If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Rocky Mountain News)   Hispanic activists: "If (Democrats) hope to capture the White House in 2008, they better listen to us." They don't like the "Tortilla Wall" either   (rockymountainnews.com) divider line 76
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

222 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 Nov 2006 at 5:09 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



76 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2006-11-17 01:19:24 PM
Um, if the Democrats want to get the White House and keep Congress, they better come up with something quick. A wall, followed by a back-tax payment program that can lead to citizenship, would be a good start.
 
2006-11-17 01:32:34 PM
How are they supposed to calculate undocumented workers' back-taxes?
 
2006-11-17 01:36:16 PM
Fark It: A wall. . .would be a good start an utterly meaningless gesture designed to placate the mouth-breathing provincials swayed by arguments appealing to jingoism.

Much more accurate.
 
2006-11-17 01:38:36 PM
surfnazi

How are they supposed to calculate undocumented workers' back-taxes?

Take the amount of money that illegals have cost the government and private insurance companies in terms of car accidents, emergency room care, and the cost of educating the children of illegals. Add that all up (that part might take a while). Divide by 20 million.

Boom, whatever we end up with after dividing by 20 million is how much they owe our government.
 
2006-11-17 01:41:06 PM
Pocket Ninja

Fark It: A wall. . .would be a good start an utterly meaningless gesture designed to placate the mouth-breathing provincials swayed by arguments appealing to jingoism.

How do the majority of illegal immigrants enter this country?

/Florida should also repeal the wet-foot/dry-foot law
 
2006-11-17 01:42:22 PM
Fark It: How do the majority of illegal immigrants enter this country?

Ummm..exactly the same way they'll enter it after we finish building an unfunded wall?
 
2006-11-17 01:44:33 PM
PocketNinja


Ummm..exactly the same way they'll enter it after we finish building an unfunded wall?


Are they going to use mutant powers to go through the wall without being detected?
 
2006-11-17 01:46:00 PM
I wonder how long it will take the Democrats to sell out...
 
2006-11-17 01:47:14 PM
DIA


I wonder how long it will take the Democrats to sell out...


They have at least until January.....
 
2006-11-17 01:49:17 PM
Fark It
Um, if the Democrats want to get the White House and keep Congress, they better come up with something quick. A wall, followed by a back-tax payment program that can lead to citizenship, would be a good start.

I wonder, why must our imigration policy specificly target hispanic imigrants. Why do these new imigration policies not take into account illegal Asian and Eastern European imigrants? Why do they specificly target the illegal imigrant and not the businesses which are enabling these criminals (last I checked aiding and abeting was a crime)?
 
2006-11-17 01:54:09 PM
Fark It: Are they going to use mutant powers to go through the wall without being detected?

Ah, I get it. You're one of those people who think this will result in a thousand-mile long impregnable fortress, invulnerable to every possible incursion. And that there's money and manpower available to really build such a thing.

(one hint: there's a reason Bush approved, but did not fund, this wall)

The idea of a wall is a sparkly little ball designed to distract the easily distractible from the reality of illegal immigration in this country, which is actually quite simple. It is this: As Long As There Is Demand, There Will Be Illegal Immigration.

There, see? That even fits on a bumper sticker.

You want to get serious about illegal immigration? You want to stop it cold? It's easy, and it won't take a ridiculous wall to do it. All you gotta do is start seizing assets and revoking business licenses from anyone--and I do mean anyone--who hires illegals. One strike, you're out. That neighborhood landscaper who gives you such a good deal on your yard? Fark him. Seize his trucks, deport his workers. Wal-Mart? Close stores where illegals are caught, fine them a billion per incident. Your state representative? Deport his nanny, remove him from office, put him in jail.

And so on. Once you remove any possibility of demand--in other words, once you make it too risky for the white people who are HIRING illegals to actually hire them--illegals will have no reason to come here.

Of course, never mind what that might do to the prices of goods and services. But I'm sure nobody would complain about that. 'Cause, you know, all the bad, bad illegals would no longer be stealing all those jobs so many Americans so desperately want.
 
2006-11-17 01:54:38 PM
Fark It: They have at least until January.....


Pretty generous there, I doubt everyone will wait that long.
 
2006-11-17 01:57:01 PM
Code_Archeologist


Fark It
Um, if the Democrats want to get the White House and keep Congress, they better come up with something quick. A wall, followed by a back-tax payment program that can lead to citizenship, would be a good start.

