If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   Obama lays out clear plan for Iraq withdrawal in NY Times op-ed   (nytimes.com) divider line 148
    More: Cool  
•       •       •

2330 clicks; posted to Politics » on 14 Jul 2008 at 8:56 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



148 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2008-07-14 04:57:09 PM
No way this gets green lit. Excellent article though.
 
2008-07-14 05:06:20 PM
ok, but does he have a plan for what to do about withdrawal from Iraq ? I didn't think so.

Vote Republican in 2008 and support a plan.
 
2008-07-14 05:26:33 PM
Curious about this:

Unlike Senator McCain, I would make it absolutely clear that we seek no presence in Iraq similar to our permanent bases in South Korea


Why not?
 
2008-07-14 05:30:45 PM
Hobodeluxe [TotalFark] Quote 2008-07-14 04:57:09 PM
No way this gets green lit. Excellent article though.


Denied! (luckily for us)
 
2008-07-14 05:36:11 PM
This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.
 
2008-07-14 05:37:38 PM
Stoj: Why not?

Because there would never be a stop in violence against our troops. Muslims, as I understand it, don't like westerners. Therefore there'd be problems on a regular basis. It's all or nothing.
 
2008-07-14 05:39:27 PM
Stoj: Why not?

Because Iraqis don't want us there. The South Koreans appreciated our presence to keep the bat-shiat crazy North Koreans on their side of the DMZ.
 
2008-07-14 05:39:35 PM
Summary: Try to mostly withdraw within 16 months with in put from commanders on tactics (but not on the withdrawal strategy).

Might work. Might not. But I don't think there's significant factual support for any of the propositions set forth by the senator as justifications for the strategy. The other unwritten assumption of his plan is that the Iraq occupation has essentially succeeded.
 
2008-07-14 05:40:40 PM
Stoj: Why not?

Do you think Lebanon would be better off if US Marines had stayed? I don't. I think it'd be about the same simmering level of violence and that more US troops would have died while trying to get in the middle of age-old factional fights.

Lebanon in the 80s is a much closer analogy to today's Iraq than 1958 Korea.
 
2008-07-14 05:42:17 PM
My plan:

"Hey, guys? I'm just going down to the coast to pick up something I left on a ship. Be right back, honest."
 
2008-07-14 05:43:06 PM
This is just the sort of defeatism one would expect from a commie Muslim terrorist sympathizer.
 
2008-07-14 05:47:02 PM
Lionel Mandrake: This is just the sort of defeatism one would expect from a commie Muslim terrorist sympathizer.


i heard he was a zionist radical christian!
 
2008-07-14 05:47:52 PM
Uh, I'm pretty sure he is a atheist anarchist socialist guys
 
2008-07-14 05:48:43 PM
Given the choice between another 8 years of Bush-like tactics, or at least 4 of a fundamental change in policy, possibly for the better, I'll take my chances with Obama.

I just hope some a-hole Klansman doesn't try to bump him off.
 
2008-07-14 05:48:48 PM
Stoj: Curious about this:

Unlike Senator McCain, I would make it absolutely clear that we seek no presence in Iraq similar to our permanent bases in South Korea

Why not?


Funny thing, when we keep our troops stationed in the middle east, let's say Saudi Arabia just for shiats and giggles, those silly Arabs kooks like to up and fly jumbo jets into our buildings. Crazy as the thought may be, perhaps forcibly staying in a country we invaded to "liberate" after they ask us to leave might just be looked upon as imperial aggression into their lands.

I probably made that all up though. God knows researching the conflicts in that part of the world was too much work for you to do so why would anyone else want to, am I right?
 
2008-07-14 05:49:17 PM
filth: Summary: Try to mostly withdraw within 16 months with in put from commanders on tactics (but not on the withdrawal strategy).

Might work. Might not. But I don't think there's significant factual support for any of the propositions set forth by the senator as justifications for the strategy. The other unwritten assumption of his plan is that the Iraq occupation has essentially succeeded.


but at least its something, and its something concrete. Reality might force things to change on the ground, but i'd be willing to bet provisions would be put into place for that likelihood.
 
2008-07-14 05:50:16 PM
FlashHarry: Lionel Mandrake: This is just the sort of defeatism one would expect from a commie Muslim terrorist sympathizer.


i heard he was a zionist radical christian jew!


FTFY

i285.photobucket.com
 
2008-07-14 05:50:27 PM
Bill Frist: Uh, I'm pretty sure he is a atheist anarchist socialist guys

Nah... more like an elitist vegitarian trekkie... still a vast improvement.
 
2008-07-14 05:52:01 PM
filth: But I don't think there's significant factual support for any of the propositions set forth by the senator as justifications for the strategy.

I think the fact that the democratically elected leadership of the country wants us to leave is pretty well established... and more than enough reason for us to leave.
 
2008-07-14 05:52:06 PM
Stoj: Why not?

Probably because the Iraqis don't want us there. South Korea in the late 50s and Iraq today are not the same thing. And, they won't be the same thing over the next 10 years, despite what John McCain may believe.
 
