If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(AP)   Green Bay puts up municipal nativity scene just to piss off atheists   (hosted.ap.org) divider line 302
    More: Dumbass  
•       •       •

11935 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Dec 2007 at 6:12 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



302 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2007-12-12 03:42:19 PM
Freedom From Religion Foundation. You're doing it wrong, folks.

Really, if the city council wants to do this, I don't have much of a problem with it.
 
2007-12-12 03:48:52 PM
I hope they're happy paying the massive legal fees. Good job city council, you've just raised your constituents' taxes, are you happy now?
 
2007-12-12 03:50:43 PM
An individual paid for it with his own money. The city allowed him to do it.

The door's open, folks. Time to put in that FSM diorama on the same public property. Hope they have enough room.
 
2007-12-12 03:53:10 PM
Let's hope someone makes sure to put up a Flying Spaghetti Monster. I know there has to be some Pastafarians in Green Bay.
 
2007-12-12 03:54:28 PM
Council president Chad Fradette told a city committee he believed the U.S. Constitution upholds citizens' right to display symbols of their religious beliefs on publicly owned property as long as they are not paid for with tax money and other faiths aren't excluded.

Which is exactly right.
 
2007-12-12 03:59:40 PM
kronicfeld: Council president Chad Fradette told a city committee he believed the U.S. Constitution upholds citizens' right to display symbols of their religious beliefs on publicly owned property as long as they are not paid for with tax money and other faiths aren't excluded.

Which is exactly right.


We'll have to see what happens when a Muslim tries to put up a statue of the Koran, eh?
 
2007-12-12 03:59:49 PM
Perfectly cool with me as long as they don't deny others the right to do the same.
 
2007-12-12 04:09:51 PM
As an Atheist I'm satisfied that my lack of beliefs is represented by any remaining empty space on that piece of land. If it all gets filled up with other displays then I'll be upset.

I will add that I hope the baby Jesus in that Nativity is represented as a little white boy though, that always cracks me up.
 
2007-12-12 04:22:05 PM
I am an atheist and my local government could put up a nativity scene and I would not give a crap. Its Christmas season, many people are christian and they can display their religious icons as long as they don't exclude anyone.
 
2007-12-12 04:26:41 PM
Christmas is a legitimate tourist event in my town. I may be an atheist, but it would be stupid to oppose something that supports my industry through the winter months in my area.
 
2007-12-12 04:31:13 PM
SphericalTime: Christmas is a legitimate tourist event in my town. I may be an atheist, but it would be stupid to oppose something that supports my industry through the winter months in my area.

How does that implicate the local government in any way?
 
2007-12-12 04:38:19 PM
What a bunch of attention whores.

/Both sides.
 
2007-12-12 04:50:20 PM
I just wanted to say that my scrupled, principled atheistic piety is more laudable than your scrupled, principled religious piety.
 
2007-12-12 04:51:47 PM
Oh, and: paging Samsaran to this thread.

Samsaran you are badly needed in this thread.
 
2007-12-12 05:01:38 PM
Isn't there a Muslim member on the house now from Minnesota?

Maybe he can put something up some Ramadan stuff for us to test these theories.
 
2007-12-12 05:13:09 PM
Submitter: Green Bay puts up municipal nativity scene just to piss off atheists idiots who don't understand that getting outraged over plastic Jesuses is not the way to get people to listen to you.

I wish this Neo-Atheist fad would pass and these people would just go back to their crystals and pyramids or whatever and stop giving the rest of us a bad name.
 
2007-12-12 05:16:17 PM
Seriously, can we get over this?

I know atheists aren't an organized movement for the most part... why would we be? What, should we have weekly meetings about our lack of faith?-- but don't we have bigger concerns than a stupid holiday decoration?

Can't these "high profile" atheists see that they're being distracted from the real problems, like the way religion is seeping into government and law? All because they're easily distracted by a light-up baby Jesus?

Honestly, it's embarrassing, and makes everyone look stupid. That said, the religious-types who are baiting people with their desperate need to display their faith everywhere and anywhere? They're not much better. Put the baby Jesus on your own lawn... isn't that enough?
 
2007-12-12 05:20:54 PM
Green Bay needs one of these on their lawn:

www.wnd.com
 
2007-12-12 05:27:37 PM
Not only is having the baby Jesus on one's own lawn not good enough, but they should actually attach a handle to each figure making it easier to use for bashing people over the head with.

Since that seems to be the main purpose for Jesus these days.
 
2007-12-12 05:35:01 PM
Mordant: Not only is having the baby Jesus on one's own lawn not good enough, but they should actually attach a handle to each figure making it easier to use for bashing people over the head with.