I wonder, why must our imigration policy specificly target hispanic imigrants. Why do these new imigration policies not take into account illegal Asian and Eastern European imigrants? Why do they specificly target the illegal imigrant and not the businesses which are enabling these criminals (last I checked aiding and abeting was a crime)?


They don't target hispanic immigrants, hispanic immigrants are 90% of the target.

Mexico is the largest source country for unauthorized immigration to the United States.
The estimated unauthorized resident population from Mexico increased from about 2.0 million in
1990 to 4.8 million in January 2000. Mexico's share of the total unauthorized resident
population increased from 58 percent in 1990 to 69 percent in 2000. In addition to Mexico, six
countries had more than 100,000 unauthorized residents in the United States in January 2000 --
El Salvador, Guatemala, Colombia, Honduras, China, and Ecuador.


Also, how would making illegals pay a fine unfairly target hispanics?
 
2006-11-17 01:58:02 PM
Fark It: Are they going to use mutant powers to go through the wall without being detected?

No, they'll hide in trucks just like they do now.
 
2006-11-17 02:02:24 PM
Pocket Ninja


Fark It: Are they going to use mutant powers to go through the wall without being detected?

Ah, I get it. You're one of those people who think this will result in a thousand-mile long impregnable fortress, invulnerable to every possible incursion. And that there's money and manpower available to really build such a thing.

(one hint: there's a reason Bush approved, but did not fund, this wall)

The idea of a wall is a sparkly little ball designed to distract the easily distractible from the reality of illegal immigration in this country, which is actually quite simple. It is this: As Long As There Is Demand, There Will Be Illegal Immigration.

There, see? That even fits on a bumper sticker.

You want to get serious about illegal immigration? You want to stop it cold? It's easy, and it won't take a ridiculous wall to do it. All you gotta do is start seizing assets and revoking business licenses from anyone--and I do mean anyone--who hires illegals. One strike, you're out. That neighborhood landscaper who gives you such a good deal on your yard? Fark him. Seize his trucks, deport his workers. Wal-Mart? Close stores where illegals are caught, fine them a billion per incident. Your state representative? Deport his nanny, remove him from office, put him in jail.

And so on. Once you remove any possibility of demand--in other words, once you make it too risky for the white people who are HIRING illegals to actually hire them--illegals will have no reason to come here.

Of course, never mind what that might do to the prices of goods and services. But I'm sure nobody would complain about that. 'Cause, you know, all the bad, bad illegals would no longer be stealing all those jobs so many Americans so desperately want.


Actually, I thought the plan was to put up a wall on the most heavily crossed sections of the border, and then focus our military and border patrol to fill in the gaps. A wall would have been cheaper than Iraq and more beneficial to our national security. Although your plan does have a certain appeal to it. Maybe if after the fine payment and wall go up, and people still hire illegals, then your plan would make sense.

/the government has done nothing, and the problem has gotten worse
//so let's keep doing nothing
 
2006-11-17 02:18:36 PM
Pocket Ninja: All you gotta do is start seizing assets and revoking business licenses from anyone--and I do mean anyone--who hires illegals.

My aunt was telling me (and I don't know it to be true, but she's pretty reliable) that she had heard on the news that there is a little known law in a few states that allows for criminal prosecution for hiring illegal immigrants, and that some states were starting to enforce it.

However, I wonder what's going to happen when all the low-income Americans who so badly want those jobs start making five and change an hour and realize that they can no longer afford the products.
 
2006-11-17 02:26:05 PM
SuperSally: However, I wonder what's going to happen when all the low-income Americans who so badly want those jobs start making five and change an hour and realize that they can no longer afford the products.

That's when you'll start seeing the same red-faced 'Mericans who are now yelling about "walls" start kicking, stomping, and yelling about how we need more "guest workers" in the country to fill the low-wage jobs.
 
2006-11-17 02:31:12 PM
Dancin_In_Anson: I wonder how long it will take the Democrats to sell out...

I'm pretty sure the act of getting elected requires you to totally sell out to the highest bidder and probably also sign some sort of pact with satan, that last part is still unproven.
 
2006-11-17 02:31:47 PM
In history, has there ever been a wall (particularly a wall with gaps in it) that has worked? Sheena Easton notwithstanding.
 