2008-07-14 05:52:15 PM
coma: Crazy as the thought may be, perhaps forcibly staying in a country we invaded to "liberate" after they ask us to leave might just be looked upon as imperial aggression into their lands.

THIS!!!!!
 
2008-07-14 05:55:34 PM


Boritom [TotalFark] Quote 2008-07-14 05:50:27 PM
Bill Frist: Uh, I'm pretty sure he is a atheist anarchist socialist guys

Nah... more like an elitist vegitarian trekkie... still a vast improvement.


Or a Scottish Wiccan Somnambulist
 
2008-07-14 05:56:24 PM
Stoj: Curious about this:

Unlike Senator McCain, I would make it absolutely clear that we seek no presence in Iraq similar to our permanent bases in South Korea

Why not?


Good question!

I'm sure it'll work out if we stayed. After all, our bases in Saudi Arabia didn't cause any blowback that I can recall...
 
2008-07-14 05:56:33 PM
filth: The other unwritten assumption of his plan is that the Iraq occupation has essentially succeeded.

Really?

Where is that implied?

You must be fantastic at reading between the lines.
 
2008-07-14 06:02:14 PM
benlonghair: Because there would never be a stop in violence against our troops. Muslims, as I understand it, don't like westerners. Therefore there'd be problems on a regular basis. It's all or nothing.

Code_Archeologist: Because Iraqis don't want us there. The South Koreans appreciated our presence to keep the bat-shiat crazy North Koreans on their side of the DMZ.

Bill_Wick's_Friend: Lebanon in the 80s is a much closer analogy to today's Iraq than 1958 Korea.

coma: God knows researching the conflicts in that part of the world was too much work for you to do so why would anyone else want to, am I right?

bulldg4life: Probably because the Iraqis don't want us there. South Korea in the late 50s and Iraq today are not the same thing. And, they won't be the same thing over the next 10 years, despite what John McCain may believe.

dameron: I'm sure it'll work out if we stayed. After all, our bases in Saudi Arabia didn't cause any blowback that I can recall...

KTHX.
 
2008-07-14 06:03:22 PM
Bill Frist: Or a Scottish Wiccan Somnambulist

Suddenly, I see Sean Connery and Rob Zombie in a remake of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari in my mind's eye...

Gotta stop using them David LynchTM Mind's-Eye drops.
 
2008-07-14 06:17:47 PM
This thread is surprisingly civilized.

I think that Senator Obama's strategy is very good, and I support it. I just wish he hadn't laid it out in the NY Times.
 
2008-07-14 06:19:23 PM
bulldg4life: filth: The other unwritten assumption of his plan is that the Iraq occupation has essentially succeeded.

Really?

Where is that implied?

You must be fantastic at reading between the lines.


"Succeeded" could be subject to debate. Let's say "produced stability." Because otherwise he's calling for chaos. And I very seriously doubt he's doing that. I really don't think he would advocate even a pull-out-and-see-what-happens approach. He strikes me as more responsible than that. I just happen to disagree with his assessment of the current situation.
 
2008-07-14 06:22:43 PM
GAT_00: This thread is surprisingly civilized.

By Fark standards. So far.
 
2008-07-14 06:25:41 PM
Code_Archeologist: filth: But I don't think there's significant factual support for any of the propositions set forth by the senator as justifications for the strategy.

I think the fact that the democratically elected leadership of the country wants us to leave is pretty well established... and more than enough reason for us to leave.


I don't think that's well established at all. Al Maliki wants a timetable, but there's no official Iraqi position on the subject, and several legislators don't want us to go just yet.

The one part of Obama's essay that I really like is his apparent sensitivity to the ability of Iraqis to handle security. If that process accelerates, then we definitely should leave in conjunction with it.
 
2008-07-14 07:09:04 PM
GAT_00: I think that Senator Obama's strategy is very good, and I support it. I just wish he hadn't laid it out in the NY Times.

Transparency is apparently a fundamental strategic tool in Obama's thinking. Instead of trying to surprise the world, the methodology of the feeble-minded drama queens in office now, Obama seems to want people to understand what he's doing.
 
2008-07-14 07:10:51 PM
bulldg4life:
Probably because the Iraqis don't want us there. South Korea in the late 50s and Iraq today are not the same thing. And, they won't be the same thing over the next 10 years.


well put, they do indeed want us the f*ck outta there
 
2008-07-14 07:43:31 PM
TheOther: GAT_00: I think that Senator Obama's strategy is very good, and I support it. I just wish he hadn't laid it out in the NY Times.

Transparency is apparently a fundamental strategic tool in Obama's thinking. Instead of trying to surprise the world, the methodology of the feeble-minded drama queens in office now, Obama seems to want people to understand what he's doing.


Sneaky bastard...what's that all about?
 
2008-07-14 08:12:49 PM
bulldg4life: Stoj: Why not?

Probably because the Iraqis don't want us there. South Korea in the late 50s and Iraq today are not the same thing. And, they won't be the same thing over the next 10 years, despite what John McCain may believe.


