Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Wonkette)   Popular neo-con "think tank" proposes nuking *Iraq,* making Bush Jr. dictator of the world and killing all Arabs. (Oh yeah: Cheney was on the board of directors of said think tank)   (wonkette.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

21226 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Aug 2007 at 5:08 PM (9 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



508 Comments     (+0 »)
 


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2007-08-21 08:08:20 PM  
img.photobucket.com
img.photobucket.com
 
2007-08-21 08:09:10 PM  
smitty1276:
posted on a site by an organization that nobody knew existed.

Except Brit Hume.
 
2007-08-21 08:10:02 PM  
jamspoon: Philip Atkinson's description of his childhood (pops)

Any psychiatrist in this thread want to analyse it for us?


It's kind of sad aint it? I read his biography page.

I hope he gets the help he needs. I almost feel like he is being exploited.

I'm just glad he didn't mention pure grain alchohol and rain water.
 
2007-08-21 08:16:31 PM  
Rationalizer's Field Guide to Recognizing Neocons:

Do they advocate a strongly interventionist foreign policy? +3
Believe in spreading liberal democracy? +2
Want to carpet-bomb the towelheads, for to teach them a lesson? -1
Distrust international institutions? +1
Foreign policy idealists? +1
Are they Henry Kissinger? -1000
Moderate to liberal on social welfare issues? +1
Moderate to conservative on cultural issues? +1
Overly concerned about the power of the state? -1
Are they really into Leo Strauss? +1
Used to be a liberal? +1
Used to be a Trotskyite? +2
Do You Not Like Them? +0
 
2007-08-21 08:18:10 PM  
a832.ac-images.myspacecdn.com
 
2007-08-21 08:20:09 PM  
dave420: Father_Jack Your idea of victory is just killing anyone who might have a problem with what you're doing. Great logic. Brilliant. Bravo. Have a cookie.

Hello, I see your problem you only read part of my post. If you two dunder-heads had finished reading you would have read that I don't think going to war with parts of a country is a good idea. That reasons being that you only go to war with a country when there is a need to fight the whole country.

The rules of engagement during WWII were weapons free. Free fire doesn't mean you kill everyone that moves. If you guys didn't have one dimensional thought you would realize that discretion is the better part of valor. The fact is if your enemy run to ground, leave no ground to run to. That doesn't mean everyone must die, but you don't go to war if your not going to kill and don't expect to be killed. That is how it works.

During WWII we were fighting the Nazis and the Japanese, and we bombed targets of infrastructure. The Nazis were the government and the country. It is true that there were non party members and anti Nazi citizenry. They did however build and maintain the Nazi war movement, thereby making them enemies by performing enemy acts. The same with Japan.

I don't know if you looked lately but Germany is still there, and *gasp* is still populated by Germans. And furthermore we are allies with them. Holy cow! They are a stable country! What's that you say Japan is also still here, too.

You guys have the same mentality that the these Neo-Con Raisin Cakes have only in reverse. Welcome to the world of reality, you are going to be stuck here a while.
 
2007-08-21 08:22:10 PM  
degreeless:
Neocon in the title is a fail for subby.

Not when the group in question is an offspring of Center for Security Policies, which was founded by Frank Gaffney, one of the original signatories of the Project for a New American Century Statement of Principles, who also happens to be on the Board of Advisers for FSM.
 
2007-08-21 08:24:16 PM  
Clarky: dave420: Father_Jack Your idea of victory is just killing anyone who might have a problem with what you're doing. Great logic. Brilliant. Bravo. Have a cookie.


hey, why did you include me in that? i didnt say anything which should illicit this response.
 
2007-08-21 08:25:16 PM  
uselessgit:
And yes, I do feel free to paint liberals with a broad brush, since you are all a one dimentional lot with your "Global Warming" and Bush Derangement Syndrome and all.


i149.photobucket.com
 
2007-08-21 08:35:36 PM  
What's really scary is how crazy everyone here is. You all prove that if the right has something crazy, the left will also have it, in far greater numbers.
 
2007-08-21 08:36:02 PM  
Father_Jack: hey, why did you include me in that? i didnt say anything which should illicit this response.

You said This to Dave420's statement to me. I naturally assumed that you were in agreement with his comments to me. I protested. If I am in error, I apologize.
 
2007-08-21 08:37:26 PM  
So you don't like Henry Kissinger?

Do you think Dick Cheney would look half this sexy?

www.lowculture.com
 
2007-08-21 08:37:45 PM  
Wolf_Blitzer: Keep up the insanity, skookum! I haven't laughed this hard since Mighty_Dog changed his handle again.

Dang, is it 8:00 already??
 
2007-08-21 08:39:37 PM  
Hmm, funny... Glenn Beck thinks this too. Is he a part of this crazy-ass thinktank too?
 
2007-08-21 08:39:53 PM  
/agrees with all points from article. Let God sort em out
 
2007-08-21 08:50:57 PM  
Can't wait until the next 9/11, just to see the entire planet say "Now THAT one they deserved."

punistation.fuyucorp.biz
 
2007-08-21 08:53:28 PM  
This author is totally off the deep end. Apparently he got thrown out of Toastmasters.
 
