If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ABC)   Rev. Wright elbows his way back into the headlines just in time to hurt Obama's chances in Indiana and North Carolina   (abcnews.go.com) divider line 235
    More: Dumbass  
•       •       •

1580 clicks; posted to Politics » on 25 Apr 2008 at 2:43 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



235 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2008-04-25 04:14:00 PM
Thune: dgc360: sarcastrophe: That's a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out, well delivered "b... b... b... but CHRISTIANS!!!!" post...

Here's a question for you then. Why are Falwell and Robertson revered, but Wright isn't when their messages can be compared as similar?

Fallwell and Robertson's comments basically boil down to don't be gay.

They do not beleive that behaviour to be moraly acceptable.

Wright said that the government was controlled by rich white people, and that the government created the aids virus to kill black people.

So in essence, white people are perpetrating a genocide on black people.

I don't see these as equivalent.


i100.photobucket.com
 
2008-04-25 04:14:28 PM
Thune: Wright said that the government was controlled by rich white people, and that the government created the aids virus to kill black people.

I fully admit the Aids virus was a bit out there, but for the longest time wasn't the government mainly controlled by rich white people?
 
2008-04-25 04:14:37 PM
wolvernova: The Homer Tax: The question raised was, why is it such a big deal when Wright says something, but not a big deal when other people say the same thing?

It was a big deal when they said those things. For the second time, you cannot use assholes like Falwell and Robertson to excuse this asshole Wright. Do you get it?


You are perpetually mis-characterizing my argument. Perhaps someone else is defending his statements, but I'm not. I agree with you that they're all assholes. My point is that all of these politicians associate with all of these assholes.

Yet, people only seem to have a problem with Obama and his association with Wright. That's what I don't understand.
 
2008-04-25 04:15:57 PM
The Homer Tax: The question raised was, why is it such a big deal when Wright says something, but not a big deal when other people say the same thing?

well, to be fair, Wright is more closely associated to Obama than the others are to McCain.


either way, I think the whole "Pastor Sniping" thing going back and forth is a little disturbing. I don't really care who Obama's friends are, same with McCain.
 
2008-04-25 04:16:03 PM
sarcastrophe: The Homer Tax: The question raised was, why is it such a big deal when Wright says something, but not a big deal when other people say the same thing?

dgc360: Here's a question for you then. Why are Falwell and Robertson revered, but Wright isn't when their messages can be compared as similar?

Why can't both of them be bigots? They are all equally appalling in my mind.


See above, I agree with you. I just don't understand why the GOP's crazy religious idiots are permissible, while the DNC's are not.
 
2008-04-25 04:16:46 PM
sarcastrophe: Why can't both of them be bigots? They are all equally appalling in my mind.

That wasn't my question though.

dgc360: Why are Falwell and Robertson revered, but Wright isn't when their messages can be compared as similar?
 
2008-04-25 04:16:58 PM
I just found out Obama is running for president, not Rev. Wright.

I keep confusing my black people.
 
2008-04-25 04:17:37 PM
FeedTheCollapse: The Homer Tax: The question raised was, why is it such a big deal when Wright says something, but not a big deal when other people say the same thing?

well, to be fair, Wright is more closely associated to Obama than the others are to McCain.


either way, I think the whole "Pastor Sniping" thing going back and forth is a little disturbing. I don't really care who Obama's friends are, same with McCain.


I'm not even really necessarily talking about McCain. I'm talking about Bush. My question is that if this shiat has been going on from these religious whacks for a long time, why is *this* such a big deal *now*?
 
2008-04-25 04:17:51 PM
The Homer Tax: See above, I agree with you. I just don't understand why the GOP's crazy religious idiots are permissible, while the DNC's are not.

This is where I'm trying to go with my train of thought.
 
2008-04-25 04:18:18 PM
but for the longest time wasn't the government mainly controlled by rich white people?

because poor people had to spend their time working for food to feed their families and didn't have time to get involved in politics nor the education necessary. who's left? the rich white guys who became the founding fathers.
 
