Lee451: I always get a great laugh out of you Obamanations. If there is a wang in my mouth, at least it would be white, which os more than any of you can say. If it upsets you to hear the truth about what you have elected, then I am personally sorry, for the USA, as it is the rest of us who will be punished by his election.

You praise and worship a "man" with no credentials, no experience and a load of Clinton loyalists on his team, and you think He will actually be in charge?

Again I laugh.

So, per your MyFark profile, you believe that a woman must live outside of the village while menstruating? After all, it's in Leviticus...

Or maybe you're just a bigoted choad who uses religion to justify his own bigotry.

I suppose it's all right as long as the dick in your mouth is white.

I did it! I read them all! Aw, it took forever. You guys got trolled, biiiiig time. Like, three guys came through here and you bit on all of them. Winterwhile, Lee451, even Erebus1954.

Who remembers what we say when we see a troll? We say "Oh, no! pray don't take me. I'm too little, that I am. Wait a bit till the second Billy Goat Gruff comes. He's much bigger." Then you trit-trot-trit-trot on across the bridge.

I came for intelligent, thoughful debate... and I leave disappointed.

Ikimasen: I did it! I read them all! Aw, it took forever. You guys got trolled, biiiiig time. Like, three guys came through here and you bit on all of them. Winterwhile, Lee451, even Erebus1954.

I'd rather be counted as somebody who pounds ignorance back up the ass from which it came, and if it is deliberate, feigned ignorance, more fool the pretender.

Erebus1954: bunner: Erebus1954: Typical liberal response, no respect for minority or alternative opinions, just name calling.

What about the typical mouth breathing, schoolyard bully, neocon response to the smell of their own medicine which is "typical liberal *fill in the blank* ?

I rest my case.

Yeah, and no one remember Watergate, just that Nixon was a foreign policy genius who opened up negotiations with China.

Oh wait. . .

burndtdan: grrr let's try that again

Wow, you think you're so smart with that picture. Your ignorance betrays how little you actually know about the war you hate so much. There are so many things wrong with that picture and the caption you used it with. I know, I know, you're just trying to use it for effect to stir up people's emotions, but surely you could find a more appropriate picture to use with that quote.

First: the ship in that picture is an Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate, or FFG. The frigates all had their missile launchers removed long ago, Link (new window) so they would not have been used to launch missiles into Iraq. Fail.

Second: even if the missile launchers had not been removed from the frigates at the time of Iraqi Freedom, they are not capable of firing Tomahawk missiles. Link (new window) They are only capable of firing anti-air or anti-ship missiles. Fail.

Last: the missile pictured in the photo is an RGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missile.Link (new window) The US Navy did not use anti-ship missiles to attack land based targets in Iraq. That is what we use the Tomahawk missile for. Link (new window) There is even an anti-ship variant of the Tomahawk missile. Again, Fail.

It took me all of about 2 minutes to round up all of this information, surely you could have done the same. I know that I won't ever convince you to see my view point, but I sure won't stand idly by and let you spew your opinions and attempt to back them up with pictures that aren't correct. I mean hell, there is a picture right there on the Wikipedia link of a Tomahawk actually being launched into Iraq during the first Gulf War from USS Missouri BB-63. Though the war and time period would be wrong, at least the missile and target would be right. A cursory GIS for Tomahawk Missile Link (new window) turns up a Ticonderoga class CG launching tomahawk into Iraq as the second search result. So please, next time you want to use pictures to get people riled up, do your research. Doing your research: so easy, a caveman could do it. Seriously. It took me all of two minutes to find this information, and there is tons more out there. Just do it.

/Yes I'm in the navy
//But doing the research is so easy even for those who don't know about ships and missiles off the top of their heads
///Wikipedia is a treasure trove of information, particularly if you just want to get the basic facts straight before you say something
////Or you can continue to be an ignorant arsehole, your choice

*reply to Zefal's FDR picture*



. . . wut?


Maybe you should say "liberals." Though modern definitions of liberal and conservative don't really apply to the 1860's either.

james_bong: burndtdan: grrr let's try that again

Wow, you think you're so smart with that picture. Your ignorance betrays how little you actually know about the war you hate so much. There are so many things wrong with that picture and the caption you used it with. I know, I know, you're just trying to use it for effect to stir up people's emotions, but surely you could find a more appropriate picture to use with that quote.

First: the ship in that picture is an Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate, or FFG. The frigates all had their missile launchers removed long ago, Link (new window) so they would not have been used to launch missiles into Iraq. Fail.

