Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Rosie O'Donnell thinks 9/11 was an inside job, which means she thinks the Holocaust didn't happen, which means she weighs as much as a duck, and therefore is made of wood and is a witch. Burn her   ( news.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

22272 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 Apr 2007 at 1:07 PM (10 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



1133 Comments     (+0 »)
 


Oldest | « | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | » | Newest

 
2007-04-11 03:59:25 PM  
DROxINxTHExWIND :


Of course it is not hatred to disagree with the government. Nor is it hatred to make really stupid comments on a radio comedy show. My point was that NEITHER should be vilified. Each has shown their character in ways totally unrelated to these comments, and to evaluate a career, a person or an entire body of work based on single comments is pretty shallow.

Sorry about the last post - hit "Add Comment" too quick!
 
2007-04-11 03:59:39 PM  
Actually there are two groups that influence a lot of the shiat that is going on right now. They are the members of PNAC and The Carlyle Group. Not that hard to comprehend. It revolves around money and power like most of the world's man made catastrophies.

Also, people keep saying that 9/11 was done by Muslim terrorists, but the whole truth was that it was done by Saudi Muslim terrorists.

Why were there more than 30 pages of blacked out material in the 9/11 Commission report referring to what was later discovered to be Saudi Arabia? Why do Dead Eye Dick and the wonder monkey hold hands with the Saudi royalty when they visit? Who is Prince Bandar and why is he granted instance access to our leaders?

I read the BBC non-explanation of WTC7, it is a lot of hand waiving and leads to no actual explanation. If there was a straight forward explanation, then why did the BBC pull the footage and try to get it removed from other sites?

9/11 was caused by Saudi Muslim terrorists, our administration chose to go after Afghanistan due to their harboring of Bin Laden. Then we decided to go after Iraq, completely unconnected to 9/11. Saudi Arabia, which does sponsor terrorist groups (members of the royal family have been linked to such funding), gets off scott free.

WTC 7 collapses for inexplicable reasons. A major news agency reports its collapse a full 30 minutes before reality catches up. Then they hide the footage, then they issue a non-explanation 5 years later.

The fact is we aren't privy to all the facts.
 
2007-04-11 04:00:04 PM  
Mr.Churka


mikaloyd


Do you have one of those flexible telescopes they use for endoscopies? If not, how did you read my post with your head so far up your ass?


By the enormous glimmering light of your ego which was reflected and focused by your tinfoil chapeau.
 
2007-04-11 04:01:44 PM  
FritzyvonFritz: First of all, count me as a 9-11 "agnostic". I don't make any claims at this point about thermate or vast conspiracies. My gripe is that I consider the case still open, since nobody other than that doofus Moussaui really went to trial in the US.

Also, I think the government and media have acted suspiciously here by constantly rubbing our noses in September 11, and in the case of the Gov., stalling and underfunding an investigation.

But if I were to float a CT, it would go like this: everything happened as the government said it did EXCEPT that the perpetrators were stooges unaware that they were doing the business of MOSSAD, whose friends in the Pentagon tipped them off to the massive extent of the air drills on that particular day.

If you don't think that Israeli spies have been operating in the Pentagon for a while now, you might want to do some research. Check out the resume of Richard Perle, for example. These are the guys who were talking about taking out Iraq a long time ago, and who mentioned a "New Pearl Harbor" long before 9-11.

Why do you think we are constantly mucking about in the Middle East? Two reasons:

1. Israel
2. Oil

These are related. Israel needs oil, and hates having to buy it from Russia, who kicked out their agents during the Yukos fiasco.
 
2007-04-11 04:02:04 PM  
iaazathot: Also, people keep saying that 9/11 was done by Muslim terrorists, but the whole truth was that it was done by Saudi Muslim terrorists.

Uh-huh. I love how this administration leaves that shiat out of the argument. 'The Saudi's are our friends'.

Bullshiat.
 
2007-04-11 04:02:30 PM  
So, who WAS on the grassy knoll . . .
 
2007-04-11 04:04:03 PM  
Laws of Armed Conflict(LOAC) Rules of Engagement (ROE)

is something Military aviators fear more than
missiles.

Lawyers would have to give an OK before shooting down
a civilian aircraft, even if it was taken over by
enemy combatants.

We all know how fast lawyers are... Right Duke La Crosse players?
 
