Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Rosie O'Donnell thinks 9/11 was an inside job, which means she thinks the Holocaust didn't happen, which means she weighs as much as a duck, and therefore is made of wood and is a witch. Burn her   ( news.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

22272 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 Apr 2007 at 1:07 PM (10 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



1133 Comments     (+0 »)
 


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Newest

 
2007-04-11 10:00:51 AM  
Good one, subby

Yeah, Rosie O' Donnell is a loon and her 9/11 conpsiracy is laughable and she never back up her assertions. But if she's not denying the Holocasut, why try to hang that around her neck? Isn't her loopy 9/11 conpsiracy theories and her pathetic emo poetry on the subject enough reason to mock her without having to invent other reasons?

TFA is such a strawman, it's practically singing "I would wile away the hours, conferrin' with the flowers".
 
2007-04-11 10:05:41 AM  
This seems as good a place as any to make my suggestion that Imus and O'Donnell team up for some kind of crazy person morning zoo radio-tv show.
 
2007-04-11 10:10:04 AM  
MacG


This seems as good a place as any to make my suggestion that Imus and O'Donnell team up for some kind of crazy person morning zoo radio-tv show.


Interesting. But not "oil and water" enough. I'd rather see her team up with Bill O'Reilly. Difficulty: O'Reilly can't cut her mic when she refuses to jump through his hoops.
 
2007-04-11 10:10:25 AM  
A lot of people think 9/11 was a conspiracy. She's just the highest profile person to admit it.
 
2007-04-11 10:19:37 AM  
But that isn't her nose - it's a FALSE one!
 
2007-04-11 10:22:55 AM  
A lot of people think the reverse-vampire-Trilateral Commission cabal controls the US money supply. She's just the highest profile person to admit it.

A lot of people think Coors Light is the nectar of the gods. She's just the highest profile person to admit it.

A lot of people think the gnomes under their bed tell them to burn things. She's just the highest profile person to admit it.
 
2007-04-11 10:24:07 AM  
Gwendolyn: A lot of people think 9/11 was a conspiracy. She's just the highest profile person to admit it.

A lot of people think that the moon landing was faked and that UFOs are what gave them a sore rump.
 
2007-04-11 10:24:21 AM  
....and we're green.

A Holy Grail quotefest--9/11 conspiracy flame war combo.

Should be interesting.
 
2007-04-11 10:25:13 AM  
Rosie is an expert on structural engineering. She even built her own reinforcements to her house to prevent the floors from collapsing under her weight.
 
2007-04-11 10:25:16 AM  
Maybe she's just trying to get a hot new girlfriend. We all know the hot ones are batshiat crazy.
 
2007-04-11 10:29:49 AM  
Gwendolyn :A lot of people think 9/11 was a conspiracy. She's just the highest profile person to admit it

Rosie is higher profile the Charlie Sheen? That my just push him over the edge
 
2007-04-11 10:31:09 AM  
my= may


/preview is not my freind
 
2007-04-11 10:31:33 AM  
szmike: A Holy Grail quotefest--9/11 conspiracy flame war combo.

The twins towers were only a model.
 
2007-04-11 10:32:45 AM  
anal brazil men: The twins towers were only a model.

Shhhh
 
2007-04-11 10:33:10 AM  
A recent poll from the Scripps Research Center found that more than a third of Americans believe that 9/11 was an "inside job."

Therein lies the true backwash of American society.
 
2007-04-11 10:33:43 AM  
anal brazil men

szmike: A Holy Grail quotefest--9/11 conspiracy flame war combo.

The twins towers were only a model.


Ssshhhh!
 
2007-04-11 10:34:48 AM  
AzDownboy

Damnit! I knew my "ssshhh" was too long.
 
2007-04-11 10:35:50 AM  
Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?
 
2007-04-11 10:39:48 AM  
"She turned me into a newt!"
"A newt?"
...
...
...
"I got better."
 
2007-04-11 10:40:05 AM  
Let me just go ahead and complete the logic of TFA:

Rosie is Hitler.

/was bound to happen soon, anyway
/"It's not my mustache, it's a false one"
 
2007-04-11 10:45:20 AM  
TheConvincingSavant: A recent poll from the Scripps Research Center found that more than a third of Americans believe that 9/11 was an "inside job."

Therein lies the true backwash of American society.


Let's make a deal. We'll kill the 1/3 that believes its a conspiracy as long as we also execute the 1/3 that still believes that the President is doing a heckuva job.
 
2007-04-11 10:52:23 AM  
Hyaku-Shiki: Let's make a deal. We'll kill the 1/3 that believes its a conspiracy as long as we also execute the 1/3 that still believes that the President is doing a heckuva job.

But then there'd be no one left.

/Fuzzy math
 
2007-04-11 10:52:44 AM  
szmike: Interesting. But not "oil and water" enough. I'd rather see her team up with Bill O'Reilly. Difficulty: O'Reilly can't cut her mic when she refuses to jump through his hoops.

