Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Farc leader dead. Fark leader still drinking beer, checking out boobies   (edition.cnn.com) divider line 93
    More: PSA  
•       •       •

9297 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 May 2008 at 11:25 PM (6 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



93 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2008-05-24 11:26:40 PM  
Remember, Drew said no boobies.
 
2008-05-24 11:26:53 PM  
You'll get over it.
 
2008-05-24 11:27:01 PM  
Oh, I get it...They're like...the same but....
 
2008-05-24 11:27:15 PM  
I submitted this with a better headline.
 
2008-05-24 11:27:29 PM  
You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.
 
2008-05-24 11:27:39 PM  
Really? This one?
 
2008-05-24 11:28:28 PM  
I thought Drew hated boobies now....
 
2008-05-24 11:28:35 PM  
Well, sounds normal to me.
 
2008-05-24 11:29:15 PM  
praise the lord
 
2008-05-24 11:29:24 PM  
Several dozen "ZOMG TEH DREW IS DED!!1!" and this is the one that goes green.
 
2008-05-24 11:29:27 PM  
"Farc leader dead. Fark leader still drinking beer, checking threads for boobies"

/FIFY
 
2008-05-24 11:29:32 PM  
Goldeneye007: You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

So people can view this site at work and not get insta-fired.
 
2008-05-24 11:30:06 PM  
So which 'leader' is it this time, or doesnt Columbia recycle its leaders like Al Qaeda?
 
2008-05-24 11:30:23 PM  
When did Drew tear up his Manhood Card? Is he still trying to sell out to Microsoft/Google/MySpace/Anyone with a couple of extra bucks?
 
2008-05-24 11:31:11 PM  
Ahhh, no pictures of boobies. That makes (more) sense.
 
2008-05-24 11:31:40 PM  
Suck it Farc, suck it long and hard. Oh, and you can suck it too Hugo Chavez, your time will come.
 
2008-05-24 11:32:56 PM  
I submitted this with a less funny headline.
 
2008-05-24 11:33:23 PM  
sunami: Goldeneye007: You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

So people can view this site at work and not get insta-fired.


Solution: stop Farking at work.

/banging the secretary while xeroxing her breasts is, however, still okay
 
2008-05-24 11:33:47 PM  
I didn't bother to submit this with a better headline.
 
2008-05-24 11:34:20 PM  
Plan Colombia
Noam Chomsky
Excerpted from Rogue States, 2000

In 1999, Colombia became the leading recipient of US military and police assistance, replacing Turkey (Israel and Egypt are in a separate category). Colombia receives more US military aid than the rest of Latin America and the Caribbean combined. The total for 1999 reached about $300 million, along with $60 million in arms sales, approximately a threefold increase from 1998. The figure is scheduled to increase still more sharply with the anticipated passage of some version of Clinton's Colombia Plan, submitted to Congress in April 2000, which called for a $1.6 billion "emergency aid" package for two years. Through the 1990s, Colombia has been by far the leading recipient of US military aid in Latin America, and has also compiled by far the worst human rights record, in conformity with a well-established and long-standing correlation.

In theory, "Plan Colombia" is a two-year Colombian government program of $7.5 billion, with the US providing the military muscle and token funds for other purposes, and some $6 billion from the Colombian government, Europe, the IMF, and the World Bank for social and economic programs that Colombia is to prepare. According to non-US diplomats, the draft of "Plan Colombia" was written in English, not Spanish. The military program (arms, training, intelligence infrastructure) was in place in late 1999, but "the Colombian govern-ment has yet to present a coherent social investment program" as of mid-2000, and few governments are "willing to climb aboard what is widely perceived as an American project to clean up its backyard," by means that are familiar to those who do not choose what has been called "intentional ignorance."

We can often learn from systematic patterns, so let us tarry for a moment on the previous champion, Turkey. As a major US military ally and strategic outpost, Turkey has received substantial military aid from the origins of the Cold War. But arms deliveries began to increase sharply in 1984. Evidently, there was no Cold War connection at all. Rather, that was the year when Turkey initiated a large-scale counterinsurgency campaign in the Kurdish southeast, which also is the site of major US air bases and the locus of regional surveillance, so that everything that happens there is well known in Washington. Arms deliveries peaked in 1997. In that year alone, they exceeded the total from the entire period 1950-83. US arms amounted to about 80 percent of Turkish military equipment, including heavy armaments(jet planes, tanks, etc.), often evading congressional restrictions.

By 1999, Turkey had largely suppressed Kurdish resistance by extreme terror and ethnic cleansing, leaving some 2 to 3 million refugees, 3,500 villages destroyed (seven times as high as in Kosovo under NATO bombs), and tens of thousands killed, primarily during the Clinton years. A huge flow of US arms was no longer needed to accomplish these objectives. Turkey can therefore be singled out for praise for its "positive experiences" in showing how "tough counterterrorism measures plus political dialogue with non-terrorist opposition groups" can overcome the plague of violence and atrocities, so we learn from the lead article in the New York Times on the State Department's "latest annual report describing the administration's efforts to combat terrorism." More evidence, if such is needed, that cynicism is utterly without limits.

wall of text continues here
 
2008-05-24 11:34:30 PM  
Pics or it didnt happen.
 
2008-05-24 11:34:34 PM  
Maybe this will mean the end of the horrible FARC/FARK jokes?

Nah ;)
 
2008-05-24 11:34:43 PM  
So if no one can post BOOBIES . Then the religious have won.

/Quoting the 'safe for work version' of Fark, from a while ago.
//So is someone were to post a pic of George W. posing with a male stripper in a public washroom.
///Yes or No?
 
2008-05-24 11:34:51 PM  
How come no one else submitted this?
 