2007-08-21 08:58:08 PM  
Neurocrat: This author is totally off the deep end. Apparently he got thrown out of Toastmasters.

Er, there should have been a link there.
 
2007-08-21 08:59:09 PM  
wowzer97pooh: So you don't like Henry Kissinger?

Nobody likes Henry Kissinger. I doubt his mother liked him. I doubt his dog likes him.
 
2007-08-21 09:02:08 PM  
www.tshirthell.com
 
2007-08-21 09:03:18 PM  
Dansker: degreeless:
Neocon in the title is a fail for subby.

Not when the group in question is an offspring of Center for Security Policies, which was founded by Frank Gaffney, one of the original signatories of the Project for a New American Century Statement of Principles, who also happens to be on the Board of Advisers for FSM.


It's a fair cop, though I'd like to point out that by that standard, The New Republic is a neocon magazine.
 
2007-08-21 09:09:48 PM  
Neurocrat: Neurocrat: This author is totally off the deep end. Apparently he got thrown out of Toastmasters.

Er, there should have been a link there.


Evidently, Toastmasters told him a) Sieg Heil was no way to start a speech and b) goose-stepping around the podium was right out.
 
2007-08-21 09:12:09 PM  
Are we sure that our President is not a TX series?
With Presidents like this, we do not need Sky-Net to wipe mankind from the face of the planet.

Can't we get him to play chess instead?
 
2007-08-21 09:15:06 PM  
smitty1276:
3) The article never existed, and some lefty somewhere noticed that the previously unknown groups site was down, made up an article, and convinced a bunch of uber-partisan half-wits that there was this article.

I'm leaning towards number 3, given that there doesn't appear to be a cached copy anywhere.


You haven't read this thread, have you? At least two cached copies on Google have been posted.

Google Cache has a copy here of the original page

Second Google Cache
 
2007-08-21 09:16:27 PM  
Yeah not politically incorrect, but how is this different from Cato the elder ending all his speeches with Carthago delenda est?
 
2007-08-21 09:17:02 PM  
Not politically correct*...
 
2007-08-21 09:17:08 PM  
jamspoon: Philip Atkinson's description of his childhood (pops)

Any psychiatrist in this thread want to analyse it for us?


Garden variety Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Grandiosity, belief in one's specialness, excessive sensitivity to criticism, lack of empathy, sense of entitlement, and belief that others are envious of him--it's all there. For example, he rationalizes the fact that the neighbor boys hated him because of his own superiority not, say, because he was, in reality, a massive douche. Speaking clinically, of course.
 
2007-08-21 09:17:10 PM  
Jesus can nuke whoever he wants. Bush talks to Jesus, so shut up libtards.
 
2007-08-21 09:17:58 PM  
Mad-n-FL: Are we sure that our President is not a TX series?
With Presidents like this, we do not need Sky-Net to wipe mankind from the face of the planet.

Can't we get him to play chess instead?


Now lets be fair, I don't think its reasonable to believe that the current President or anyone in his administration seriously believes this crap. This level of insanity is apparently reserved for the author of this article, Tom Tancredo, Freepers, and skookum.
 
2007-08-21 09:22:57 PM  
PresidentPutz: Oxymoron
NeoCon Think-Tank.

NeoConsLiberals don't think, they march in step like lemurs or facistcommunist soldiers.


/TFIFY
 
2007-08-21 09:25:23 PM  
skookum: Which is why, in the coming decade, we will find something for them to do that doesn't allow for mulling about the Devil's Workshop. They will be put to work, I assure you.

And I, for one, welcome our Concentration Camp Building Overlords. I would like to remind them that I would make an excellent kapo. I require only a pound of sausage, a loaf a bread, a dozen eggs, and an assistant who speaks both English and Polish.

(call me).
 
2007-08-21 09:33:16 PM  
Already been posted in this thread, but apparently bears repeating:

Google cache of the crazy article in question.
 
2007-08-21 09:39:28 PM  
So when does Bush make his horse a Senator?
 
2007-08-21 09:40:12 PM  
Has anyone seen BravadoGT??


LOlololo...heh
 
2007-08-21 09:42:37 PM  
skookum: In five years, there will be a working nuclear device available to Muslim extremists. And it's time to nip this in the bud before we oh-so regret our lack of action.

Skookum is a troll, a paranoid schizo or a retard. There are no other options.
 
2007-08-21 09:48:53 PM  
mediaho: Google search for the author's name(p)

He's just chock full o'crazy.


Ironically I saw a link to an article he wrote about some sort of "insanity test"
 
2007-08-21 09:49:06 PM  
YHBTYHLHAND
 
2007-08-21 09:51:11 PM  
uselessgit: Ah, so you DO agree that I am a natural comedian GW? Do you think i can get people to pay me like they do you? (BTW, do they give liberals different money than real people? Can you actualy spend it outside your compound?)

img511.imageshack.us

said the moran
 
2007-08-21 09:52:40 PM  
Neurocrat

This author is totally off the deep end. Apparently he got thrown out of Toastmasters.

