Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   Eighth grader texts nude picture of herself to 13-year-old boy. Boy arrested on charges of being a filthy, filthy boy who received child pornography from the helpless victim   (wfaa.com) divider line 245
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

25683 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Oct 2008 at 1:31 AM (6 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



245 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2008-10-09 03:24:16 AM  
Pffft....

I remember our principal/sixth-grade math teacher chuckling when we had our calculators out doing the upside-down tricks.

66045508
7734
and the one where he was laughing at, the classic:
5318008
 
2008-10-09 03:24:34 AM  
elix: He could've just deleted it to avoid getting caught.

But if he'd deleted it and the girl who sent it ratted him out, it'd have been tampering with evidence, now wunnit?

Poor kid. Wonder if he's gay.



Not gay, just stupid.

As a parent of teenage girls, believe me when I say they're just as impulsive and irrational as their adult counterparts.

IMHO, here's what most likely happend.

1.Girl sends naked pics to boys she "likes"
2.Boy shows pics to all his buddies (boys she doesn't "like")
3.Girl finds out and tells mommy and daddy.
4.Mommy and daddy call police to protect their snowflake.

If the dumbass would have just deleted it, there wouldn't have been any proof. But the cops probably would've pressured him into
admitting receiving it, then charged him with something like
'conspiracy to receive child pornography' .
 
2008-10-09 03:30:18 AM  
Dread Pirate Slasher: She texted it? What was it, ASCII?

Thank you...came in to say exactly that.
 
2008-10-09 03:31:17 AM  
oh i'm sure he doesnt know what pornography means, just keep telling yourself that while he eats up all your bandwidth downloading porn
 
2008-10-09 03:32:12 AM  
what are 13 year olds doing with cell phones?
 
2008-10-09 03:32:52 AM  
i102.photobucket.com
this is not enough pedophiles.
 
2008-10-09 03:35:44 AM  
bhcompy: acchief:

When I was in school, 8th grade was Jr. High and there was no middle school. This boy is in middle school (5-7th grades I think), and she's in Jr. High. But I could be wrong.

well, most places either have "Middle School" or "Jr High". I've never seen anywhere with "both". Just a different name for the same thing. And most are somewhere in the 5-9 range. I've seen highschools go 10-12 and elementaries up through 5 and 6.


San Diego City Schools: Point Loma
Silver Gate (K-4)
Dana (5-6)
Correia (7-8)
Point Loma (9-12)

One example.
 
2008-10-09 03:36:40 AM  
zz9: acchief: Okay, for the benefit of someone from the UK, how old is an eighth grader?

13.

Thanks.
Why didn't they say "Eighth grader sends pic to another eighth grader" or "13 y/o sends pic to 13 y/o"?


This
 
2008-10-09 03:38:53 AM  
There is an old joke: If a man happens to be seen nude through his bedroom window by a woman, he's guilty of indecent exposure. If a man happens to see a woman nude in her bedroom window, he's a peeping tom.
 
2008-10-09 03:40:22 AM  
Exactly how the hell did he have any control over what was texted to him?
 
2008-10-09 03:43:23 AM  
Z1P2: Exactly how the hell did he have any control over what was texted to him?

When I was a kid, "text" was only a noun.
 
2008-10-09 03:51:51 AM  
tonesskin: Are you that retarded? Nudity does not equal child porn per the law. So it is hard to say what she was doing here to constitute child porn.I hope the ACLU gets involved as well. The benefit of donation-funded legal service is that it is pretty easy to make a public entity miserable. Tax payers don't like long legal fights. Our office does pro bono work with legal service companies at times; we love it because it is hilarious when a DA or a city attorney (in a civil case) suddenly sees the "feeble" opponent walk in with multiple attorneys and professional consultants. Especially since consultants typically aren't hired by the government except in high profile cases. farking idiots suffer every time.

Was she creating art, or trying to arouse him and appeal to his prurient interests? Considering its from a "school yard game" and the fact that Ferber lets states be much stricter with potential child porn, its going to be hard to classify this as any type of protected speech regardless of how many omfgconsultants come in.
 
2008-10-09 03:54:41 AM  
SobrietyFighter: what are 13 year olds doing with cell phones?

Obviously taking nude pics of themselves.

Why do you ask?
 
2008-10-09 03:58:03 AM  
My approach to problems like this will be easy in the future.

"You see hun, Daddy has set himself up an admin account on your computer, and might or might not have installed a keylogger too.

So Daddy might or might not be aware of anything going on on this computer, including sent and received files, chat logs and everything.