2008-05-24 11:35:31 PM  
Goldeneye007: You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

Because this site is private property, and Drew can run it as he sees fit.
 
2008-05-24 11:36:06 PM  
i was wondering how long this would take to show up here
 
2008-05-24 11:36:07 PM  
Goldeneye007
You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

Because we, as ultra-liberal hippie pinko commie farker scum, believe in freedom of speech. But unlike the crazy ultra-liberal hippie pinko commie non-farker scum who do stupid things like attend college, we realize that freedom of speech also gives a website operator the right to decide what we wants to allow on his own damn site.

In conclusion, wanna post boobies, learn some HTML. Or, as I like to call it, Liberty Markup.

 
2008-05-24 11:36:56 PM  
sunami: Goldeneye007: You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

So people can view this site at work and not get insta-fired.


I understand a restriction against posting pornography, but not censoring cuss words.
 
2008-05-24 11:36:57 PM  
I've never submitted a headline before.
 
2008-05-24 11:37:13 PM  
friedo: Goldeneye007
You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

Because we, as ultra-liberal hippie pinko commie farker scum, believe in freedom of speech. But unlike the crazy ultra-liberal hippie pinko commie non-farker scum who do stupid things like attend college, we realize that freedom of speech also gives a website operator the right to decide what we wants to allow on his own damn site.

In conclusion, wanna post boobies, learn some HTML. Or, as I like to call it, Liberty Markup.


We also have the right to never come here ag... ++++NO CARRIER++++
 
2008-05-24 11:40:28 PM  
adios amigo

www.thoseshirts.com
 
2008-05-24 11:40:37 PM  
And before anyone says "this thread is useless without pics" :

www.beegs.com
 
2008-05-24 11:41:28 PM  
ah3133: [pic]

9 seconds...

/*shakes tiny fist*
 
2008-05-24 11:42:00 PM  
heypete: Because this site is private property, and Drew can run it as he sees fit

True, but I can't resist pointing out that this a principle most "liberal" farkers aren't too fond of.

Of course, he wasn't really talking about political liberals. He's talking about the fact that Fark is socially tolerant- which is one (at leas theoretical) element of what's sometimes called "social liberalism."

Goldeneye007: You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post

It's so the site doesn't get blocked by work filters, dumbass. It's not Drew's prudishness.
 
2008-05-24 11:42:02 PM  
I wonder how it connected this is to the ones who came in to surrender themselves and the laptop that was found.
 
2008-05-24 11:45:50 PM  
As for the actual article, I love how openly cavalier and unapologetic they are at the prospect that he's dead. Colombia's government is full of its own dickishness, but FARC is still worse.

You'd never see that kind of open honesty from our own government.
 
2008-05-24 11:46:20 PM  
Churchill2004
True, but I can't resist pointing out that this a principle most "liberal" farkers aren't too fond of.

There's an infinite amount of space available on the 'net, so property isn't scarce. lolz u fale!
 
2008-05-24 11:47:38 PM  
RanDomino: There's an infinite amount of space available on the 'net, so property isn't scarce. lolz u fale!

All property is "scarce". That's the only reason anything is worth something.
 
2008-05-24 11:51:26 PM  
cliffy: I submitted this with a better headline.

This...
 
2008-05-24 11:52:14 PM  
img187.imageshack.us
approves.
 
2008-05-24 11:54:28 PM  
wrong thread.

/there's a limit to everything including weed
 
2008-05-24 11:58:56 PM  
He is definately burning in hell.

Most of my family had farms near the Colombian border (venezuela) and my dad was kidnapped by FARC around 10 years ago (he was released after we paid ransom 7 1/2 months later), he was in really bad shape and to this day he is still traumatized.

So, fark farc.
 
2008-05-25 12:00:00 AM  
Goldeneye007: You know, I've always wonder why we, as mostly liberal farkers, put up with all the censors and restrictions on what we can post.

Ever hear of a Net Nanny, genius?
 
2008-05-25 12:01:52 AM  
Farc leader dead. Fark leader still drinking beer, checking out boobies

Subby threadjacks his own submission. Beautiful. Now what was the thread about. Who cares. Beer and boobies FTW.
 
2008-05-25 12:02:01 AM  
I didn't submit this with a better/funnier headline....
 
2008-05-25 12:02:18 AM  
Thank goodness Drew's okay!!

And for that...a nice pair of boobies!!!

images.jupiterimages.com

And for good measure...a nice pair of bouncing tits!!

www.myconfinedspace.com

/What?
 
2008-05-25 12:04:27 AM  
Churchill2004: As for the actual article, I love how openly cavalier and unapologetic they are at the prospect that he's dead. Colombia's government is full of its own dickishness, but FARC is still worse.

You'd never see that kind of open honesty from our own government.



I don't know, I think our government and media partied pretty hard when we gunned down Saddam's kids. When Osama gets put down, you're going to hear some more cheering.
 
2008-05-25 12:05:39 AM  
Countdown until ol' Hugito blows his top......
 
2008-05-25 12:05:52 AM  
I submitted this article as: "Drew is Dead" like an uncreative maggot. I got a filter saying someone else submitted the article, so I gave up and went back to sleep on the floor.
 
2008-05-25 12:08:51 AM  
maq0r: He is definately burning in hell.

Most of my family had farms near the Colombian border (venezuela) and my dad was kidnapped by FARC around 10 years ago (he was released after we paid ransom 7 1/2 months later), he was in really bad shape and to this day he is still traumatized.

So, fark farc.


You must be a moran. Read what Noam Chomsky has to say about FARC. They're heroes fighting for the oppressed people of Colombia.

JK. But some people actually believe that. Same idiots who like Che.
 
Displayed 50 of 93 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report