"You guys aren't here to learn public speaking, you are just sitting around jabbering!"
"Now just calm down Phil, we just think you might enjoy a different club better. We just don't want to hear the same speech of yours again, every meeting you insist on--"
"That's not how it works! You don't even know how Toastmasters works!"
"Look, I'm sorry but you're out. It's always your way and that's not--"
"Uh excuse me but I was one of the original members!"
"Well, we voted and you're out. You're not a dictator just because you were here first."
"Maybe I should be! Maybe I should be dictator!"
"Well, you're not and Toastmasters is a democracy. Goodbye."
"I'll show you. I'll show ALL of you!"
 
2007-08-21 09:56:22 PM  
wibwib: skookum: In five years, there will be a working nuclear device available to Muslim extremists. And it's time to nip this in the bud before we oh-so regret our lack of action.

Skookum is a troll, a paranoid schizo or a retard. There are no other options.


heh you probably chose to quote the one comment in this thread in which he was dead on accurate, because that one is only a matter of time, almost sure to happen eventually
 
2007-08-21 10:04:26 PM  
FuriousGeorge945: Keep going guys, soon enough you'll get to the point where it won't even be possible to reach new, pathetic lows.

Sorry dude, but we're not the ones trying to pass off an article--which isn't even there anymore--from some obscure website that nobody has heard of as some major scandal. That would be you.

B-b-but, Brit Hume... Yeah, big deal. Somebody has managed to get a few media appearances in an era when any moron can get a few media appearances. That doesn't change the fact that nobody here ever heard of them before. And what's really funny is that you're actually trying to convince the masses, who have never heard of this group, that they have heard of this group. Moreover, you're trying to convince people that the group is an "important" "top" "influential" "thinktank".

You may want to pause for a moment and consider how that makes you look to most people.
 
2007-08-21 10:05:58 PM  
martissimo:

heh you probably chose to quote the one comment in this thread in which he was dead on accurate, because that one is only a matter of time, almost sure to happen eventually

True enough, except they probably have them now. Look at the scary number of unaccounted for Soviet Block nukes out there. They probably can't figure out what to do with them.
 
2007-08-21 10:07:28 PM  
Muslim extremists:
1 nuke ( several kilo-deaths....maybe)


american and russian extremists:
tens of thousands of nukes ( over 2 tera-deaths )

who to fear?
 
2007-08-21 10:13:04 PM  
I finally actual READ the article, and there is no way that dude is serious. It sounds like some sort of parody. And it CERTAINLY isn't reflective of the opinions of any large number of people, and you all know it, so drop the pretense.

Also, if this group is so "big" and "important" and "influential" as a "thinktank", why are we just hearing about this all-important and widely-circulated memo to the powers-that-be, this decree from on high, if you will, TWO farkING WEEKS after it was published? Wouldn't you think that one of the tens of millions of people going to Family Security Matters website to get their marching orders might have mentioned this life-altering declaration from those who rule the "neocon" right?

/yes, I'm mocking your intellect on purpose.
 
2007-08-21 10:13:36 PM  
BravadoGT: It is! How ridiculous to have more affection for your friends, family and neighbors than strangers across an ocean...Thanks for showing me the light!

Why do you hate our troops?
 
2007-08-21 10:13:49 PM  
ianfer: who to fear?

I would say probably the ones who are openly attempting to use them, but, then again, I'm smart.
 
2007-08-21 10:23:18 PM  
Wow I've seen some moronic neocon posters here on Fark, but this thread takes the cake. I mean seriously guys, aside from sniffing glue with Uncle Dad whilst watching NASCAR wrestling, have you guys taken up a new hobby like beating each other in the head with hammers? Eating Chinese toothpaste? What is it?

I'm concerned here. You guys are approaching the "Too Brain Damaged To Breathe" level.

/Inhale. Exhale. Say it with me now....
 
2007-08-21 10:25:30 PM  
Sunny Ray: You're still whining about the election(s). No wonder the Muslims see Libs as weak and easliy distracted and are using these traits to try to defeat us. And you people keep feeding them.

Somehow, I don't think Muslim extremists distinguish Americans by political affiliation...

uselessgit: Liberals can't fight. They hate broken fingernails and don't understand the concept of self defence.

Think again.
 
2007-08-21 10:33:49 PM  
uselessgit: Marine that is no longer on Active Duty....

You know there is something here about not getting a pay check vs. being on welfare... or not being able to qualify for welfare so you had to be a Marine, but I'm not too sure what line of work would be more dangerous, being on welfare of being a Marine. Welfare probably pays more...

Maybe you could come up witha good joke on that?

(not beeing snarky... honest, there could be a good joke there)


WTF are you talking about? Seriously, what the heck is wrong with you? GTFO!
 
2007-08-21 10:37:26 PM  
smitty1276: Well, my point was that if it was really a "popular" or "top" "think tank", then it would have some cache out there somewhere. It obviously doesn't even get enough traffic for a daily (or monthly, even) google or internet archive cache.

Cause no one in the thread posted any links to the google caches of the site and article or anything like that...
 
Displayed 50 of 508 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter








In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report