2007-04-11 04:04:12 PM  
Mathmatix: You are a babbling retard.
 
2007-04-11 04:04:47 PM  
Faethe: I don't care. You let a training camp for armies of idiots who soul purpose is to go into other peoples countries and blow shiat up, you are responsible.

who is "you" all the civilians in the country that are going to die because some people they don't know destroyed some buildings they have never heard of or seen in a country half way across the globe...


Russia would have pulled this shiat we sure as hell would not have invaded Moscow.

maybe under your control but we made nice with the pakis because they have nukes and it would be hard to retaliate against them so dont think for a second the current admin wanted to do anything but follow the path of least resistance to Iraq...
 
2007-04-11 04:05:17 PM  
milk_plus: The people who were part of this "inside job" couldn't coordinated microwaving easy Mac much less one the greatest terrorist attacks in history. Their greatest defense is their own incompetence.

QFT. It's easier for 19 whackjobs to plan an attack than it is for an entire gov't. full of whackjobs to coordinate their efforts.

And Sir Charles, I did NOT need to be reminded of that movie.
 
2007-04-11 04:05:42 PM  
mikaloyd

It's a chapeau, so fark you!


/GIS for tinfoil toupee sadly lackluster
//My ego is a light, for when all other lights go out
 
2007-04-11 04:05:46 PM  
you honestly think the federal government has the competence to pull this off?

The federal government can put cruise missiles through windows. They can put a man on the moon. They can build a plane that can't be detected by radar. They can pull whatever they want off.
 
2007-04-11 04:05:56 PM  
Picador

Actually, a close up video of the top of the building suggests that the collapse of WTC 1 appears to have originated at the base. You can see the antenna, which was mounted to the core columns, begin to collapse before the outer walls of the building. Most likely the demolition was a double-pronged affair in which the core columns were brought down from bottom to top (as evidenced by the sinking antenna) while the outer skeleton and the attached floors were exploded away from top to bottom a split second later. Note how the outside walls of the tower peeled away like a banana to reveal nothing of the core inside, those 47 massive 1,300 foot-high core columns having apparently telescoped in on themselves and sunk out of sight.

except for the fact that there were no "Core Columns" running up the middle of the building. The WTC was more suceptable to collapse for this reason. It was a truss construction utilizing an exo-skeletal support system which was used to maximize floor space. There was no "core" that was aiding in support which is one of the reasons it collapsed the way it did- most builtings are built around the central core which has some form of masonry. The WTC had no internal masonry, or for that matter had no internal steel support beams. what you are seeing is the external skeleton which is primary support peeling away because it was primarily held in place by the floor trusses. Once that truss was weakened by the heat, and it sagged, the structural support of the floor failed, and the pancaking of the floors began. the tilting of the antenna was caused by one side failing prior to the other (if you look at a wide shot of the moment of collapse, you will see it's actually swaying and not falling in on itself, but actually falling to the south-west into where the plane initially hit and took out a good majority of the support structure to that side (like putting a notch in a tree to "encourage" the fall to one side. However, given that it was so high, it wouldn't topple the building to one side, it would just start the chain reaction.

/Firefighter
//at the scene not long after
/// hates to have to tell all you bat shiat people that perhaps what was actually broadcast on television, photographed repeatedly from hundreds of different spots, with millions of live witnesses actually did happen.
 
2007-04-11 04:06:38 PM  
Well, Deucednuisance, that explains the floors. But it doesn't explain the collpase of the core columns which were a separate structure of their own to which the floors were attached. How does a massive skeleton made of 47 1,300 foot high vertical columns collapse into itself? That's like cutting through an oak tree and having it splinter straight down into toothpicks rather than topple over.
 
2007-04-11 04:08:00 PM  
The federal government can put cruise missiles through windows. They can put a man on the moon. They can build a plane that can't be detected by radar. They can pull whatever they want off.

Really? A secret among hundreds, if not thousands of poorly paid government workers and citizens isn't going to be leaked in 6 years?

Are you freaking kidding me?
 
2007-04-11 04:10:00 PM  
vernercomp

I already told you it was Corey Lidle.
 
2007-04-11 04:10:35 PM  
Unwashed Mass Member: "there were no "Core Columns" running up the middle of the building"

Please cite a credible source here, preferably something involving the actual blueprints for the buildings. Cause the last I heard, they did indeed have center columns.
 
