The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

OH FOR FARK'S SAKE. What the hell is wrong with this country? OMGZ SHE'S TRYING TO CORRUPT OUR YOOTS!!!111

Americans scream and giggle everytime they see peepee parts

Lionel Mandrake: The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

Sure, I'd want my kid to be taught by this woman with such righteous values. Obviously you don't have kids

*does GIS*

Holy DO NOT WANT Batman.

jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

Sure, I'd want my kid to be taught by this woman with such righteous values. Obviously you don't have kids

And how would the kids know all about her past if dickheads like you didn't bring it up? And the fkn "concerned" media didn't broadcast it? How the hell would they know, and why would they care?

Obviously, you are a judgmental moran.

Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

Sure, I'd want my kid to be taught by this woman with such righteous values. Obviously you don't have kids

And how would the kids know all about her past if dickheads like you didn't bring it up? And the fkn "concerned" media didn't broadcast it? How the hell would they know, and why would they care?

Obviously, you are a judgmental moran.

So what you are saying is that a person's past should have no reflection of their character?

jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

Sure, I'd want my kid to be taught by this woman with such righteous values. Obviously you don't have kids

And how would the kids know all about her past if dickheads like you didn't bring it up? And the fkn "concerned" media didn't broadcast it? How the hell would they know, and why would they care?

Obviously, you are a judgmental moran.

So what you are saying is that a person's past should have no reflection of their character?

Did she do something illegal? Did she do something to harm children? What exactly in her past disqualifies her from being a "cafeteria and playground aide"?

If you have a substantive reason for denying her this job, please state it. It seems that your just sayng "ew..I don't like that...fire her."

Please give me a good reason to not allow her to do this work.

Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

Sure, I'd want my kid to be taught by this woman with such righteous values. Obviously you don't have kids

And how would the kids know all about her past if dickheads like you didn't bring it up? And the fkn "concerned" media didn't broadcast it? How the hell would they know, and why would they care?

Obviously, you are a judgmental moran.

So what you are saying is that a person's past should have no reflection of their character?

Did she do something illegal? Did she do something to harm children? What exactly in her past disqualifies her from being a "cafeteria and playground aide"?

If you have a substantive reason for denying her this job, please state it. It seems that your just sayng "ew..I don't like that...fire her."

Please give me a good reason to not allow her to do this work.

OK. Would you, if you have any one of these, want your wife, daughter, or mother seeing a nymphomaniac (or even former) for a psychologist? I would hope not.

jmonty: OK. Would you, if you have any one of these, want your wife, daughter, or mother seeing a nymphomaniac (or even former) for a psychologist? I would hope not.

That has nothing to do with anything.

I asked a simple question: what is your reason for denying her this job?

I think I answered everything. I would not want my kid brought up with bad morals. And I'm not one to blame the school system on the upbriging of my child. But I will say that I do bring my kid up right, and when I'm working, I want my kid to be tendered to the the best that I can accommodate while I'm not there.

Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: OK. Would you, if you have any one of these, want your wife, daughter, or mother seeing a nymphomaniac (or even former) for a psychologist? I would hope not.

That has nothing to do with anything.

I asked a simple question: what is your reason for denying her this job?

Sorry Lionel, we were on a discussion there and i didn't quote you. no offence

I think I answered everything. I would not want my kid brought up with bad morals. And I'm not one to blame the school system on the upbriging of my child. But I will say that I do bring my kid up right, and when I'm working, I want my kid to be tendered to the the best that I can accommodate while I'm not there.

jmonty: I think I answered everything. I would not want my kid brought up with bad morals. And I'm not one to blame the school system on the upbriging of my child. But I will say that I do bring my kid up right, and when I'm working, I want my kid to be tendered to the the best that I can accommodate while I'm not there.

So you can't answer a simple, direct question?

That's typical of moral crusaders.

This wouldn't be a problem if she acted in horribly violent slasher movies, or movies that portrayed her as a bank robber, crooked executive, etc.

Saw 3 is OK for the snowflakes, but heaven forbid someone give a hummer on-screen

JoJoTheIdiotMonkeyBoy: jmonty: OK. Would you, if you have any one of these, want your wife, daughter, or mother seeing a nymphomaniac (or even former) for a psychologist? I would hope not.

Dude, she was a Porn Star. She wasn't a pedophile, rapist, buggerer, or any of that crap. Her name turned up no shady past, so what's the problem?

Her name turned up no shady past??? Dude, it's legalized prostitution

jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: OK. Would you, if you have any one of these, want your wife, daughter, or mother seeing a nymphomaniac (or even former) for a psychologist? I would hope not.

That has nothing to do with anything.

I asked a simple question: what is your reason for denying her this job?

Sorry Lionel, we were on a discussion there and i didn't quote you. no offence

I think I answered everything. I would not want my kid brought up with bad morals. And I'm not one to blame the school system on the upbriging of my child. But I will say that I do bring my kid up right, and when I'm working, I want my kid to be tendered to the the best that I can accommodate while I'm not there.

I apologize...I answered the earlier post.

I don't get why you think her being a playground and cafeteria aide would would be harmful to your kid. If the media and concerned parents didn't bring it up, your kid would never ever know. If they heard you discussing it, they wouldn't understand.

So far, no one, including you, has given me a good reason why she should be fired. If you can, please do.

jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: The school superintendent says the district is investigating all of it's options to see what sort of recourse it has.

How about letting her do her fkn job, asshole? You ever think of that?

If she does her job well, leave her the fk alone.