2008-04-25 04:18:27 PM
keithgabryelski: Thune: Koalaesq: wolvernova

Unless you believe that Obama was either (a) influenced by or (b) agrees with Wright, why care what Wright says?

Um yeah, A and B sound about right.

I wouldnt spend 20 years in a Klan church if I didnt agree with them.

It seems a stretch to say Wright's sermons were like Klan church meetings.

It seems there is plenty of recordings of Wright's sermons although there is only some number of minutes of stuff that
is what people are complaining about.

We can discuss what he said and why I think some is out of line (crazy) and some is defensible.

But you don't seem to be complaining about Wrights words but about Obama sitting in the church of a man that said those words.

Is it possible Obama never heard those words? I'd say yeah.
Is it possible Obama heard hard-hitting sermons and thought the benefit to the community out-weighed the detriment: yeah, probably.

Obama's actions seem to fit giving him some slack on these matters (Just as McCain's acts seem to fit giving him some slack on the religious nuts that have endorsed him).


I am deeply concerned about someone who would sit for 20 years and not be appalled by that filth.

I am also disgusted by the massive double standard.

Imus says "Nappy headed ho" on the air and Obama says "that guy would no longer be working for me".

However, he will allow his children to absorb the racist hatred of Wrights sermons and thats ok.

I'm sorry, this is just not presidential material.
 
2008-04-25 04:19:05 PM
I'm talking about Bush. My question is that if this shiat has been going on from these religious whacks for a long time, why is *this* such a big deal *now*?

it's been a big deal for a while. google bush or reagan and bob jones university.
 
2008-04-25 04:19:58 PM
The Homer Tax: See above, I agree with you. I just don't understand why the GOP's crazy religious idiots are permissible, while the DNC's are not.

They're not acceptable to me, so I can't help you understand it. Religion and politics don't mix to well and there are a lot of wedge issues people can't get over. That's all I can figure.
 
2008-04-25 04:20:05 PM
keithgabryelski: Thune: dougiezerosag: Let's go over the attack machine so far.

His wife hates America
He is muslim
His middle name is hussein
He dosen't wear a flag pin
His preacher hates America
He hangs with 60's radicals
He thinks Farrakhan is awesome
He is an elitist
He hates white people (like his grandma)

At what point does this start becoming unfair?

When it becomes inacurate?

So, those stroked-out are, at their face, inaccurate.

The rest are canards.



Oh its that easy?

Bush lied, soldiers died

Man.. I really need to learn the rules around here.
 
2008-04-25 04:22:06 PM
The Homer Tax: wolvernova: The Homer Tax: The question raised was, why is it such a big deal when Wright says something, but not a big deal when other people say the same thing?

It was a big deal when they said those things. For the second time, you cannot use assholes like Falwell and Robertson to excuse this asshole Wright. Do you get it?

You are perpetually mis-characterizing my argument. Perhaps someone else is defending his statements, but I'm not. I agree with you that they're all assholes. My point is that all of these politicians associate with all of these assholes.

Yet, people only seem to have a problem with Obama and his association with Wright. That's what I don't understand.


Ok, your post sounded exactly like somebody else that just asked the same question.

Here's the difference as I see it. McCain is pandering to the religious nuts on the right. His "spiritual advisor" is nothing more than a freak show given the title to lure in the evangelicals. Hell, McCain let it be known eight years ago that he did not like those jackasses and they railroaded him for it.

Reverend Wright has had a very close personal relationship with Obama and his family for 20 years. McCain's association: political pandering. Obama's association: deep and personal.
 
2008-04-25 04:22:26 PM
dgc360: Thune: Wright said that the government was controlled by rich white people, and that the government created the aids virus to kill black people.

I fully admit the Aids virus was a bit out there, but for the longest time wasn't the government mainly controlled by rich white people?


It still is, the demographics of US power hasn't changed that much.

It is the insane racial demonization that i have a problem with.
 
