If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(SFGate)   Judge rules that bare breasts do not constitute free speech   (sfgate.com) divider line 146
    More: Sad  
•       •       •

13783 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Nov 2005 at 1:50 PM (8 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



146 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2005-11-05 11:38:55 AM
Farking activist judges!
 
2005-11-05 11:41:50 AM
Huh. My grandfather was right. California IS full of queers.

Seriously, why would someone ever ban bare boobies?
 
2005-11-05 11:43:08 AM
I've never understood why we can't get our boobs out. Who is that offending really? I shouldn't have to wear a top at a beach.. guys don't have to! Perhaps if EVERYONE was doing it, then it wouldn't be such a big deal.
 
2005-11-05 11:45:00 AM
Heh, WHERE was the judge when this was going down:


*** NSFW - NSF-Lunch NSF-sanity ***

Breasts Not Bombs, Berkeley, July 23, 2005

Stock up on bleach for your eyes if you look at this. You were warned.

Did I mention it was disgusting?
 
2005-11-05 11:45:27 AM
U.S. District Judge Garland Burrell, a George H. W. Bush appointee. If this had been brought before he Ninth Circus, Hell, thoses judges would probably strip down in the street with the bare boobs.
 
2005-11-05 11:45:35 AM
farking idiots. i'd liove to see this get overturned.
 
2005-11-05 11:45:51 AM
No. They constitute free boobies. A much more sacred concept.
 
2005-11-05 11:46:04 AM
If that applied to man boobies, that woud make sense
 
2005-11-05 11:46:36 AM
I was trying to explain to someone last night on FARK how oppressive the US really is. Here's another example. I mean, really, trying to force some arbitrary moral standards on people. Who cares? It's the human body, why is it necessary to keep it covered up? It's because of arbitrary pointless sheltering like this that some people grow up to be sociopathic sex maniacs. It's also why some priests tur t oboy lovin'. If your human instincts are repressed, they'll come out sooner or later and then you won't know what to do .
 
2005-11-05 11:47:12 AM
Why do people fear the boobies?

Do conservative people have different kinds of boobies? Do they hide stuff in there?

Boobies = good
 
2005-11-05 11:47:41 AM
You'd have more standing arguing this case than the example you were providing last night.
 
2005-11-05 11:48:26 AM
Here in , you can't swing a dead cat without striking a topless bar.

But I can't remove my top at a private beach.
 
2005-11-05 11:48:41 AM
You know, tgot warned me. But did I heed? No, no I did not.

And I paid the price.

Oh yeah, I paid.
 
2005-11-05 11:50:08 AM
nin_man: Seriously, why would someone ever ban bare boobies?

Heed the warning of GavinTheAlmighty.
 
2005-11-05 11:51:02 AM
I call on all TFettes to proudly exhibit their...um, free speech. It's a moral imperative!

/gmail in profile
 
2005-11-05 11:51:26 AM
phenn: But I can't remove my top at a private beach.

You can at my private beach, anytime;)
 
2005-11-05 11:53:22 AM
But I have such delicious and outspoken breasts!
 
2005-11-05 11:53:23 AM
the_gospel_of_thomas: Did I mention it was disgusting?

Gee. Naked human beings. Where's your profile picture, Adonis? :)
 
2005-11-05 11:53:48 AM
We need a panel of people to judge which boobies are allowed to be bared. I think Farkers would be pretty good at that.
 
2005-11-05 11:57:55 AM
Rain-Monkey
Do conservative people have different kinds of boobies? Do they hide stuff in there?

So that's where those WMD were hidden...
 
2005-11-05 11:59:03 AM
This is anti-American.
 
2005-11-05 11:59:18 AM
I support your right to bare your boobies, even if I disagree with those boobies.

tgot

Dude, that guy's sack was the size of a football!
 
2005-11-05 12:01:57 PM
the_gospel_of_thomas: Stock up on bleach for your eyes if you look at this.


that was the most traumatic experience of my life.

/liberal
//despise Berkeley
 
2005-11-05 12:02:23 PM
Despite the ramblings of nudists. Some people have no business being nekkid in public, yes, that includes me.
 
2005-11-05 12:03:59 PM
Another Big Government Republican intrusion into citizens' lives.
 
2005-11-05 12:04:35 PM
2005-11-05 11:45:00 AM the_gospel_of_thomas [TotalFark]



Stock up on bleach for your eyes if you look at this. You were warned.

Did I mention it was disgusting?


The human body is beautiful no matter what at any age....

BWAHHHHAA... Who am I kidding. No it isn't.
 
2005-11-05 12:08:14 PM
the_gospel_of_thomas: Heed the warning of GavinTheAlmighty.

Oh, I've seen worse. The worst thing about that was that one woman who wore her pants up to where her boobies used to be before they fell.
 
2005-11-05 12:08:22 PM
And yes, that guys sack was huge
 
2005-11-05 12:12:42 PM
Okay, now that we've gotten this out of our system, two things:

#1 The human body is beautiful* ( except for the people who should never take their clothes off in public. )

and #2, The judge should encourage only the cuties to protest neeked, and threaten legnthy jail time for the people in the Berkeley protest for the sake of humanity.


/off to TF where there are a lot of links to images MUCH BETTER than the horriable link I provided ... seriously regretting searching for that link. I should havelet it go ... wanted to answer the "Wa! Wa! that Judge is Wrong!" with a "Oh, no he isn't!" kind of reply ...
 
2005-11-05 12:12:53 PM
Kickass - I'm expecting you'll all support the "Penises not Pelosi" protest and donate to the defense fund!
 