Sure, I'd want my kid to be taught by this woman with such righteous values. Obviously you don't have kids

I have a kid. And I don't give a shiat. For one, she's not a teacher. She's a cafeteria/playground aide. For two, if she did try to teach the kids her "righteous values" (or at least the ones she had as a pornstar), she'd be out on her ass faster than you can blink and she knows it. Get off your goddamned high horse.

jmonty: Her name turned up no shady past??? Dude, it's legalized prostitution

and yet nothing turned up in a background check, according to TFA. She must be such a horrible person.

Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: I think I answered everything. I would not want my kid brought up with bad morals. And I'm not one to blame the school system on the upbriging of my child. But I will say that I do bring my kid up right, and when I'm working, I want my kid to be tendered to the the best that I can accommodate while I'm not there.

So you can't answer a simple, direct question?

That's typical of moral crusaders.

I answered a simple and direct question. To you, Adolf Hitler would have been a fun person to invite over at parties!

jmonty: Lionel Mandrake: jmonty: I think I answered everything. I would not want my kid brought up with bad morals. And I'm not one to blame the school system on the upbriging of my child. But I will say that I do bring my kid up right, and when I'm working, I want my kid to be tendered to the the best that I can accommodate while I'm not there.

So you can't answer a simple, direct question?

That's typical of moral crusaders.

I answered a simple and direct question. To you, Adolf Hitler would have been a fun person to invite over at parties!

Oh yeah, because pornstars are big proponents of genocide and warfare! You only look like a bigger ass with each post you make.

jmonty: To you, Adolf Hitler would have been a fun person to invite over at parties!

22 posts to Godwin. And just like most others, this one is completely irrelevant and a silly method of avoidance.

From Wikipedia (new window)
Under her real name Louisa C. Tuck, she said that she hasn't worked in adult entertainment for five years and should be able to continue her job. "If this is about morality, our president-elect has admitted to doing crack, and he's our president. Does that make him a bad person?"

jmonty: I answered a simple and direct question. To you, Adolf Hitler would have been a fun person to invite over at parties!

What? Seriously, WHAT?

I suspect your kids have more immediate problems than a cafeteria/playground aide...

sarcastrophe: jmonty: Adolf Hitler

Porn star.... hitler.... porn star... hitler...

*confused*

I think the point is, if Hitler had become a porn star, he wouldn't have committed genocide. All the man needed after his art school rejection was a good hummer. But, would anyone give it to him?

Nooooo...

So he said, "Fark it, I'm gonna kill everyone in the world until I get a good hummer."

/I wonder if Eva gave him a hummer before they ended up in their ditch covered in petrol on fire. ;)
//did I miss a point in this thread?

jmonty: So what you are saying is that a person's past should have no reflection of their character?

Are you saying we should only judge people by their pasts and not by their current behavior?

If so, then I hope you have lived a flawless life, because otherwise, there might be something you have done in your past that would merit one of us calling Child Services and having your child taken away.

Good thing the world doesn't work that way, eh?

mamoru: /I wonder if Eva gave him a hummer before they ended up in their ditch covered in petrol on fire. ;)

and it was their honeymoon too.

Oh Adolf, how shall we spend our honeymoon.
In a ditch, covered in petrol, on fire.

mamoru: jmonty: So what you are saying is that a person's past should have no reflection of their character?

Are you saying we should only judge people by their pasts and not by their current behavior?

If so, then I hope you have lived a flawless life, because otherwise, there might be something you have done in your past that would merit one of us calling Child Services and having your child taken away.

Good thing the world doesn't work that way, eh?

Everybody's done wrong in there life. But usually, when one's done wrong, they make sure that never happens again. Not that this is always the case, but in most cases I'd like to think most people do not make the same mistake twice. Especially when there are kids involved.

I STILL can't eat at Arby's because of the Fark references to roast beef.

Blegh!

You guys suck.

lionfish: Oh wait. Mary Magdalin was a whore.

No, she was absolutely NOT.

jmonty: Everybody's done wrong in there life. But usually, when one's done wrong, they make sure that never happens again. Not that this is always the case, but in most cases I'd like to think most people do not make the same mistake twice. Especially when there are kids involved.

You haven't yet established what it was she did that was wrong. She had a job in a profession you find distasteful, yet it is legal. A profession she has apparently chosen to leave behind.

Perhaps she feels like she should be doing something better, doing her part to help the next generation. Now, she knows she's not going to be a teacher, so she works behind the scenes, making sure they eat right and don't get hurt while playing.

And then you condemn her for her past. Can't she be allowed to leave it behind? She never hurt anyone. Do you think perhaps she will be holding "real" sex ed classes behind the gym?

The worst part of it all is that you not only don't address the question at hand, What did she do that was wrong, you haven't shown how what she has done in the past has any bearing on what she is doing now. And then, in an act of sheer desperation, you vomit "But won't someone think of the children" on the end, as if that justifies the random trail of half-moldy thoughts and outright disingenuous you call an argument.

jmonty: in most cases I'd like to think most people do not make the same mistake twice. Especially when there are kids involved.

And, now that kids are involved, has she been making the same "mistake" (as you put it)? Has she been shagging the kids? Has she been filming porn scenes on school grounds? Pole dances on the swingsets? Has she even brought up her previous life as an adult film star at all?

Or has she just been doing her job as it should be done?

lionfish: Im sure that's what Jesus would want. He wouldnt pal around with whores. Oh wait. Mary Magdalin was a whore. And jesus accepted her. Perhaps you can learn from someone like him. I think his friends wrote a book or something.

Mary Magdalene is nowhere in the Bible identified as a prostitute. Sorry.

That said, I've no problem with this woman working. She can clearly do her job, or they'd have fired her for that.