2007-04-11 04:11:23 PM  
beam-cut photo is photoshopped!

Two can play this game. Show me evidence that the towers existed in the first place. Thanks, how do you know they aren't photoshopped!!??? This is O'reilly logic: "Show me evidence!" ok here you are "That evidence is fake!!!"
 
2007-04-11 04:11:51 PM  
Faethe

Our government has ALWAYS been full of Shiat. EVERY government is full of Shiat. That's part of being a government. People want to be reassured. When my son who is 5 asks me Daddy am I safe? I dont go in to a long diatribe about what might happen to him. The kid would pee himself.
I reassure him and then try like hell to manage his exposure to danger...but guess what...I am doomed to fail...and for a time he may hate on me for it, but with maturity he will see that it was the ONLY way to allow him the room to grow, to feel joy, to expand himself..
Much as Rosie's ass is free to continue expanding and expanding.

I just long for the days when our government did a better job of Farking with the truth. We've gotten to the point where they can't even bullshiat us a little before everyone thinks its a plot.

God Bless America!
 
2007-04-11 04:13:03 PM  
Boojum2k: Wrong. The argument is that only controlled demolitions could have brought the towers straight down at near-freefall.

But when I hear people talk about that, I wonder why the perpetrators would have wanted to go to the trouble of "controlling the demolition." What would they have had to gain from the extra effort, as opposed to just letting the buildings fall in whatever way they might happen to fall?
 
2007-04-11 04:13:17 PM  
Headso: who is "you" all the civilians in the country that are going to die because some people they don't know destroyed some buildings they have never heard of or seen in a country half way across the globe...

Well, the someone should have thought about that shiat before they bombed the fark out of us. Not just us, either. Plenty of other countries had the piss bombed out of them by the same group of assholes, for the same reasons. The difference between us and them? We can get away with nuking people. That's it.

maybe under your control but we made nice with the pakis because they have nukes and it would be hard to retaliate against them so dont think for a second the current admin wanted to do anything but follow the path of least resistance to Iraq...

The nuke they have is...cute. The nukes they have are the same exact ones North Korea tested. Those work. Sort of...not really. One C-130 gunship, one pass of a C-130 gunship could destroy that much or more. Especially people wise. Nukes are primarily an environmental hazard. They do vaporize shiat, but it's one bang, one place, unlike now where we basically just wipe clean 'vast tracks of land' along with everyone living on it.
 
2007-04-11 04:13:20 PM  
Boy, wouldn't the world be simpler if she were right? We would just have to reveal the evil people secretly causing all the bad things in the world and everything would be made right. Roll the credits. Raise the house lights.

By the time most people reach Rosie's age, they learn that the world doesn't work like that and all of the bad things you don't like aren't being secretly caused by the people you don't like.

But I suppose when you have as much money as she has now, you can keep living in your fantasy world and your hangers-on won't point out when you're full of shiat. Save us from celebrities living in their little bubbles.
 
2007-04-11 04:14:59 PM  
dave2198: Really? A secret among hundreds, if not thousands of poorly paid government workers and citizens isn't going to be leaked in 6 years?

the terrorist groups supposedly worked in blind cells that didn't know eachother and only had the information that was absolutely necessary. I would imagine if the government wanted to accomplish the same goal they would approach it in a similar manner...

/no I don't believe the government "was in on it"
 
2007-04-11 04:15:30 PM  
Utopias Marathon: I recommend reading my whole post. It is in support that the building fell due to weakened steel from the combination fires

Yeah, my bad.

SuperNinjaToad: hhmm elchip assuming it was actually demolition, do you think the perpetrators give a crap if the building fits into its own footprint coming down(done to minimize damage)? They know thousands will die anyway so what if a few hundred more on the ground gets it when it comes down? Your logic in this instance is thus flawed.

An interesting point, but regardless -- the twin towers did not collapse in anything resembling a controlled demolition, in which charges pull the building down.

The twin towers collapsed in a manner consistent with what was explained. The floors above the impact came crashing down onto the floors below, causing a progressive failure. It's quite plain to see.

Unwashed_Mass_Member: except for the fact that there were no "Core Columns" running up the middle of the building.

I'm pretty sure there were, and that the load was shared between the internal columns and the exoskeleton.
 
