If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(TPC)   Newspaper gets in trouble for front page picture of two female soccer players flashing their sports bra below the title "Goals Gone Wild" (with pic, SFW)   (thepittsburghchannel.com) divider line 97
    More: Amusing  
•       •       •

47695 clicks; posted to Main » on 30 Nov 2005 at 10:20 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



97 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2005-11-30 10:21:04 AM
Underage boobies? Hubbahubba!
 
2005-11-30 10:21:16 AM
That's hawt
 
2005-11-30 10:22:06 AM
You know, I saw "Pittsburgh" in the hostname and thought it odd that people there would be offended by sports-bra-flashing...
 
2005-11-30 10:22:10 AM
And...the spiffy headline - "Four Good Reasons to Support Cavs Sports"
 
2005-11-30 10:23:23 AM
I'm glad they weren't showing the men's team asking for support.
 
2005-11-30 10:24:00 AM
Oh my god! Sports bra encased boobies! Fire and brimstone! We're all going to hell!!!
 
2005-11-30 10:24:58 AM
I think the "four good reasons" part was the offensive one.
 
2005-11-30 10:25:10 AM
hahahaha... AND their bras say "Big Johnson Soccer". Awesome.
 
2005-11-30 10:25:18 AM
Another case of American prudishness. In Europe they could be topless with the words written across their chests and no one would complain.
 
2005-11-30 10:25:27 AM
I just love American :-)
 
2005-11-30 10:25:53 AM
What's JCCC's mascot? A kangaroo or something?

/go to a real school!
//go Jayhawks!
///(intelligent design class=mythology department)
 
2005-11-30 10:26:21 AM
BIG Johnson Soccer. hehe
 
2005-11-30 10:26:26 AM
please post enlarged pic!!
 
2005-11-30 10:28:36 AM
Am I the only one who read headline as "Goats Gone Wild?"
/actually disappointed to find it was not...
 
2005-11-30 10:28:38 AM
meh.. most soccer chicks are lesbian anyways. wait.. maybe it's softball. either way... lesbians can be hot!
 
2005-11-30 10:28:40 AM
This is almost as bad as theSear's circular in last weeks mail
 
2005-11-30 10:28:48 AM
I hate puritans, I hate puritans, I HATE PURITANS!!!

I like sports bras though.
 
2005-11-30 10:29:41 AM
2005-11-30 10:26:26 AM puckstopper55

please post enlarged pic!!


Down boy...
 
2005-11-30 10:30:11 AM
Hardly "gets in trouble". The athletic director objected. Not the girls, not the community, not the college. No outrage here folks. RTFA and move alone.
 
2005-11-30 10:30:17 AM
As a former caption writer. I have absolute faith that if a few people complained, more people called to say they ROFLed, and the writer got high-fives in the newsroom.
 
2005-11-30 10:30:22 AM
Finally, some boobage...

Kudos to the editor as that is clever. Its not offensive. It works. Its good advertising and creative marketing.

/uptight folks leave the light on. You pay the bill.
 
2005-11-30 10:30:36 AM
If they were under 18, I would have a problem, but they are in college, right? Let the Sports Bra burning begin!!
 
2005-11-30 10:31:31 AM
kill me now.

/hates puritans as well
//moves to france to burn cars and witness the emplosion first hand
 
2005-11-30 10:31:40 AM
Do the offending hussies have to wear an `E' (for exibitionist) on their puritan robes in public or is a stoning called for?

Unfun fundies
 
2005-11-30 10:32:37 AM
WOOHOO! I went to school there. The mascot is a Cavalier, or some thing like that. The student body voted on Cavs when UVa was actually good at basketball. Then, I went to a real school.

/Go Jayhawks! Bowl eligible!
 
2005-11-30 10:32:47 AM
Once again the inferior sex proves it can't handle equality.

/get a grip
 
2005-11-30 10:33:50 AM
After RTFA, I take back my previous comment. It's a stupid posed picture.
 
2005-11-30 10:35:57 AM
At BadJocks we found a picture of the entire team and think we've figured out who the brunette is (#6, Natasha Morris) but can't quite finger the blonde. Anyone want to take stab at IDing some boobies?
 