2008-04-25 04:22:36 PM
dougiezerosag: I just found out Obama is running for president, not Rev. Wright.

I keep confusing my black people.


LOL
 
2008-04-25 04:24:19 PM
8 years of Bush... and the people have spoken and they yell:

"Barrack Obama... I want know, do you believe in the American flag?"
 
2008-04-25 04:28:03 PM
dougiezerosag: 8 years of Bush... and the people have spoken and they yell:

"Barrack Obama... I want know, do you believe in the American flag?"


Did you know that the FBI requires a personality test for its candidates?

non-policy questions about personal beliefs are just as valid when choosing a president.

These questions are only getting poo poo'd by the Obamites because he flubbed the answers so bad.
 
2008-04-25 04:28:13 PM
Thune: Koalaesq: wolvernova

Unless you believe that Obama was either (a) influenced by or (b) agrees with Wright, why care what Wright says?

Um yeah, A and B sound about right.

I wouldnt spend 20 years in a Klan church if I didnt agree with them.


Yes, because we all know only attractive and successful African-Americans are allowed in nubian churches.

/Hello, farking coont filter! shiat!
 
2008-04-25 04:28:16 PM
danlpoon: Who is your candidate and what about their ideas and their solutions do you like?

I don't take sides, sorry. All politicians stink. I should know.



Well, that's awfully helpful of you, and good to know you're part of the solution.
/sorry, earlier thread
 
2008-04-25 04:28:30 PM
wolvernova: The Homer Tax: wolvernova: The Homer Tax: The question raised was, why is it such a big deal when Wright says something, but not a big deal when other people say the same thing?

It was a big deal when they said those things. For the second time, you cannot use assholes like Falwell and Robertson to excuse this asshole Wright. Do you get it?

You are perpetually mis-characterizing my argument. Perhaps someone else is defending his statements, but I'm not. I agree with you that they're all assholes. My point is that all of these politicians associate with all of these assholes.

Yet, people only seem to have a problem with Obama and his association with Wright. That's what I don't understand.

Ok, your post sounded exactly like somebody else that just asked the same question.

Here's the difference as I see it. McCain is pandering to the religious nuts on the right. His "spiritual advisor" is nothing more than a freak show given the title to lure in the evangelicals. Hell, McCain let it be known eight years ago that he did not like those jackasses and they railroaded him for it.

Reverend Wright has had a very close personal relationship with Obama and his family for 20 years. McCain's association: political pandering. Obama's association: deep and personal.


Can you explain what you find so controversial about Wright's statements? The AIDS thing was a bit out of left field, but considering Tuskegee, it's maybe not as insane as it sounds. The rest of the things he said though...I'm intrigued to know what you have a problem with.
 
2008-04-25 04:28:47 PM
Thune

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Study_of_Untreated_Syphilis_in_the_Negro_M ale

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_Board_of_North_Carolina

The state and federal governments of the United States are not your friends.
 
2008-04-25 04:28:49 PM
Thune: I am deeply concerned about someone who would sit for 20 years and not be appalled by that filth.

because all Wright did in 20 years was make those same out-of-context quotes?


feigning indignance much?
 
2008-04-25 04:30:49 PM
Damn it I meant to link those. Either way, Rev. Wright may just have a point to his speeches.
 
2008-04-25 04:31:19 PM
Thune: keithgabryelski: Thune: Koalaesq: wolvernova

Unless you believe that Obama was either (a) influenced by or (b) agrees with Wright, why care what Wright says?

Um yeah, A and B sound about right.

I wouldnt spend 20 years in a Klan church if I didnt agree with them.

It seems a stretch to say Wright's sermons were like Klan church meetings.

It seems there is plenty of recordings of Wright's sermons although there is only some number of minutes of stuff that
is what people are complaining about.

We can discuss what he said and why I think some is out of line (crazy) and some is defensible.

But you don't seem to be complaining about Wrights words but about Obama sitting in the church of a man that said those words.