So let's just agree that the computer is perhaps best used for schoolwork and chatting with your friends, and with "friends" I do not mean someone pretending to be 15 years old on the internet.

Mmmkay?

No, you cannot have a webcam, not yours!"
 
2008-10-09 04:02:06 AM  
Bakudai: bhcompy: acchief:

When I was in school, 8th grade was Jr. High and there was no middle school. This boy is in middle school (5-7th grades I think), and she's in Jr. High. But I could be wrong.

well, most places either have "Middle School" or "Jr High". I've never seen anywhere with "both". Just a different name for the same thing. And most are somewhere in the 5-9 range. I've seen highschools go 10-12 and elementaries up through 5 and 6.

San Diego City Schools: Point Loma
Silver Gate (K-4)
Dana (5-6)
Correia (7-8)
Point Loma (9-12)

One example.


Back in the day here it was 1-7 elementary, 8-9 jr.high, and 10-12 high school. K was on its own, and we didn't have "pre-school" either.
 
2008-10-09 04:07:11 AM  
Durendal: If they're going to charge him, they need to charge the girl for creating child porn. Otherwise they set a precedent and girls can get any guy busted if they feel like it.

Seriously THIS

Last time I checked they have to prove intent

Did he store it ? did he save it to some other folder and keep it ?

Did he send it to someone else ?

Otherwise this case is simple...
the sender is guilty of production of child pornography, along with distribution.
You cant charge a recipient of child porn unless you can prove they INTENDED to do so.

Otherwise this is fairly serious breach of the intent of the law.
 
2008-10-09 04:16:14 AM  
Cornwell: "You see hun, Daddy has set himself up an admin account on your computer, and might or might not have installed a keylogger too

I tell my son....

Daddy is typing in the 3 key letters right now... S.S.H.

Daddy is entering sudo now

Daddy ... is.... WAAAH.. ok Daddy is done now

sudo shutdown -h +0

what.. your kids have winblows computers ? I thought you cared ?!?
 
2008-10-09 04:17:11 AM  
I came here for pics... disappointed.
 
2008-10-09 04:21:50 AM  
Wait... did any of you listen to the video report? Did the reporter just say "it sure is stirring up more than emotions in this small town"? Really????
 
2008-10-09 04:26:41 AM  
Durendal: If they're going to charge him, they need to charge the girl for creating child porn. Otherwise they set a precedent and girls can get any guy busted if they feel like it.

Hell, they already can. She instigates sex, gets it, the guy doesn't call, she claims rape, he goes to prison.
 
2008-10-09 04:26:47 AM  
When I was 15, my girlfriend was 1 year older. So does this mean I can have her arrested for everything that we...I mean everything she did to me?
 
2008-10-09 04:37:37 AM  
LincolnLogolas: However, I demand pics. Boot20, TITS or GTFO

www1.istockphoto.com

no need to thank me man
 
2008-10-09 04:47:14 AM  
Hand Banana: What this article doesn't say is that the girl is also facing felony charges: Link

/which is still asinine...


FTFA: Newark Licking Valley. Licking County.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!
 
2008-10-09 04:50:05 AM  
Slartibartfaster: Cornwell: "You see hun, Daddy has set himself up an admin account on your computer, and might or might not have installed a keylogger too

I tell my son....

Daddy is typing in the 3 key letters right now... S.S.H.

Daddy is entering sudo now

Daddy ... is.... WAAAH.. ok Daddy is done now

sudo shutdown -h +0

what.. your kids have winblows computers ? I thought you cared ?!?


My kids will have a computer that allows me to maybe or maybe not monitor their online activities.

The threat of Daddy maybe knowing should be more than enough.
 
2008-10-09 04:51:45 AM  
Sluteen: Hmm I feel like making the guys horny today.
(Takes naked pics of herself and sends to every boy in class.)

(A few minutes later...)
Parent: Hmm what's this in the phone of Timmy...OMG! A delicious looking nubile teenage body! Let me jack off first before I call the cops!

(After a few days...)
School Official: There are naked pictures being sent out by a slutty teenage girl. If your child has received the naked pictures, then he has to be detained!

Parents: Why?!

School Official: Because they have the naked pictures of the slutty teenage girl!
(Celphone starts to make a sound. School Official checks and finds the picture of the sexy body of Sluteen.)

Parents: Heyyyy why are you suddenly jacking off?!

School Official: I am now a sex offender, might as well go out with a big bang!

Girls: Hmmm now we have a way to blackmail boys! Do what we want or we send you naked pictures of ourselves! Female power!!!