I'd refuse, too, if I didn't think I could fit through them.
 
2007-04-11 11:04:55 AM  
I HATE Rosie with a passion, I really do.

However,

I think Geraldo Rivera was right. (Did I really just say that?)

He says that Rosie isn't really as crazy as she's making it seem. She's just pushing the loon factor up in order to get canned from the view so that she can get her own show.

What saddens me is that there are an unknown number of poor uneducated people listening to her and thinking she actually makes sense, tells the truth, etc...
 
2007-04-11 11:06:12 AM  
Rosie is a government shill. Her credibility is ZERO. Who else to have discredit the 911 truth movement? Propaganda runs deep people, wake up. The zionist controllers have her mentioning the holocost? That gives even more proof to who she really works for.
 
2007-04-11 11:06:57 AM  
what else floats in water?

Gravy

very small rocks

lead, lead

A DUCK!
 
2007-04-11 11:08:11 AM  
dasboot told me about the thread and said I should share my thoughts on the situation...


i am in the conspiracy camp, though i dont know how much. the main reason is physics, melting points, and structural integrity. if you see skyscrapers around the world(some a lil less poorly made than wtc) you see that some of the most intense infernos still dont bring down buildings. the heat just isnt enough to melt the steel of the wtc. melting points of steel is something in excess of 2500degrees(cant remember if its celsius or fahrenheit forgive me) and there is just no possible way for a 767 not fully loaded, just loaded enough to make it to L.A., to generate enough heat to melt steel. and also, after the initial impact, most of the jet fuel was consumed in the huge fireball explosion...

this is what i think, i know some will think i am a loon or whatever but science rarely lets me down, and it seems that the science doesnt agree with the event witnessed.
 
2007-04-11 11:14:07 AM  
mathmatix: but science rarely lets me down, and it seems that the science doesn't agree with the event witnessed.

Indeed. While I can't believe that 9/11 was an inside job (you honestly think the federal government has the competence to pull this off?), there are a number of scientific factors (as you pointed out) causing me to think not all may be what it seems.
 
2007-04-11 11:25:46 AM  
mathmatix
the heat just isnt enough to melt the steel of the wtc. melting points of steel is something in excess of 2500degrees(cant remember if its celsius or fahrenheit forgive me) and there is just no possible way for a 767 not fully loaded, just loaded enough to make it to L.A., to generate enough heat to melt steel. and also, after the initial impact, most of the jet fuel was consumed in the huge fireball explosion...

A) It didn't need to "melt" the steel to bring the building down. Temps as low at 700 degrees can severely weaken the structural strength of steel.

B) While the fuel burns at that temp normally, you are totally ignoring the impact and affect of both other combustibles in the building, and that other factors affect the temp of burning material as well (forced air for instance, or the air draft created by a fire itself force feeding the fire)

C) Popular Mechanics knocked all this BS down with a very well written debunking of all these "theories" as to what may have happen, take the 15 minutes to check it out and avoid repeating repeatedly debunked information.
 
2007-04-11 11:29:34 AM  
tnpir: you honestly think the federal government has the competence to pull this off?

that's been my underlying argument for years aboot various conspiracy theories. the same people that say it's a conspiracy call Bush and the administration idiots. You can't have it both ways. They can't be completely stupid and incompetent, and yet totally capable of pulling off covert operations like a 9/11 without being exposed somehow.

So, I really havent read a lot, but I know that most of the contrversy is focused on building 7, not the main towers. What I think is most likely is that there is more information about the collapse that we may never know. It's so far removed from the event that facts and reality may be clouded by innuendo and opinion. At the end of the day, anybody that wants to end up with a certain result can use the facts to support it. I don't see any of these theories becoming widely accepted unless some tangible, independent proof of government responsiblity comes to light. until then, it's just a bunch of tin-foil hat wearing internet geeks setting fire to chickenwire with kerosene.
 
2007-04-11 11:29:52 AM  
Sorry wraithbane, you need to check again. While you are at, check out who popular mechanics is owned by. The towers fell in 9 seconds, freefall speed, wasn't any weakened steel. Why the molten steel lava pit that burned for months under the towers? Why is there diagonally cut steel beams at the base of the towers?
You are seriously gonna slap yourself when all of this finally comes to light.
 
2007-04-11 11:32:17 AM  
Sorry wraithbane, you need to check again. While you are at, check out who popular mechanics is owned by.

Oh good grief. . . another Loose Changer.
 
2007-04-11 11:32:34 AM  
Why the molten steel lava pit that burned for months under the towers?

there was molten metal, not necessarily steel. the towers were covered with aluminum, for example.

Why is there diagonally cut steel beams at the base of the towers?

cite a photo and provide convincing evidence of thes extraordinary claim.
 
2007-04-11 11:32:47 AM  
It wasn't Bush or our government that pulled this off. They are just there to keep you arguing for the red or the blue side. The world banks and other global elites hold the puppet strings of the world.
 