2005-11-30 10:35:58 AM
lame... i demand ten seconds of my life back

/was this photo taken at an itty bitty titty committee meeting?
 
2005-11-30 10:36:07 AM
'"I don't think it portrays the image of what our athletes are," Heinrich said.'

HAHAHA...Are teachers and faculty still that in the dark?
 
2005-11-30 10:36:09 AM
Yes, this is a disgrace because, as the athletic director says, it does not portray the correct image. The more accurate image to be sending out to the world is that we're a bunch sexless victorian prigs that have no right to or interest in displays of a sexual nature. LOCK THE WOMEN UP AND STONE THEM IF THEY TEMPT US!!!

/is there a video for sale?
 
2005-11-30 10:36:43 AM
errr, how are they underaged? it was at a community college, right? so most likely they're at least 18...didn't see anything mentioning a highschool unless I failed at RTFA...

i was at the gym last night and there was a girl there working out in just a sports bra and spandex shorts...kinda gross actually. and distracting. i don't go to the gym to please a wandering eye...put on a freaking shirt, chick.
 
2005-11-30 10:37:46 AM
Ahaha, "four good reasons"...nicely put.
 
2005-11-30 10:38:49 AM
Actually, closer to "three good reasons" but who's complaining?
 
2005-11-30 10:38:54 AM
I'd like two pickets to tittsburgh please...
 
2005-11-30 10:39:09 AM
ichiban=teh ghey
 
2005-11-30 10:42:21 AM
The paper has the girls' names. I'm not going to out them on FARK though.
 
2005-11-30 10:43:49 AM
I'd say that the players are actually #3 (back row, 2nd from end) and #17 (hair on brunette isn't that curly and appears to be quite long). But that's just after 30 seconds of looking.
 
2005-11-30 10:48:25 AM
badjocks

can't quite finger the blonde.

She's probably just a little up tight, maybe you should buy her a few drinks.
 
2005-11-30 10:48:41 AM
I don't see the problem. The "four good reasons to support the team" comment was a little obvious and stupid, but the whole thing wasn't offensive. Oh, well...
 
2005-11-30 10:51:34 AM
The person who wrote the headline, took the picture, and wrote the caption has the makings of a great FARK headline writer. Drew should hire this guy as soon as he graduates.

/ I know the submitters write the headlines, but some could use this guys help.
// Your dog wants Duke to suck
 
2005-11-30 10:53:27 AM
This is just another sad example of our dying culture. These young women should be celebrated for continuing their educations and their success in the sports arena. If you have no problems with their unfortunate display, you must be a liberal.
 
2005-11-30 10:53:30 AM
The nerve of that editor! You'd never see a mainstream magazine resort to such smut on the cover.

 
2005-11-30 10:54:10 AM
treesloth:

I don't see the problem. The "four good reasons to support the team" comment was a little obvious and stupid, but the whole thing wasn't offensive. Oh, well...

It's a CC rag. I'd expect no better.
 
2005-11-30 10:57:51 AM
Holy Farking crap.

I never thought I'd live to see the day that my little Community College would make it to FARK.

I work (doing so right now) and attend class here at JCCC and when this first came out a couple of weeks ago I must admit to being mildly impressed.

It's much easier on the eyes than the usual tripe that gets on the front page.
 
jph
2005-11-30 11:00:23 AM
I prefer this sort of display:

 
2005-11-30 11:03:04 AM


What's wrong with that pic? I don't see anything ofenseive. Now, if we saw some nip then ok make a scene. Man, people get offended over nothing.

"OH NO!! Their showing their sports bra. Think of the children!!" -- gimme a break
 
2005-11-30 11:09:02 AM
I found the whole thing to be cleavage. Clever. shiat, what'd I say?
 
2005-11-30 11:09:04 AM
Sigh.... I don't miss living in the US. We have real boobies on broadcast TV over here...
 
2005-11-30 11:10:13 AM
"Click to Enlarge". If only it were that easy...
 
Displayed 50 of 97 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report