Hell yeah, we need a third party candidate now more than ever.

And Bloomberg is rich like Perot but not crazy like Perot.

/voting Bloomberg '08

not sure if it could help the d's or hurt them

What about thinking about helping the country?

This two-party stranglehold on our government benefits no one.

I could vote for Mayor Mike, though I typically vote Libertarian.

Hagel/Bagel 2008

Confabulat: This two-party stranglehold on our government benefits no one.

Depending on his stance on a bunch of issues I would possibly vote for him, but I doubt he would be able to accomplish much- the 2 parties would make sure he was completely ineffective.

I would only vote for the guy if he was running for principal of my kid's school. The guy is seconds away from blinking the lights on the Empire State Building to get everyone to be quiet.

I doubt he would be able to accomplish much

After 8 years of GW Bush, I love the idea of a President that can't do much.

WTF with NY mayors running for prez? I'm going to wait for them to dig up Lindsay and run him. Suck it, Beame and LaGuardia.

Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger would be interesting

then don't elect him. he's proven himself to be a nanny who favors more government control over citizens

Didn't you vote for GW Bush in 2004? Your opinion about political leaders is null and void.

rawkus -

Die in a fire.

- New Yorker

The guy really thinks he's the principal of New York City. I'm not sure if that's enough not to vote for him for prez, however.

Let me guess: According to Bloomberg, taking scary-looking guns away from some harmless guy in Texas is going to make you and me safer.

Bloomberg only ran as a Republican to avoid the crowded Democratic primary, as he was a Democrat for 20 years. He was never a Republican.

Furthermore, he owes his political life, like Guiliani, to 9/11. Mark Green, the Democratic nominee, was kicking his ass prior to 9/11. Then it was GOP-mania sweeping the nation.

elpepe55: VP candidate has to meet all the Const. requirements of the president... so Arnold can't get on the ticket.

yeah i know, but you know that is who he would run with if he could. it's too bad, because that would be a really interesting ticket, they could maybe even carry California

albo then don't elect him. he's proven himself to be a nanny who favors more government control over citizens.

QFT.

Censoring others for their opinions doesn't bolster yours in the slightest.


Sorry, but history has already recorded the disaster of the Bush presidency. You were wrong about everything, and were fooled into supporting a war that was unnecessary and disasterous.

Those are now facts, whether you are willing to recognize them or not.

If you voted for Bush in 2004, you have been proven to be easily suckered and a poor judge of what makes a good President.

Therefore, your opinion is like that of Paris Hilton--who cares what you think? Grown-ups are trying to talk here.