Since that seems to be the main purpose for Jesus these days.


Heh. :)

There is a really weird display on a house on my way home from work. Not only does it look like Wal-Mart's light aisle threw up on the house -- every color and shape possible -- but they have a huge nativity... with an even bigger Mickey Mouse standing behind it.

The way Mickey Mouse's hands are positioned, it looks like the sign should say "Mickey Mouse presents... the BABY JESUS!!"

It's a really strange display. If I didn't feel weird about doing it, I'd pull over and take a picture of it, but that seems really rude and invasive.
 
2007-12-12 05:55:03 PM
Atheist leader Richard Dawkins, a recent convert to "Cultural Christianity," has declared an end to the War on Christmas: "I'm a cultural Christian ... I like singing carols along with everybody else. I'm not one of those who wants to purge our society of our Christian history." ~ Cultural Christian Richard Dawkins.

Time for his followers to follow suit.
 
2007-12-12 06:00:09 PM
SkinnyHead: I'm not one of those who wants to purge our society of our Christian history." ~ Cultural Christian Richard Dawkins.

I think that's really strange, but... the problem is, the hardcore religious don't want "Cultural Christians." they want hardcore Christians who think the baby Jesus really was born in a manger and that the rules of the bible should apply as rules in real life.

That's the problem.

I honestly could not care less what a Christian does with their own property, their own lives, and on their own time. It's only when it impacts me/people who don't follow their rules -- such as people who want gay rights, abortion rights, etc... that I have a problem with them.

A plastic baby Jesus? Meh. Knock yourself out. Put 60,000 of them out and pretend there was a little army of them born after your God impregnated a virgin via magic. I don't care about your beliefs -- especially the really fictional ones -- so long as you don't use them to try and control the rest of us by using your power and lobby to influence the law of the land.
 
2007-12-12 06:00:46 PM
kronicfeld: How does that implicate the local government in any way?

Because my local government pays to put up Christmas decorations in public areas and put on Christian specific displays. It's part of the local culture, and is a long established tradition that generates revenue for businesses adjacent to those public areas and for the government in the form of taxes.

It may be a Christian specific display, but it's a Christian specific display that makes money for me, an atheist, and for local business owners that include Jews and Muslims.
 
2007-12-12 06:02:43 PM
Council president Chad Fradette told a city committee he believed the U.S. Constitution upholds citizens' right to display symbols of their religious beliefs on publicly owned property as long as they are not paid for with tax money and other faiths aren't excluded.

How can athiests have a problem with this? So long as other religions are allowed, and the scene, and the electricity to power it are not payed with for government funds, these disturbed athiests won't have a leg to stand on.
 
2007-12-12 06:04:16 PM
with for-->for with
 
2007-12-12 06:08:53 PM
TheConvincingSavant: Council president Chad Fradette told a city committee he believed the U.S. Constitution upholds citizens' right to display symbols of their religious beliefs on publicly owned property as long as they are not paid for with tax money and other faiths aren't excluded.

How can athiests have a problem with this? So long as other religions are allowed, and the scene, and the electricity to power it are not payed with for government funds, these disturbed athiests won't have a leg to stand on.


Some of us don't.
 
2007-12-12 06:19:20 PM
it's prolly dem joo boyz fault
 
2007-12-12 06:19:22 PM
Fradette had wanted to extend an invitation to all religions to put up displays, but committee members agreed a policy was needed to prevent people from testing the boundaries of taste.

Of course you don't want to give freedom over religious expression to those non-Christians. Because they would just ruin it.
 
2007-12-12 06:20:27 PM
Hah! Suck it, atheist. Where is your God now?
 
2007-12-12 06:20:40 PM
Tis the season.
 
2007-12-12 06:21:45 PM
SkinnyHead: Time for his followers to follow suit.

I celebrate Christmas. That doesn't mean I think the government should spend money on it.

Do you think the government should be in charge of celebrating our holidays for us?

See some people think the government should not be involved in every aspect of our lives.
 
2007-12-12 06:23:03 PM
They have Santa stuff all over, why not other mythological things?
 
2007-12-12 06:23:10 PM
You know I was going to say something about being supprised by the level of maturity from the atheists in this thread but then I saw ju66l3r's post so nevermind.
 
2007-12-12 06:24:02 PM
img443.imageshack.us


They should put Brett Favre in that nativity cuz y'know a nativity without Brett Favre is just a nativity that doesn't have Brett Favre in it and ya need Brett Farve in your nativity cuz that's what a nativity is all about, Brett Favre.
 
2007-12-12 06:24:20 PM
Three legged dog: You know I was going to say something about being supprised by the level of maturity from the atheists in this thread but then I saw ju66l3r's post so nevermind.