Second: even if the missile launchers had not been removed from the frigates at the time of Iraqi Freedom, they are not capable of firing Tomahawk missiles. Link (new window) They are only capable of firing anti-air or anti-ship missiles. Fail.

Last: the missile pictured in the photo is an RGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship missile.Link (new window) The US Navy did not use anti-ship missiles to attack land based targets in Iraq. That is what we use the Tomahawk missile for. Link (new window) There is even an anti-ship variant of the Tomahawk missile. Again, Fail.

It took me all of about 2 minutes to round up all of this information, surely you could have done the same. I know that I won't ever convince you to see my view point, but I sure won't stand idly by and let you spew your opinions and attempt to back them up with pictures that aren't correct. I mean hell, there is a picture right there on the Wikipedia link of a Tomahawk actually being launched into Iraq during the first Gulf War from USS Missouri BB-63. Though the war and time period would be wrong, at least the missile and target would be right. A cursory GIS for Tomahawk Missile Link (new window) turns up a Ticonderoga class CG launching tomahawk into Iraq as the second search result. So please, next time you want to use pictures to get people riled up, do your research. Doing your research: so easy, a caveman could do it. Seriously. It took me all of two minutes to find this information, and there is tons more out there. Just do it.

/Yes I'm in the navy
//But doing the research is so easy even for those who don't know about ships and missiles off the top of their heads
///Wikipedia is a treasure trove of information, particularly if you just want to get the basic facts straight before you say something
////Or you can continue to be an ignorant arsehole, your choice

Oh man, you sure showed that guy! I liked when you were all "fail." and he's like, or he'd be like, "aw man. What's a frigate?" and then you're like, "Those don't even have missiles on them. Fail." And I was like, "this guy can't just be looking this stuff up, he must be in the Navy or something." AND THEN you're like, "I'm in the Navy, but even if I wasn't, I could look it up, so fail!"

RemyDuron: *reply to Zefal's FDR picture*



. . . wut?


Maybe you should say "liberals." Though modern definitions of liberal and conservative don't really apply to the 1860's either.

Democrats' viewpoint selfserving, deluded belief, not mine.

How about remembering a dimwit , a warmonger, crippler of thousands of American soldiers, and a president with a limited grasp of the English language?
Works for me.

Historian see Nixon as the person who tarnished the US presidency reputation.

Historian will see Bush as the person who tarnished the US reputation with the world.

Bush keep me save for 8 years? 9/11 happened on his watch, not including the FEMA fiasco.

Sigh... Conservative fark voices... look, people supported bush, almost unquestioningly, from 2000 to 2004, including liberals. He EARNED all the hate. Now don't go just giving the hate away to Obama: at least let him earn it in office first. If he doesn't do enough stupid things, then don't give it to him.

/is that so much to ask?

PascalsGhost: Erebus1954: Is Abraham Lincoln primarily remembered for suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus? No? Bush won't be either.

History forgets about the whiners and complainers.

LOL


You're right, my Mom is a stupid whore.

shrug

All the Democrats in Congress support the war and continue to fund it.

All the Democrats in Congress that are bankrolling this war seem to be happy with the way things are going. They've been there every step of the way. Money, surveillance, intelligence, wiretapping, FISA all blessed by the Dems.

Wait, what? Did they tell you something else?

Snark all you farking want but he did liberate millions.

In 20 years, when all the Bush derangment subsides, he will go down as a president who freed millions of people from 2 murderous totalitarian regimes.

Whereas you guys won't be remembered for crap.

Thune: Snark all you farking want but he did liberate millions.

In 20 years, when all the Bush derangment subsides, he will go down as a president who freed millions of people from 2 murderous totalitarian regimes.

Whereas you guys won't be remembered for crap.

What?!! You mean there's no chapter in the history book for whiners, complainers, and second-guessers?

Thune: Snark all you farking want but he did liberate millions.

In 20 years, when all the Bush derangment subsides, he will go down as a president who freed millions of people from 2 murderous totalitarian regimes.

Whereas you guys won't be remembered for crap.

Let's see. We remember: U.S. Confirmed Deaths
Reported Deaths: 4207
Confirmed Deaths: 4206
Pending Confirmation: 1
DoD Confirmation List

(people still remember Reagan for the 241 marines that were killed in Beirut)

People will remember when Bush himself compared Iraq to Vietnam.

People will remember him starting 2 wars, then sitting on his thumbs for 7 years while he sacrifices GOLF!

But I am sure you Republicans will refer to the whole entire War in Iraq as "The Surge™". The facts are straight Bush was told to invade but not occupy Iraq.