Boys: Oh shiat, it's like our dreams and nightmares combined!
 
2008-10-09 04:53:31 AM  
Slartibartfaster: Cornwell: "You see hun, Daddy has set himself up an admin account on your computer, and might or might not have installed a keylogger too

I tell my son....

Daddy is typing in the 3 key letters right now... S.S.H.

Daddy is entering sudo now

Daddy ... is.... WAAAH.. ok Daddy is done now

sudo shutdown -h +0

what.. your kids have winblows computers ? I thought you cared ?!?


Windows daddy: Presses power button. Much faster.
 
2008-10-09 05:13:14 AM  
The crazy thing is, it isn't his phone, it's his mom and pops. So technically 'they' own child porn...

/i've got my popcorn ready
//this could get interesting

www.werd.com
 
2008-10-09 05:57:48 AM  
larrycot: This happened at my school last year. One of my home room students sent topless pictures of herself to several boys. She was suspended, the boys were told to delete the images.

Seemed like a reasonable solution. She instigated the illegal activity, not them.


How is this possible ACTUAL brains being used at a school??
I hope the principal was fired and a fundamentalist outrage took place and those boys are now being charged with distributing C/P, and even attempted Rape since that is what was going to happen next
 
2008-10-09 06:10:55 AM  
So is this like one of those annoying Jamster commercials but you can pay to get naked 13 year old girls pics? I blame that stupid frog.
 
2008-10-09 06:19:11 AM  
This thread's useless without pics.

/i'm 16, so it's alright ...right?
 
2008-10-09 06:19:14 AM  
This is news? This is getting police attention?

i4.photobucket.com
 
2008-10-09 06:33:22 AM  
Redscum: This thread's useless without pics.

/i'm 16, so it's alright ...right?


Really getting a kick out of these replies...
 
2008-10-09 06:54:04 AM  
Coke_Can: Don't you love how they call her an 8th grader and he's a 13 year old boy to make it look like there was a big age difference?

Sorry, dumb question but I don't live in America: how old is an 8th grader usually?
 
2008-10-09 06:54:44 AM  
OMG! Porn! Somebody help me from these sinful art pieces!.


Right right right. Cause this girl just wanted to be the next Praxilites or Michaelangelo, and not just a teen age slut....
 
2008-10-09 06:54:49 AM  
"He doesn't understand what pornography means," said one parent.

Is our children learning?
 
2008-10-09 07:07:28 AM  
bobadooey: american bullshiat at its finest
13 year olds can be pedofiles???


Right. And if the girl is in 8th grade, that makes her, uh, 13.

I don't understand how this constitutes illegal activity anyway.
They are both minors. And SHE initiated the contact.

I remember before I was 18, there was always that great "statutory rape" thing. But that wasn't an issue as long as both people were still minors. Where it became an issue was when one person in the relationship turned 18, and the other was still 17 or younger.
Suddenly the "adult" can be arrested for statutory rape!

I always thought that was among the most ridiculous laws that ever came to be!

And nowadays, it's completely out of control. Now you are a "SEX OFFENDER" if a girl sends you a picture?!?

Somehow, someway, they have GOT to get a handle on what defines a sex offender, and stop simply throwing the book at everyone with a libido.
 
2008-10-09 07:09:52 AM  
jimpoz: ragekage: am I gonna get sent to PMITA prison for having a picture of my daughter at six months old splashing around in the sink on my computer next?



/pbfcomics.com is down, wayback machine is hella slow; spent way too much time grabbing this image


I thought I was going to be arrested at WalMart trying to get pics processed of my then 2 yo nephew splashing around in my huge, claw foot bath tub. You would not believe how this WalMart employee carried on about that picture. Have not stepped in a WalMart since. Wish I had that picture, it was really cute, but the Wally World employee destroyed the negative, not the whole roll, just that one. I still see red whenever I think about that day.
 
2008-10-09 07:19:35 AM  
ragekage [TotalFark] Quote 2008-10-09 12:06:29 AM
Durendal: If they're going to charge him, they need to charge the girl for creating child porn. Otherwise they set a precedent and girls can get any guy busted if they feel like it.

That would imply some sort of common sense was at work here. Obviously, that's not the case. Jesus Christ, I mean, people with child pornography need to be strung up, IMHO, but am I gonna get sent to PMITA prison for having a picture of my daughter at six months old splashing around in the sink on my computer next?


Get real. She's the victim. We have to maintain that whole double-standard thing.

