If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Seed)   Cool places to visit now before global warming destroys them. Alas, poor Venice, I hardly knew ye   (seedmagazine.com) divider line 92
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

9135 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Sep 2006 at 8:35 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



92 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2006-09-24 06:10:05 PM
IT"S THE GLOBAL WARMIMING! IT"S GONNA KILL US ALL!!!


WHWHAASDWPKKKKAAAA GLLLAHHAHAPULLLL
 
2006-09-24 06:29:44 PM
upload.wikimedia.org
 
2006-09-24 06:59:08 PM
Ah Southpark, the most reasonable of Republican counter-arguments.
 
2006-09-24 07:16:04 PM
7of7: Ah Southpark, the most reasonable of Republican counter-arguments


1)I'm not a Republican.

2)It wasn't a reasoned counter argument, it was snark.
 
2006-09-24 07:22:39 PM
So it's like New Orleans but with a warning then?
 
2006-09-24 07:25:48 PM
Well, a little bit of flooding might actually do wonders to get that smell out of Venice.
 
2006-09-24 08:33:39 PM
Um, doesn't venice have a sinking problem. Even without global warming they'd be screwed.
 
2006-09-24 08:40:17 PM
Good.

They probably deserved to die.

/Not really serious here
//But I'm depressed and I don't give a fark.
///Sla.. oh the hell with it.
////Life sucks.
 
2006-09-24 08:40:55 PM
Venice does have a sinking problem, but it's relatively small when compared to its stinking problem.
 
2006-09-24 08:43:06 PM
"Global warming is causing sea levels to rise more rapidly than nature once allowed.

What the fark does that mean? Global warming isn't natural? Do they have some information that nobody else does?
 
2006-09-24 08:43:09 PM
a visit to amsterdam before its destruction should be in order. personally i hope venice sinks, i have a small collection of venetian crystal which would become priceless if such a thing were to happen.

just kidding, i simply hate venetians.
 
2006-09-24 08:55:12 PM
What the fark does that mean? Global warming isn't natural? Do they have some information that nobody else does?

Wow. There are still people out there who believe humans haven't helped with global warming.
 
2006-09-24 08:57:55 PM
Pre-emptive Global Warming thread strike:

1). It's happening
2). No, it isn't
3). Hockey stick graph
4). Manbearpig
5). Pirates
6). Ecofasists
7). Neocon poopflingers
8). I like cake

End .... scene.
 
2006-09-24 08:58:59 PM
I am one of the top level officials in the U.S. government.
Obviously, I can't tell you who I am. But, people... we ARE looking into this. We ARE weighing options. I'm actually having a meeting about it on Wednesday.

Sen. X
 
2006-09-24 09:02:55 PM
I am one of the top level officials in the U.S. government.
Obviously, I can't tell you who I am. But, people... we ARE looking into this. We ARE weighing options. I'm actually having a meeting about it on Wednesday.


Can you bury that whole IRS investigation going on regarding my taxes for 2005 as well, please?
 
2006-09-24 09:07:52 PM
aphexcoil3
Wow. There are still people out there who believe humans haven't helped with global warming.

I never said I didn't believe humans helped. I'm saying nobody has proven anything one way or the other. There are many studies that "prove" both sides.
 
2006-09-24 09:08:10 PM
Seed magazine is the G.O.A.T.
 
2006-09-24 09:09:41 PM
Venice is built on swampland. Up until a few hundred years ago they would periodically demolish and build up the land as it contiued to sink and sea levels rose. However, a few centuries ago they stopped doing this and the city became a museum piece.

In short, the city is farked, climate change or no climate change.
 
2006-09-24 09:09:58 PM
I never said I didn't believe humans helped. I'm saying nobody has proven anything one way or the other. There are many studies that "prove" both sides.

The Earth is warming -- I don't think this is disputed in any study. The cause of this warming and how much humans have contributed is still up for debate, but the Earth is definitely getting hotter.
 
2006-09-24 09:12:05 PM
... and I can't even close off an italics tag.
 
2006-09-24 09:12:37 PM
crinz83: I am one of the top level officials in the U.S. government.

Hopefully one of the most handsome, too. We'll be dropping the giant ice cube by next year, then?

