I have a great solution to Bill's problem but I'd rather not go into detail. Haha

/Actually subby's inventing things.

Just nuke Santa Fe, problem solved... is that what you had in mind ilambiquated ?

What a stretch to get Richardson's name in a fark headline. Bill's an all right candidate (best for the dems), you can find something to post about him. Shouldn't be that hard.

Giuliani would do anything for 9/11 but he won't do that. No, he won't do that.

Heck, Richardson wasn't even mentioned until halfway thru the article with a one line quote.
Subbie must have a hard on for him.
/not that there's anything wrong with that...

Sigh...the sad part is, because it's a union (OMFG SOCIALISTS!!!1!) bashing Rudy, their words have no effect on the right. They probably like him more every time they hear the union (OMFG SOCIALISTS!!!1!) criticize his policies. He'll be the Repubs nominee.

Shaggy_C: He'll be the Repubs nominee.

I hope so -- he'll be INCREDIBLY easy to run against. The far-right won't touch a thrice-married pro-choice Catholic adulterer who's supported gun control for most of his career, and the swing and left-wing won't touch a blatantly corrupt pro-Iraq-War anti-police-oversight authoritarian who's voiced support for pretty much every failed and unpopular Bush policy (the whole 'dumping your wife at a press conference and putting your mistress up in a taxpayer-funded apartment' thing won't help, nor will 'banning dancing in bars in New York City').

Matt Taibbi called Rudi a "Rage-Virus victim" in his latest article.

Cracked me the fark up.

I think he'd be better off being jealous of Clinton because she'll be president and he won't.

Stopheles: Shaggy_C: He'll be the Repubs nominee.

I hope so -- he'll be INCREDIBLY easy to run against. The far-right won't touch a thrice-married pro-choice Catholic adulterer who's supported gun control for most of his career, and the swing and left-wing won't touch a blatantly corrupt pro-Iraq-War anti-police-oversight authoritarian who's voiced support for pretty much every failed and unpopular Bush policy (the whole 'dumping your wife at a press conference and putting your mistress up in a taxpayer-funded apartment' thing won't help, nor will 'banning dancing in bars in New York City').

I think republicans will vote in droves for anybody running against hillary, no matter how flawed. whether or not that's enough to win in a general election is anybody's guess (my guess is probably, if the republican media machine can shame enough independents into voting for rudy and/or against hillary).

personally I think giuliani's campaign has been disgusting. if he never mentioned 9/11, I think I'd remember his demeanor after the attacks more (certainly more fondly, at least). maybe it's just me, but I'm not exactly going to be itching to vote for a candidate whose campaign's singular theme seems to be repackaging my pain and shoving it back into my chest.

Rev. Skarekroe: Richardson would do better if he lost weight.

Seriously.

Funny thing is, he actually has lost quite a bit of weight.