2007-04-11 11:34:38 AM  
The world banks and other global elites hold the puppet strings of the world.

so, who did it? the rothchilds? the bilderberger group? the council on foreign relations? the trilaterals? the bavarian illuminat? the jews? the reverse vampires? major-league baseball?
 
2007-04-11 11:35:23 AM  
DNA Prototype
You are seriously gonna slap yourself when all of this finally comes to light.


I'm not sure, the sun going off the main sequence will probably stop my zombie shambling days long before then.
 
2007-04-11 11:36:31 AM  
2007-04-11 11:25:46 AM Wraithbane

not going to say who popular mechanics is owned by or who had a hand in what.. thats not my beef... scientifically there is no way the towers should have fallen in less than a minute... gravity + resistance, doesnt equal 9 second collapse.

the collapse was almost as if there were no floors below the top 50...

I am not trying to be a tinfoil hatter, but the science does not equal to the event we witnessed.
 
2007-04-11 11:37:33 AM  
scientifically there is no way the towers should have fallen in less than a minute...

and what "science" is this that you are citing as a reason? care to share?
 
2007-04-11 11:41:49 AM  
cite a photo and provide convincing evidence of thes extraordinary claim.

img217.imageshack.us

img217.imageshack.us
first page google results "wtc support beams, cut"
 
2007-04-11 11:43:24 AM  
albo so you are telling me that a floor that collapses on another floor will fall at the same rate of speed as if there was no floor underneath of it....

its called the accelleration of gravity, with the resistance of other floors... how can a collapses speed up when by law of physics it should have slowed down?
 
2007-04-11 11:44:33 AM  
that's one beam out of many. and you're sure it's not a photoshop.
 
2007-04-11 11:44:49 AM  
albo show me how a collapse is supposed to occur in under 20 seconds, w/o the aid of explosives or demolition knowledge.

if you are right, there should be examples all over the world. no offense but dont be a dick just because folks have the nerve to think differently than you.
 
2007-04-11 11:45:33 AM  
that's one beam out of many. and you're sure it's not a photoshop.

you are so right, i forgot you were on th e9/11 commission and know everything and every detail about every moment and second of that day.. my apologies then
 
2007-04-11 11:46:35 AM  
its called the accelleration of gravity, with the resistance of other floors... how can a collapses speed up when by law of physics it should have slowed down?

you're discounting the tremendous weight of the floors as they pancaked down upon each other. the framing was not designed to support that. this has been extensively discussed and documented and researched to death. you need to read the official reports and other sources that aren't 911 truthers.
 
2007-04-11 11:46:56 AM  
mathmatix, could you post a pic of the beams before the rescue operation got underway? I'm sure that there were absolutely no beams cut in order to remove debris and all, but firemen walking around without being covered in grey dust kind of indicates that some time had passed between the collapse and the picture being taken.
 
2007-04-11 11:47:36 AM  
and for the record, yeah the second one looks photoshopped to add attention to the areas in question...

but i am sure you have sources with the same picture, just melted or destroyed? you do have those pics right? you seem to have no doubt of anything, so i would like to see your evidence....
 
2007-04-11 11:49:07 AM  
if you are right, there should be examples all over the world. no offense but dont be a dick just because folks have the nerve to think differently than you

i'm not being a dick just for disagreeing with you. i'm asking for proof for your extraordinary claims. when you make such claims, you have to support them.

i'm been in every 911 truth nutbar thread on fark for 5.5 years. i have yet to see any evidence that wtc collapsed other than how we saw it happen and how the subsequent research and inquiry said it did.

it's incumbent on you to provide evidence for your whacky claims (and that means more than a random jpeg)
 
2007-04-11 11:49:27 AM  
mathmatix: cite a photo and provide convincing evidence of thes extraordinary claim.

Umm, they were cutting down beams in the debris removal process.
 
2007-04-11 11:50:17 AM  
2007-04-11 11:46:56 AM Snarfangel

fair enough, i was just posting what i found...

and i can accept that as a good possibility for those pictures as possibility. but i dont simply disregard anothers opinion because it doesnt line up with mine...

albo no i am not discounting the weight of the floors, by acceleration of gravity and resistance, the floors and collapse should not have sped up ... simple. i've read the official reports, and they dont seem to answer the questions i have. now are you going to continue to flame me for having the nerve to question something that doesnt necessarily fit with the explanation?
 
2007-04-11 11:52:39 AM  
Article is entirely accurate.

Bogus non-scientific assertions about "WTC7 wasn't even hit! It must have been demolished!" are every bit as inaccurate, uninformed and asinine as "this door doesn't close! This CAN'T have been a gas chamber!".

Congrats, conspiracy kooks. Rosie O'Donnell and Alex Jones can be your Ernst Zundel and Fred Leuchter and you can hang on their every (incorrect) word.
 
Displayed 50 of 1133 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Newest



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report