Bush fails
World leaders refuse to shake George Bush's hand.
http://www.wimp.com/bushfails/ (pops)

// And his only diehard supporters are parasites, retards, incompetents, and losers.

Thune: Snark all you farking want but he did liberatemurder millions.

In 20 years, when all the Bush derangment subsides, he will go down as a president who freed millions of people from 2 murderous totalitarian regimes.

Whereas you guys won't be remembered for crap.

We are not snarking.

Dems would rather snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than admit they are wrong.

Lemme translate from the neo-con - not to be confused with actual conservatism - partisan hack,

"wah wah wah, my vagina hurts. your precious negro, wah wah wah. stay the course, we're not gonna play along with YOUR president. Wah wah wah. pass the vagasil."

Schoolyard bullies, jerkoffs, armchair warmongers and deluded greedheads who think something useful happened when the economy tanked, Iraq was invaded and the constitution was used for bogroll by the HSA, CIA and FBI.

I'm just gonna scrape you twats off of my screen because, honestly, I'm a little tired of your pissweak attempts to derail the first amount of useful optimism this country has felt in 8 years.

eepapapee: Oh man, you sure showed that guy! I liked when you were all "fail." and he's like, or he'd be like, "aw man. What's a frigate?" and then you're like, "Those don't even have missiles on them. Fail." And I was like, "this guy can't just be looking this stuff up, he must be in the Navy or something." AND THEN you're like, "I'm in the Navy, but even if I wasn't, I could look it up, so fail!"

i love how he wrote all that and all i did was do a GIS

BWAHAHAHAHA
What an ass...
More proof that W really has no clue at all.
Probably has a secret hope of being canonized too.
...wow...

its like i liberated the animals from the zoo and they promptly ate each other and my crew..... gj there

Erebus1954: Dems would rather snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than admit they are wrong.

I know you thought this was a clever little expression, but trust me- you thought wrong.

lol

Thune: In 20 years, when all the Bush derangment subsides, he will go down as a president who freed millions of people from 2 murderous totalitarian regimes.

Tigger: I'd like him to be remembered as a warning to all future presidents that no one is above the law, after he is executed for war crimes.

I second this.

NicoFinn: Tigger: I'd like him to be remembered as a warning to all future presidents that no one is above the law, after he is executed for war crimes.

I second this.

Won't happen, and I blame Gerald Ford for that. If he had let Nixon and his pals go to trial, it would have shown us and the world that NO ONE is about the law, not even the President. But he pardoned him, giving every President after him the pass of precedence. All Presidents pretty much know from this point on that if they overstep their bounds, it is now in the unofficial lexicon of American political culture that the next Prez has an obligation to pardon the bonehead before him, to "help the country move on."

Yeah, it would have been painful to see a President's dirty laundry dragged through the mud on a world stage. In the long term, however, it would have nipped this "executive privilege" thing in the bud and proved that even they were going to be held accountable.

Hey Bush,shiat in one hand and wish for a favorable legacy in the other, then see which you get first.

Shadowknight:
Yeah, it would have been painful to see a President's dirty laundry dragged through the mud on a world stage. In the long term, however, it would have nipped this "executive privilege" thing in the bud and proved that even they were going to be held accountable.

It's tempting, but I think we should let the Clinton perjury dog lie.

Speaking about the WMD's, "The consensus was the same, from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration, It was the same intelligence belief that our allies and friends around the world shared." -Senator Hillary Clinton, April 20, 2004 on Larry King Live

Tech N9ne: Thank you President Bush for keeping us safe for 8 years, lets see how the new prez fairs on that.

Except for that whole 9/11 thing, right?

Erebus1954: Shadowknight:
Yeah, it would have been painful to see a President's dirty laundry dragged through the mud on a world stage. In the long term, however, it would have nipped this "executive privilege" thing in the bud and proved that even they were going to be held accountable.

It's tempting, but I think we should let the Clinton perjury dog lie.

Again, bogus perjury charge does not equal illegal wiretaps, spying, and outright abuses of office and power.

Shadowknight: Erebus1954: Shadowknight:
Yeah, it would have been painful to see a President's dirty laundry dragged through the mud on a world stage. In the long term, however, it would have nipped this "executive privilege" thing in the bud and proved that even they were going to be held accountable.

It's tempting, but I think we should let the Clinton perjury dog lie.

Again, bogus perjury charge does not equal illegal wiretaps, spying, and outright abuses of office and power.

It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is.