Is it possible Obama never heard those words? I'd say yeah.
Is it possible Obama heard hard-hitting sermons and thought the benefit to the community out-weighed the detriment: yeah, probably.

Obama's actions seem to fit giving him some slack on these matters (Just as McCain's acts seem to fit giving him some slack on the religious nuts that have endorsed him).

I am deeply concerned about someone who would sit for 20 years and not be appalled by that filth.

I am also disgusted by the massive double standard.

Imus says "Nappy headed ho" on the air and Obama says "that guy would no longer be working for me".

However, he will allow his children to absorb the racist hatred of Wrights sermons and thats ok.

I'm sorry, this is just not presidential material.


again, Obama says he never heard sermons like the one that people are complaining about. Obama also claims most of the sermons he was present for were uplifting.

I find it believable that Wright sectioned off his sermons (he made three sermons each week) tuning them for a specific audience (hard hitting, kinder gentler, mainstream). I can also see how someone going to one of the sermons would never hear of the other two.
 
2008-04-25 04:32:01 PM
wolvernova: This is what bothers me. We all know that Bush has surrounded himself with some pretty awful people. There is a reason we judge people based on who they associate with, and I think the Obama cultists are too defensive about this Wright thing.

First...OMG OBAMA CULT RUN!

Second...I reiterate, if Reverend Wright is the best that the "librul media" can come up with, and people vote for someone else because of that, I'll be laughing my ass off when the people complain about who Hillary and McCain associate with 6 months into their term...
 
2008-04-25 04:34:10 PM
Thune:

Oh its that easy?

Bush lied, soldiers died

Man.. I really need to learn the rules around here.


I'm not sure what you are getting at.

are you calling "bush lied, soldier's died" a canard and that people's use of it is unfair to the bush administration?

and that unfairness is like the unfairness applied to Barack Obama when people say "Obama doesn't love this country because he doesn't wear a flag pin".

Really?
 
2008-04-25 04:34:46 PM
wolvernova:
Reverend Wright has had a very close personal relationship with Obama and his family for 20 years. McCain's association: political pandering. Obama's association: deep and personal.


Do you not have any deep and personal relationships with people who you don't agree with on everything? Is it not possible the Obama has a relationship with this man *despite* the fact that in 20 years of sermons, he's produced 3 minutes of youtube craziness?
 
d23 [TotalFark]
2008-04-25 04:36:03 PM
welcome to 2004 all the fark over again...

Someone is going to find a video of Obama falling off a waverunner or something.
 
2008-04-25 04:39:21 PM
non-policy questions about personal beliefs are just as valid when choosing a president.

Yeah... but asking if someone believes in the American flag is stupid. Maybe someone should ask Obama what he believes in bald eagles and mother nature.
 
2008-04-25 04:39:33 PM
I just went to Obama's myspace webpage just out of curiosity.

Myspace makes me very sad about the future of discourse.
 
2008-04-25 04:41:15 PM
Well, that's awfully helpful of you, and good to know you're part of the solution.

Solution to what, Chicken Little?
 
2008-04-25 04:42:06 PM
Mrstupid7: Thune

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Study_of_Untreated_Syphilis_in_the_Negro_M ale

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_Board_of_North_Carolina

The state and federal governments of the United States are not your friends.


Do you beleive that the United States created the Aids virus to kill black people.

Do you believe that teaching poor minorities, of all ages, to mistrust and hate the white race and thier country is productive?
 
2008-04-25 04:43:58 PM
keithgabryelski: Thune:

Oh its that easy?

Bush lied, soldiers died

Man.. I really need to learn the rules around here.

I'm not sure what you are getting at.

are you calling "bush lied, soldier's died" a canard and that people's use of it is unfair to the bush administration?

and that unfairness is like the unfairness applied to Barack Obama when people say "Obama doesn't love this country because he doesn't wear a flag pin".

Really?


Im stating that I can make anything untrue just by drawing a line through it, just as the responder did.
 