2007-04-11 04:16:45 PM  
Yamagoo: I just long for the days when our government did a better job of Farking with the truth. We've gotten to the point where they can't even bullshiat us a little before everyone thinks its a plot.

I think Rosie keyed into the correlation between the number of people who believe in the omnipotence of the government and the president's approval rating. The lower it gets, the more people think that there's a plot.

Sometimes there is.
 
2007-04-11 04:17:32 PM  
Arman N. Havana

Yeah but here's the thing...(oh boy this is going to cause trouble) Rosie isn't just a regular person..she's a gay person and as any of them will tell you they are special and need special considerations and rights beyond those of regular people, cause you know they're gay and no one but other gay people who think exactly like they do understands them...therefore she must believe that the government who won't recognize her special gayness is behind every boo boo she ever got or will ever get till they make her, and everyone who thinks like she does...more special than everyone else....

See...there's a simple explanation for everything
 
2007-04-11 04:17:51 PM  
Cryptozoophiliac

Actually, there were internal support beams, by column I was referring to a typically masonry inner core to a building which is primarily utilized to provide rigidity, and an escape (note the internal fire escape stairs) which are absent in the WTC. There are however support beams in the center column, on that I do need to clarify.

However, the truss floor construction (any firefighter will tell you it is the most dangerous form of construction to have to deal with in firefighting) is extremely unstable due to it's weakness when even slightly weakend.
 
2007-04-11 04:18:36 PM  
Unwashed_Mass_Member -- there are photographs of the towers taken mid-construction which show beyond doubt that there was indeed a massive inner core structure. In addition, the blueprints of the Twin Towers are now available, having been leaked to the general public after years of official suppression. If your argument rests on the non-existence of this well-documented core structure, you lose.

And what do you make of all the eyewitnesses (including members of the broadcast media live at the scene) who reported an ongoing series of explosions within the buildings starting from the moment BEFORE the plane crashes and continuing on at intervals until both towers were down?
 
2007-04-11 04:18:50 PM  
of course the sound records showing there were explosions in the basement before the fall, the clearly visible squibs, the crimping of WTC7, the Silverstein PBS screwup and the fact that the WTC went through unprecedented shut down of all security for a whole weekend had nothing to do with it.... or the fact silverstein just took out a terrorist attack policy, or the fact that the person in charge of rewiring all the fiber optics was a company run by Bush's little bro.

Oh of course the people getting IM's to get out, the israeli's caught filming the attacks by police from a distance, and the dirty money changing hands and people getting fired for odd reasons just before it happened had nothing to do with it.

Things just don't add up. There is too many coincidences and there are no SUCH thing as them.. they happen for a reason.
 
2007-04-11 04:19:37 PM  
elchip: I'm pretty sure there were, and that the load was shared between the internal columns and the exoskeleton.

I saw in a few documentaries that the dude who designed it did it for that reason - to spread the load out to the skeleton as well. I, for one, amazed the thing just didn't pitch right over and start the mother of all chain reactions. Maybe that was the point of flying a plane into it, and it didn't work out that way?
 
2007-04-11 04:21:41 PM  
but jesus was a witch
i mean he floated on water... he did magic and such things
if only they had burned him at the stake...
/i wonder what that would have been like

//my point was going to be oh wait Rosie is too heavy to put up on a stake but i kind of started wandering and now forget how i was going to start and or get there
 
2007-04-11 04:21:54 PM  
Picador: And what do you make of all the eyewitnesses (including members of the broadcast media live at the scene) who reported an ongoing series of explosions within the buildings starting from the moment BEFORE the plane crashes and continuing on at intervals until both towers were down?

Clearly, people were wrong about explosions before the plane crashes. And, umm, you think the aftermath of a big plane crashing into a skyscraper at 550 mph is gonna be quiet?
 
2007-04-11 04:22:03 PM  
Here is what makes me smart:

1. i beleive everything i see on tv
2. i beleive the government never lies
3. i beleive Good,moral people run the world.

You see, it's smarter to "Debunk" any version of reality not presented by television than it is to question a version of reality presented by television. It just is.
 