2005-11-05 12:35:13 PM
You Americans are so friggin' gay.

This has been legal in Ontario for something like 15 years. And there aren't women stripping their tops off and rubbing it in people's faces; that constitutes a crime. The most to be seen is spring-breakers pulling up their tops for beads at Sauble Beach.

But hey, if breasts are that much of a threat to your sense of morals, gawn witcha bad selves.
 
2005-11-05 12:40:57 PM
the_gospel_of_thomas: Stock up on bleach for your eyes if you look at this. You were warned.

Did I mention it was disgusting?



Holy CRAP! She could suckle a baby behind her! Her boobs are like haning off her sides...why!/ So she can ride full gallop onto a steepe pony, shoot a bow at Chinaman merchants, and keep her baby fed all at the same time!?
 
2005-11-05 01:07:55 PM
"So she can ride full gallop onto a steepe pony, shoot a bow at Chinaman merchants, and keep her baby fed all at the same time!?"

You owe me a keyboard, mouse, and monitor now.
 
2005-11-05 01:10:16 PM
sayntfuu: You owe me a keyboard, mouse, and monitor now.


hehehe.

I aim to please.

You obviously aim for your keyboard, mouse, and monitor. ;)

hehehehehe.

But good lord did you see those mammories!?
 
2005-11-05 01:29:01 PM
My apologies to all involved.

While my attempt at humor was genuine, my typist has mangled it so far beyond recognition that I am required to lay two into her, drag her body out back, and type for the first time in over twenty years.

While the post she left was something like this:
Holy CRAP! She could suckle a baby behind her! Her boobs are like haning off her sides...why!/ So she can ride full gallop onto a steepe pony, shoot a bow at Chinaman merchants, and keep her baby fed all at the same time!?

I was hoping for something more along these lines:

Good Lord! That feminine protester has female glands that seem to hang down her sides and not along the front, like normal. She might even be able to feed a small infant if it were placed behind her. Why is that? Is she perhaps of Mongolian origin were it was customary to feed one's child while riding full gallop, bow in hand, driving off the Chinamen and keeping their wares to decorate one's yurt? It seems likely.
 
2005-11-05 01:51:15 PM
Forget about free speech... most who look at bare breasts become speechless...
 
2005-11-05 01:54:59 PM
To other countries the US looks like a bunch of Puritan assholes for having such hangups like this. There are hardly any bare boobies in South Beach anymore. South Beach! But it's perfectly legal for some 60 year old with huge man tits to walk down the street, flopping around. WTF?
 
2005-11-05 01:55:42 PM
While I honestly believe that a double standard for indecency should not be allowed, and that as long as men are permitted to go topless, women should not be prohibitted, these particular protesters make me chuckle:

"All we really have is the power of ourselves," she said. "Our bodies bring attention."

If that is really all you have, you aren't trying hard enough.
 
2005-11-05 01:58:40 PM
Why would you wanna see bear breasts anyway?
 
2005-11-05 02:00:46 PM
Some people just can't understand the damage that the sight of bare boobs inflicts on children.

For example
 
2005-11-05 02:02:41 PM
"Once an old judge, whose brain was quite sh'tty
Said: It is not free speech to bare titty.
Without getting critical--
Of all us apolitical--
Horny dudes who like boobs 'cause they're pretty."

-----best I could do on short notice(I got nothin')
 
2005-11-05 02:05:34 PM
I think we have a "article about boobies without actually showing boobies" trifecta in play.

Having read the article, unfortunatly the judge is right. These hippies are trying to legalize going topless as a form of Free Speech. I think the puritanism in this country is laughable but this broad's going about it the wrong way.

"All we really have is the power of ourselves," she said. "Our bodies bring attention."

I can just picture exactly what this Berkley attention whore looks like. She had too much LDS.
 
2005-11-05 02:06:49 PM
How sad...oh well...

Thanks for the mammories.
 
2005-11-05 02:07:47 PM
Visual Rape... interesting. Forcing someone to look at your nasty, shriveled, old peener as you march down the street is Visiual Rape. I just really like saying that.

Visual Rape
Visual Rape
Visual Rape
Visual Rape

I think I have my favort new term of the day.
 
2005-11-05 02:08:04 PM
I can just picture exactly what this Berkley attention whore looks like. She had too much LDS.

Too much Latter Day Saints? That is sure path to attention-whoredom.

/i keed
 
2005-11-05 02:08:52 PM
Yup, legal up here in most of Canada. Doesn't change a thing in day-to-day life. Maybe on some beaches in the summer.....
 
2005-11-05 02:09:36 PM
Some people just can't understand the damage that the sight of bare boobs inflicts on children.

Some people just can't accept the fact that there are disgusting boobies out there, and that if I don't want to see them, then I have to sacrifice not seeing any. Its only fair.

Not to mention the scrotum festival. Good god, I'd hate to see how much pubic hair was laying around where those old raisins sat. Its disgusting.
 
2005-11-05 02:09:37 PM
Oh, and for the love of God... DO NOT look at the link provided by the_gospel_of_thomas.

I am now out of bleach.
 
2005-11-05 02:09:43 PM
estream: Too much Latter Day Saints? That is sure path to attention-whoredom.

Actually, spelling was intentional. I was paraphrasing Star Trek 4: The One With The Whales.
 
2005-11-05 02:12:42 PM
shiat placebo effect, I was gonna ask you if i could borrow some!
 
Displayed 50 of 146 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report