Seriously, I agree. Why isn't the girl in trouble? My guess she is the daughter of either a) faculty, b) administration or c) local politician\government administrator.
 
2008-10-09 07:20:51 AM  
I'm not sure which part of this is the dumbest, a 13 year old in trouble for child porn or his parents thinking he doesn't know porn is.
 
2008-10-09 07:40:09 AM  
This is not hyperbole but if we don't start a "civil rights movement" to protect the rights of men from B.S. treatment in cases like this and elsewhere in the legal system it's just going to get worse.

Grade F trolling... and far too late, anyway. Good night.
 
2008-10-09 07:40:12 AM  
"He doesn't understand what pornography means," said one parent.


sure, I find that hard to believe, even Amish kids know what porn is before that age
 
2008-10-09 07:40:14 AM  
adambuck: I find it unbelievable that a 13 year old doesn't know what porn is, as the mother tried to say.

They are probably not Democrats.
 
2008-10-09 07:40:48 AM  
durbnpoisn: I remember before I was 18, there was always that great "statutory rape" thing. But that wasn't an issue as long as both people were still minors. Where it became an issue was when one person in the relationship turned 18, and the other was still 17 or younger.
Suddenly the "adult" can be arrested for statutory rape!


Living across the Atlantic, I'm fortunately blessed with somewhat sane legislation. Amongst other things, the laws covering age of consent actually has an exception for "relationships where both parties are within reasonable age of one another", which I guess every member of a jury would see as "(Your age / 2) + 7" because this formula has for some reason become the benchmark for "reasonable".

Then again, there are cases where guys have gone to trial for having had a sexual affair with a minor (under 16 here) while they were aged 20+, but having had prison sentences suspended due to the fact that they are currently engaged to the girl three or four years later, and they have a kid together, and rather been ordered to pay a fine to the "insulted party" of quite a decent sum.
 
2008-10-09 07:42:25 AM  
Oh_Enough_Already: Wow, just wow.

Look: unfair laws are just that, unfair. There will be laws that are unfair and, until challenged they will stay on the books. I can live with that.

Unfair application of existing laws however is fundamentally unconstitutional and this is yet another in the myriad of cases where (particularly with sex-based offenses) ONLY MEN are charged and/or ONLY MEN can be perpetrators and women can ONLY BE VICTIMS.

This extends from cases like this to cases where adult women who have sex with under-aged teens get slap on the wrist sentences and are charged with lesser offenses than males who do the same thing are.

How is this sort of radical disparity not a national story at this point?

Women scream for "equality" but then ask for kid-glove treatment when they fark up because they're women.

Laws are supposed to be equally applied and yet woman are almost NEVER held accountable and men are always seen as the "perps" women only as "victims" and ALWAYS given the benefit of the doubt.

We're supposed to have the best legal system in the world here and yet shiat like this happens over and over and over again.

Can you imagine the outcry if it was blacks or gays or Jews or some other genuine minority group that was consistently railroaded in the courts like this?

And yet men "as a "group" receive no attention when they're persecuted/prosecuted over and over and over again.

At least in other countries they have the balls to flat out say that the sexes are treated differently when found to have committed the same act.

To wit: this thread where the story was about how both boys and girls may be charged with "illegal" sex when they fark one another whereas presently only the males have been getting charged.

There, parents and women's rights groups are aghast that underaged girls will be treated equally as underaged boys when said "illegal" sex occurs.

What kind of cognitive disconnect must people have to complain about laws like this?

"Men and women are exactly the same and must be treated equally unless they both do something bad together and then it will only be the man's fault."

Seriously, either codify it it into law that men will only be viewed as "offenders" and women can only be "victims" or start applying the laws equally.

This is not hyperbole but if we don't start a "civil rights movement" to protect the rights of men from B.S. treatment in cases like this and elsewhere in the legal system it's just going to get worse.

And it's legislated that women are - no matter what- delicate snowflakes who can only ever be victims and cannot or must not be held accountable for their actions why the fark are they allowed to vote, go to school, etc.

Look ladies, pick a position: either you're equals and you must fight for that equality -including the "right" to be held equally as accountable for sex crimes as the men who commit them would be - or your a lesser species who gets molly coddled at every turn and - commensurately must be willing to accept a lesser position in society as a result of your "protected" status.

This have your cake and eat it too shiat has gone on long enough.



I blame Walt Disney. Seriously.

/they're not all princesses dammit
 
2008-10-09 07:45:01 AM  
adeist69: Oh_Enough_Already: Wow, just wow.

Look: unfair laws are just that, unfair. There will be laws that are unfair and, until challenged they will stay on the books. I can live with that.