Or I could have been suprised. Either way.

/Cheers the levelheaded Atheists here.
 
2007-12-12 06:25:09 PM
TheConvincingSavant: Council president Chad Fradette told a city committee he believed the U.S. Constitution upholds citizens' right to display symbols of their religious beliefs on publicly owned property as long as they are not paid for with tax money and other faiths aren't excluded.

How can athiests have a problem with this? So long as other religions are allowed, and the scene, and the electricity to power it are not payed with for government funds, these disturbed athiests won't have a leg to stand on.


this is government land, and that is my only problem with it. how would a private citizen go about asking the power company to break down their usage of electricity for their own holiday display if they wanted to follow suit and do as the Councilman has done?

this is not free and equal access. if they set up some way to donate free power (and distribute it equally), and set up equal space for other's decorations, then fine. but that is clearly not how this is playing out, and it is clearly their intent to have it that way
 
2007-12-12 06:27:37 PM
To be fair why don't they put up an "Atheist Scene" One that displays a blank canvas?
 
2007-12-12 06:28:57 PM
People in Green Bay should know there is no god.

There is only Brett Favre.

/suck it, theists
//you too, libs
 
2007-12-12 06:29:34 PM
I don't know who is more annoying... the religious side that gets offended by anything the athiests do, or vice versa.

It is a symbiotic relationship... they both need each other do validate their beliefs.
 
2007-12-12 06:32:52 PM
Corvus: SkinnyHead: Time for his followers to follow suit.

I celebrate Christmas. That doesn't mean I think the government should spend money on it.

Do you think the government should be in charge of celebrating our holidays for us?

See some people think the government should not be involved in every aspect of our lives.


I agree, but the state and the church have ALWAYS been linked. Julius Caesar was the Pontifex Maximus in his day. We need to keep the ritual while rejecting the religion.
 
2007-12-12 06:33:00 PM
Good for them - And I'm an atheist

If your offended by this your not an atheist, your a freaking moronic crybaby.

Get over yourselves.
 
2007-12-12 06:33:11 PM
Good on you, Green Bay. Militant atheists are some of the most annoying people in existence.
 
2007-12-12 06:33:25 PM
PLEASE, somebody build this nativity scene and make Green Bay display it:

img81.imageshack.us
 
2007-12-12 06:33:35 PM
kiwannabee: People in Green Bay should know there is no god.

There is only Brett Favre.


They put a Bart Starr on top of their trees up there, they do.
 
2007-12-12 06:34:35 PM
amazing_live_seamonkeys: I wish this Neo-Atheist fad would pass and these people would just go back to their crystals and pyramids or whatever and stop giving the rest of us a bad name.

as a member of the Crystals and Pyramids faith, I oppose this notion.

/also getting a kick
 
2007-12-12 06:36:08 PM
I'm an atheist...I don't care if there's a nativity scene set up as long as my money isn't paying for it. I don't care if the stores have "holiday" sales or "christmas" sales. What I do care about is all the morons on both sides arguing about it constantly. I believe that the true atheists and the true christians are the ones who are quiet about this as they are the ones content and confident in their beliefs.
 
2007-12-12 06:36:30 PM
Oranda - I don't know who is more annoying... the religious side that gets offended by anything the athiests do, or vice versa.

It is a symbiotic relationship... they both need each other do validate their beliefs.



Yes, their synchronous beliefs that 'THEY' are the ones being persecuted.
 
2007-12-12 06:36:32 PM
meh, christianity is on its way out anyway... the christian mindset is too self destructive to survive in the modern world much longer and people will let it go in order to save themselves

/wonders what the municipal courts will look like in 500 years
//my great great great great grandchildren will probably find out when they go to pay their $100,000 speeding tickets
 
2007-12-12 06:36:32 PM
I'm an atheist, and I celebrate Christmas as a secular holiday. I put up a tree, give gifts, and have a special meal. As an atheist, I have no problem with government celebrating Christmas in a secular fashion. I do, however, have a problem with government celebrating it as a religious holiday. A tree is one thing, but a nativity scene is something completely different.

You can't have government tacitly promoting any religion. It doesn't matter that it offers it to all of them; it cannot offer it to any of them. Someone said that this distracts from the real issue of religion creeping into government, but this is part of the same issue. Religion has to be fought every step of the way, big or small.
 
2007-12-12 06:36:45 PM
Berrik: Good on you, Green Bay. Militant atheists are some of the most annoying people in existence.

way more annoying than those who willfully violate the Constitution to promote their own agendas...
 
Displayed 50 of 302 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report