM
SchlingFocker: What's a "black-sounding" name? What's a "white-sounding" name?

What's the race of the interviewer?


I'm betting that the race of the interviewer isn't relevant; I don't think it's included.

Here is a review of the study, and the inclusion of a critical study of the study, which is also interesting.

Link (new window)



There's also the Harvard Implicit Association test, which is very interesting.

Link (new window)


Again: All of this can be explained without personally held racism.
 
2009-02-18 05:12:07 PM
By the way, I see I got my numbers wrong. I apologize for the hyperbole; it was unintentional.

The study found 'only' a 50% increase in response rate for the 'white' names over the 'black' names. I think I was conflating this with another study. Anyway, apologies for anyone who was misled.
 
wee [TotalFark]
2009-02-18 05:15:23 PM
cheshirecatsmileyface: As a black person, I am more than fine with giving up Black History Month. However, it would be nice if black history wasn't relegated to just a couple chapters on slavery and the civil rights movement in school history books.

I'm with you on that. I've been reading a lot of nonfiction lately (turning into my dad, I guess), and I'm always coming across interesting stuff I never learned in history class. The last good one I read was called "Rum". It had all sorts of really interesting stuff in it about the slave trade and how this part of the world was colonized. A book along those lines called "Salt" also gets into some black history hardly anyone talks about.

Another good one I read is called Patton's Panthers. It's about the first all black tank battalion to enter combat in WWII and what they accomplished. Fascinating stuff, and I'd never even heard of them (which is saying quite a lot, since I've been a big WWII buff for 30 years now).

Anyway, the token history month should go. It's mean to showcase and honor and educate, but it pretty much fails on all those counts. I think it's actually actively divisive.
 
2009-02-18 05:16:11 PM
Obdicut: By the way, I see I got my numbers wrong. I apologize for the hyperbole; it was unintentional.

The study found 'only' a 50% increase in response rate for the 'white' names over the 'black' names. I think I was conflating this with another study. Anyway, apologies for anyone who was misled.


It's a little late...I already slit my wrists out of shame.
 
2009-02-18 05:18:03 PM
wee: cheshirecatsmileyface: As a black person, I am more than fine with giving up Black History Month. However, it would be nice if black history wasn't relegated to just a couple chapters on slavery and the civil rights movement in school history books.

I'm with you on that. I've been reading a lot of nonfiction lately (turning into my dad, I guess), and I'm always coming across interesting stuff I never learned in history class. The last good one I read was called "Rum". It had all sorts of really interesting stuff in it about the slave trade and how this part of the world was colonized. A book along those lines called "Salt" also gets into some black history hardly anyone talks about.

Another good one I read is called Patton's Panthers. It's about the first all black tank battalion to enter combat in WWII and what they accomplished. Fascinating stuff, and I'd never even heard of them (which is saying quite a lot, since I've been a big WWII buff for 30 years now).

Anyway, the token history month should go. It's mean to showcase and honor and educate, but it pretty much fails on all those counts. I think it's actually actively divisive.


Maybe if they at least used a month that wasn't always the shortest month of the year, it would be more effective. Those extra 3 days they'd get from October sure would be nice.
 
2009-02-18 05:18:56 PM
CrankMyBlueSax: And how is it Mr. Holder can get away with saying such things? Oh yeah .....

I am sorry what is he "getting away with" exactly?
 
2009-02-18 05:19:10 PM
Well, there's hating the race and then there's hating the culture.
 
2009-02-18 05:21:37 PM
Cowards because everyone is afraid of being sued and/or labeled as a racist by locals and the media.

Safer to not talk about touchy subjects, no matter what it is.
 
2009-02-18 05:22:38 PM
I find it funny how when a black person says "America has a problem about dealing with race issues" the right takes it as them saying "WHITEY has a problem with race issues".

It's pretty damn funny.

Is it they think blacks always accuse whites?

Is it they think only real Americans are white?

It's pretty funny and scary at them same time.
 
2009-02-18 05:22:41 PM
good, we need a lulzy topic back in the news cycle, this economy stuff for the past 3 months has been incredibly boring.
 
2009-02-18 05:25:17 PM
Corvus: the right takes it as them saying "WHITEY has a problem with race issues".

The who? Who said that?

No one said that but you. Methinks you are projecting a little bit.
 