/thus solving the problem forever.
//I said FOREVER!!!
 
2006-09-24 09:20:20 PM
aphexcoil3: Wow. There are still people out there who believe humans haven't helped with global warming.

http://www.grinningplanet.com/2005/06-21/global-warming-facts-article.htm(po ps)
 
2006-09-24 09:23:39 PM
I am one of the top level officials in the U.S. government.

Oh, thank the gods. I thought we were in trouble there for a moment. I'll rest better tonight knowing that the United States government is on the case!
 
2006-09-24 09:24:53 PM
Venice? Buh Bye. Vermont is on the list. For the love of all that is holy stock up on maple syrup now!
 
2006-09-24 09:33:23 PM
Sorry, Venice has been sinking for hundreds of years. Even before the advent of the industrial revolution.
 
2006-09-24 09:35:03 PM
I am one of the top level officials in the U.S. government.

Let me guess, you're getting a kick out these replies? :P

/All I came in to say
 
2006-09-24 09:36:49 PM
Articles like this give Al Gore credibility... this alone discounts any valid argument.
 
2006-09-24 09:40:38 PM
Venice smells like dog shiat and raw sewage. Enjoy!
 
2006-09-24 09:41:57 PM
"Wow. There are still people out there who believe humans haven't helped with global warming."

Yep. And smarter people than you, too.

http://www.reporterherald.com/Top-Story.asp?ID=6894

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-329es.html

http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/articles/V3/N13/EDIT.jsp
 
2006-09-24 09:54:16 PM
Lets drive tourists to these places in droves before they asplode! That'll fix it!
 
2006-09-24 09:57:20 PM
I am stepping in for one comment tonight and one comment only, so here goes:

deadpo3t:
aphexcoil3: Wow. There are still people out there who believe humans haven't helped with global warming.

http://www.grinningplanet.com/2005/06-21/global-warming-facts-article.htm(pops )


If you goto this webpage and look at the response to global myth 1 you will see a graph of CO2 concentration over the past 1000 years.

1000 years.

1000 farking years.

I am a statistician by trade. I cannot buy into global warming when I see junk science like this treated seriously.

Why should I give an estimate of CO2 concentration levels from the year 1000 serious merit? Its a farking joke.

They're guessing.

You really think we KNOW what the CO2 concentration was in the year 1000? We may have a guess. How accurate do you think that guess is?

1000 years of data, my ass.

1000 years.

Get some perspective.

1000 years.

Why do I repeat it? Because crap like this is the basis for pro-global warming arguements. Bring me CREDIBLE evidence.

1000 years.
 
2006-09-24 10:07:15 PM
StatJunkie: Why should I give an estimate of CO2 concentration levels from the year 1000 serious merit? Its a farking joke.


I would just like to point out that the site stated mission is "Saving the Planet one joke at a time", so I'm pretty sure that it is in fact a joke.

I would suggest that deadpo3t try a little harder to find a more credible source from a more scientifically literate author next time.
 
2006-09-24 10:07:17 PM
Rockdrummer: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-329es.html

Unfortunately, this policy analysis is from 1998.
 
2006-09-24 10:17:42 PM
StatJunkie: That's where you're wrong. We have very reliable methods for measuring how much CO2 was in the atmosphere across much of the span of Earth's history by measuring air trapped in glaciers, and many other methods.

That said, what that site isn't telling you is that:
1) CO2 levels are much higher than they were in the past million years, but that is actually much lower than they were in much older geological epochs.

2) Those same "long time ago" epochs- we're talking dinosaurs here, had a signifigantly warmer temperature.

3) Those periods also had far more biodiversity than we have today.

In short, global warming, in the short-term, is going to be very bad for us. In the long term however (and by long term, I mean > 1,000,000 years) it's probably a really good thing.
 
2006-09-24 10:32:56 PM
Ahh Global Warming, and Evolution should be in the craziest myth creature link
 
2006-09-24 10:37:16 PM
Oh, for Christ's sake, what do you folks think is going to happen? The pretty Vermont foliage will happen in Canada and God knows the place needs -something- interesting, the reefs around Newport Beach will warm up and get prettier fish. Things are going to move, folks. What we know now as the tropics are going to be hotter, but the stuff in the article is going to move toward the temperate zones. Pity about Venice, though, moving that would be a biatch.