2008-04-25 04:45:04 PM
I believe that the United States has done biological testing on blacks. That's the first link. Rev. Wright is speaking of injustice and where it came from.

Do you think ignoring injustices is productive?
 
2008-04-25 04:45:22 PM
keithgabryelski: Thune: keithgabryelski: Thune: Koalaesq: wolvernova

Unless you believe that Obama was either (a) influenced by or (b) agrees with Wright, why care what Wright says?

Um yeah, A and B sound about right.

I wouldnt spend 20 years in a Klan church if I didnt agree with them.

It seems a stretch to say Wright's sermons were like Klan church meetings.

It seems there is plenty of recordings of Wright's sermons although there is only some number of minutes of stuff that
is what people are complaining about.

We can discuss what he said and why I think some is out of line (crazy) and some is defensible.

But you don't seem to be complaining about Wrights words but about Obama sitting in the church of a man that said those words.

Is it possible Obama never heard those words? I'd say yeah.
Is it possible Obama heard hard-hitting sermons and thought the benefit to the community out-weighed the detriment: yeah, probably.

Obama's actions seem to fit giving him some slack on these matters (Just as McCain's acts seem to fit giving him some slack on the religious nuts that have endorsed him).

I am deeply concerned about someone who would sit for 20 years and not be appalled by that filth.

I am also disgusted by the massive double standard.

Imus says "Nappy headed ho" on the air and Obama says "that guy would no longer be working for me".

However, he will allow his children to absorb the racist hatred of Wrights sermons and thats ok.

I'm sorry, this is just not presidential material.

again, Obama says he never heard sermons like the one that people are complaining about. Obama also claims most of the sermons he was present for were uplifting.

I find it believable that Wright sectioned off his sermons (he made three sermons each week) tuning them for a specific audience (hard hitting, kinder gentler, mainstream). I can also see how someone going to one of the sermons would never hear of the other two.


I do not believe he spent 20 years as part of that church and did not know the sermons that reverend Wright was preeching.

It defies logic.
 
2008-04-25 04:46:30 PM
The Homer Tax: Do you not have any deep and personal relationships with people who you don't agree with on everything? Is it not possible the Obama has a relationship with this man *despite* the fact that in 20 years of sermons, he's produced 3 minutes of youtube craziness?

I don't associate with people that profess hate about my country, nor am I running for president.

Just because our president is George Bush doesn't mean we shouldn't have standards and judgment about who we elect and who they associate themselves with.

What Wright said is hateful. Worse is that he's not even sorry. You folks that defend him by bringing up Falwell or insisting he was correct are only pushing me further from wanting Obama in office. It's the same stupid ideology that I saw in 2004. Different guy, same blinders. I'm not saying one shouldn't vote for Obama, but you're giving him WAY too much of a pass on this.
 
2008-04-25 04:47:58 PM
wolvernova

He's saying hate the injustices the government has performed, not me and you. There's quite a difference.
 
2008-04-25 04:50:02 PM
Mrstupid7: I believe that the United States has done biological testing on blacks. That's the first link. Rev. Wright is speaking of injustice and where it came from.

Do you think ignoring injustices is productive?


I do not.

I also don't thing paiting the country through the lense of two obscure minor historical events is productive either.
 
2008-04-25 04:51:37 PM
The AIDS thing is wrong, but it's a common belief in some black communities. I have heard it many times growing up in Detroit when I was younger.

Now, Obama is a very educated man, grew up in Hawaii... he isn't even from the inner cities. He spent his youth traveling abroad.

Now do you believe Obama thinks AIDS was created by the USA? Or do you WANT to believe he does.
 
2008-04-25 04:53:46 PM
The japanese interment camps were pretty interesting too Thune. Maybe the trail of tears will get you thinking.

I really don't feel like researching, but there is a lot.
 
2008-04-25 04:53:50 PM
wolvernova: So Hagee is an asshole, Wright's fine though, right?

/see what i did?


Yeah. That's the right thing to say to people.

