Roman Fyseek: Kyoto.

Kyoto doesn't tell anyone to stop polluting. It tells them to find ways of stopping INCREASING their pollution output, and eventually reduce it.

Roman Fyseek: Nobody, yet.

Ah. You're just making stuff up. Ok.

Roman Fyseek: if you continue to push this Al Gore religion,

I haven't seen Al Gore's movie, so I can't say what his "religion" is other than he is a business man who wants to sell snake oil under the name "carbon-credits". But the fact that he's trying to make money off of global warming, does not mean that the whole thing is false.

Flab: It tells them to find ways of stopping INCREASING their pollution output, and eventually reduce it.

No. It tells their governments to find ways to reduce the people's pollution output. I didn't sign that farking thing. Whether a politician signs that thing or not, I didn't sign that farking thing.

I'm happy to say that *I* have reduced my consumption. *I* have reduced my mileage. *I* have purchased a more economical vehicle. I don't need a politician, especially a foreign politician, to force me to be green. *I* am doing just fine on my own.

TheMaskedUnit: The retardations are astounding.

You most assuredly are
retarded.

Flab: But the fact that he's trying to make money off of global warming, does not mean that the whole thing is false.

But it is! All your comrades said it. It's global "Climate Change!" Global warming is the *OLD* thing.

Do try to keep up.

Fark It: Wow, there's a lot of conservative bullshiat in this thread.

No. There's four of us. I believe the bullshiat you sense comes from elsewhere. But, there are a lot of church of global warmists here.

Roman Fyseek: I didn't sign that farking thing. Whether a politician signs that thing or not, I didn't sign that farking thing.

That's the basis of democracy. You elect politicians to make decisions on your behalf. At least, this way, we have the illusion of having a say in what they sign. The downside, is that we sometimes have to live with decisions we don't like.

Roman Fyseek: All your comrades said it.

Again with the pidgeonholes! Sheesh!

/Gotta run. Train to catch. Smooches everyone.

Flab: That's the basis of democracy.

Actually, that's the basis of a republic. Hey, there's that word!

LouDobbsAwaaaay: /The scientists of the world shake their heads and go back to solving the worlds problems...

When did they start that? Can you name a few problems they've solved that economics wouldn't have solved on its own with better results?

Don't get me wrong. I like DVDs but, it seems that it was funded by private research. I like radio but, again, it seems like it was funded by private organizations. In fact, I can't think of anything that the government has solved with or without scientists that wouldn't have been solved cheaper and more efficiently and effectively than private companies.

Oh, wait! Spaceship 1! Oh, nevermind...

Oh, and apparently, the left gets really upset at grammar issues. Democrat senator isn't a slam. It's poor grammar.

Anyway, your worlds should be world's.

LouDobbsAwaaaay: way too hard,

Oh, hell no... I'm drunk, now. I'm working just to type.

Flab: The people who find the term "democrat senator" annoying do so on the basis that it's bad grammar.

/paste is easy

Flab: thanks for the linkee. The guidelines seem pretty reasonable, so either the organization probably wasn't tall enough to ride the ride, simply put.

Alternatively, they could be excluded based on this clause:

"The Department of Public Information reserves the right to deny or withdraw accreditation of journalists from media organizations whose activities run counter to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations..."

It's certainly possible that their activities run counter to those principles.

Anyone post this one yet? 1958 film clip about Global Warming.

Darth Shatner: What is the current temperature of the earth?

at 3300ft above sea level, the average for yesterday was 27.00F, which is 0,14F higher than last year at the same date.

Just for fun:
1998: 25,68
1999: 25,34
2000: 25,18
2001: no data
2002: 25,93
2003: 26,20
2004: 26,44
2005: 26,42
2006: 26,85
2007: 27,00
20y avg.: 25,39

Source. You can also get the temps for many other altitudes, and fancy colored graphs too here.

What should the current temperature of the earth be? There are many "good" answers to this question. Different eras have had different temperature cycles, but unless there was a massive volcanic eruption (e.g. Krakatoa, Pinatubo, etc...) or meteorite, the fauna and flora had time to adapt. Fir trees don't really like tropical weather, and likewise, orange trees don't fare too well below freezing.

Can man actually cool down the temperature of the earth?

I fail to see why you ask this question since no one is talking about trying to cool down the temperature of the earth. We are only talking about trying to reduce and maybe stop the effects of man-made pollution.

To say there is man made global warming and that we can stop it you have to have these answers.

You don't need to have the answer to hunger in the third world to be able to say it exists, or even to try and help reduce it.

I am sure there are a million websites dedicated to this factual information.

Indeed there are. In fact, there's also an international conference in Bali right now where they're discussing just that... You may have heard of it, apparently some fake reporters were denied access.

Also, how much time will man save humanity before global made global warming melt the glaciers and ice caps anyways?

"humanity" will survive the melting of the ice caps. But that doesn't mean we should sit idly and watch millions of Bengladeshis and Floridians drown.

It seams like science should have this answer too.

There are numerous models of various scenarios about it, but somehow I get the impression you wouldn't believe them.