Unfair application of existing laws however is fundamentally unconstitutional and this is yet another in the myriad of cases where (particularly with sex-based offenses) ONLY MEN are charged and/or ONLY MEN can be perpetrators and women can ONLY BE VICTIMS.

This extends from cases like this to cases where adult women who have sex with under-aged teens get slap on the wrist sentences and are charged with lesser offenses than males who do the same thing are.

How is this sort of radical disparity not a national story at this point?

Women scream for "equality" but then ask for kid-glove treatment when they fark up because they're women.

Laws are supposed to be equally applied and yet woman are almost NEVER held accountable and men are always seen as the "perps" women only as "victims" and ALWAYS given the benefit of the doubt.

We're supposed to have the best legal system in the world here and yet shiat like this happens over and over and over again.

Can you imagine the outcry if it was blacks or gays or Jews or some other genuine minority group that was consistently railroaded in the courts like this?

And yet men "as a "group" receive no attention when they're persecuted/prosecuted over and over and over again.

At least in other countries they have the balls to flat out say that the sexes are treated differently when found to have committed the same act.

To wit: this thread where the story was about how both boys and girls may be charged with "illegal" sex when they fark one another whereas presently only the males have been getting charged.

There, parents and women's rights groups are aghast that underaged girls will be treated equally as underaged boys when said "illegal" sex occurs.

What kind of cognitive disconnect must people have to complain about laws like this?

"Men and women are exactly the same and must be treated equally unless they both do something bad together and then it will only be the man's fault."

Seriously, either codify it it into law that men will only be viewed as "offenders" and women can only be "victims" or start applying the laws equally.

This is not hyperbole but if we don't start a "civil rights movement" to protect the rights of men from B.S. treatment in cases like this and elsewhere in the legal system it's just going to get worse.

And it's legislated that women are - no matter what- delicate snowflakes who can only ever be victims and cannot or must not be held accountable for their actions why the fark are they allowed to vote, go to school, etc.

Look ladies, pick a position: either you're equals and you must fight for that equality -including the "right" to be held equally as accountable for sex crimes as the men who commit them would be - or your a lesser species who gets molly coddled at every turn and - commensurately must be willing to accept a lesser position in society as a result of your "protected" status.

This have your cake and eat it too shiat has gone on long enough.


I blame Walt Disney. Seriously.

/they're not all princesses dammit


I blame NOW and the typical liberal mindset of our country.
 
2008-10-09 07:54:54 AM  
i102.photobucket.com

Dude, lay off the juice. It shrinks your junk and gives you acne.
 
2008-10-09 08:05:29 AM  
durbnpoisn: I remember before I was 18, there was always that great "statutory rape" thing. But that wasn't an issue as long as both people were still minors. Where it became an issue was when one person in the relationship turned 18, and the other was still 17 or younger.
Suddenly the "adult" can be arrested for statutory rape!


This is because people younger than 18 are all clean, precious innocent flowers, immature and incapable of understanding sex or the consequences of it and certainly not able to responsibly have it, until the minute they turn 18, at which point they are instantly physically and emotionally mature enough to take part in and understand the consequences of all kinds of raunchy sex, pregnancy, STDs, orgies, etc.
 
2008-10-09 08:07:11 AM  
i102.photobucket.com
THIS IS NOT ENOUGH BROCCOLIS
 
2008-10-09 08:08:42 AM  
GreenSun 2008-10-09 04:51:45 AM

Please do everyone a favor and never become a writer.

Seriously, I feel disgusted now. Not by the content of what you wrote, but by the fact you actually wrote it.
 
2008-10-09 08:13:32 AM  
stiletto_the_wise: durbnpoisn: I remember before I was 18, there was always that great "statutory rape" thing. But that wasn't an issue as long as both people were still minors. Where it became an issue was when one person in the relationship turned 18, and the other was still 17 or younger.
Suddenly the "adult" can be arrested for statutory rape!

This is because people younger than 18 are all clean, precious innocent flowers, immature and incapable of understanding sex or the consequences of it and certainly not able to responsibly have it, until the minute they turn 18, at which point they are instantly physically and emotionally mature enough to take part in and understand the consequences of all kinds of raunchy sex, pregnancy, STDs, orgies, etc.


By then, kids in some states have been driving for two years, but are still two years away from legally buying alcohol.

"Yes, we believe you are competent enough to control a three ton vehicle, but not a sixpack. And you are nowhere near mature enough to participate in elections. See ya!"
 
Displayed 50 of 245 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report