For me:

I don't like McCain because of that crazy ass. I don't like McCain because McCain's an actual flip-flopper. Forget "I was against the war before I was for it", it's "I was against the war before I was for the war at which point I was also against the war and became forgainst the war and now I am agfor it".

"Torture's bad mmmkay?"
(closed door session with Bush)
"LOLZ I HEART TEH TORTUR IZ OK"

Plus he's faking being a neocon with his "100 year" occupation of Iraq if needed. Pandering ass.

--------

I don't like Obama being a "social program to fix a complex problem" Democrat. I don't think he will change much. I don't think he'll be able to do most of the things he sets himself out to do.

--------

Hillary is not someone people should even WANT for President. She's ruthless and vindictive in the primaries. I don't need to see that until they take office. I don't want to know what she's like in office. She can't even handle competition. She's a liar and has more skeletons than a closet in Pompeii. She thinks this race is owed to her, and she's going to do whatever it takes to win. No thanks. I would rather have someone do whatever it takes to turn this country around. Plus, she sponsored a farking Flag-burning amendment. How retarded is that?

So out of all of them, Obama is the least odious. I don't care if his Pastor was crazy or not. Obama is not. I don't care if he knew Tony Rezko and had dealings with him or not. There is nothing there, there will be nothing there, and Clinton "I may have 10 scandals tied to me but you can still trust me" and McCain "I love lobbyists, possibly literally" doesn't do it for me.

As for Change and Hope: no, I don't think he will do a lot there, but he's got some interesting campaign and congressional reform ideas and for christsake, let's at least TRY to change things. Geez, stop whining about how bad Washington is and at least give it a try. Better than sitting on our thumbs whimpering about it.

McCain will win the Presidency. There is nothing left but Pastor this, Socialist that and Muslim this for Obama, and Hillary will be shiatting mud for a year after she gets the nom. I am trying to figure out if McCain will pick Romney. If so, that's your new President in 2 years.
 
2008-04-25 04:54:03 PM
Thune: Im stating that I can make anything untrue just by drawing a line through it, just as the responder did.

oh, well, if you disagreed with any of the things I crossed out you should present your argument to the specific point.
 
2008-04-25 04:57:04 PM
dougiezerosag:

Now do you believe Obama thinks AIDS was created by the USA? Or do you WANT to believe he does.




Dare I say...THIS.
 
2008-04-25 04:57:27 PM
Thune:
I do not believe he spent 20 years as part of that church and did not know the sermons that reverend Wright was preeching.

It defies logic.


Ok, then. You are understood, you believe Obama is lying when he says he did not about specifics of Wright's sermon just after 9/11.

To be clear, I believe him.

It's all good -- that's what makes this a ball game.
 
2008-04-25 04:58:21 PM
pcloadletter, I more or less agree with you, except I find McCain's flipflopping to not be a big deal. In '04 I couldn't believe that tactic worked against Kerry.

While I'm most likely to vote for McCain, his ties with the neocons and which direction he looks like he's leaning towards will ultimately push me one way or another. But every time Obama promises huge amounts of money for this or that program that we don't need, I realize that I'm not really thrilled by any candidate.

Oh, and I will NEVER vote for Hillary. She and Giulliani were on my 'never' list.
 
2008-04-25 04:58:48 PM
Mrstupid7: The japanese interment camps were pretty interesting too Thune. Maybe the trail of tears will get you thinking.

I really don't feel like researching, but there is a lot.


Every government has a skeletons in its closet.

Should we review the millions that died under Stalin?

The Japanese internment camps weren't a shiny example of American civil liberties, but they weren't Auschwitz either.
 
2008-04-25 04:58:52 PM
Theaetetus: That was meant for danlpoon:, the one who brought up his bum.
 
2008-04-25 04:59:25 PM
Hillary is not someone people should even WANT for President. She's ruthless and vindictive

Man. That's what you WANT in a President. 'Passive and Generous' is no way to lead a nation.
 
Displayed 50 of 235 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report