2007-04-11 04:22:09 PM  
Faethe: Well, the someone should have thought about that shiat before they bombed the fark out of us.

the last thing some guy who can barley feed himself cares about is what some asshat is doing in another country half way across the globe, it is kinda hard to go stage a protest or whatever when you survive on pennies a day... One sheet of cardboard paper is like a weeks salary! not to mention the sharpie to write with...

The nuke they have is...cute. The nukes they have are the same exact ones North Korea tested. Those work. Sort of...not really. One C-130 gunship, one pass of a C-130 gunship could destroy that much or more. Especially people wise. Nukes are primarily an environmental hazard. They do vaporize shiat, but it's one bang, one place, unlike now where we basically just wipe clean 'vast tracks of land' along with everyone living on it.

it was cute enough to scare us away from punishing them for their hand in creating and financing AQ, it was cute enough to get Mussaraf in the whitehouse and on the daily show to sell his crappy book rather than being in a bunker hiding from our guys
 
2007-04-11 04:22:20 PM  
Faethe
Believing in the Tooth Fairy ain't makin her put Quarters under my kids pillows...I do that..me...

So Farking what if people distrust the government THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BY DESIGN

The damn thing shouldnt have ever gotten this Farking big to begin with...but every farking icehole with a runny nose wants free tissues from the Feds and we fall for their Shiat time and time again.

THIS is why I am a social Conservative.
 
2007-04-11 04:23:02 PM  
Picador: Well, Deucednuisance, that explains the floors. But it doesn't explain the collpase of the core columns which were a separate structure of their own to which the floors were attached. How does a massive skeleton made of 47 1,300 foot high vertical columns collapse into itself? That's like cutting through an oak tree and having it splinter straight down into toothpicks rather than topple over.

You, sir, are sadly misinformed.

1) Building had no "core columns". Unwashed_Mass_Member covered that point nicely. But suffice it to say that the four corner columns were not "solid", but made of segments, also bolted together.

2) Ever cut down a tree? I'm betting not. Because they are not balanced. You have to take into account a tree's "lean" (if you don't want to kill yourself) because that's the way if "wants to go". They don't fall over until you cut them because the roots extend both down and out, grabbing the earth, holding the whole system in tension. Unlike a building, in which everything is balanced atop everything else.

And taking advantage of that fact is why controlled demolitions work in the first place. The potential energy in the building is already pointing straight down. It's incredibly difficult to topple a building, which is why you almost never see it happen. They fall straight down because they are built in balance.

And no-one has ever answered this question for me: If someone wanted to take out the building, the point is to cause as much damage and casualties as possible, right?

So, if the building *could* have been toppled, why would they take the extra time to plant explosives in all four corners, quadrupling the opportunity for discovery? Why would they go to all that effort, just to be TIDY?
 
2007-04-11 04:23:18 PM  
Faethe

Genocide - because we can get away with it.

You make me sick, but I'm not going to hold your neighbours responsible.

Heres to hoping horrible things happen to you. Cheers.
 
2007-04-11 04:23:38 PM  
Mathmatix: Earth to farktard... are you familiar with the term paranoid dellusions? Are you crazy or just stupid?

there are skyscrapers around the world that have burnt from 1-20 hours and the buildings didnt collapse, the frame was still left.. at the very least, if official story is true than the frame of the wtc buildings should have been left...

And these buildings, the ones that burned so long and didn't collapse... They were hit by Boeing 767 airplanes first going over 500 mph right? Because a 767 fully louded with people and luggage going 500+ mph certainly wouldn't do any structural damage to a building or other object would it?

Hey douchebag, man of science... don't suppose you're familiar with the formula: E = (1/2)mv^2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy#Kinetic_energy_of_rigid_bo​dies

Basically it states that the kinetic energy of a given object increases 4 fold every time you double the speed. Ever see the damage a 4,000 lb car does to an object when it crashes at 60 mph? The car would have roughly 1.5 million Joules of energy to disapate when it crashed. A boeing 767 weighs ~336,000 lbs. A boeing 767 going 500 mph would hit with roughly 4 billion Joules of energy. In other words ONE of those planes hit the building with the energy of over 2,600 4000 lb cars going 60 mph. I can't see any reason that would damage a building in any way - can you?

I love how you conspiracy idiot retards always say "other buildings burned but they didn't fall" as if a farking airplane going 500 mph crashing into a building has no effect on its structure what-so-ever in and of itself let alone the fire.