The best analogy I heard to McCain's view of our troops in Iraq was from another Farker (who's name I sadly forget) and I will paraphrase:

The problem with McCain's view of the troops in Iraq is the same problem as a mother who says "I have no problem with my kid playing in the middle of an interstate freeway, as long as there are no cars there."
 
2008-07-14 08:48:49 PM
Bill Frist: Hobodeluxe [TotalFark] Quote 2008-07-14 04:57:09 PM
No way this gets green lit. Excellent article though.

Denied! (luckily for us)


reverse psychology :P
 
2008-07-14 09:03:38 PM
benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.


Yeah. I sure do hate that socialized army. And those socialized fire and police services. They would be much better if they were run on a for profit basis.
 
2008-07-14 09:03:45 PM
Lionel Mandrake: TheOther: GAT_00: I think that Senator Obama's strategy is very good, and I support it. I just wish he hadn't laid it out in the NY Times.

Transparency is apparently a fundamental strategic tool in Obama's thinking. Instead of trying to surprise the world, the methodology of the feeble-minded drama queens in office now, Obama seems to want people to understand what he's doing.

Sneaky bastard...what's that all about?


I find myself confused by this statement also. I don't think he shouldn't be saying anything, I just don't like the fact that he felt like the NYT was the best place to lay it out.
 
2008-07-14 09:04:07 PM
benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.


why?

other than a knee-jerk reaction to the word "socialism" what is it about that word that scares you so very much?

(btw we already have "socialized" Armed Forces, Fire and Police protection, roads and infrastructure, and about 50% of all healthcare spending in the country is already socialized.
 
2008-07-14 09:04:29 PM
MPAVictoria: benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.

Yeah. I sure do hate that socialized army. And those socialized fire and police services. They would be much better if they were run on a for profit basis.


And that socialized highway system. I choose not to use it - I hike from Los Angeles to Phoenix, usually.
 
2008-07-14 09:04:49 PM
Mordant: ok, but does he have a plan for what to do about withdrawal from Iraq ? I didn't think so.

Vote Republican in 2008 and support a plan.


The Republicans don't have a plan. They never have. That's why we're still there.
 
2008-07-14 09:07:20 PM
MPAVictoria: benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.

Yeah. I sure do hate that socialized army. And those socialized fire and police services. They would be much better if they were run on a for profit basis.


okay that's spooky. Not quite a simulpost but close damn enough...
 
2008-07-14 09:07:54 PM
benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.


Really? Nothing?

Well, I guess we'll still have Blackwater.
 
2008-07-14 09:08:37 PM
DamnYankees: MPAVictoria: benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.

Yeah. I sure do hate that socialized army. And those socialized fire and police services. They would be much better if they were run on a for profit basis.

And that socialized highway system. I choose not to use it - I hike from Los Angeles to Phoenix, usually.


Sissy. I tunnel underground with a nothing but a rusty spoon to get there. I don't want to accidentally walk through any stinking socialist parks.
 
2008-07-14 09:09:25 PM
Magorn: MPAVictoria: benlonghair: This should be fun. In before 1k+ posts.

I like Obama. I don't like his idea for socialized healthcare. NOTHING should be 'socialized' in this country.

Yeah. I sure do hate that socialized army. And those socialized fire and police services. They would be much better if they were run on a for profit basis.

okay that's spooky. Not quite a simulpost but close damn enough...


Easily close enough... So that brings up the question: Am i spying on you? Or are you spying on me?
 
2008-07-14 09:10:33 PM
MPAVictoria: Sissy. I tunnel underground with a nothing but a rusty spoon to get there. I don't want to accidentally walk through any stinking socialist parks.

Well, my roommate likes to hire a bunch of blind mole rats and they tunnel for him. He likes that immigrant labor.
 
2008-07-14 09:12:19 PM
This thread is surprisingly civilized.

By Fark standards. So far.


DEFEATOCRATS!
 
2008-07-14 09:12:20 PM
DamnYankees: MPAVictoria: Sissy. I tunnel underground with a nothing but a rusty spoon to get there. I don't want to accidentally walk through any stinking socialist parks.

Well, my roommate likes to hire a bunch of blind mole rats and they tunnel for him. He likes that immigrant labor.


Well I hope to good he doesn't pay them minimum wage. That would be unamerican!
 
2008-07-14 09:13:08 PM
FTFA: "In the 18 months since President Bush announced the surge, our troops have performed heroically in bringing down the level of violence. New tactics have protected the Iraqi population, and the Sunni tribes have rejected Al Qaeda - greatly weakening its effectiveness."

That's great Senator considering you said before the surge: "I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse.'"
 
2008-07-14 09:14:51 PM
RevMercutio: The Republicans don't have a plan. They never have. That's why we're still there.

If they put as much effort into developing a plan as they do into figuring out how to blame Democrats for everything, we'd live in a much better world.
 
2008-07-14 09:15:02 PM
In before McCainDemocrat.

/Cool article
 
Displayed 50 of 148 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report