Being gloomy about global warming is like being gloomy about tides. Global warming is happening no matter whose fault it is, and it might not be such a bad thing - and if the ocean levels rise about 680 feet I will have beachfront property.
 
2006-09-24 10:41:47 PM
Venice is sinking without global warming. Venice has been sinking since the time of the Romans. They used to just tear things down and build on the rubble to keep up pace, but now that everything is a an indestructible landmark, they are sinking into oblivion.
 
2006-09-24 10:42:00 PM
for the last time Venice is not a victim of global warming, its a victim of massive groundwater pumping.
 
2006-09-24 11:45:35 PM
I'm kinda miffed I never got to see Atlantis.
 
2006-09-24 11:55:14 PM
StatJunkie: I am a statistician by trade.


That's your problem, and Bjorn Lomborg's. You're not SCIENTISTS. Estimates are not the same as guesses, and there are methods of determining how accurate the methods are.

There are thousands of really smart people who have spent their lives trying to figure out things like this, and you disrespect them to go on yelling like an idiot that they're just making "guesses."

Rockdrummer:

"Wow. There are still people out there who believe humans haven't helped with global warming."

Yep. And smarter people than you, too.


I seriously doubt that. I'm really smart, and there aren't very many serious deniers in 2006.
 
2006-09-25 12:06:28 AM
maxjenius: They used to just tear things down and build on the rubble to keep up pace, but now that everything is a an indestructible landmark,

That's pretty much the problem everywhere.
 
2006-09-25 12:07:49 AM
By what stretch of the imagination is Vermont the "most rural" state?
 
2006-09-25 12:10:18 AM
What I remember of Vermont involves weeks when it never got above -10F, lows around -30F; I suspect that there are a few more years before things change to balmy.
 
2006-09-25 12:25:15 AM
the nation's second least populous state, and its most rural

Most rural? Aww shucks, and here I thought that went to us North Dakotans..
 
2006-09-25 12:29:08 AM
MisanthropicSway: Most rural? Aww shucks, and here I thought that went to us North Dakotans..


Wyoming is the least populous state, and we make a great case for most rural, too, for better or worse. I live in one of the big cities at 30k. It's not as cold or snowy as Vermont or North Dakota either.
 
2006-09-25 12:38:52 AM
mbrother
Wyoming is the least populous state, and we make a great case for most rural, too, for better or worse. I live in one of the big cities at 30k. It's not as cold or snowy as Vermont or North Dakota either.

Wyoming is a beautiful place...I've often thought of moving there, but I love our snowy cold winters too much to give them up.

/will take 6ft of snow and -30F over a yucky hot day anytime
//wonders if they need any Literature instructors in Antarctica
 
2006-09-25 12:44:05 AM
MisanthropicSway: /will take 6ft of snow and -30F over a yucky hot day anytime


We don't get as hot as you do in ND, either. I looked at comparisons with Minnesota before moving here, and it had lots less snow and 10 degrees warmer in the winter, while also being 10 degrees cooler in the summer without all the rain/mosquitoes.

The NSF does have a program to allow artists, including writers, to winter over in Antarctica. You might look into it.
 
2006-09-25 12:45:39 AM
goeniegoegoe

So it's like New Orleans but with a warning then?

New Orleans had plenty of warning. That's the annoying part.


crinz83

I am one of the top level officials in the U.S. government.

I'm torn between making snarky jokes about "government to the rescue" or being depressed that it's entirely plausible that top government officials actually read fark.com.

/sigh
//Arnie, where are you?
///Save me, Arnie!
 
2006-09-25 12:58:08 AM
"Rockdrummer: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-329es.html
Unfortunately, this policy analysis is from 1998."

Well, Al said GW has been happening for 30 years, so....

Maybe Al forgot that 30 years ago the same scientists were scaring us all with this:

Link
 
2006-09-25 01:01:55 AM
Rockdrummer:

Well, Al said GW has been happening for 30 years, so....

Maybe Al forgot that 30 years ago the same scientists were scaring us all with this:

Link



No that was the media, not the overwhelming majority of all climatologists. There's a difference. Learn it, and stop making shiatty, fallacious arguments.
 
Displayed 50 of 92 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report