Frankly when you work out the mathamatics I illustrated above it's shocking the god damn buildings didn't fall down sooner. Seems they are pretty WELL engineered if they can withstand the impact of a 168 ton object crashing into them at 500+ mph.


do i have evidence to back this up, no. do i have supporting links or witnesses, no. I dont have the time and resources too. But that doesnt make you telling me the official version is right, and w/o evidence i cant question it...

So in a nutshell, you're a realatively stupid person with a minimal grasp of science and engineering... you "don't have time and resources" to do any research but you do feel qualified to question the findings of experts (many who hold Phds in relevant fields) who spent YEARS of their lives investigating this matter?

Right. You are a worthless human being.
 
2007-04-11 04:26:42 PM  
mathmatix
those were cut during the clean up want me to pull up the picture of the cutting them?
 
2007-04-11 04:27:19 PM  
br986
Dude you just became my hero, but for the love of God take a hit off this joint before you're farking head explodes!

Great stuff though MAN that's great stuff!
 
2007-04-11 04:27:22 PM  
elchip either doesn't have a job or his job is to post disinformation.
 
2007-04-11 04:27:37 PM  
May have already been posted but here is a copy of the manual for the lunar buggy and it's deployment from the lander.

http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/LRV_OpsNAS8-25145Pt4.pdf
 
2007-04-11 04:28:19 PM  
3rdorderofsimulacra: Here is what makes me smart:

1. i beleive everything i see on tv
2. i beleive the government never lies
3. i beleive Good,moral people run the world.

You see, it's smarter to "Debunk" any version of reality not presented by television than it is to question a version of reality presented by television. It just is.


Well, I'm convinced by your very strong argument.

9/11 was a conspiracy done by the government! Why do you sheeple keep denying it?
 
2007-04-11 04:28:47 PM  
elchip either doesn't have a job or his job is to post disinformation.

and you don't read threads all the way through before casting lame-ass ad hominem. he provided sourced and comprehensive responses on the issues.
 
2007-04-11 04:29:47 PM  
Picador:

I clarified my statement above. As well these "internal explosions" were a result of massive amounts of air rushing out of the building (as well as crushed debris) as the floors pancaked on top of one another.

something to consider:

1. Not one person of this supposed conspiracy has come forward toblow the whistle on a conspiray that would have taken hundreds to enact.
2. Not one worker in the buildings ever came forward to talk about how strange it was that there was a sudden influx of janitors or maintenance people who where stringing all these demo charges in the weeks/months leading up to the attacks. it's kind of hard to hid something like that.

I have a question: outside of peoples obvious hatred for President Bush, and need to believe that there are no enemies other than internal, why would people take to suspending belief so much as to believe that their government would liquidate thousands of it's own citizens for "oil" which it was getting an ass load of for a lot cheaper than we do now? what is the MOTIVATION? you say corporations staged it? Who runs corporations? you can't effect something of this size without thousands knowing about it... and yet not one person who would have been involved has come forward.

On the other side, you have independently verified (by Popular Science, independent experts, and the hundreds of sitable sources and most listed above) that state that what we saw was a direct result of airplanes hitting these structures. I'm really at a loss to try and understand (and I'm happy I don't) what would make someone go this far off the reservation?
 
2007-04-11 04:30:08 PM  

He says that Rosie isn't really as crazy as she's making it seem. She's just pushing the loon factor up in order to get canned from the view so that she can get her own show.


She already had her own show back in 1996...
 
2007-04-11 04:31:27 PM  
nashBridges

Thanks. Sounds horrible - what a way to go.. :(

J.
 
2007-04-11 04:31:42 PM  
Non-story; magic bullet.
 
2007-04-11 04:31:43 PM  
OMG!!!1!! Its teh conspiracy. WTF?
 
2007-04-11 04:32:01 PM  
3rdorderofsimulacra

Here is what makes me smart:
1. i beleive everything i see on tv
2. i beleive the government never lies
3. i beleive Good,moral people run the world.

You see, it's smarter to "Debunk" any version of reality not presented by television than it is to question a version of reality presented by television. It just is.


I beleive(sp) I can fly
I BELIEVE I can touch the sky
I think about it every night and day
Spread my wings and fly away....
 
Displayed 50 of 1133 comments


Oldest | « | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | » | Newest



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.

In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report