2006-11-17 02:39:05 PM
MsStressa: In history, has there ever been a wall (particularly a wall with gaps in it) that has worked?

The berlin wall was quite effective in limiting the movement of the East German Citizenry
 
2006-11-17 02:40:41 PM
MsStressa

In history, has there ever been a wall (particularly a wall with gaps in it) that has worked?

And this is a wall that only covers about a third of the border...
 
2006-11-17 02:51:25 PM
Headso

The berlin wall was quite effective in limiting the movement of the East German Citizenry

Was being the operative word.
 
2006-11-17 02:56:50 PM
MsStressa: Was being the operative word.

As a way to limit movement it worked, no?
 
2006-11-17 03:22:42 PM
Actually, I'd prefer to see towers constructed every 1000 yards or so, randomly manned with sharpshooters to stop the invasion.


I figure after about 10 or so, the mezcans might start rethinking their strategery.
 
2006-11-17 03:25:38 PM
DIA


Actually, I'd prefer to see towers constructed every 1000 yards or so, randomly manned with sharpshooters to stop the invasion.


I figure after about 10 or so, the mezcans might start rethinking their strategery.


I don't know about FR, but out here in reality you can't shoot women and children no matter how brown they are.
 
2006-11-17 03:46:23 PM
Fark It: I don't know about FR, but out here in reality you can't shoot women and children no matter how brown they are.


Who gives a fark about the color of their skin? I suree don't.
 
2006-11-17 03:53:13 PM
Dancin_In_Anson: I figure after about 10 or so

10? You're gonna have to try much harder than that. Of the thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants who come here each year, hundreds of them die. Ten wouldn't even get noticed.
 
2006-11-17 04:01:55 PM
ArcadianRefugee: Of the thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants who come here each year, hundreds of them die.


From the elements...it's different when people are shooting at you...

You would think anyway.
 
2006-11-17 04:06:31 PM
This wall could really fark my retirement plans.
 
2006-11-17 05:12:49 PM
I took a vaction to Mexico this past summer. The tour guide told us, "So you are building a wall! It won't stop us!"

I never laughed so hard in my life.
 
2006-11-17 05:13:26 PM
So... if the Democrats don't forgive illegal activity, they have no hope of capturing the White House?

Ooooooookay.

How about this?

1) Grant amnesty to illegal aliens so long as they pay back taxes. This is probably a hell of a lot cheaper than trying to root them all out.
2) Crack down heavily on illegal aliens -- that includes ones already here who decide to stay illegal as well as ones who come in afterwards.
3) Heavily enforce the border against illegal immigration. Fence, guards, whatever.
4) Expand the number of legal immigrants we allow into the country, and work to reduce the cost of becoming a citizen.
5) Heavily fine people who employ illegal immigrants.
 
2006-11-17 05:16:12 PM
elchip: How about this?

nope, you are only allowed to select 1 of the 5 on that list, a multi pronged approach is not something that can be condensed down into 3 second sound bites...
 
2006-11-17 05:18:43 PM
Headso: nope, you are only allowed to select 1 of the 5 on that list, a multi pronged approach is not something that can be condensed down into 3 second sound bites...

We just need to get John Moschitta to provide the sound bites.
 
2006-11-17 05:38:08 PM
elchip: Heavily fine people who employ illegal immigrants.

I guess the footdragger's argument on this one is:

If we do this, then expect a general increase in the price of goods and services, hiring illegals and paying them crap keeps inflation at bay.
 
2006-11-17 05:45:26 PM
Dancin_In_Anson: Actually, I'd prefer to see towers constructed every 1000 yards or so, randomly manned with sharpshooters to stop the invasion.


I wish you psuedo-conservatives would just come out of the closet and admit your unnatural lust for the Soviet system.
 
2006-11-17 06:04:18 PM
First, they should stop the North American Union, build a wall, repeal the patriot act 1,1.5, the military comission act and give back the pose comittatus. and impeach bush.

Then we can talk.
 
2006-11-17 06:08:32 PM
knobmaker: I wish you psuedo-conservatives would just come out of the closet and admit your unnatural lust for the Soviet system.


How so? They were trying to keep people in. And to be honest, if you want to come here, I welcome you with open arms.

However, if your first act upon arriving here is illegal, you know it and you do it anyway (and in some cases repeatedly), you have show a general disdain for the place I call home, so get the fark out and stay the fark out.