2009-02-18 05:25:58 PM
I am butthurt by the frequency of the word "butthurt" in these threads. I suggest the following alternatives:

anally disturbed

sphincterized

colonoscopissedoff

jammed full of lightbulbs
 
2009-02-18 05:25:58 PM
gustakooka: It's a little late...I already slit my wrists out of shame.

Why? One of the interesting things about the Harvard Implicit Association test is that black people taking it associate negatives with black people, and positives with white people. Black people, according to that test, are 'racist' against black people.

So even if my farked-up numbers had been true, the study doesn't say anything about white people, it says it about employers.
 
2009-02-18 05:27:06 PM
Let's see......maybe he should start by explaining why 99% of the blacks voted for the black guy......

What an asshat
 
2009-02-18 05:27:13 PM
bhcompy: Cowards because everyone is afraid of being sued and/or labeled as a racist by locals and the media.

Not to mention having the Rev. Al Sharpton or Rev. Jackson parked outside of your front door with the satellite truck running.
 
2009-02-18 05:28:09 PM
NYZooMan: Well, there's hating the race and then there's hating the culture.

"I don't hate black people for being black, per se. I hate them for being different from me, and not having the good sense to become more similar."

Something like that?
 
2009-02-18 05:28:13 PM
cchris_39: Let's see......maybe he should start by explaining why 99% of the blacks voted for the black guy......

What an asshat


uh, i think he referred to all Americans not just whitey.
 
2009-02-18 05:28:37 PM
It also means we have to be able to accept criticism where that is justified

ahuh. Good luck with that.
 
2009-02-18 05:29:14 PM
gustakooka: Corvus: the right takes it as them saying "WHITEY has a problem with race issues".

The who? Who said that?

No one said that but you. Methinks you are projecting a little bit.


So I feel that blacks are accusing white people?

Really?

What color am I?

Hey idiot read this thread and you will see many comments of people referring to black people calling out white people on racism. Which is not what Holden is doing here.

so pathetic.
 
2009-02-18 05:30:51 PM
gustakooka: Corvus: the right takes it as them saying "WHITEY has a problem with race issues".

The who? Who said that?

No one said that but you. Methinks you are projecting a little bit.


Opppss Here is an example:



cchris_39: Let's see......maybe he should start by explaining why 99% of the blacks voted for the black guy......

What an asshat
 
2009-02-18 05:31:28 PM
NYZooMan: Well, there's hating the race and then there's hating the culture.

Theres a lot of truth to this. Most of the time discrimination that people perceive as racial is in fact against cultures associated with races.

I commonly hear people refer to "ghetto people" when talking about welfare queens, hip hop gangsters, and bums. You could take it as a euphemism for blacks, but it really isn't. You would never hear someone refer to Colin Powell or Obama as ghetto, yet with Cynthia McKinney it comes out naturally.

And there is nothing wrong with having a problem with a culture. If we find fault with a culture (which is really just a shared outlook), then we've lost the ability to judge anyone's opinions.
 
2009-02-18 05:32:48 PM
cchurch: And there is nothing wrong with having a problem with a culture. If we find fault with a culture (which is really just a shared outlook), then we've lost the ability to judge anyone's opinions.

Condemning an entire culture is always just stupid. Condemning aspects of a culture is useful behavior, but still needs good presentation.


/Like Peter at the Million Man March, that's how NOT to do it.
 
2009-02-18 05:33:09 PM
Obdicut: gustakooka: It's a little late...I already slit my wrists out of shame.

Why? One of the interesting things about the Harvard Implicit Association test is that black people taking it associate negatives with black people, and positives with white people. Black people, according to that test, are 'racist' against black people.

So even if my farked-up numbers had been true, the study doesn't say anything about white people, it says it about employers.


It was a failed attempt at a joke.

You said the interviewer wasn't taken into account. Why not? It seems that would be an important variable.
 
2009-02-18 05:34:02 PM
cchurch: And there is nothing wrong with having a problem with a culture. If we find fault with a culture (which is really just a shared outlook), then we've lost the ability to judge anyone's opinions.

But it is a problem when you prejudice an entire race based on the culture and for many that is easy to do.
 
2009-02-18 05:35:05 PM
Mr_Fabulous: NYZooMan: Well, there's hating the race and then there's hating the culture.

"I don't hate black people for being black, per se. I hate them for being different from me, and not having the good sense to become more similar."

Something like that?


More like hating people who talk constantly in the movies.
 
Displayed 50 of 306 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report