That's "soviet" how?

Or are you just trying to throw around words that you think make you sound like you know what the fark you are talking about when in reality you have not a clue?
 
2006-11-17 06:14:09 PM
Dancin_In_Anson: That's "soviet" how?

Having a well-placed regimen of snipers in imposing towers shoot innocent human beings?

You have to ask?

Your proposition is completely totalitarianist. Practically textbook, DIA.

What's your objection to going after the REAL criminals:

Those that hire illegals. Fine 'em, jail 'em, set an example.

The result is that no one hires them, they get picked up by Immigration and are deported. Just like any other undesirable alien.
 
2006-11-17 06:15:54 PM
Want illegal immmigration to end? Fight the demand for it. Punish companies who hire people not eligible to work in the U.S. Make following the law the less expensive choice.

Walls and sharpshooters will never work for the same reason the war on drugs has failed. Supply will inevitably meet the demand, somewhere, somehow.
 
2006-11-17 06:18:23 PM

That random homeowner paying cash sans witholding to the domestic help isn't filing with the IRS or checking papers. Even if you tell him that he should be verifying that the Social Security certificate or I-9 are legitimate, does he even have the ability to spot a forgery? Do you expect him to report that he's thinking that he might have hired an undocumented worker?


If not, whom do you expect to report him?

 
2006-11-17 06:19:21 PM
Korovyov: Even if you tell him that he should be verifying that the Social Security certificate or I-9 are legitimate, does he even have the ability to spot a forgery

Wouldn't it be the job of the Social Security office to determine that?
 
2006-11-17 06:23:47 PM
Pocket Ninja:..."blah blah jingoism."

(Much more accurate.) Because that's what it's all about(jingoism), not that there's a problem or anything with the entire system being overburdened. Pull your head out of whatever hole it's in and look at the issue from a realistic standpoint.
 
2006-11-17 06:29:04 PM

whidbey --
If the homeowner's paying cash to the help, and not withholding FICA/SS, how is the Social Security Administration even going to know?


If the money is deposited into a bank, than the bank's reporting to the IRS might cause some flags, but so long as it stays cash... *shrug*

 
2006-11-17 06:31:14 PM
whidbey: Having a well-placed regimen of snipers in imposing towers shoot innocent human beings?


Innocent of what? Illegally invading the United States?

Your proposition is completely totalitarianist. Practically textbook, DIA.

Not in the least. It's "protectionist". Like I said, if they want to be a part of the American experience, come on in, the water's fine. But if your first act is to disobey our sysetem of laws prposely, you have show that you have no regard for this great nation.

But that's the kind of person you want moving in I guess.
 
2006-11-17 06:37:06 PM
Dancin_In_Anson: Innocent of what? Illegally invading the United States?

Does not justify force, sir. Not at all. And yes, they are innocent until proven guilty.

Not in the least. It's "protectionist"

Nice euphemism. It's a show of force, admit it, with the only outcome being a body count. Do not want.

But if your first act is to disobey our sysetem of laws prposely, you have show that you have no regard for this great nation.

The people that hire the illegals are the ones that are ultimately doing the most damage. Again, what's your problem with going after them?
 
2006-11-17 06:38:12 PM
Most legal immigrants don't like the illegals either. You don't need to give illegals amnesty to keep the legals vote .

And you farking dem leaders better not. I'm a dem too.
 
2006-11-17 06:40:22 PM
Does not justify force, sir. Not at all. And yes, they are innocent until proven guilty.

Ya know, if you're just going to continue to pretend to be an idiot, you don't have much chance of convincing us of anything. And you'll notice that I'm extending you the courtesy of assuming that you're merely pretending.
 
2006-11-17 06:41:32 PM
AladinSane: Ya know, if you're just going to continue to pretend to be an idiot, you don't have much chance of convincing us of anything.

Do you have a point?
 
2006-11-17 06:45:07 PM
hey, whidbey, just so you can get off of your high horse:

Most of us agree that employers are part of the problem. What about the prostitution, drug runners, etc, though?

1. Fence
2. Employers get fined
3. Government enforces existing laws
4. I have another beer
5. Develop a real and simple worker plan that does not overburden America.

Si or no?
 
2006-11-17 06:48:04 PM
Throw these traitors who hire the illegals in jail.

No fence needed then

Thats much much cheaper too.
 
Displayed 50 of 76 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report